IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Add Knights Mill (KNM) to the list of CPUIDs supported by intel_pstate.
Signed-off-by: Piotr Luc <piotr.luc@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Add the compatible string for supporting the generic cpufreq driver on
the ZTE's zx296718 SoC.
Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie <baoyou.xie@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Joonyoung Shim reported an interesting problem on his ARM octa-core
Odoroid-XU3 platform. During system suspend, dev_pm_opp_put_regulator()
was failing for a struct device for which dev_pm_opp_set_regulator() is
called earlier.
This happened because an earlier call to
dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table() function (from cpufreq-dt.c file)
removed all the entries from opp_table->dev_list apart from the last CPU
device in the cpumask of CPUs sharing the OPP.
But both dev_pm_opp_set_regulator() and dev_pm_opp_put_regulator()
routines get CPU device for the first CPU in the cpumask. And so the OPP
core failed to find the OPP table for the struct device.
This patch attempts to fix this problem by returning a pointer to the
opp_table from dev_pm_opp_set_regulator() and using that as the
parameter to dev_pm_opp_put_regulator(). This ensures that the
dev_pm_opp_put_regulator() doesn't fail to find the opp table.
Note that similar design problem also exists with other
dev_pm_opp_put_*() APIs, but those aren't used currently by anyone and
so we don't need to update them for now.
Cc: 4.4+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.4+
Reported-by: Joonyoung Shim <jy0922.shim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
[ Viresh: Wrote commit log and tested on exynos 5250 ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Rename CONFIG_SCHED_ITMT for Intel Turbo Boost Max Technology 3.0
to CONFIG_SCHED_MC_PRIO. This makes the configuration extensible
in future to other architectures that wish to similarly establish
CPU core priorities support in the scheduler.
The description in Kconfig is updated to reflect this change with
added details for better clarity. The configuration is explicitly
default-y, to enable the feature on CPUs that have this feature.
It has no effect on non-TBM3 CPUs.
Signed-off-by: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: bp@suse.de
Cc: jolsa@redhat.com
Cc: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: rjw@rjwysocki.net
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2b2ee29d93e3f162922d72d0165a1405864fbb23.1480444902.git.tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
The online / pre_down callback is invoked on the target CPU since commit
1cf4f629d9d2 ("cpu/hotplug: Move online calls to hotplugged cpu") which means
for the hotplug callback we can use rmdsrl() instead of rdmsr_on_cpus().
This leaves us with set_boost() as the only user which still needs to
read/write the MSR on different CPUs. There is no point in doing that
update on all cpus with the read modify write magic via per cpu data. We
simply can issue a function call on all online CPUs which also means that we
need half that many IPIs.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Install the callbacks via the state machine.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The addition of the generic governor support marked the
intel_pstate_exit_perf_limits as inline(), which fixed a warning,
but it introduced another warning:
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c: In function ‘intel_pstate_exit_perf_limits’:
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:483:1: error: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Werror=return-type]
This changes it back to a 'void' return type, and changes the
corresponding intel_pstate_init_acpi_perf_limits() function to
be inline as well for consistency.
Fixes: 001c76f05b01 (cpufreq: intel_pstate: Generic governors support)
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
When user has selected performance policy, then set the EPP (Energy
Performance Preference) or EPB (Energy Performance Bias) to maximum
performance mode.
Also when user switch back to powersave, then restore EPP/EPB to last
EPP/EPB value before entering performance mode. If user has not changed
EPP/EPB manually then it will be power on default value.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Even with round up of limits->min_perf and limits->max_perf, in some
cases resultant performance is 100 MHz less than the desired.
For example when the maximum frequency is 3.50 GHz, setting
scaling_min_frequency to 2.3 GHz always results in 2.2 GHz minimum.
Currently the fixed floating point operation uses 8 bit precision for
calculating limits->min_perf and limits->max_perf. For some operations
in this driver the 14 bit precision is used. Using the 14 bit precision
also for calculating limits->min_perf and limits->max_perf, addresses
this issue.
Introduced fp_ext_toint() equivalent to fp_toint() and int_ext_tofp()
equivalent to int_tofp() with 14 bit precision.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
In some use cases, user wants to enforce a minimum performance limit on
CPUs. But because of simple division the resultant performance is 100 MHz
less than the desired in some cases.
For example when the maximum frequency is 3.50 GHz, setting
scaling_min_frequency to 1.6 GHz always results in 1.5 GHz minimum. With
simple round up, the frequency can be set to 1.6 GHz to minimum in this
case. This round up is already done to max_policy_pct and max_perf, so do
the same for min_policy_pct and min_perf.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The return value of cpufreq_update_policy() is never used, so make
it void.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
There are two places in the cpufreq core in which low-level driver
callbacks may be invoked for an inactive cpufreq policy, which isn't
guaranteed to work in general. Both are due to possible races with
CPU offline.
First, in cpufreq_get(), the policy may become inactive after
the check against policy->cpus in cpufreq_cpu_get() and before
policy->rwsem is acquired, in which case using it going forward may
not be correct.
Second, an analogous situation is possible in cpufreq_update_policy().
Avoid using inactive policies by adding policy_is_inactive() checks
to the code in the above places.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
There may be reasons to use generic cpufreq governors (eg. schedutil)
on Intel platforms instead of the intel_pstate driver's internal
governor. However, that currently can only be done by disabling
intel_pstate altogether and using the acpi-cpufreq driver instead
of it, which is subject to limitations.
First of all, acpi-cpufreq only works on systems where the _PSS
object is present in the ACPI tables for all logical CPUs. Second,
on those systems acpi-cpufreq will only use frequencies listed by
_PSS which may be suboptimal. In particular, by convention, the
whole turbo range is represented in _PSS as a single P-state and
the frequency assigned to it is greater by 1 MHz than the greatest
non-turbo frequency listed by _PSS. That may confuse governors to
use turbo frequencies less frequently which may lead to suboptimal
performance.
For this reason, make it possible to use the intel_pstate driver
with generic cpufreq governors as a "normal" cpufreq driver. That
mode is enforced by adding intel_pstate=passive to the kernel
command line and cannot be disabled at run time. In that mode,
intel_pstate provides a cpufreq driver interface including
the ->target() and ->fast_switch() callbacks and is listed in
scaling_driver as "intel_cpufreq".
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
Currently, intel_pstate is unable to control P-states on my
IvyBridge-based Acer Aspire S5, because they are controlled by SMM
on that machine by default and it is necessary to request OS control
of P-states from it via the SMI Command register exposed in the ACPI
FADT. intel_pstate doesn't do that now, but acpi-cpufreq and other
cpufreq drivers for x86 platforms do.
Address this problem by making intel_pstate use the ACPI-defined
mechanism as well. However, intel_pstate is not modular and it
doesn't need the module refcount tricks played by
acpi_processor_notify_smm(), so export the core of this function
to it as acpi_processor_pstate_control() and make it call that.
[The changes in processor_perflib.c related to this should not
make any functional difference for the acpi_processor_notify_smm()
users].
To be safe, only call acpi_processor_notify_smm() from intel_pstate
if ACPI _PPC support is enabled in it.
Suggested-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Add the compatible strings for supporting the generic cpufreq driver on
the Renesas RZ/G1M (r8a7743) and RZ/G1E (r8a7745) SoCs.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Simon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The original comment about the frequency increase to maximum is wrong.
Both increase and decrease happen at steps.
Signed-off-by: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@semaphore.gr>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
What's returned from this function is the delta by which the frequency
must be increased or decreased and not the final frequency that should
be selected.
Name it properly to match its purpose. Also update the variables used to
store that value.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
lpstate_idx remains uninitialized in the case when elapsed_time
is greater than MAX_RAMP_DOWN_TIME. At the end of rampdown the
global pstate should be equal to the local pstate.
Fixes: 20b15b766354 (cpufreq: powernv: Use PMCR to verify global and localpstate)
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Akshay Adiga <akshay.adiga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Use get_target_pstate_use_cpu_load() to calculate target P-State for
devices, with the preferred power management profile in ACPI FADT
set to PM_MOBILE.
This may help in resolving some thermal issues caused by low sustained
cpu bound workloads. The current algorithm tend to over provision in this
case as it doesn't look at the CPU busyness.
Also included the fix from Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> to solve compile
issue, when CONFIG_ACPI is not defined.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
For device-tree based pxa25x and pxa27x platforms, cpufreq-dt driver is
doing the job as well as pxa2xx-cpufreq, so add these platforms to the
compatibility list.
This won't work for legacy non device-tree platforms where
pxa2xx-cpufreq is still required.
Signed-off-by: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Allow CPUfreq statistics to be cleared by writing anything to
/sys/.../cpufreq/stats/reset.
Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The earlier implementation of governors used background timers and so
functions, mutex, etc had 'timer' keyword in their names.
But that's not true anymore. Replace 'timer' with 'update', as those
functions, variables are based around updates to frequency.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
As fast_switch() may get called with interrupt disable mode, we cannot
hold a mutex to update the global_pstate_info. So currently, fast_switch()
does not update the global_pstate_info and it will end up with stale data
whenever pstate is updated through fast_switch().
As the gpstate_timer can fire after fast_switch() has updated the pstates,
the timer handler cannot rely on the cached values of local and global
pstate and needs to read it from the PMCR.
Only gpstate_timer_handler() is affected by the stale cached pstate data
beacause either fast_switch() or target_index() routines will be called
for a given govenor, but gpstate_timer can fire after the governor has
changed to schedutil.
Signed-off-by: Akshay Adiga <akshay.adiga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Adding fast_switch which does light weight operation to set the desired
pstate. Both global and local pstates are set to the same desired pstate.
Signed-off-by: Akshay Adiga <akshay.adiga@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Fixes the following sparse warning:
drivers/cpufreq/brcmstb-avs-cpufreq.c:982:18: warning:
symbol 'brcm_avs_cpufreq_attr' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The limits variable gets modified from intel_pstate sysfs and also gets
modified from cpufreq sysfs. So protect with a mutex to keep data
integrity, when they are getting modified from multiple threads.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
In order to aid debugging, we add a debugfs interface to the driver
that allows direct interaction with the AVS co-processor.
The debugfs interface provides a means for reading all and writing some
of the mailbox registers directly from the shell prompt and enables a
user to execute the communications protocol between ARM CPU and AVS CPU
step-by-step.
This interface should be used for debugging purposes only.
Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This driver supports voltage and frequency scaling on Broadcom STB SoCs
using AVS firmware with DFS and DVFS support.
Actual frequency or voltage scaling is done exclusively by the AVS
firmware. The driver merely provides a standard CPUfreq interface to
other kernel components and userland, and instructs the AVS firmware to
perform frequency or voltage changes on its behalf.
Signed-off-by: Markus Mayer <mmayer@broadcom.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Add compatible strings for Pro5, PXs2, LD6b, LD11, LD20 SoCs to use
the generic cpufreq driver.
Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
When policy->max and policy->min are same, in some cases they don't
result in the same frequency cap. The max_policy_pct is rounded up but
not min_perf_pct. So even when they are same, results in different
percentage or maximum and minimum.
Since minimum is a conservative value for power, a lower value without
rounding is better in most of the cases, unless user wants
policy->max = policy->min.
This change uses use the same policy percentage when policy->max and
policy->min are same.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Intel P-State offers two interface to set performance limits:
- Intel P-State sysfs
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/min_perf_pct
- cpufreq
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq
In the current implementation both of the above methods, change limits
to every CPU in the system. Moreover the limits placed using cpufreq
policy interface also presented in the Intel P-State sysfs via modified
max_perf_pct and min_per_pct during sysfs reads. This allows to check
percent of reduced/increased performance, irrespective of method used to
limit.
There are some new generations of processors, where it is possible to
have limits placed on individual CPU cores. Using cpufreq interface it
is possible to set limits on each CPU. But the current processing will
use last limits placed on all CPUs. So the per core limit feature of
CPUs can't be used.
This change brings in capability to set P-States limits for each CPU,
with some limitations. In this case what should be the read of
max_perf_pct and min_perf_pct? It can be most restrictive limits placed
on any CPU or max possible performance on any given CPU on which no
limits are placed. In either case someone will have issue.
So the consensus is, we can't have both sysfs controls present when user
wants to use limit per core limits.
- By default per-core-control feature is not enabled. So no one will
notice any difference.
- The way to enable is by kernel command line
intel_pstate=per_cpu_perf_limits
- When the per-core-controls are enabled there is no display of for both
read and write on
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/max_perf_pct
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/min_perf_pct
- User can change limits using
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_min_freq
/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu*/cpufreq/scaling_governor
- User can still observe turbo percent and number of P-States from
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/turbo_pct
/sys/devices/system/cpu/intel_pstate/num_pstates
- User can read write system wide turbo status
/sys/devices/system/cpu/no_turbo
While changing this BUG_ON is changed to WARN_ON, as they are not fatal
errors for the system.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
After switching the core module clocks controlling the Integrator
clock frequencies to the common clock framework, defining the
operating points in the device tree, and activating the generic
DT-based CPUfreq driver, we can retire the old Integrator
cpufreq driver.
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This enables the generic DT and OPP-based cpufreq driver on the
ARM Integrator/AP and Integrator/CP.
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
* pm-cpufreq-fixes:
cpufreq: intel_pstate: Always set max P-state in performance mode
cpufreq: intel_pstate: Set P-state upfront in performance mode
* pm-sleep-fixes:
PM / suspend: Fix missing KERN_CONT for suspend message
The only times at which intel_pstate checks the policy set for
a given CPU is the initialization of that CPU and updates of its
policy settings from cpufreq when intel_pstate_set_policy() is
invoked.
That is insufficient, however, because intel_pstate uses the same
P-state selection function for all CPUs regardless of the policy
setting for each of them and the P-state limits are shared between
them. Thus if the policy is set to "performance" for a particular
CPU, it may not behave as expected if the cpufreq settings are
changed subsequently for another CPU.
That can be easily demonstrated by writing "performance" to
scaling_governor for all CPUs and then switching it to "powersave"
for one of them in which case all of the CPUs will behave as though
their scaling_governor were all "powersave" (even though the policy
still appears to be "performance" for the remaining CPUs).
Fix this problem by modifying intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate() to
always set the P-state to the maximum allowed by the current limits
for all CPUs whose policy is set to "performance".
Note that it still is recommended to always change the policy setting
in the same way for all CPUs even with this fix applied to avoid
confusion.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
After commit a4675fbc4a7a (cpufreq: intel_pstate: Replace timers with
utilization update callbacks) the cpufreq governor callbacks may not
be invoked on NOHZ_FULL CPUs and, in particular, switching to the
"performance" policy via sysfs may not have any effect on them. That
is a problem, because it usually is desirable to squeeze the last
bit of performance out of those CPUs, so work around it by setting
the maximum P-state (within the limits) in intel_pstate_set_policy()
upfront when the policy is CPUFREQ_POLICY_PERFORMANCE.
Fixes: a4675fbc4a7a (cpufreq: intel_pstate: Replace timers with utilization update callbacks)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
When target state is calculated using get_target_pstate_use_cpu_load(),
PID controller is not used, hence it has no effect on performance.
So don't present debugfs entries to tune PID controller.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The "IOwait boosting" mechanism is only used by the
get_target_pstate_use_cpu_load() governor function and the
boost_iowait flag in pid_params is always set when that function
is in use (and it is never set otherwise). This means that the
boost_iowait flag is in fact redundant and may be dropped.
For this reason, replace the boost_iowait flag check in
intel_pstate_update_util() with an equivalent check against
pstate_funcs.get_target_pstate and drop that flag.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE is added so that CPPC cpufreq module can be
automatically loaded when we have a acpi processor device with
"ACPI0007" hid.
Signed-off-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
- Fix two cpufreq regressions causing undesirable changes in
behavior to appear (one in the core and one in the conservative
governor) introduced during the 4.8 cycle (Aaro Koskinen, Rafael
Wysocki).
- Fix the way the intel_pstate driver accesses MSRs related to the
hardware-managed P-states (HWP) feature during the initialization
which currently is unsafe and may cause the processor to generate
a general protection fault (Srinivas Pandruvada).
- Rework the intel_pstate's P-state selection algorithm used on Atom
processors to avoid known problems with the current one and to
make the computation more straightforward, which also happens to
improve performance in multiple benchmarks a bit (Rafael Wysocki).
- Improve two comments in the intel_pstate driver (Rafael Wysocki).
- Fix the desired performance computation in the CPPC cpufreq driver
(Hoan Tran).
- Fix the devfreq core to avoid printing misleading error messages
in some cases (Tobias Jakobi).
- Fix the error code path in devfreq_add_device() to use proper
locking around list modifications (Axel Lin).
- Fix a build failure and remove a couple of redundant updates of
variables in the exynos-nocp devfreq driver (Axel Lin).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)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=3yoB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Merge tag 'pm-extra-4.9-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm
Pull more power management updates from Rafael Wysocki:
"This includes a couple of fixes for cpufreq regressions introduced in
4.8, a rework of the intel_pstate algorithm used on Atom processors
(that took some time to test) plus a fix and a couple of cleanups in
that driver, a CPPC cpufreq driver fix, and a some devfreq fixes and
cleanups (core and exynos-nocp).
Specifics:
- Fix two cpufreq regressions causing undesirable changes in behavior
to appear (one in the core and one in the conservative governor)
introduced during the 4.8 cycle (Aaro Koskinen, Rafael Wysocki).
- Fix the way the intel_pstate driver accesses MSRs related to the
hardware-managed P-states (HWP) feature during the initialization
which currently is unsafe and may cause the processor to generate a
general protection fault (Srinivas Pandruvada).
- Rework the intel_pstate's P-state selection algorithm used on Atom
processors to avoid known problems with the current one and to make
the computation more straightforward, which also happens to improve
performance in multiple benchmarks a bit (Rafael Wysocki).
- Improve two comments in the intel_pstate driver (Rafael Wysocki).
- Fix the desired performance computation in the CPPC cpufreq driver
(Hoan Tran).
- Fix the devfreq core to avoid printing misleading error messages in
some cases (Tobias Jakobi).
- Fix the error code path in devfreq_add_device() to use proper
locking around list modifications (Axel Lin).
- Fix a build failure and remove a couple of redundant updates of
variables in the exynos-nocp devfreq driver (Axel Lin)"
* tag 'pm-extra-4.9-rc1' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm:
cpufreq: CPPC: Correct desired_perf calculation
cpufreq: conservative: Fix next frequency selection
cpufreq: skip invalid entries when searching the frequency
cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix struct pstate_adjust_policy kerneldoc
cpufreq: intel_pstate: Proportional algorithm for Atom
PM / devfreq: Skip status update on uninitialized previous_freq
PM / devfreq: Add proper locking around list_del()
PM / devfreq: exynos-nocp: Remove redundant code
PM / devfreq: exynos-nocp: Select REGMAP_MMIO
cpufreq: intel_pstate: Clarify comment in get_target_pstate_use_performance()
cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix unsafe HWP MSR access
The desired_perf is an abstract performance number. Its value should
be in the range of [lowest perf, highest perf] of CPPC.
The correct calculation is
desired_perf = freq * cppc_highest_perf / cppc_dmi_max_khz
And cppc_cpufreq_set_target() returns if desired_perf is exactly
the same with the old perf.
Signed-off-by: Hoan Tran <hotran@apm.com>
Reviewed-by: Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Commit d352cf47d93e (cpufreq: conservative: Do not use transition
notifications) overlooked the case when the "frequency step" used
by the conservative governor is small relative to the distances
between the available frequencies and broke the algorithm by
using policy->cur instead of the previously requested frequency
when computing the next one.
As a result, the governor may not be able to go outside of a narrow
range between two consecutive available frequencies.
Fix the problem by making the governor save the previously requested
frequency and select the next one relative that value (unless it is
out of range, in which case policy->cur will be used instead).
Fixes: d352cf47d93e (cpufreq: conservative: Do not use transition notifications)
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177171
Reported-and-tested-by: Aleksey Rybalkin <aleksey@rybalkin.org>
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: 4.8+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.8+
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
It looks like the name of struct pstate_adjust_policy was updated
without updating its kerneldoc comment accordingly, so fix that
mistake.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The PID algorithm used by the intel_pstate driver tends to drive
performance to the minimum for workloads with utilization below the
setpoint, which is undesirable, so replace it with a modified
"proportional" algorithm on Atom.
The new algorithm will set the new P-state to be 1.25 times the
available maximum times the (frequency-invariant) utilization during
the previous sampling period except when the target P-state computed
this way is lower than the average P-state during the previous
sampling period. In the latter case, it will increase the target by
50% of the difference between it and the average P-state to prevent
performance from dropping down too fast in some cases.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Tested-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Make the comment explaining the meaning of the perf_scaled variable
in get_target_pstate_use_performance() more straightforward.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This is a requirement that MSR MSR_PM_ENABLE must be set to 0x01 before
reading MSR_HWP_CAPABILITIES on a given CPU. If cpufreq init() is
scheduled on a CPU which is not same as policy->cpu or migrates to a
different CPU before calling msr read for MSR_HWP_CAPABILITIES, it
is possible that MSR_PM_ENABLE was not to set to 0x01 on that CPU.
This will cause GP fault. So like other places in this path
rdmsrl_on_cpu should be used instead of rdmsrl.
Moreover the scope of MSR_HWP_CAPABILITIES is on per thread basis, so it
should be read from the same CPU, for which MSR MSR_HWP_REQUEST is
getting set.
dmesg dump or warning:
[ 22.014488] WARNING: CPU: 139 PID: 1 at arch/x86/mm/extable.c:50 ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe+0x68/0x70
[ 22.014492] unchecked MSR access error: RDMSR from 0x771
[ 22.014493] Modules linked in:
[ 22.014507] CPU: 139 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.7.5+ #1
...
...
[ 22.014516] Call Trace:
[ 22.014542] [<ffffffff813d7dd1>] dump_stack+0x63/0x82
[ 22.014558] [<ffffffff8107bc8b>] __warn+0xcb/0xf0
[ 22.014561] [<ffffffff8107bcff>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x4f/0x60
[ 22.014563] [<ffffffff810676f8>] ex_handler_rdmsr_unsafe+0x68/0x70
[ 22.014564] [<ffffffff810677d9>] fixup_exception+0x39/0x50
[ 22.014604] [<ffffffff8102e400>] do_general_protection+0x80/0x150
[ 22.014610] [<ffffffff817f9ec8>] general_protection+0x28/0x30
[ 22.014635] [<ffffffff81687940>] ? get_target_pstate_use_performance+0xb0/0xb0
[ 22.014642] [<ffffffff810600c7>] ? native_read_msr+0x7/0x40
[ 22.014657] [<ffffffff81688123>] intel_pstate_hwp_set+0x23/0x130
[ 22.014660] [<ffffffff81688406>] intel_pstate_set_policy+0x1b6/0x340
[ 22.014662] [<ffffffff816829bb>] cpufreq_set_policy+0xeb/0x2c0
[ 22.014664] [<ffffffff81682f39>] cpufreq_init_policy+0x79/0xe0
[ 22.014666] [<ffffffff81682cb0>] ? cpufreq_update_policy+0x120/0x120
[ 22.014669] [<ffffffff816833a6>] cpufreq_online+0x406/0x820
[ 22.014671] [<ffffffff8168381f>] cpufreq_add_dev+0x5f/0x90
[ 22.014717] [<ffffffff81530ac8>] subsys_interface_register+0xb8/0x100
[ 22.014719] [<ffffffff816821bc>] cpufreq_register_driver+0x14c/0x210
[ 22.014749] [<ffffffff81fe1d90>] intel_pstate_init+0x39d/0x4d5
[ 22.014751] [<ffffffff81fe13f2>] ? cpufreq_gov_dbs_init+0x12/0x12
Cc: 4.3+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.3+
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
