IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Use shiny new acpi_dev_found() and remove all the boilerplate
to search for a particular ACPI device. No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
Acked-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Constify the asus_quirks[] DMI table. There's no need to have it
writeable during runtime.
Signed-off-by: Mathias Krause <minipli@googlemail.com>
Cc: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com>
Replace direct inclusions of <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and
<acpi/acpi_drivers.h>, which are incorrect, with <linux/acpi.h>
inclusions and remove some inclusions of those files that aren't
necessary.
First of all, <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>
should not be included directly from any files that are built for
CONFIG_ACPI unset, because that generally leads to build warnings about
undefined symbols in !CONFIG_ACPI builds. For CONFIG_ACPI set,
<linux/acpi.h> includes those files and for CONFIG_ACPI unset it
provides stub ACPI symbols to be used in that case.
Second, there are ordering dependencies between those files that always
have to be met. Namely, it is required that <acpi/acpi_bus.h> be included
prior to <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> so that the acpi_pci_root declarations the
latter depends on are always there. And <acpi/acpi.h> which provides
basic ACPICA type declarations should always be included prior to any other
ACPI headers in CONFIG_ACPI builds. That also is taken care of including
<linux/acpi.h> as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> (drivers/pci stuff)
Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> (Xen stuff)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1000146
Some h/w that can adjust screen brightness through ACPI functions, but
can't turn on/off the backlight power correctly. So, we list those h/w in
quirks and try to turn on/off the backlight power through WMI.
Signed-off-by: AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Some models work better with different values of wapf, so move the
variable into quriks_entry to make it more easy to give a specific
value to different models.
Based on original patch from AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
Cc: AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Due to some implementation reasons, ASUS ET2012 All-in-One machines
can't report the correct backlight power status, it will always return
1. To track the backlight power status correctly, we have to store the
status by ourselves.
BTW, by the BIOS design, the backlight power will be turn on/off
sequently, no matter what the value of the parameter will be.
More over, the brightness adjustment command will turn on the backlight
power. Those behaviors will make us fail to track the backlight power
status.
For example, While we are trying to turn on the backlight power,
we will send out the brightness adjustment command and then trying to
figure out if we have to turn on the backlight power, then send out
the command. But, the real case is that, the backlight power turns on
while sending the brightness adjustment command, and then we send out
the command to turn on the backlight power, it actually will turn off
the backlight power and the backlight power status we recorded becomes
wrong. So, we have to seperate these two commands by a if statement.
Signed-off-by: AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Some ASUS ET2012E/I All-in-One machines that use a scalar board
to control the brightness, and they only accept brightness up and down
command. So, I introduced a get_scalar_command() function to pass the
command to the scalar board through WMI.
Besides, we have to store the brightness value locally, for we need the
old value to know the brightness value is increasing or decreasing.
BTW, since there is no way to retrieve the actual brightness(it would be
a fixed value), and the max brightness value would be fixed to 1, so we
have to keep passing the brightness up/down command when we reached the
max brightness value or 0.
Signed-off-by: AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
This key is different than other hotkeys, having seperate scan
codes for press, release, and hold, so it requires some special
filtering. Press and release events are passed on, and hold events
are ignored since sparse-keymap does not support hardware
autorepeat.
Note that "Home" in the context of this button doesn't mean the
same thing as the usual Home key, and it really isn't clear at
all what is meant by "Home". The manufacurer's description of the
button indicates that it should launch some sort of touch screen
settings interface on short press and apply a desktop rotation on
long press.
Signed-off-by: Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentin.chary@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Just a trivial pr_warning to pr_warn conversion
while adding a few missing newlines.
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
New Asus notebooks are using a WMI device similar to
the one used in Eee PCs. Since we don't want to load
eeepc-wmi module on Asus notebooks, and we want to
keep the eeepc-wmi module for backward compatibility,
this patch introduce a new module, named asus-wmi, that
will be used by eeepc-wmi and the new Asus Notebook WMI
Driver.
eeepc-wmi's input device strings (device name and phys)
are kept, but rfkill and led names are changed (s/eeepc/asus/).
This should not break anything since rfkill are used by type or
index, not by name, and the eeepc::touchpad led wasn't working
correctly before 2.6.39 anyway.
Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
New Asus notebooks are using a WMI device similar to
the one used in Eee PCs. Since we don't want to load
a module named eeepc-laptop on Asus Notebooks, start by
copying all the code to asus-wmi.c.
Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
These keys are supposed to be handled by any software
using the camera (like webKam or cheese...). They can
also be used to actually move the camera when possible.
Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Each device seems to be in a "group" (devid >> 16 & 0xFF).
Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
This key should power off the backlight, not the display,
it is also used in acpi/video.c to do the same thing.
Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
I checked some more DSDT, and it seems that I wasn't
totally right about the meaning of DSTS return value.
Bit 0 is clearly the status of the device, and I discovered
that bit 16 is set when the device is present.
Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
eeepc_wmi_get_devstate returns an acpi_status, so each
call need extra logic to handle the return code. This
patch add a simple getter, returning a boolean (or a
negative error code).
Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
\AMW0.WMBC, which is the main method that we use,
is not reentrant. When wireless hotpluging is enabled,
toggling the status of the wireless device using WMBC will
trigger a notification and the notification handler need to
call WMBC again to get the new status of the device, this
will trigger the following error:
ACPI Error (dswload-0802): [_T_0] Namespace lookup failure, AE_ALREADY_EXISTS
ACPI Exception: AE_ALREADY_EXISTS, During name lookup/catalog (20100428/psloop-231)
ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\AMW0.WMBC] (Node f7023b88), AE_ALREADY_EXISTS
ACPI: Marking method WMBC as Serialized because of AE_ALREADY_EXISTS error
Since there is currently no way to tell the acpi subsystem to mark
a method as serialized, we do it in eeepc-wmi.
Of course, we could let the first call fail, and then it would work,
but it doesn't seems really clean, and it will make the first
WMBC call return a random value.
This patch was tested on EeePc 1000H with a RaLink RT2860
wireless card using the rt2800pci driver. rt2860sta driver
seems to deadlock when we remove the pci device...
Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Implement wireless like hotplug handling (code stolen from eeepc-laptop).
Reminder: on some models rfkill is implemented by logically unplugging the
wireless card from the PCI bus. Despite sending ACPI notifications, this does
not appear to be implemented using standard ACPI hotplug - nor does the
firmware provide the _OSC method required to support native PCIe hotplug.
The only sensible choice appears to be to handle the hotplugging directly in
the platform driver.
Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
If legacy device (SB.ATKD - ASUS010) used by eeepc-laptop
is enabled, don't allow eeepc-wmi to load because:
- eeepc-laptop may be loaded, and can conflict with
eeepc-wmi (they both try to register eeepc::touchpad
led for example).
- the WMI interface is inteded to be used when the OS is
not detected as Win 7. And when this is the case, the
ASUS010 device is disabled.
Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
Since eeepc-wmi has currently no official maintainer, I claim
maintainership of this driver, and add it to the acpi4asus project.
Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
eeepc-wmi/ - debugfs root directory
dev_id - current dev_id
ctrl_param - current ctrl_param
devs - call DEVS(dev_id, ctrl_param) and print result
dsts - call DSTS(dev_id) and print result
DEVS and DSTS are the main functions used in eeepc-wmi, this
will allow to test new features without patching the drivers.
Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
wimax support is missing because I don't have any DSDT
with WMI and wimax support.
Most of the code comes from eeepc-laptop.
Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
The old code was using platform_driver.probe to initialize
eeepc_wmi context. That's a mistake because if probe fail,
eeepc_platform_register() won't tell anyone, and chaos will happen.
Wrap add and remove code inside eeepc_wmi_add() / eeepc_wmi_remove(),
and try to use the static platform_device only in eeepc_wmi_init()
and eeepc_wmi_exit()
The code is now very similar to eeepc-laptop, except eeepc_laptop_add
and eeepc_laptop_remove are called from acpi_driver, not module
init/exit functions, but WMI doesn't provide such functionalities (yet ?).
Signed-off-by: Corentin Chary <corentincj@iksaif.net>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com>
