IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The VESA Organization Vendor-Specific Data Block, defined in VESA
DisplayID Standard v2.0, specifies the eDP Multi-SST Operation (MSO)
stream count and segment pixel overlap.
DisplayID v1.3 has Appendix B: DisplayID as an EDID Extension,
describing how DisplayID sections may be embedded in EDID extension
blocks. DisplayID v2.0 does not have such a section, perhaps implying
that DisplayID v2.0 data should not be included in EDID extensions, but
rather in a "pure" DisplayID structure at its own DDC address pair
A4h/A5h, as described in VESA E-DDC Standard v1.3 chapter 3.
However, in practice, displays out in the field have embedded DisplayID
v2.0 data blocks in EDID extensions, including, in particular, some eDP
MSO displays, where a pure DisplayID structure is not available at all.
Parse the MSO data from the DisplayID data block. Do it as part of
drm_add_display_info(), extending it to parse also DisplayID data to
avoid requiring extra calls to update the information.
v2: Check for VESA OUI (Ville)
Reviewed-by: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime@cerno.tech>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/73ca2887e7b37880690f5c9ba4594c9cd1170669.1630419362.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
Iterating DisplayID blocks across sections (in EDID extensions) is
unnecessarily complicated for the caller. Implement DisplayID iterators
to go through all blocks in all sections.
Usage example:
const struct displayid_block *block;
struct displayid_iter iter;
displayid_iter_edid_begin(edid, &iter);
displayid_iter_for_each(block, &iter) {
/* operate on block */
}
displayid_iter_end(&iter);
When DisplayID is stored in EDID extensions, the DisplayID sections map
to extensions as described in VESA DisplayID v1.3 Appendix B: DisplayID
as an EDID Extension. This is implemented here.
When DisplayID is stored in its dedicated DDC device 0xA4, according to
VESA E-DDC v1.3, different rules apply for the structure. This is not
implemented here, as we don't currently use it, but the idea is you'd
have a different call for beginning the iteration, for example simply:
displayid_iter_begin(displayid, &iter);
instead of displayid_iter_edid_begin(), and everything else would be
hidden away in the iterator functions.
v2:
- sizeof(struct displayid_block) -> sizeof(*block) (Ville)
- remove __ prefix from displayid_iter_block
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/da3dead1752ab16c061f7bd248ac1a4268f7fefb.1617024940.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
There is a regular need in the kernel to provide a way to declare having a
dynamically sized set of trailing elements in a structure. Kernel code should
always use “flexible array members”[1] for these cases. The older style of
one-element or zero-length arrays should no longer be used[2].
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flexible_array_member
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
The tiled 5K Dell monitor appears to be hiding it's tiled mode
inside the displayid timings block, this patch parses this
blocks and adds the modes to the modelist.
v1.1: add missing __packed.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95207
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
