5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Xin Long
176ef96c19 sctp: call gso_reset_checksum when computing checksum in sctp_gso_segment
[ Upstream commit fc228abc2347e106a44c0e9b29ab70b712c4ca51 ]

Jianlin reported a panic when running sctp gso over gre over vlan device:

  [   84.772930] RIP: 0010:do_csum+0x6d/0x170
  [   84.790605] Call Trace:
  [   84.791054]  csum_partial+0xd/0x20
  [   84.791657]  gre_gso_segment+0x2c3/0x390
  [   84.792364]  inet_gso_segment+0x161/0x3e0
  [   84.793071]  skb_mac_gso_segment+0xb8/0x120
  [   84.793846]  __skb_gso_segment+0x7e/0x180
  [   84.794581]  validate_xmit_skb+0x141/0x2e0
  [   84.795297]  __dev_queue_xmit+0x258/0x8f0
  [   84.795949]  ? eth_header+0x26/0xc0
  [   84.796581]  ip_finish_output2+0x196/0x430
  [   84.797295]  ? skb_gso_validate_network_len+0x11/0x80
  [   84.798183]  ? ip_finish_output+0x169/0x270
  [   84.798875]  ip_output+0x6c/0xe0
  [   84.799413]  ? ip_append_data.part.50+0xc0/0xc0
  [   84.800145]  iptunnel_xmit+0x144/0x1c0
  [   84.800814]  ip_tunnel_xmit+0x62d/0x930 [ip_tunnel]
  [   84.801699]  gre_tap_xmit+0xac/0xf0 [ip_gre]
  [   84.802395]  dev_hard_start_xmit+0xa5/0x210
  [   84.803086]  sch_direct_xmit+0x14f/0x340
  [   84.803733]  __dev_queue_xmit+0x799/0x8f0
  [   84.804472]  ip_finish_output2+0x2e0/0x430
  [   84.805255]  ? skb_gso_validate_network_len+0x11/0x80
  [   84.806154]  ip_output+0x6c/0xe0
  [   84.806721]  ? ip_append_data.part.50+0xc0/0xc0
  [   84.807516]  sctp_packet_transmit+0x716/0xa10 [sctp]
  [   84.808337]  sctp_outq_flush+0xd7/0x880 [sctp]

It was caused by SKB_GSO_CB(skb)->csum_start not set in sctp_gso_segment.
sctp_gso_segment() calls skb_segment() with 'feature | NETIF_F_HW_CSUM',
which causes SKB_GSO_CB(skb)->csum_start not to be set in skb_segment().

For TCP/UDP, when feature supports HW_CSUM, CHECKSUM_PARTIAL will be set
and gso_reset_checksum will be called to set SKB_GSO_CB(skb)->csum_start.

So SCTP should do the same as TCP/UDP, to call gso_reset_checksum() when
computing checksum in sctp_gso_segment.

Reported-by: Jianlin Shi <jishi@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Acked-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2019-02-27 10:07:01 +01:00
Willem de Bruijn
3110e2134c gso: validate gso_type in GSO handlers
[ Upstream commit 121d57af308d0cf943f08f4738d24d3966c38cd9 ]

Validate gso_type during segmentation as SKB_GSO_DODGY sources
may pass packets where the gso_type does not match the contents.

Syzkaller was able to enter the SCTP gso handler with a packet of
gso_type SKB_GSO_TCPV4.

On entry of transport layer gso handlers, verify that the gso_type
matches the transport protocol.

Fixes: 90017accff61 ("sctp: Add GSO support")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<001a1137452496ffc305617e5fe0@google.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+fee64147a25aecd48055@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2018-01-31 12:55:55 +01:00
Xin Long
bf812fe926 sctp: sctp gso should set feature with NETIF_F_SG when calling skb_segment
[ Upstream commit 5207f3996338e1db71363fe381c81aaf1e54e4e3 ]

Now sctp gso puts segments into skb's frag_list, then processes these
segments in skb_segment. But skb_segment handles them only when gs is
enabled, as it's in the same branch with skb's frags.

Although almost all the NICs support sg other than some old ones, but
since commit 1e16aa3ddf86 ("net: gso: use feature flag argument in all
protocol gso handlers"), features &= skb->dev->hw_enc_features, and
xfrm_output_gso call skb_segment with features = 0, which means sctp
gso would call skb_segment with sg = 0, and skb_segment would not work
as expected.

This patch is to fix it by setting features param with NETIF_F_SG when
calling skb_segment so that it can go the right branch to process the
skb's frag_list.

Signed-off-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@verizon.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-06-17 06:41:56 +02:00
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
c5c4e45c4b sctp: fix GSO for IPv6
commit 90017accff61 ("sctp: Add GSO support") didn't register SCTP GSO
offloading for IPv6 and yet didn't put any restrictions on generating
GSO packets while in IPv6, which causes all IPv6 GSO'ed packets to be
silently dropped.

The fix is to properly register the offload this time.

Fixes: 90017accff61 ("sctp: Add GSO support")
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-07-16 22:02:09 -07:00
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
90017accff sctp: Add GSO support
SCTP has this pecualiarity that its packets cannot be just segmented to
(P)MTU. Its chunks must be contained in IP segments, padding respected.
So we can't just generate a big skb, set gso_size to the fragmentation
point and deliver it to IP layer.

This patch takes a different approach. SCTP will now build a skb as it
would be if it was received using GRO. That is, there will be a cover
skb with protocol headers and children ones containing the actual
segments, already segmented to a way that respects SCTP RFCs.

With that, we can tell skb_segment() to just split based on frag_list,
trusting its sizes are already in accordance.

This way SCTP can benefit from GSO and instead of passing several
packets through the stack, it can pass a single large packet.

v2:
- Added support for receiving GSO frames, as requested by Dave Miller.
- Clear skb->cb if packet is GSO (otherwise it's not used by SCTP)
- Added heuristics similar to what we have in TCP for not generating
  single GSO packets that fills cwnd.
v3:
- consider sctphdr size in skb_gso_transport_seglen()
- rebased due to 5c7cdf339af5 ("gso: Remove arbitrary checks for
  unsupported GSO")

Signed-off-by: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Xin Long <lucien.xin@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
2016-06-03 19:37:21 -04:00