IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Add generic union types for btree pointers, keys and records. The generic
btree pointer contains either a 32 and 64bit big endian scalar for short
and long form btrees, and the key and record contain the relevant type for
each possible btree.
Split out from a bigger patch from Dave Chinner and simplified a little
further.
SGI-PV: 985583
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32178a
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
xfs_btree_init_cursor contains close to little shared code for the
different btrees and will get even more non-common code in the future.
Split it up into one routine per btree type.
Because xfs_btree_dup_cursor needs to call the init routine for a generic
btree cursor add a new btree operation vector that contains a dup_cursor
method that initializes a new cursor based on an existing one.
The btree operations vector is based on an idea and code from Dave Chinner
and will grow more entries later during this series.
SGI-PV: 985583
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32176a
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
This type is only embedded in struct xfs_btree_block and never used
directly. By moving the fields directly into struct xfs_btree_block a lot
of the macros for struct xfs_btree_sblock and struct xfs_btree_lblock can
be used for struct xfs_btree_block too now which helps greatly with some
of the migrations during implementing the generic btree code.
SGI-PV: 985583
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32174a
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Bill O'Donnell <billodo@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
The alloc and inobt btree use the same agbp/agno pair in the btree_cur
union. Make them use the same bc_private.a union member so that code for
these two short form btree implementations can be shared.
SGI-PV: 981498
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:31788a
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Tim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: David Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
These are mostly locking annotations, marking things static, casts where
needed and declaring stuff in header files.
SGI-PV: 971186
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:30002a
Signed-off-by: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com>
It makes it incrementally clearer to read the code when the top of a macro
spaghetti-pile only receives the 3 arguments it uses, rather than 2 extra
ones which are not used. Also when you start pulling this thread out of
the sweater (i.e. remove unused args from XFS_BTREE_*_ADDR), a couple
other third arms etc fall off too. If they're not used in the macro, then
they sometimes don't need to be passed to the function calling the macro
either, etc....
Patch provided by Eric Sandeen (sandeen@sandeen.net).
SGI-PV: 960197
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:28037a
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Signed-off-by: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
__be64 and let the callers use the proper macros.
SGI-PV: 954580
SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26560a
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Tim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
