IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
We're transitioning to memalloc_nofs_save/restore instead of GFP flags
with the rest of the kernel, and GFP_NOIO was excessively strict and
causing unnnecessary allocation failures - these allocations are done
with btree locks dropped.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We had a deadlock on page_lock, because buffered reads signal completion
by unlocking the page, but the dio read path normally dirties the pages
it's reading to with set_page_dirty_lock.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
It was using an internal btree node iterator interface, when
bch2_btree_iter_peek_slot() sufficed. We were hitting a null ptr deref
that looked like it was from the iterator not being uptodate - this will
also fix that.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
There was a race: btree node writes drop their reference on journal pins
before clearing the btree_node_write_in_flight flag.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
In the future, stripe index 0 will be a sentinal value. This patch
doesn't disallow stripes at POS_MIN yet, leaving that for when we do the
on disk format changes.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Allocating buckets for existing stripes was busted, in part because the
data structures were too contorted. This reworks new stripes so that we
have an array of open buckets that matches blocks in the stripe, and
it's sparse if we're reusing an existing stripe.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
A user reported a bug that implies they might not be correctly sorted,
this should help track that down.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This makes bch2_stripes_write() work more like bch2_alloc_write().
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The primary stripes radix tree can be sparse, which was causing an
assertion to pop because the one use for gc isn't. Fix this by changing
the algorithm to copy between the two radix trees.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The sectors argument shouldn't have been a u32 - it can be up to U32_MAX
(i.e. fallocate creating persistent reservations), and if replication is
enabled we'll overflow when we calculate the real number of sectors to
reserve. Oops.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
All writes prior to a journal write need to be flushed before the
journal write itself happens. On single device filesystems, it suffices
to mark the write with REQ_PREFLUSH|REQ_FUA, but on multi device
filesystems we need to issue flushes to every device - and wait for them
to complete - before issuing the journal writes. Previously, we were
issuing flushes to every device, but we weren't waiting for them to
complete before issuing the journal writes.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This is because we had a bug where we were writing out journal entries
with garbage last_seq, and not catching it.
Also, completely ignore jset->last_seq when JSET_NO_FLUSH is true,
because of aforementioned bug, but change the write path to set last_seq
to 0 when JSET_NO_FLUSH is true.
Minor other cleanups and comments.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This fixes a bug where mark and sweep gc incorrectly was clearing out
the stripes heap and causing assertions to fire later - simpler to just
create the stripes heap after gc has finished.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
bch2_btree_and_journal_walk() walks the btree overlaying keys from the
journal; it was introduced so that we could read in the alloc btree
prior to journal replay being done, when journalling of updates to
interior btree nodes was introduced.
But it didn't have btree node prefetching, which introduced a severe
regression with mount times, particularly on spinning rust. This patch
implements btree node prefetching for the btree + journal walk,
hopefully fixing that.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
- Originally bch_extent_stripe_ptr didn't contain the block index,
instead we'd have to search through the stripe pointers to figure out
which pointer matched. When the block field was added to
bch_extent_stripe_ptr, not all of the code was updated to use it.
This patch fixes that, and we also now verify that field where it
makes sense.
- The ec_stripe_buf_init/exit() functions have been improved, and are
now used by the bch2_ec_read_extent() (recovery read) path.
- get_stripe_key() is now used by bch2_ec_read_extent().
- We now have a getter and setter for checksums within a stripe, like
we had previously for block sector counts, and ec_generate_checksums
and ec_validate_checksums are now quite a bit smaller and cleaner.
ec.c still needs a lot of work, but this patch is slowly moving things
in the right direction.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
More debugging info is always a good thing.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This fixes a regression introduced by "bcachefs: Refactor filesystem
usage accounting". We have to include all the replicas entries that have
any of the entries for different journal entries nonzero, we can't skip
them if they sum to zero.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Alloc info isn't stored on a particular device, it makes no sense to
only be writing it out for rw members - this was causing fsck to not fix
alloc info errors, oops.
Also, make sure we write out alloc info in other repair paths.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
A btree node merge operation deletes a key in the parent node; if when
inserting into the parent node we split the parent node, we can end up
with a whiteout in the parent node that we don't want.
The existing code drops them before doing the split, because they can
screw up picking the pivot, but we forgot about the unwritten writeouts
area - that needs to be cleared out too.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This reverts part of the change from "bcachefs: Don't use
BTREE_INSERT_USE_RESERVE so much" - it turns out we still should be
reserving open buckets for btree node allocations, because otherwise
data bucket allocations (especially with erasure coding enabled) can use
up all our open buckets and we won't be able to do the metadata update
that lets us release those open bucket references. Oops.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The zstd compression code seems to have a bug where it will write just
past the end of the destination buffer - probably only when the
compressed output isn't going to fit in the destination buffer, which
will never happen if you're always allocating a bigger buffer than the
source buffer which would explain other users not hitting it. But, we
size the buffer according to how much contiguous space on disk we have,
so...
generally, bugs like this don't write more than a word past the end of
the buffer, so an easy workaround is to subtract a fudge factor from the
buffer size.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We don't want to fail the recovery/mount because of a single error
reading from the journal - the relevant journal entry may still be found
on other devices, and missing or no journal entries found is already
handled later in the recovery process.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
It used to be safe to reallocate a buf that the write path owns without
holding the journal lock, but now this can trigger an assertion in
journal_seq_to_buf().
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
With various newer key types - stripe keys, inline data extents - the
old approach of calculating the maximum size of the value is becoming
more and more error prone. Better to switch to bkey_on_stack, which can
dynamically allocate if necessary to handle any size bkey.
In particular we also want to get rid of BKEY_EXTENT_VAL_U64s_MAX.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Allocations for copygc have to be kept separate from everything else,
so that copygc doesn't get starved.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We don't want writes to not get erasure coded just because the allocator
temporarily wasn't keeping up.
However, it's not guaranteed that these allocations will ever succeed,
we can currently get stuck - especially if devices are different sizes -
we still have work to do in this area.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Previously, in the stripe creation path, when reusing an existing stripe
we'd read the existing stripe synchronously - ouch.
Now, we allocate two stripe bufs if we're using an existing stripe, so
that we can do the read asynchronously - and, we read the full stripe so
that we can run recovery, if necessary.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Originally, we'd check for -ENOSPC when getting a disk reservation
whenever the new extent took up more space on disk than the old extent.
Erasure coding screwed this up, because with erasure coding writes are
initially replicated, and then in the background the extra replicas are
dropped when the stripe is created. This means that with erasure coding
enabled, writes will always take up more space on disk than the data
they're overwriting - but, according to posix, overwrites aren't
supposed to return ENOSPC.
So, in this patch we fudge things: if the new extent has more replicas
than the _effective_ replicas of the old extent, or if the old extent is
compressed and the new one isn't, we check for ENOSPC when getting the
disk reservation - otherwise, we don't.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Previously, we were using BTREE_INSERT_RESERVE in a lot of places where
it no longer makes sense.
- we now have more open_buckets than we used to, and the reserves work
better, so we shouldn't need to use BTREE_INSERT_RESERVE just because
we're holding open_buckets pinned anymore.
- We have the btree key cache for updates to the alloc btree, meaning
we no longer need the btree reserve to ensure the allocator can make
forward progress.
This means that we should only need a reserve for btree updates to
ensure that copygc can make forward progress.
Since it's now just for copygc, we can also fold RESERVE_BTREE into
RESERVE_MOVINGGC (the allocator's freelist reserve).
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The move path was calling bch2_bucket_io_time_reset() for cached
pointers (which it shouldn't have been), and then not calling
bch2_trans_reset() when it got -EINTR (indicating transaction restart).
Oops.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
__btree_trans_get_iter() was using bch2_btree_iter_upgrade, but it
shouldn't have been because on failure bch2_btree_iter_upgrade may drop
locks in other iterators, expecting the transaction to be restarted. But
__btree_trans_get_iter can't return an error to indicate that we need to
restart thet transaction - oops.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
We normally avoid having too many dirty keys in the btree key cache, to
ensure that we can always shrink our caches to reclaim memory if needed.
But this check was causing us to go into an infinite loop on startup, in
the btree insert path before journal reclaim was started.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
In bch2_btree_interior_update_will_free_node, we copy the journal pins
from outstanding writes on the btree node we're about to free. But, this
can race with the writes completing, and dropping their journal pins.
To guard against this, just use READ_ONCE() in bch2_journal_pin_copy().
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
With the btree key cache code, we don't need to update the alloc btree
lazily - and this will mean we can remove the bch2_alloc_write() call in
the shutdown path.
Future work: we really need to expend the bucket IO clocks from 16 to 64
bits, so that we don't have to rescale them.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This now means "the maximum number of pointers within a bkey" - and
bch_devs_list is updated to use it instead of BCH_REPLICAS_MAX, since
stripes can contain more than BCH_REPLICAS_MAX pointers.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This is something we clearly should be checking for, but weren't -
oops.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Particularly on emergency shutdown we can end up having to clean up a
lot of dirty cached btree keys here.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
If a btree node merger is followed by a split or compact of the parent
node, we could end up with the parent btree node iterator pointing to
the whiteout inserted by the btree node merge operation - the fix is to
ensure that interior btree node iterators always point to the first non
whiteout.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
With erasure coding, we now have processes in the background that
compact data, causing it to take up less space on disk than when it was
written, or potentially when it was read.
This means that we can't trust the page cache when it says "we have data
on disk taking up x amount of space here" - there's always the potential
to race with background compaction.
To fix this, just check if we need to add to our disk reservation in the
bch2_extent_update() path, in the transaction that will do the btree
update.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
This is needed to fix a bug where we're overflowing iterators within a
btree transaction, because we're updating the stripes btree (to update
block counts) and the stripes btree trigger is unnecessarily updating
the alloc btree - it doesn't need to update the alloc btree when the
pointers within a stripe aren't changing.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
The stripe creation path was too state-machiney: it would always run the
full state machine until it had succesfully created a new stripe.
But if we tried to get and reuse an existing stripe after we'd already
allocated some buckets, the buckets we'd allocated might have conflicted
with the blocks in the existing stripe we need to keep - oops.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Also, print out more information on btree transaction iterator overflow.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
When we didn't find a key to delete we were getting a null ptr deref.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Metadata corruption bugs are hard to debug if we can't see exactly what
went wrong - try to allocate a bigger buffer so we can print out
everything we have.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Without checking if we actually flushed anything, journal reclaim could
still go into an infinite loop while trying ot shut down.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
Had a type that meant we were triggering journal reclaim _much_ more
aggressively than needed. Also, fix a potential integer overflow.
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
- Try to always keep 1/8th of the journal free, on top of
pre-reservations
- Move the check for whether the journal is stuck to
bch2_journal_space_available, and make it only fire when there aren't
any journal writes in flight (that might free up space by updating
last_seq)
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>
