IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Freq caps (i.e. RP0, RP1 and RPn frequencies) are read from HW. However the
formats (bit positions, widths, registers and units) of these vary for
different generations with even more variations arriving in the future. In
order not to have to do identical computation for these caps in multiple
places, here we centralize the computation of these caps. This makes the
code cleaner and also more extensible for the future.
v2: Clarify that caps are in "hw units" in comments (Lucas De Marchi)
v3: Minor checkpatch fix
v4: s/intel_rps_get_freq_caps/gen6_rps_get_freq_caps/ (Badal Nilawar)
v5: Changes comments to kernel doc (Anshuman Gupta)
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ashutosh Dixit <ashutosh.dixit@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Badal Nilawar <badal.nilawar@intel.com>
Acked-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220406191848.20895-1-ashutosh.dixit@intel.com
Throttling here refers to the GT frequency being clipped. Each of
the throttle reason attributes will have a 0 or 1 value depending
upon whether there is throttling and also the specific reason for
it.
The following is a brief description of the sysfs throttle
frequency attributes added:
- throttle_reason_status: when set indicates that there is GT
frequency clipping.
- throttle_reason_pl1: when set indicates that PBM PL1 (platform
or package PL1) has caused GT frequency clipping.
- throttle_reason_pl2: when set indicates that PBM PL2 or PL3
(platform or package PL2 or PL3) has caused GT frequency
clipping.
- throttle_reason_pl4: when set indicates that PL4 or IccMax has
caused GT frequency clipping.
- throttle_reason_thermal: when set indicates that Thermal event
has caused GT frequency clipping.
- throttle_reason_prochot: when set indicates that PROCHOT# has
caused GT frequency clipping.
- throttle_reason_ratl: when set indicates that Running Average
Thermal Limit has caused GT frequency clipping.
- throttle_reason_vr_thermalert: when set indicates that Hot VR
(any processor VR) has caused GT frequency clipping.
- throttle_reason_vr_tdc: when set indicates that VR TDC
(Thermal Design Current) has caused GT frequency clipping.
Signed-off-by: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dale B Stimson <dale.b.stimson@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220318233938.149744-8-andi.shyti@linux.intel.com
By default, GT (and GuC) run at RPn. Requesting for RP0
before firmware load can speed up DMA and HuC auth as well.
In addition to writing to 0xA008, we also need to enable
swreq in 0xA024 so that Punit will pay heed to our request.
SLPC will restore the frequency back to RPn after initialization,
but we need to manually do that for the non-SLPC path.
We don't need a manual override in the SLPC disabled case, just
use the intel_rps_set function to ensure consistent RPS state.
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Sujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20211216233022.21351-1-vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com
As with the realisation for soft-rc6, we respond to idling the engines
within microseconds, far faster than the response times for HW RC6 and
RPS. Furthermore, our fast parking upon idle, prevents HW RPS from
running for many desktop workloads, as the RPS evaluation intervals are
on the order of tens of milliseconds, but the typical workload is just a
couple of milliseconds, but yet we still need to determine the best
frequency for user latency versus power.
Recognising that the HW evaluation intervals are a poor fit, and that
they were deprecated [in bspec at least] from gen10, start to wean
ourselves off them and replace the EI with a timer and our accurate
busy-stats. The principle benefit of manually evaluating RPS intervals
is that we can be more responsive for better performance and powersaving
for both spiky workloads and steady-state.
Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/1698
Fixes: 98479ada42 ("drm/i915/gt: Treat idling as a RPS downclock event")
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200429205446.3259-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
