IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Modify the governor .throttle() callback definition so that it takes a
trip pointer instead of a trip index as its second argument, adjust the
governors accordingly and update the core code invoking .throttle().
This causes the governors to become independent of the representation
of the list of trips in the thermal zone structure.
This change is not expected to alter the general functionality.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Fold update_passive_instance() into thermal_zone_trip_update() that is
its only caller so as to make the code in question easier to follow.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com>
Replace the integer trip number stored in struct thermal_instance with
a pointer to the relevant trip and adjust the code using the structure
in question accordingly.
The main reason for making this change is to allow the trip point to
cooling device binding code more straightforward, as illustrated by
subsequent modifications of the ACPI thermal driver, but it also helps
to clarify the overall design and allows the governor code overhead to
be reduced (through subsequent modifications).
The only case in which it adds complexity is trip_point_show() that
needs to walk the trips[] table to find the index of the given trip
point, but this is not a critical path and the interface that
trip_point_show() belongs to is problematic anyway (for instance, it
doesn't cover the case when the same cooling devices is associated
with multiple trip points).
This is a preliminary change and the affected code will be refined by
a series of subsequent modifications of thermal governors, the core and
the ACPI thermal driver.
The general functionality is not expected to be affected by this change.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
For the algorithm of choosing the next target state in step_wise
governor, the code does the right thing but is implemented in a
way different from what the comment describes. And this hurts the code
readability.
As the logic in the comment is simpler, adjust the code logic to align
with the comment.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
[ rjw: Subject edit ]
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Commit 4102c4042a33 ("thermal/core: Remove DROP_FULL and RAISE_FULL")
removes support for THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_FULL/DROP_FULL but leaves the
comment unchanged.
Delete the obsolte comment about THERMAL_TREND_RAISE_FULL/DROP_FULL.
Fixes: 4102c4042a33 ("thermal/core: Remove DROP_FULL and RAISE_FULL")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The traces are exported but only local to the thermal core code. On
the other side, the traces take the thermal zone device structure as
argument, thus they have to rely on the exported thermal.h header
file. As we want to move the structure to the private thermal core
header, first we have to relocate those traces to the same place as
many drivers do.
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Suggested-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230307133735.90772-2-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
The governors are using the ops->get_trip_* functions, Replace these
calls with thermal_zone_get_trip().
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> # IPA
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221003092602.1323944-5-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
All the governors throttling ops are taking/releasing the lock at the
beginning and the end of the function.
We can move the mutex to the throttling call site instead.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220805153834.2510142-4-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
The thermal zone lock is taken in the different places in the
throttling path.
At the first glance it does not hurt to move them at the beginning and
the end of the 'throttle' function. That will allow a consolidation of
the lock in the next following changes.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220805153834.2510142-3-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
The trends DROP_FULL and RAISE_FULL are not used and were never used
in the past AFAICT. Remove these conditions as they seems to not be
handled anywhere.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220629151012.3115773-2-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
The code is actually clampling the next cooling device state using the
lowest and highest states of the thermal instance.
That code can be replaced by the clamp() macro which does exactly the
same. It results in a simpler routine to read.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220629151012.3115773-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
The code was reorganized in 2012 with the commit 0c01ebbfd3caf1.
The main change is a loop on the trip points array and a unconditional
call to the throttle() ops of the governors for each of them even if
the trip temperature is not reached yet.
With this change, the 'forced_passive' is no longer checked in the
thermal_zone_device_update() function but in the step wise governor's
throttle() callback.
As the force_passive does no belong to the trip point array, the
thermal_zone_device_update() can not compare with the specified
passive temperature, thus does not detect the passive limit has been
crossed. Consequently, throttle() is never called and the
'forced_passive' branch is unreached.
In addition, the default processor cooling device is not automatically
bound to the thermal zone if there is not passive trip point, thus the
'forced_passive' can not operate.
If there is an active trip point, then the throttle function will be
called to mitigate at this temperature and the 'forced_passive' will
override the mitigation of the active trip point in this case but with
the default cooling device bound to the thermal zone, so usually a
fan, and that is not a passive cooling effect.
Given the regression exists since more than 8 years, nobody complained
and at the best of my knowledge there is no bug open in
https://bugzilla.kernel.org, it is reasonable to say it is unused.
Remove the 'forced_passive' related code.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201214233811.485669-1-daniel.lezcano@linaro.org
