IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
[ Upstream commit 6c02757c936063f0631b4e43fe156f8c8f1f351f ]
There's issue when do io test:
WARN: soft lockup - CPU#45 stuck for 11s! [jbd2/dm-2-8:4170]
CPU: 45 PID: 4170 Comm: jbd2/dm-2-8 Kdump: loaded Tainted: G OE
Call trace:
dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1a0
show_stack+0x24/0x30
dump_stack+0xb0/0x100
watchdog_timer_fn+0x254/0x3f8
__hrtimer_run_queues+0x11c/0x380
hrtimer_interrupt+0xfc/0x2f8
arch_timer_handler_phys+0x38/0x58
handle_percpu_devid_irq+0x90/0x248
generic_handle_irq+0x3c/0x58
__handle_domain_irq+0x68/0xc0
gic_handle_irq+0x90/0x320
el1_irq+0xcc/0x180
queued_spin_lock_slowpath+0x1d8/0x320
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction+0x10f4/0x1c78 [jbd2]
kjournald2+0xec/0x2f0 [jbd2]
kthread+0x134/0x138
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
Analyzed informations from vmcore as follows:
(1) There are about 5k+ jbd2_inode in 'commit_transaction->t_inode_list';
(2) Now is processing the 855th jbd2_inode;
(3) JBD2 task has TIF_NEED_RESCHED flag;
(4) There's no pags in address_space around the 855th jbd2_inode;
(5) There are some process is doing drop caches;
(6) Mounted with 'nodioread_nolock' option;
(7) 128 CPUs;
According to informations from vmcore we know 'journal->j_list_lock' spin lock
competition is fierce. So journal_finish_inode_data_buffers() maybe process
slowly. Theoretically, there is scheduling point in the filemap_fdatawait_range_keep_errors().
However, if inode's address_space has no pages which taged with PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK,
will not call cond_resched(). So may lead to soft lockup.
journal_finish_inode_data_buffers
filemap_fdatawait_range_keep_errors
__filemap_fdatawait_range
while (index <= end)
nr_pages = pagevec_lookup_range_tag(&pvec, mapping, &index, end, PAGECACHE_TAG_WRITEBACK);
if (!nr_pages)
break; --> If 'nr_pages' is equal zero will break, then will not call cond_resched()
for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++)
wait_on_page_writeback(page);
cond_resched();
To solve above issue, add scheduling point in the journal_finish_inode_data_buffers();
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231211112544.3879780-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 85559227211020b270728104c3b89918f7af27ac ]
The write_flags print in the trace of jbd2_write_superblock() is not
real, so move the modification before the trace.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231129114740.2686201-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 61187fce8600e8ef90e601be84f9d0f3222c1206 upstream.
JBD2 makes sure journal data is fallen on fs device by sync_blockdev(),
however, other process could intercept the EIO information from bdev's
mapping, which leads journal recovering successful even EIO occurs during
data written back to fs device.
We found this problem in our product, iscsi + multipath is chosen for block
device of ext4. Unstable network may trigger kpartx to rescan partitions in
device mapper layer. Detailed process is shown as following:
mount kpartx irq
jbd2_journal_recover
do_one_pass
memcpy(nbh->b_data, obh->b_data) // copy data to fs dev from journal
mark_buffer_dirty // mark bh dirty
vfs_read
generic_file_read_iter // dio
filemap_write_and_wait_range
__filemap_fdatawrite_range
do_writepages
block_write_full_folio
submit_bh_wbc
>> EIO occurs in disk <<
end_buffer_async_write
mark_buffer_write_io_error
mapping_set_error
set_bit(AS_EIO, &mapping->flags) // set!
filemap_check_errors
test_and_clear_bit(AS_EIO, &mapping->flags) // clear!
err2 = sync_blockdev
filemap_write_and_wait
filemap_check_errors
test_and_clear_bit(AS_EIO, &mapping->flags) // false
err2 = 0
Filesystem is mounted successfully even data from journal is failed written
into disk, and ext4/ocfs2 could become corrupted.
Fix it by comparing the wb_err state in fs block device before recovering
and after recovering.
A reproducer can be found in the kernel bugzilla referenced below.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217888
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230919012525.1783108-1-chengzhihao1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 2dfba3bb40ad8536b9fa802364f2d40da31aa88e ]
We got a filesystem inconsistency issue below while running generic/475
I/O failure pressure test with fast_commit feature enabled.
Symlink /p3/d3/d1c/d6c/dd6/dce/l101 (inode #132605) is invalid.
If fast_commit feature is enabled, a special fast_commit journal area is
appended to the end of the normal journal area. The journal->j_last
point to the first unused block behind the normal journal area instead
of the whole log area, and the journal->j_fc_last point to the first
unused block behind the fast_commit journal area. While doing journal
recovery, do_one_pass(PASS_SCAN) should first scan the normal journal
area and turn around to the first block once it meet journal->j_last,
but the wrap() macro misuse the journal->j_fc_last, so the recovering
could not read the next magic block (commit block perhaps) and would end
early mistakenly and missing tN and every transaction after it in the
following example. Finally, it could lead to filesystem inconsistency.
| normal journal area | fast commit area |
+-------------------------------------------------+------------------+
| tN(rere) | tN+1 |~| tN-x |...| tN-1 | tN(front) | .... |
+-------------------------------------------------+------------------+
/ / /
start journal->j_last journal->j_fc_last
This patch fix it by use the correct ending journal->j_last.
Fixes: 5b849b5f96b4 ("jbd2: fast commit recovery path")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reported-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-ext4/20230613043120.GB1584772@mit.edu/
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230626073322.3956567-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit cb3b3bf22cf33707d684e74207908ba0ef3b6467 ]
The name of jbd_debug() is confusing as all functions inside jbd2 have
jbd2_ prefix. Rename jbd_debug() to jbd2_debug(). No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220608112355.4397-2-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 2dfba3bb40ad ("jbd2: correct the end of the journal recovery scan range")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit f7f497cb702462e8505ff3d8d4e7722ad95626a1 ]
This patch kills t_handle_lock transaction spinlock completely from
jbd2.
To explain the reasoning, currently there were three sites at which
this spinlock was used.
1. jbd2_journal_wait_updates()
a. Based on careful code review it can be seen that, we don't need this
lock here. This is since we wait for any currently ongoing updates
based on a atomic variable t_updates. And we anyway don't take any
t_handle_lock while in stop_this_handle().
i.e.
write_lock(&journal->j_state_lock()
jbd2_journal_wait_updates() stop_this_handle()
while (atomic_read(txn->t_updates) { |
DEFINE_WAIT(wait); |
prepare_to_wait(); |
if (atomic_read(txn->t_updates) if (atomic_dec_and_test(txn->t_updates))
write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
schedule(); wake_up()
write_lock(&journal->j_state_lock);
finish_wait();
}
txn->t_state = T_COMMIT
write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
b. Also note that between atomic_inc(&txn->t_updates) in
start_this_handle() and jbd2_journal_wait_updates(), the
synchronization happens via read_lock(journal->j_state_lock) in
start_this_handle();
2. jbd2_journal_extend()
a. jbd2_journal_extend() is called with the handle of each process from
task_struct. So no lock required in updating member fields of handle_t
b. For member fields of h_transaction, all updates happens only via
atomic APIs (which is also within read_lock()).
So, no need of this transaction spinlock.
3. update_t_max_wait()
Based on Jan suggestion, this can be carefully removed using atomic
cmpxchg API.
Note that there can be several processes which are waiting for a new
transaction to be allocated and started. For doing this only one
process will succeed in taking write_lock() and allocating a new txn.
After that all of the process will be updating the t_max_wait (max
transaction wait time). This can be done via below method w/o taking
any locks using atomic cmpxchg.
For more details refer [1]
new = get_new_val();
old = READ_ONCE(ptr->max_val);
while (old < new)
old = cmpxchg(&ptr->max_val, old, new);
[1]: https://lwn.net/Articles/849237/
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/d89e599658b4a1f3893a48c6feded200073037fc.1644992076.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 2dfba3bb40ad ("jbd2: correct the end of the journal recovery scan range")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit cc16eecae687912238ee6efbff71ad31e2bc414e ]
jbd2_journal_wait_updates() is called with j_state_lock held. But if
there is a commit in progress, then this transaction might get committed
and freed via jbd2_journal_commit_transaction() ->
jbd2_journal_free_transaction(), when we release j_state_lock.
So check for journal->j_running_transaction everytime we release and
acquire j_state_lock to avoid use-after-free issue.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/948c2fed518ae739db6a8f7f83f1d58b504f87d0.1644497105.git.ritesh.list@gmail.com
Fixes: 4f98186848707f53 ("jbd2: refactor wait logic for transaction updates into a common function")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+afa2ca5171d93e44b348@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 2dfba3bb40ad ("jbd2: correct the end of the journal recovery scan range")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 4f98186848707f530669238d90e0562d92a78aab ]
No functionality change as such in this patch. This only refactors the
common piece of code which waits for t_updates to finish into a common
function named as jbd2_journal_wait_updates(journal_t *)
Signed-off-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/8c564f70f4b2591171677a2a74fccb22a7b6c3a4.1642416995.git.riteshh@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 2dfba3bb40ad ("jbd2: correct the end of the journal recovery scan range")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 590a809ff743e7bd890ba5fb36bc38e20a36de53 upstream.
Following process will corrupt ext4 image:
Step 1:
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
__jbd2_journal_insert_checkpoint(jh, commit_transaction)
// Put jh into trans1->t_checkpoint_list
journal->j_checkpoint_transactions = commit_transaction
// Put trans1 into journal->j_checkpoint_transactions
Step 2:
do_get_write_access
test_clear_buffer_dirty(bh) // clear buffer dirty，set jbd dirty
__jbd2_journal_file_buffer(jh, transaction) // jh belongs to trans2
Step 3:
drop_cache
journal_shrink_one_cp_list
jbd2_journal_try_remove_checkpoint
if (!trylock_buffer(bh)) // lock bh, true
if (buffer_dirty(bh)) // buffer is not dirty
__jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh)
// remove jh from trans1->t_checkpoint_list
Step 4:
jbd2_log_do_checkpoint
trans1 = journal->j_checkpoint_transactions
// jh is not in trans1->t_checkpoint_list
jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail(journal) // trans1 is done
Step 5: Power cut, trans2 is not committed, jh is lost in next mounting.
Fix it by checking 'jh->b_transaction' before remove it from checkpoint.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Fixes: 46f881b5b175 ("jbd2: fix a race when checking checkpoint buffer busy")
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230714025528.564988-3-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 373ac521799d9e97061515aca6ec6621789036bb upstream.
journal_clean_one_cp_list() has been merged into
journal_shrink_one_cp_list(), but do chekpoint buffer cleanup from the
committing process is just a best effort, it should stop scan once it
meet a busy buffer, or else it will cause a lot of invalid buffer scan
and checks. We catch a performance regression when doing fs_mark tests
below.
Test cmd:
./fs_mark -d scratch -s 1024 -n 10000 -t 1 -D 100 -N 100
Before merging checkpoint buffer cleanup:
FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
95 10000 1024 8304.9 49033
After merging checkpoint buffer cleanup:
FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
95 10000 1024 7649.0 50012
FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
95 10000 1024 2107.1 50871
After merging checkpoint buffer cleanup, the total loop count in
journal_shrink_one_cp_list() could be up to 6,261,600+ (50,000+ ~
100,000+ in general), most of them are invalid. This patch fix it
through passing 'shrink_type' into journal_shrink_one_cp_list() and add
a new 'SHRINK_BUSY_STOP' to indicate it should stop once meet a busy
buffer. After fix, the loop count descending back to 10,000+.
After this fix:
FSUse% Count Size Files/sec App Overhead
95 10000 1024 8558.4 49109
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Fixes: b98dba273a0e ("jbd2: remove journal_clean_one_cp_list()")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230714025528.564988-2-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 46f881b5b1758dc4a35fba4a643c10717d0cf427 ]
Before removing checkpoint buffer from the t_checkpoint_list, we have to
check both BH_Dirty and BH_Lock bits together to distinguish buffers
have not been or were being written back. But __cp_buffer_busy() checks
them separately, it first check lock state and then check dirty, the
window between these two checks could be raced by writing back
procedure, which locks buffer and clears buffer dirty before I/O
completes. So it cannot guarantee checkpointing buffers been written
back to disk if some error happens later. Finally, it may clean
checkpoint transactions and lead to inconsistent filesystem.
jbd2_journal_forget() and __journal_try_to_free_buffer() also have the
same problem (journal_unmap_buffer() escape from this issue since it's
running under the buffer lock), so fix them through introducing a new
helper to try holding the buffer lock and remove really clean buffer.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217490
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606135928.434610-6-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit b98dba273a0e47dbfade89c9af73c5b012a4eabb ]
journal_clean_one_cp_list() and journal_shrink_one_cp_list() are almost
the same, so merge them into journal_shrink_one_cp_list(), remove the
nr_to_scan parameter, always scan and try to free the whole checkpoint
list.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606135928.434610-4-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 46f881b5b175 ("jbd2: fix a race when checking checkpoint buffer busy")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit be22255360f80d3af789daad00025171a65424a5 ]
Since t_checkpoint_io_list was stop using in jbd2_log_do_checkpoint()
now, it's time to remove the whole t_checkpoint_io_list logic.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606135928.434610-3-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Stable-dep-of: 46f881b5b175 ("jbd2: fix a race when checking checkpoint buffer busy")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit e34c8dd238d0c9368b746480f313055f5bab5040 ]
Following process,
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction
// there are several dirty buffer heads in transaction->t_checkpoint_list
P1 wb_workfn
jbd2_log_do_checkpoint
if (buffer_locked(bh)) // false
__block_write_full_page
trylock_buffer(bh)
test_clear_buffer_dirty(bh)
if (!buffer_dirty(bh))
__jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh)
if (buffer_write_io_error(bh)) // false
>> bh IO error occurs <<
jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail
__jbd2_update_log_tail
jbd2_write_superblock
// The bh won't be replayed in next mount.
, which could corrupt the ext4 image, fetch a reproducer in [Link].
Since writeback process clears buffer dirty after locking buffer head,
we can fix it by try locking buffer and check dirtiness while buffer is
locked, the buffer head can be removed if it is neither dirty nor locked.
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=217490
Fixes: 470decc613ab ("[PATCH] jbd2: initial copy of files from jbd")
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606135928.434610-5-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit c2d6fd9d6f35079f1669f0100f05b46708c74b7f upstream.
There is a long-standing metadata corruption issue that happens from
time to time, but it's very difficult to reproduce and analyse, benefit
from the JBD2_CYCLE_RECORD option, we found out that the problem is the
checkpointing process miss to write out some buffers which are raced by
another do_get_write_access(). Looks below for detail.
jbd2_log_do_checkpoint() //transaction X
//buffer A is dirty and not belones to any transaction
__buffer_relink_io() //move it to the IO list
__flush_batch()
write_dirty_buffer()
do_get_write_access()
clear_buffer_dirty
__jbd2_journal_file_buffer()
//add buffer A to a new transaction Y
lock_buffer(bh)
//doesn't write out
__jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint()
//finish checkpoint except buffer A
//filesystem corrupt if the new transaction Y isn't fully write out.
Due to the t_checkpoint_list walking loop in jbd2_log_do_checkpoint()
have already handles waiting for buffers under IO and re-added new
transaction to complete commit, and it also removing cleaned buffers,
this makes sure the list will eventually get empty. So it's fine to
leave buffers on the t_checkpoint_list while flushing out and completely
stop using the t_checkpoint_io_list.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Tested-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230606135928.434610-2-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit bd159398a2d2234de07d310132865706964aaaa7 ]
When invalidating buffers under the partial tail page,
jbd2_journal_invalidate_folio() returns -EBUSY if the buffer is part of
the committing transaction as we cannot safely modify buffer state.
However if the buffer is already invalidated (due to previous
invalidation attempts from ext4_wait_for_tail_page_commit()), there's
nothing to do and there's no point in returning -EBUSY. This fixes
occasional warnings from ext4_journalled_invalidate_folio() triggered by
generic/051 fstest when blocksize < pagesize.
Fixes: 53e872681fed ("ext4: fix deadlock in journal_unmap_buffer()")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230329154950.19720-1-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 2729cfdcfa1cc49bef5a90d046fa4a187fdfcc69 upstream.
This patch drops all calls to ext4_fc_start_update() and
ext4_fc_stop_update(). To ensure that there are no ongoing journal
updates during fast commit, we also make jbd2_fc_begin_commit() lock
journal for updates. This way we don't have to maintain two different
transaction start stop APIs for fast commit and full commit. This
patch doesn't remove the functions altogether since in future we want
to have inode level locking for fast commits.
Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211223202140.2061101-2-harshads@google.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit e6b9bd7290d334451ce054e98e752abc055e0034 upstream.
Following process will make data lost and could lead to a filesystem
corrupted problem:
1. jh(bh) is inserted into T1->t_checkpoint_list, bh is dirty, and
jh->b_transaction = NULL
2. T1 is added into journal->j_checkpoint_transactions.
3. Get bh prepare to write while doing checkpoing:
PA PB
do_get_write_access jbd2_log_do_checkpoint
spin_lock(&jh->b_state_lock)
if (buffer_dirty(bh))
clear_buffer_dirty(bh) // clear buffer dirty
set_buffer_jbddirty(bh)
transaction =
journal->j_checkpoint_transactions
jh = transaction->t_checkpoint_list
if (!buffer_dirty(bh))
__jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint(jh)
// bh won't be flushed
jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail
__jbd2_journal_file_buffer(jh, transaction, BJ_Reserved)
4. Aborting journal/Power-cut before writing latest bh on journal area.
In this way we get a corrupted filesystem with bh's data lost.
Fix it by moving the clearing of buffer_dirty bit just before the call
to __jbd2_journal_file_buffer(), both bit clearing and jh->b_transaction
assignment are under journal->j_list_lock locked, so that
jbd2_log_do_checkpoint() will wait until jh's new transaction fininshed
even bh is currently not dirty. And journal_shrink_one_cp_list() won't
remove jh from checkpoint list if the buffer head is reused in
do_get_write_access().
Fetch a reproducer in [Link].
Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216898
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: zhanchengbin <zhanchengbin1@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230110015327.1181863-1-chengzhihao1@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit dfff66f30f66b9524b661f311bbed8ff3d2ca49f upstream.
In fc_do_one_pass() miss release buffer head after use which will lead
to reference count leak.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220917093805.1782845-1-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 243d1a5d505d0b0460c9af0ad56ed4a56ef0bebd upstream.
In 'jbd2_fc_wait_bufs' use 'bh' after put buffer head reference count
which may lead to use-after-free.
So judge buffer if uptodate before put buffer head reference count.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220914100812.1414768-3-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit e0d5fc7a6d80ac2406c7dfc6bb625201d0250a8a upstream.
As in 'jbd2_fc_wait_bufs' if buffer isn't uptodate, will return -EIO without
update 'journal->j_fc_off'. But 'jbd2_fc_release_bufs' will release buffer head
from ‘j_fc_off - 1’ if 'bh' is NULL will terminal release which will lead to
buffer head buffer head reference count leak.
To solve above issue, update 'journal->j_fc_off' before return -EIO.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ye Bin <yebin10@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220914100812.1414768-2-yebin10@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 34fc8768ec6089565d6d73bad26724083cecf7bd upstream.
LIFO wakeup order is unfair and sometimes leads to a journal
user not being able to get a journal handle for hundreds of
transactions in a row.
FIFO wakeup can make things more fair.
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Alexey Lyashkov <alexey.lyashkov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220907165959.1137482-1-alexey.lyashkov@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit a89573ce4ad32f19f43ec669771726817e185be0 ]
We catch an assert problem in jbd2_journal_commit_transaction() when
doing fsstress and request falut injection tests. The problem is
happened in a race condition between jbd2_journal_commit_transaction()
and ext4_end_io_end(). Firstly, ext4_writepages() writeback dirty pages
and start reserved handle, and then the journal was aborted due to some
previous metadata IO error, jbd2_journal_abort() start to commit current
running transaction, the committing procedure could be raced by
ext4_end_io_end() and lead to subtract j_reserved_credits twice from
commit_transaction->t_outstanding_credits, finally the
t_outstanding_credits is mistakenly smaller than t_nr_buffers and
trigger assert.
kjournald2 kworker
jbd2_journal_commit_transaction()
write_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
atomic_sub(j_reserved_credits, t_outstanding_credits); //sub once
jbd2_journal_start_reserved()
start_this_handle() //detect aborted journal
jbd2_journal_free_reserved() //get running transaction
read_lock(&journal->j_state_lock)
__jbd2_journal_unreserve_handle()
atomic_sub(j_reserved_credits, t_outstanding_credits);
//sub again
read_unlock(&journal->j_state_lock);
journal->j_running_transaction = NULL;
J_ASSERT(t_nr_buffers <= t_outstanding_credits) //bomb!!!
Fix this issue by using journal->j_state_lock to protect the subtraction
in jbd2_journal_commit_transaction().
Fixes: 96f1e0974575 ("jbd2: avoid long hold times of j_state_lock while committing a transaction")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220611130426.2013258-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit e85c81ba8859a4c839bcd69c5d83b32954133a5b ]
For the follow scenario:
1. jbd start commit transaction n
2. task A get new handle for transaction n+1
3. task A do some ineligible actions and mark FC_INELIGIBLE
4. jbd complete transaction n and clean FC_INELIGIBLE
5. task A call fsync
In this case fast commit will not fallback to full commit and
transaction n+1 also not handled by jbd.
Make ext4_fc_mark_ineligible() also record transaction tid for
latest ineligible case, when call ext4_fc_cleanup() check
current transaction tid, if small than latest ineligible tid
do not clear the EXT4_MF_FC_INELIGIBLE.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reported-by: Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Xin Yin <yinxin.x@bytedance.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220117093655.35160-2-yinxin.x@bytedance.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 4cd1103d8c66b2cdb7e64385c274edb0ac5e8887 upstream.
Patch series "ocfs2: fix a deadlock case".
This fixes a deadlock case in ocfs2. We firstly export jbd2 symbols
jbd2_journal_[grab|put]_journal_head as preparation and later use them
in ocfs2 insread of jbd_[lock|unlock]_bh_journal_head to fix the
deadlock.
This patch (of 2):
This exports symbols jbd2_journal_[grab|put]_journal_head, which will be
used outside modules, e.g. ocfs2.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20220121071205.100648-2-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com>
Cc: Changwei Ge <gechangwei@live.cn>
Cc: Gang He <ghe@suse.com>
Cc: Jun Piao <piaojun@huawei.com>
Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>
Cc: Gautham Ananthakrishna <gautham.ananthakrishna@oracle.com>
Cc: Saeed Mirzamohammadi <saeed.mirzamohammadi@oracle.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
JBD2 layer support triggers which are called when journaling layer moves
buffer to a certain state. We can use the frozen trigger, which gets
called when buffer data is frozen and about to be written out to the
journal, to compute block checksums for some buffer types (similarly as
does ocfs2). This avoids unnecessary repeated recomputation of the
checksum (at the cost of larger window where memory corruption won't be
caught by checksumming) and is even necessary when there are
unsynchronized updaters of the checksummed data.
So add superblock and journal trigger type arguments to
ext4_journal_get_write_access() and ext4_journal_get_create_access() so
that frozen triggers can be set accordingly. Also add inode argument to
ext4_walk_page_buffers() and all the callbacks used with that function
for the same purpose. This patch is mostly only a change of prototype of
the above mentioned functions and a few small helpers. Real checksumming
will come later.
Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210816095713.16537-1-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Fix a signed vs unsigned and a void * pointer arithmetic warning.
This cleanup is also in e2fsprogs commit aec460db9a93 ("e2fsck: clean
up two gcc -Wall warnings in recovery.c").
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Remove unused variable store which was never used.
This fix is also in e2fsprogs commit 99a2294f85f0 ("e2fsck: value
stored to err is never read").
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
This commit applies the e2fsck/recovery.c portions of commit
1e0c8ca7c08a ("e2fsck: fix portability problems caused by unaligned
accesses) from the e2fsprogs git tree.
The on-disk format for the ext4 journal can have unaigned 32-bit
integers. This can happen when replaying a journal using a obsolete
checksum format (which was never popularly used, since the v3 format
replaced v2 while the metadata checksum feature was being stablized).
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The function jbd2_journal_unregister_shrinker() was getting called
twice when the file system was getting unmounted. On Power and ARM
platforms this was causing kernel crash when unmounting the file
system, when a percpu_counter was destroyed twice.
Fix this by removing jbd2_journal_[un]register_shrinker() functions,
and inlining the shrinker setup and teardown into
journal_init_common() and jbd2_journal_destroy(). This means that
ext4 and ocfs2 now no longer need to know about registering and
unregistering jbd2's shrinker.
Also, while we're at it, rename the percpu counter from
j_jh_shrink_count to j_checkpoint_jh_count, since this makes it
clearer what this counter is intended to track.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210705145025.3363130-1-tytso@mit.edu
Fixes: 4ba3fcdde7e3 ("jbd2,ext4: add a shrinker to release checkpointed buffers")
Reported-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Reported-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Sachin Sant <sachinp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Export jbd2_journal_[un]register_shrinker() to fix this error when
ext4 is built as a module:
ERROR: modpost: "jbd2_journal_unregister_shrinker" undefined!
ERROR: modpost: "jbd2_journal_register_shrinker" undefined!
Fixes: 4ba3fcdde7e3 ("jbd2,ext4: add a shrinker to release checkpointed buffers")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210630083638.140218-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Now that __try_to_free_cp_buf() remove checkpointed buffer or transaction
when the buffer is not 'busy', which is only called by
journal_clean_one_cp_list(). This patch simplify this function by remove
__try_to_free_cp_buf() and invoke __cp_buffer_busy() directly.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210610112440.3438139-7-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Current metadata buffer release logic in bdev_try_to_free_page() have
a lot of use-after-free issues when umount filesystem concurrently, and
it is difficult to fix directly because ext4 is the only user of
s_op->bdev_try_to_free_page callback and we may have to add more special
refcount or lock that is only used by ext4 into the common vfs layer,
which is unacceptable.
One better solution is remove the bdev_try_to_free_page callback, but
the real problem is we cannot easily release journal_head on the
checkpointed buffer, so try_to_free_buffers() cannot release buffers and
page under memory pressure, which is more likely to trigger
out-of-memory. So we cannot remove the callback directly before we find
another way to release journal_head.
This patch introduce a shrinker to free journal_head on the checkpointed
transaction. After the journal_head got freed, try_to_free_buffers()
could free buffer properly.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210610112440.3438139-6-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Now that __jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint() can detect buffer io error
and mark journal checkpoint error, then we abort the journal later
before updating log tail to ensure the filesystem works consistently.
So we could remove other redundant buffer io error checkes.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210610112440.3438139-5-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Now that we can be sure the journal is aborted once a buffer has failed
to be written back to disk, we can remove the journal abort logic in
jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers() which was introduced in
commit c044f3d8360d ("jbd2: abort journal if free a async write error
metadata buffer"), because it may cost and propably is not safe.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210610112440.3438139-4-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Although we merged c044f3d8360 ("jbd2: abort journal if free a async
write error metadata buffer"), there is a race between
jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers() and jbd2_journal_destroy(), so the
jbd2_log_do_checkpoint() may still fail to detect the buffer write
io error flag which may lead to filesystem inconsistency.
jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers() ext4_put_super()
jbd2_journal_destroy()
__jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint()
detect buffer write error jbd2_log_do_checkpoint()
jbd2_cleanup_journal_tail()
<--- lead to inconsistency
jbd2_journal_abort()
Fix this issue by introducing a new atomic flag which only have one
JBD2_CHECKPOINT_IO_ERROR bit now, and set it in
__jbd2_journal_remove_checkpoint() when freeing a checkpoint buffer
which has write_io_error flag. Then jbd2_journal_destroy() will detect
this mark and abort the journal to prevent updating log tail.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210610112440.3438139-3-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
The 'out' lable just return the 'ret' value and seems not required, so
remove this label and switch to return appropriate value immediately.
This patch also do some minor cleanup, no logical change.
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210610112440.3438139-2-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
This comments was for jbd2_fc_wait_bufs, not for jbd2_fc_release_bufs.
Remove this misleading comments.
Signed-off-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210608141236.459441-1-yangerkun@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Add a flags argument to jbd2_journal_flush to enable discarding or
zero-filling the journal blocks while flushing the journal.
Signed-off-by: Leah Rumancik <leah.rumancik@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210518151327.130198-1-leah.rumancik@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Using no_printk() for jbd_debug() revealed two warnings:
fs/jbd2/recovery.c: In function 'fc_do_one_pass':
fs/jbd2/recovery.c:256:30: error: format '%d' expects a matching 'int' argument [-Werror=format=]
256 | jbd_debug(3, "Processing fast commit blk with seq %d");
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
fs/ext4/fast_commit.c: In function 'ext4_fc_replay_add_range':
fs/ext4/fast_commit.c:1732:30: error: format '%d' expects argument of type 'int', but argument 2 has type 'long unsigned int' [-Werror=format=]
1732 | jbd_debug(1, "Converting from %d to %d %lld",
The first one was added incorrectly, and was also missing a few newlines
in debug output, and the second one happened when the type of an
argument changed.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Fixes: d556435156b7 ("jbd2: avoid -Wempty-body warnings")
Fixes: 6db074618969 ("ext4: use BIT() macro for BH_** state bits")
Fixes: 5b849b5f96b4 ("jbd2: fast commit recovery path")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210409201211.1866633-1-arnd@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Assertion checks in jbd2_journal_dirty_metadata() are known to be racy
but we don't want to be grabbing locks just for them. We thus recheck
them under b_state_lock only if it looks like they would fail. Annotate
the checks with data_race().
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Reported-by: Hao Sun <sunhao.th@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210406161804.20150-2-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
There is no point in allocating memory for a synchronous flush.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>
Acked-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Add a helper to read number of fast commit blocks from jbd2 superblock
and also rename the JBD2_MIN_FC_BLKS to
JBD2_DEFAULT_FAST_COMMIT_BLOCKS since this constant is just the
default number of fast commit blocks to use in case number of fast
commit blocks isn't set in jbd2 superblock.
Signed-off-by: Harshad Shirwadkar <harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201120202232.2240293-2-harshadshirwadkar@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Kernel-doc markup should use this format:
identifier - description
They should not have any type before that, as otherwise
the parser won't do the right thing.
Also, some identifiers have different names between their
prototypes and the kernel-doc markup.
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/72f5c6628f5f278d67625f60893ffbc2ca28d46e.1605521731.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Add missing __acquires() and __releases() annotations. Also, in an
"this should never happen" WARN_ON check, if it *does* actually
happen, we need to release j_state_lock since this function is always
supposed to release that lock. Otherwise, things will quickly grind
to a halt after the WARN_ON trips.
Fixes: 96f1e0974575 ("jbd2: avoid long hold times of j_state_lock...")
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
