IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
CPUFreq drivers that use clock frameworks interface,i.e. clk_get_rate(),
to get CPUs clk rate, have similar sort of code used in most of them.
This patch adds a generic ->get() which will do the same thing for them.
All those drivers are required to now is to set .get to cpufreq_generic_get()
and set their clk pointer in policy->clk during ->init().
Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Sometimes boot loaders set CPU frequency to a value outside of frequency table
present with cpufreq core. In such cases CPU might be unstable if it has to run
on that frequency for long duration of time and so its better to set it to a
frequency which is specified in frequency table.
On some systems we can't really say what frequency we're running at the moment
and so for these we shouldn't check if we are running at a frequency present in
frequency table. And so we really can't force this for all the cpufreq drivers.
Hence we are created another flag here: CPUFREQ_NEED_INITIAL_FREQ_CHECK that
will be marked by platforms which want to go for this check at boot time.
Initially this is done for all ARM platforms but others may follow if required.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
freqs.old = old freq...
freqs.new = new freq...
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
/* Change rate here */
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
There are few special cases though, like exynos5440, which doesn't do everything
on the call to ->target_index() routine and call some kind of bottom halves for
doing this work, work/tasklet/etc..
They may continue doing notification from their own code as flag:
CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION is already set for them.
All drivers are also modified in this patch to avoid breaking 'git bisect', as
double notification would happen otherwise.
Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Tested-by: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Currently, the prototype of cpufreq_drivers target routines is:
int target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int target_freq,
unsigned int relation);
And most of the drivers call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() to get a valid
index of their frequency table which is closest to the target_freq. And they
don't use target_freq and relation after that.
So, it makes sense to just do this work in cpufreq core before calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_target() and simply pass index instead. But this can be
done only with drivers which expose their frequency table with cpufreq core. For
others we need to stick with the old prototype of target() until those drivers
are converted to expose frequency tables.
This patch implements the new light weight prototype for target_index() routine.
It looks like this:
int target_index(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index);
CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this
routine and pass index to it. Because CPUFreq core now requires to call routines
present in freq_table.c CONFIG_CPU_FREQ_TABLE must be enabled all the time.
This also marks target() interface as deprecated. So, that new drivers avoid
using it. And Documentation is updated accordingly.
It also converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight
.target_index() routine for many driver.
Acked-by: Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@samfundet.no>
Acked-by: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Acked-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Tested-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Use generic cpufreq_generic_init() routine instead of replicating the same code
here.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.
Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Most of the CPUFreq drivers do similar things in .exit() and .verify() routines
and .attr. So its better if we have generic routines for them which can be used
by cpufreq drivers then.
This patch uses these generic routines in the s5pv210 driver.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr().
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
policy->cpus contains all online cpus that have single shared clock line. And
their frequencies are always updated together.
Many SMP system's cpufreq drivers take care of this in individual drivers but
the best place for this code is in cpufreq core.
This patch modifies cpufreq_notify_transition() to notify frequency change for
all cpus in policy->cpus and hence updates all users of this API.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Tested-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
The following symbols are needlessly defined global:
s5pv210_verify_speed
s5pv210_getspeed
Make them static.
Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
When system reboot, the CPUFREQ level should be 800MHz to prevent
system lockup.
Signed-off-by: Huisung Kang <hs1218.kang@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Voltage scaling accesses the MAX8998 regulators over bit-banged I2C
with lots of udelays. In the case of decreasing CPU speed, the
number of loops per us for udelay needs to be adjusted prior to
decreasing voltage to avoid delaying for up to 10X too long.
Signed-off-by: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Without this lock the call to change the frequency for suspend could
switch to a new frequency while another thread was still changing the
cpu voltage.
Signed-off-by: Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@android.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Minimum 800MHz is needed to enter/exit suspend mode due to voltage mismatch.
Signed-off-by: Huisung Kang <hs1218.kang@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Relation has an additional symantics other than standard.
s5pv310_target funtion have below additional relation.
- DISABLE_FURTHER_CPUFREQ : disable further access to target
- ENABLE_FURTHER_CPUFRER : enable access to target
Signed-off-by: Huisung Kang <hs1218.kang@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
The successive calls to clk_get each call clk_put in the case of failure,
but this is not done for subsequent error handling code. The calls to
clk_get are moved to the end of the function, and appropriate gotos are
added.
A simplified version of the semantic match that finds this problem is as
follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/)
// <smpl>
@r exists@
expression e1,e2;
statement S;
@@
e1 = clk_get@p1(...);
... when != e1 = e2
when != clk_put(e1)
when any
if (...) { ... when != clk_put(e1)
when != if (...) { ... clk_put(e1) ... }
* return@p3 ...;
} else S
// </smpl>
Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
According to discussion of the ARM arch subsystem migration,
ARM cpufreq drivers move to drivers/cpufreq. So this patch
adds Kconfig.arm for ARM like x86 and adds Samsung S5PV210
and EXYNOS4210 cpufreq driver compile in there.
As a note, otherw will be moved.
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
