IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This function will delete unode with given (val,aux) pair.
And with this patch, seqnum for debug usage doesn't have any meaning
now, so remove them.
This is used by later patches to skip snapshot root.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
We've got bug reports that btrfs crashes when quota is enabled on
32bit kernel, typically with the Oops like below:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000004
IP: [<f9234590>] find_parent_nodes+0x360/0x1380 [btrfs]
*pde = 00000000
Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
CPU: 0 PID: 151 Comm: kworker/u8:2 Tainted: G S W 3.15.2-1.gd43d97e-default #1
Workqueue: btrfs-qgroup-rescan normal_work_helper [btrfs]
task: f1478130 ti: f147c000 task.ti: f147c000
EIP: 0060:[<f9234590>] EFLAGS: 00010213 CPU: 0
EIP is at find_parent_nodes+0x360/0x1380 [btrfs]
EAX: f147dda8 EBX: f147ddb0 ECX: 00000011 EDX: 00000000
ESI: 00000000 EDI: f147dda4 EBP: f147ddf8 ESP: f147dd38
DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068
CR0: 8005003b CR2: 00000004 CR3: 00bf3000 CR4: 00000690
Stack:
00000000 00000000 f147dda4 00000050 00000001 00000000 00000001 00000050
00000001 00000000 d3059000 00000001 00000022 000000a8 00000000 00000000
00000000 000000a1 00000000 00000000 00000001 00000000 00000000 11800000
Call Trace:
[<f923564d>] __btrfs_find_all_roots+0x9d/0xf0 [btrfs]
[<f9237bb1>] btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x401/0x760 [btrfs]
[<f9206148>] normal_work_helper+0xc8/0x270 [btrfs]
[<c025e38b>] process_one_work+0x11b/0x390
[<c025eea1>] worker_thread+0x101/0x340
[<c026432b>] kthread+0x9b/0xb0
[<c0712a71>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x21/0x30
[<c0264290>] kthread_create_on_node+0x110/0x110
This indicates a NULL corruption in prefs_delayed list. The further
investigation and bisection pointed that the call of ulist_add_merge()
results in the corruption.
ulist_add_merge() takes u64 as aux and writes a 64bit value into
old_aux. The callers of this function in backref.c, however, pass a
pointer of a pointer to old_aux. That is, the function overwrites
64bit value on 32bit pointer. This caused a NULL in the adjacent
variable, in this case, prefs_delayed.
Here is a quick attempt to band-aid over this: a new function,
ulist_add_merge_ptr() is introduced to pass/store properly a pointer
value instead of u64. There are still ugly void ** cast remaining
in the callers because void ** cannot be taken implicitly. But, it's
safer than explicit cast to u64, anyway.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=887046
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> [v3.11+]
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
There are not any users that use ulist except Btrfs,don't
export them.
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
We are really suffering from now ulist's implementation, some developers
gave their try, and i just gave some of my ideas for things:
1. use list+rb_tree instead of arrary+rb_tree
2. add cur_list to iterator rather than ulist structure.
3. add seqnum into every node when they are added, this is
used to do selfcheck when iterating node.
I noticed Zach Brown's comments before, long term is to kick off
ulist implementation, however, for now, we need at least avoid
arrary from ulist.
Cc: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Cc: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Walking backref tree and btrfs quota rely on ulist very much.
This patch tries to use rb_tree to speed up search time.
The original code always checks whether an element
exists before adding a new element, however it costs O(n).
I try to add a rb_tree in the ulist,this is only used to speed up
search. I also do some measurements with quota enabled.
fsstress -p 4 -n 10000
Without this path:
real 0m51.058s 2m4.745s 1m28.222s 1m5.137s
user 0m0.035s 0m0.041s 0m0.105s 0m0.100s
sys 0m12.009s 0m11.246s 0m10.901s 0m10.999s 0m11.287s
With this path:
real 0m55.295s 0m50.960s 1m2.214s 0m48.273s
user 0m0.053s 0m0.095s 0m0.135s 0m0.107s
sys 0m7.766s 0m6.013s 0m6.319s 0m6.030s 0m6.532s
After applying the patch,the execute time is down by ~42%.(11.287s->6.532s)
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Miao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Btrfs send/receive uses the aux field to store inode numbers. On
32 bit machines this may become a problem.
Also fix all users of ulist_add and ulist_add_merged.
Reported-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com>
We must build up the inode list with the extent lock held after following
indirect refs.
This also requires an extension to ulists, which allows to modify the stored
aux value in case a key already exists in the list.
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
ulist_next gets the pointer to the previously returned element to find the
next element from there. However, when we call ulist_add while iteration
with ulist_next is in progress (ulist explicitly supports this), we can
realloc the ulist internal memory, which makes the pointer to the previous
element useless.
Instead, we now use an iterator parameter that's independent from the
internal pointers.
Reported-by: Alexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
ulist is a generic data structures to hold a collection of unique u64
values. The only operations it supports is adding to the list and
enumerating it.
It is possible to store an auxiliary value along with the key. The
implementation is preliminary and can probably be sped up significantly.
It is used by btrfs_find_all_roots() quota to translate recursions into
iterative loops.
Signed-off-by: Arne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Jan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>