IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
[ Upstream commit b3b2177a2d795e35dc11597b2609eb1e7e57e570 ]
Syzbot reports a possible recursive lock in [1].
This happens due to missing lock nesting information. From the logs, we
see that a call to hfs_fill_super is made to mount the hfs filesystem.
While searching for the root inode, the lock on the catalog btree is
grabbed. Then, when the parent of the root isn't found, a call to
__hfs_bnode_create is made to create the parent of the root. This
eventually leads to a call to hfs_ext_read_extent which grabs a lock on
the extents btree.
Since the order of locking is catalog btree -> extents btree, this lock
hierarchy does not lead to a deadlock.
To tell lockdep that this locking is safe, we add nesting notation to
distinguish between catalog btrees, extents btrees, and attributes
btrees (for HFS+). This has already been done in hfsplus.
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=f007ef1d7a31a469e3be7aeb0fde0769b18585db [1]
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210701030756.58760-4-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi <desmondcheongzx@gmail.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+b718ec84a87b7e73ade4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: syzbot+b718ec84a87b7e73ade4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reviewed-by: Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Cc: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 54640c7502e5ed41fbf4eedd499e85f9acc9698f ]
Inserting a new record in a btree may require splitting several of its
nodes. If we hit ENOSPC halfway through, the new nodes will be left
orphaned and their records will be lost. This could mean lost inodes or
extents.
Henceforth, check the available disk space before making any changes.
This still leaves the potential problem of corruption on ENOMEM.
There is no need to reserve space before deleting a catalog record, as we
do for hfsplus. This difference is because hfs index nodes have fixed
length keys.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ab5fc8a7d5ffccfd5f27b1cf2cb4ceb6c110da74.1536269131.git.ernesto.mnd.fernandez@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Ernesto A. Fernández <ernesto.mnd.fernandez@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
tree_lock is used as mutex so make it a mutex.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
LKML-Reference: <20100907125056.416332114@linutronix.de>
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.
Let it rip!
