IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
commit 91792bb8089b63b7b780251eb83939348ac58a64 upstream.
Currently we try to guess if a compound request is going to
succeed waiting for credits or not based on the number of
requests in flight. This approach doesn't work correctly
all the time because there may be only one request in
flight which is going to bring multiple credits satisfying
the compound request.
Change the behavior to fail a request only if there are no requests
in flight at all and proceed waiting for credits otherwise.
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 5.1+
Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Reviewed-by: Shyam Prasad N <nspmangalore@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 8d8d1dbefc423d42d626cf5b81aac214870ebaab upstream.
While addressing some warnings generated by -Warray-bounds, I found this
bug that was introduced back in 2017:
CC [M] fs/cifs/smb2pdu.o
fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c: In function ‘SMB2_negotiate’:
fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c:822:16: warning: array subscript 1 is above array bounds
of ‘__le16[1]’ {aka ‘short unsigned int[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
822 | req->Dialects[1] = cpu_to_le16(SMB30_PROT_ID);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c:823:16: warning: array subscript 2 is above array bounds
of ‘__le16[1]’ {aka ‘short unsigned int[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
823 | req->Dialects[2] = cpu_to_le16(SMB302_PROT_ID);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c:824:16: warning: array subscript 3 is above array bounds
of ‘__le16[1]’ {aka ‘short unsigned int[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
824 | req->Dialects[3] = cpu_to_le16(SMB311_PROT_ID);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c:816:16: warning: array subscript 1 is above array bounds
of ‘__le16[1]’ {aka ‘short unsigned int[1]’} [-Warray-bounds]
816 | req->Dialects[1] = cpu_to_le16(SMB302_PROT_ID);
| ~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~
At the time, the size of array _Dialects_ was changed from 1 to 3 in struct
validate_negotiate_info_req, and then in 2019 it was changed from 3 to 4,
but those changes were never made in struct smb2_negotiate_req, which has
led to a 3 and a half years old out-of-bounds bug in function
SMB2_negotiate() (fs/cifs/smb2pdu.c).
Fix this by increasing the size of array _Dialects_ in struct
smb2_negotiate_req to 4.
Fixes: 9764c02fcbad ("SMB3: Add support for multidialect negotiate (SMB2.1 and later)")
Fixes: d5c7076b772a ("smb3: add smb3.1.1 to default dialect list")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 21b200d091826a83aafc95d847139b2b0582f6d1 upstream.
Assuming
- //HOST/a is mounted on /mnt
- //HOST/b is mounted on /mnt/b
On a slow connection, running 'df' and killing it while it's
processing /mnt/b can make cifs_get_inode_info() returns -ERESTARTSYS.
This triggers the following chain of events:
=> the dentry revalidation fail
=> dentry is put and released
=> superblock associated with the dentry is put
=> /mnt/b is unmounted
This patch makes cifs_d_revalidate() return the error instead of 0
(invalid) when cifs_revalidate_dentry() fails, except for ENOENT (file
deleted) and ESTALE (file recreated).
Signed-off-by: Aurelien Aptel <aaptel@suse.com>
Suggested-by: Shyam Prasad N <nspmangalore@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Shyam Prasad N <nspmangalore@gmail.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 5399d52233c47905bbf97dcbaa2d7a9cc31670ba ]
AF_RXRPC sockets use UDP ports in encap mode. This causes socket and dst
from an incoming packet to get stolen and attached to the UDP socket from
whence it is leaked when that socket is closed.
When a network namespace is removed, the wait for dst records to be cleaned
up happens before the cleanup of the rxrpc and UDP socket, meaning that the
wait never finishes.
Fix this by moving the rxrpc (and, by dependence, the afs) private
per-network namespace registrations to the device group rather than subsys
group. This allows cached rxrpc local endpoints to be cleared and their
UDP sockets closed before we try waiting for the dst records.
The symptom is that lines looking like the following:
unregister_netdevice: waiting for lo to become free
get emitted at regular intervals after running something like the
referenced syzbot test.
Thanks to Vadim for tracking this down and work out the fix.
Reported-by: syzbot+df400f2f24a1677cd7e0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@novek.ru>
Fixes: 5271953cad31 ("rxrpc: Use the UDP encap_rcv hook")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Vadim Fedorenko <vfedorenko@novek.ru>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/161196443016.3868642.5577440140646403533.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 5cdc4a6950a883594e9640b1decb3fcf6222a594 ]
When the capacity of the disc is too large (assuming the 4.7G
specification), the disc (UDF file system) will be burned
multiple times in the windows (Multisession Usage). When the
remaining capacity of the CD is less than 300M (estimated
value, for reference only), open the CD in the Linux system,
the content of the CD is displayed as blank (the kernel will
say "No VRS found"). Windows can display the contents of the
CD normally.
Through analysis, in the "fs/udf/super.c": udf_check_vsd
function, the actual value of VSD_MAX_SECTOR_OFFSET may
be much larger than 0x800000. According to the current code
logic, it is found that the type of sbi->s_session is "__s32",
when the remaining capacity of the disc is less than 300M
(take a set of test values: sector=3154903040,
sbi->s_session=1540464, sb->s_blocksize_bits=11 ), the
calculation result of "sbi->s_session << sb->s_blocksize_bits"
will overflow. Therefore, it is necessary to convert the
type of s_session to "loff_t" (when udf_check_vsd starts,
assign a value to _sector, which is also converted in this
way), so that the result will not overflow, and then the
content of the disc can be displayed normally.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210114075741.30448-1-changlianzhi@uniontech.com
Signed-off-by: lianzhi chang <changlianzhi@uniontech.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit b25b0b871f206936d5bca02b80d38c05623e27da upstream.
With the following patches:
- btrfs: backref, only collect file extent items matching backref offset
- btrfs: backref, not adding refs from shared block when resolving normal backref
- btrfs: backref, only search backref entries from leaves of the same root
we only collect the normal data refs we want, so the imprecise upper
bound total_refs of that EXTENT_ITEM could now be changed to the count
of the normal backref entry we want to search.
Background and how the patches fit together:
Btrfs has two types of data backref.
For BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_REF_KEY type of backref, we don't have the
exact block number. Therefore, we need to call resolve_indirect_refs.
It uses btrfs_search_slot to locate the leaf block. Then
we need to walk through the leaves to search for the EXTENT_DATA items
that have disk bytenr matching the extent item (add_all_parents).
When resolving indirect refs, we could take entries that don't
belong to the backref entry we are searching for right now.
For that reason when searching backref entry, we always use total
refs of that EXTENT_ITEM rather than individual count.
For example:
item 11 key (40831553536 EXTENT_ITEM 4194304) itemoff 15460 itemsize
extent refs 24 gen 7302 flags DATA
shared data backref parent 394985472 count 10 #1
extent data backref root 257 objectid 260 offset 1048576 count 3 #2
extent data backref root 256 objectid 260 offset 65536 count 6 #3
extent data backref root 257 objectid 260 offset 65536 count 5 #4
For example, when searching backref entry #4, we'll use total_refs
24, a very loose loop ending condition, instead of total_refs = 5.
But using total_refs = 24 is not accurate. Sometimes, we'll never find
all the refs from specific root. As a result, the loop keeps on going
until we reach the end of that inode.
The first 3 patches, handle 3 different types refs we might encounter.
These refs do not belong to the normal backref we are searching, and
hence need to be skipped.
This patch changes the total_refs to correct number so that we could
end loop as soon as we find all the refs we want.
btrfs send uses backref to find possible clone sources, the following
is a simple test to compare the results with and without this patch:
$ btrfs subvolume create /sub1
$ for i in `seq 1 163840`; do
dd if=/dev/zero of=/sub1/file bs=64K count=1 seek=$((i-1)) conv=notrunc oflag=direct
done
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot /sub1 /sub2
$ for i in `seq 1 163840`; do
dd if=/dev/zero of=/sub1/file bs=4K count=1 seek=$(((i-1)*16+10)) conv=notrunc oflag=direct
done
$ btrfs subvolume snapshot -r /sub1 /snap1
$ time btrfs send /snap1 | btrfs receive /volume2
Without this patch:
real 69m48.124s
user 0m50.199s
sys 70m15.600s
With this patch:
real 1m59.683s
user 0m35.421s
sys 2m42.684s
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: ethanwu <ethanwu@synology.com>
[ add patchset cover letter with background and numbers ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit cfc0eed0ec89db7c4a8d461174cabfaa4a0912c7 upstream.
We could have some nodes/leaves in subvolume whose owner are not the
that subvolume. In this way, when we resolve normal backrefs of that
subvolume, we should avoid collecting those references from these blocks.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: ethanwu <ethanwu@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit ed58f2e66e849c34826083e5a6c1b506ee8a4d8e upstream.
All references from the block of SHARED_DATA_REF belong to that shared
block backref.
For example:
item 11 key (40831553536 EXTENT_ITEM 4194304) itemoff 15460 itemsize 95
extent refs 24 gen 7302 flags DATA
extent data backref root 257 objectid 260 offset 65536 count 5
extent data backref root 258 objectid 265 offset 0 count 9
shared data backref parent 394985472 count 10
Block 394985472 might be leaf from root 257, and the item obejctid and
(file_pos - file_extent_item::offset) in that leaf just happens to be
260 and 65536 which is equal to the first extent data backref entry.
Before this patch, when we resolve backref:
root 257 objectid 260 offset 65536
we will add those refs in block 394985472 and wrongly treat those as the
refs we want.
Fix this by checking if the leaf we are processing is shared data
backref, if so, just skip this leaf.
Shared data refs added into preftrees.direct have all entry value = 0
(root_id = 0, key = NULL, level = 0) except parent entry.
Other refs from indirect tree will have key value and root id != 0, and
these values won't be changed when their parent is resolved and added to
preftrees.direct. Therefore, we could reuse the preftrees.direct and
search ref with all values = 0 except parent is set to avoid getting
those resolved refs block.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: ethanwu <ethanwu@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 7ac8b88ee668a5b4743ebf3e9888fabac85c334a upstream.
When resolving one backref of type EXTENT_DATA_REF, we collect all
references that simply reference the EXTENT_ITEM even though their
(file_pos - file_extent_item::offset) are not the same as the
btrfs_extent_data_ref::offset we are searching for.
This patch adds additional check so that we only collect references whose
(file_pos - file_extent_item::offset) == btrfs_extent_data_ref::offset.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: ethanwu <ethanwu@synology.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 814b84971388cd5fb182f2e914265b3827758455 ]
If the server returns a new stateid that does not match the one in our
cache, then pnfs_layout_process() will leak the layout segments returned
by pnfs_mark_layout_stateid_invalid().
Fixes: 9888d837f3cf ("pNFS: Force a retry of LAYOUTGET if the stateid doesn't match our cache")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 2f96e40212d435b328459ba6b3956395eed8fa9f upstream.
While running btrfs/011 in a loop I would often ASSERT() while trying to
add a new free space entry that already existed, or get an EEXIST while
adding a new block to the extent tree, which is another indication of
double allocation.
This occurs because when we do the free space tree population, we create
the new root and then populate the tree and commit the transaction.
The problem is when you create a new root, the root node and commit root
node are the same. During this initial transaction commit we will run
all of the delayed refs that were paused during the free space tree
generation, and thus begin to cache block groups. While caching block
groups the caching thread will be reading from the main root for the
free space tree, so as we make allocations we'll be changing the free
space tree, which can cause us to add the same range twice which results
in either the ASSERT(ret != -EEXIST); in __btrfs_add_free_space, or in a
variety of different errors when running delayed refs because of a
double allocation.
Fix this by marking the fs_info as unsafe to load the free space tree,
and fall back on the old slow method. We could be smarter than this,
for example caching the block group while we're populating the free
space tree, but since this is a serious problem I've opted for the
simplest solution.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+
Fixes: a5ed91828518 ("Btrfs: implement the free space B-tree")
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 1e249cb5b7fc09ff216aa5a12f6c302e434e88f9 upstream.
When lazytime is enabled and an inode is being written due to its
in-memory updated timestamps having expired, either due to a sync() or
syncfs() system call or due to dirtytime_expire_interval having elapsed,
the VFS needs to inform the filesystem so that the filesystem can copy
the inode's timestamps out to the on-disk data structures.
This is done by __writeback_single_inode() calling
mark_inode_dirty_sync(), which then calls ->dirty_inode(I_DIRTY_SYNC).
However, this occurs after __writeback_single_inode() has already
cleared the dirty flags from ->i_state. This causes two bugs:
- mark_inode_dirty_sync() redirties the inode, causing it to remain
dirty. This wastefully causes the inode to be written twice. But
more importantly, it breaks cases where sync_filesystem() is expected
to clean dirty inodes. This includes the FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY
ioctl (as reported at
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200306004555.GB225345@gmail.com), as well
as possibly filesystem freezing (freeze_super()).
- Since ->i_state doesn't contain I_DIRTY_TIME when ->dirty_inode() is
called from __writeback_single_inode() for lazytime expiration,
xfs_fs_dirty_inode() ignores the notification. (XFS only cares about
lazytime expirations, and it assumes that i_state will contain
I_DIRTY_TIME during those.) Therefore, lazy timestamps aren't
persisted by sync(), syncfs(), or dirtytime_expire_interval on XFS.
Fix this by moving the call to mark_inode_dirty_sync() to earlier in
__writeback_single_inode(), before the dirty flags are cleared from
i_state. This makes filesystems be properly notified of the timestamp
expiration, and it avoids incorrectly redirtying the inode.
This fixes xfstest generic/580 (which tests
FS_IOC_REMOVE_ENCRYPTION_KEY) when run on ext4 or f2fs with lazytime
enabled. It also fixes the new lazytime xfstest I've proposed, which
reproduces the above-mentioned XFS bug
(https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210105005818.92978-1-ebiggers@kernel.org).
Alternatively, we could call ->dirty_inode(I_DIRTY_SYNC) directly. But
due to the introduction of I_SYNC_QUEUED, mark_inode_dirty_sync() is the
right thing to do because mark_inode_dirty_sync() now knows not to move
the inode to a writeback list if it is currently queued for sync.
Fixes: 0ae45f63d4ef ("vfs: add support for a lazytime mount option")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Depends-on: 5afced3bf281 ("writeback: Avoid skipping inode writeback")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210112190253.64307-2-ebiggers@kernel.org
Suggested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 5fcd57505c002efc5823a7355e21f48dd02d5a51 upstream.
The only use of I_DIRTY_TIME_EXPIRE is to detect in
__writeback_single_inode() that inode got there because flush worker
decided it's time to writeback the dirty inode time stamps (either
because we are syncing or because of age). However we can detect this
directly in __writeback_single_inode() and there's no need for the
strange propagation with I_DIRTY_TIME_EXPIRE flag.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 7955f105afb6034af344038d663bc98809483cdd upstream.
In the negotiate protocol preauth context, the server is not required
to populate the salt (although it is done by most servers) so do
not warn on mount.
We retain the checks (warn) that the preauth context is the minimum
size and that the salt does not exceed DataLength of the SMB response.
Although we use the defaults in the case that the preauth context
response is invalid, these checks may be useful in the future
as servers add support for additional mechanisms.
CC: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Shyam Prasad N <sprasad@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
No upstream commit, this is a fix to a stable 5.4 specific backport.
The intention of backport commit cac68d12c531 ("io_uring: grab ->fs as part
of async offload") as found in the stable 5.4 tree was to make
io_sq_wq_submit_work() to switch the workqueue task's ->fs over to the
submitting task's one during the IO operation.
However, due to a small logic error, this change turned out to not have any
actual effect. From a high level, the relevant code in
io_sq_wq_submit_work() looks like
old_fs_struct = current->fs;
do {
...
if (req->fs != current->fs && current->fs != old_fs_struct) {
task_lock(current);
if (req->fs)
current->fs = req->fs;
else
current->fs = old_fs_struct;
task_unlock(current);
}
...
} while (req);
The if condition is supposed to cover the case that current->fs doesn't
match what's needed for processing the request, but observe how it fails
to ever evaluate to true due to the second clause:
current->fs != old_fs_struct will be false in the first iteration as per
the initialization of old_fs_struct and because this prevents current->fs
from getting replaced, the same follows inductively for all subsequent
iterations.
Fix said if condition such that
- if req->fs is set and doesn't match current->fs, the latter will be
switched to the former
- or if req->fs is unset, the switch back to the initial old_fs_struct
will be made, if necessary.
While at it, also correct the condition for the ->fs related cleanup right
before the return of io_sq_wq_submit_work(): currently, old_fs_struct is
restored only if it's non-NULL. It is always non-NULL though and thus, the
if-condition is rendundant. Supposedly, the motivation had been to optimize
and avoid switching current->fs back to the initial old_fs_struct in case
it is found to have the desired value already. Make it so.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.4
Fixes: cac68d12c531 ("io_uring: grab ->fs as part of async offload")
Reviewed-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Nicolai Stange <nstange@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 214a5ea081e77346e4963dd6d20c5539ff8b6ae6 upstream.
RHBZ 1848178
The original intent of returning an error in this function
in the patch:
"CIFS: Mask off signals when sending SMB packets"
was to avoid interrupting packet send in the middle of
sending the data (and thus breaking an SMB connection),
but we also don't want to fail the request for non-fatal
signals even before we have had a chance to try to
send it (the reported problem could be reproduced e.g.
by exiting a child process when the parent process was in
the midst of calling futimens to update a file's timestamps).
In addition, since the signal may remain pending when we enter the
sending loop, we may end up not sending the whole packet before
TCP buffers become full. In this case the code returns -EINTR
but what we need here is to return -ERESTARTSYS instead to
allow system calls to be restarted.
Fixes: b30c74c73c78 ("CIFS: Mask off signals when sending SMB packets")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.1+
Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 518837e65068c385dddc0a87b3e577c8be7c13b1 upstream.
When an incremental send finds an extent that is shared, it checks which
file extent items in the range refer to that extent, and for those it
emits clone operations, while for others it emits regular write operations
to avoid corruption at the destination (as described and fixed by commit
d906d49fc5f4 ("Btrfs: send, fix file corruption due to incorrect cloning
operations")).
However when the root we are cloning from is the send root, we are cloning
from the inode currently being processed and the source file range has
several extent items that partially point to the desired extent, with an
offset smaller than the offset in the file extent item for the range we
want to clone into, it can cause the algorithm to issue a clone operation
that starts at the current eof of the file being processed in the receiver
side, in which case the receiver will fail, with EINVAL, when attempting
to execute the clone operation.
Example reproducer:
$ cat test-send-clone.sh
#!/bin/bash
DEV=/dev/sdi
MNT=/mnt/sdi
mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null
mount $DEV $MNT
# Create our test file with a single and large extent (1M) and with
# different content for different file ranges that will be reflinked
# later.
xfs_io -f \
-c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 128K" \
-c "pwrite -S 0xcd 128K 128K" \
-c "pwrite -S 0xef 256K 256K" \
-c "pwrite -S 0x1a 512K 512K" \
$MNT/foobar
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1
btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1
# Now do a series of changes to our file such that we end up with
# different parts of the extent reflinked into different file offsets
# and we overwrite a large part of the extent too, so no file extent
# items refer to that part that was overwritten. This used to confuse
# the algorithm used by the kernel to figure out which file ranges to
# clone, making it attempt to clone from a source range starting at
# the current eof of the file, resulting in the receiver to fail since
# it is an invalid clone operation.
#
xfs_io -c "reflink $MNT/foobar 64K 1M 960K" \
-c "reflink $MNT/foobar 0K 512K 256K" \
-c "reflink $MNT/foobar 512K 128K 256K" \
-c "pwrite -S 0x73 384K 640K" \
$MNT/foobar
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2
btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2
echo -e "\nFile digest in the original filesystem:"
md5sum $MNT/snap2/foobar
# Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to
# apply both send streams to recreate both snapshots.
umount $DEV
mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null
mount $DEV $MNT
btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT
btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT
# Must match what we got in the original filesystem of course.
echo -e "\nFile digest in the new filesystem:"
md5sum $MNT/snap2/foobar
umount $MNT
When running the reproducer, the incremental send operation fails due to
an invalid clone operation:
$ ./test-send-clone.sh
wrote 131072/131072 bytes at offset 0
128 KiB, 32 ops; 0.0015 sec (80.906 MiB/sec and 20711.9741 ops/sec)
wrote 131072/131072 bytes at offset 131072
128 KiB, 32 ops; 0.0013 sec (90.514 MiB/sec and 23171.6148 ops/sec)
wrote 262144/262144 bytes at offset 262144
256 KiB, 64 ops; 0.0025 sec (98.270 MiB/sec and 25157.2327 ops/sec)
wrote 524288/524288 bytes at offset 524288
512 KiB, 128 ops; 0.0052 sec (95.730 MiB/sec and 24506.9883 ops/sec)
Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1'
At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1
linked 983040/983040 bytes at offset 1048576
960 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0006 sec (1.419 GiB/sec and 1550.3876 ops/sec)
linked 262144/262144 bytes at offset 524288
256 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0020 sec (120.192 MiB/sec and 480.7692 ops/sec)
linked 262144/262144 bytes at offset 131072
256 KiB, 1 ops; 0.0018 sec (133.833 MiB/sec and 535.3319 ops/sec)
wrote 655360/655360 bytes at offset 393216
640 KiB, 160 ops; 0.0093 sec (66.781 MiB/sec and 17095.8436 ops/sec)
Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2'
At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2
File digest in the original filesystem:
9c13c61cb0b9f5abf45344375cb04dfa /mnt/sdi/snap2/foobar
At subvol snap1
At snapshot snap2
ERROR: failed to clone extents to foobar: Invalid argument
File digest in the new filesystem:
132f0396da8f48d2e667196bff882cfc /mnt/sdi/snap2/foobar
The clone operation is invalid because its source range starts at the
current eof of the file in the receiver, causing the receiver to get
an EINVAL error from the clone operation when attempting it.
For the example above, what happens is the following:
1) When processing the extent at file offset 1M, the algorithm checks that
the extent is shared and can be (fully or partially) found at file
offset 0.
At this point the file has a size (and eof) of 1M at the receiver;
2) It finds that our extent item at file offset 1M has a data offset of
64K and, since the file extent item at file offset 0 has a data offset
of 0, it issues a clone operation, from the same file and root, that
has a source range offset of 64K, destination offset of 1M and a length
of 64K, since the extent item at file offset 0 refers only to the first
128K of the shared extent.
After this clone operation, the file size (and eof) at the receiver is
increased from 1M to 1088K (1M + 64K);
3) Now there's still 896K (960K - 64K) of data left to clone or write, so
it checks for the next file extent item, which starts at file offset
128K. This file extent item has a data offset of 0 and a length of
256K, so a clone operation with a source range offset of 256K, a
destination offset of 1088K (1M + 64K) and length of 128K is issued.
After this operation the file size (and eof) at the receiver increases
from 1088K to 1216K (1088K + 128K);
4) Now there's still 768K (896K - 128K) of data left to clone or write, so
it checks for the next file extent item, located at file offset 384K.
This file extent item points to a different extent, not the one we want
to clone, with a length of 640K. So we issue a write operation into the
file range 1216K (1088K + 128K, end of the last clone operation), with
a length of 640K and with a data matching the one we can find for that
range in send root.
After this operation, the file size (and eof) at the receiver increases
from 1216K to 1856K (1216K + 640K);
5) Now there's still 128K (768K - 640K) of data left to clone or write, so
we look into the file extent item, which is for file offset 1M and it
points to the extent we want to clone, with a data offset of 64K and a
length of 960K.
However this matches the file offset we started with, the start of the
range to clone into. So we can't for sure find any file extent item
from here onwards with the rest of the data we want to clone, yet we
proceed and since the file extent item points to the shared extent,
with a data offset of 64K, we issue a clone operation with a source
range starting at file offset 1856K, which matches the file extent
item's offset, 1M, plus the amount of data cloned and written so far,
which is 64K (step 2) + 128K (step 3) + 640K (step 4). This clone
operation is invalid since the source range offset matches the current
eof of the file in the receiver. We should have stopped looking for
extents to clone at this point and instead fallback to write, which
would simply the contain the data in the file range from 1856K to
1856K + 128K.
So fix this by stopping the loop that looks for file ranges to clone at
clone_range() when we reach the current eof of the file being processed,
if we are cloning from the same file and using the send root as the clone
root. This ensures any data not yet cloned will be sent to the receiver
through a write operation.
A test case for fstests will follow soon.
Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/
Fixes: 11f2069c113e ("Btrfs: send, allow clone operations within the same file")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.5+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 34d1eb0e599875064955a74712f08ff14c8e3d5f upstream.
If we fail to update a block group item in the loop we'll break, however
we'll do btrfs_run_delayed_refs and lose our error value in ret, and
thus not clean up properly. Fix this by only running the delayed refs
if there was no failure.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 18d3bff411c8d46d40537483bdc0b61b33ce0371 upstream.
This was partially fixed by f3e3d9cc3525 ("btrfs: avoid possible signal
interruption of btrfs_drop_snapshot() on relocation tree"), however it
missed a spot when we restart a trans handle because we need to end the
transaction. The fix is the same, simply use btrfs_join_transaction()
instead of btrfs_start_transaction() when deleting reloc roots.
Fixes: f3e3d9cc3525 ("btrfs: avoid possible signal interruption of btrfs_drop_snapshot() on relocation tree")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 51b2ee7d006a736a9126e8111d1f24e4fd0afaa6 upstream.
If you export a subdirectory of a filesystem, a READDIRPLUS on the root
of that export will return the filehandle of the parent with the ".."
entry.
The filehandle is optional, so let's just not return the filehandle for
".." if we're at the root of an export.
Note that once the client learns one filehandle outside of the export,
they can trivially access the rest of the export using further lookups.
However, it is also not very difficult to guess filehandles outside of
the export. So exporting a subdirectory of a filesystem should
considered equivalent to providing access to the entire filesystem. To
avoid confusion, we recommend only exporting entire filesystems.
Reported-by: Youjipeng <wangzhibei1999@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit dfd56c2c0c0dbb11be939b804ddc8d5395ab3432 upstream.
When setting password salt in the superblock, we forget to recompute the
superblock checksum so it will not match until the next superblock
modification which recomputes the checksum. Fix it.
CC: Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@google.com>
Reported-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Fixes: 9bd8212f981e ("ext4 crypto: add encryption policy and password salt support")
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201216101844.22917-8-jack@suse.cz
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 896567ee7f17a8a736cda8a28cc987228410a2ac upstream.
Before referencing the inode, we must ensure that the superblock can be
referenced. Otherwise, we can end up with iput() calling superblock
operations that are no longer valid or accessible.
Fixes: ea7c38fef0b7 ("NFSv4: Ensure we reference the inode for return-on-close in delegreturn")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit cb2856c5971723910a86b7d1d0cf623d6919cbc4 upstream.
If we exit _lgopen_prepare_attached() without setting a layout, we will
currently leak the plh_outstanding counter.
Fixes: 411ae722d10a ("pNFS: Wait for stale layoutget calls to complete in pnfs_update_layout()")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 2c8d5fc37fe2384a9bdb6965443ab9224d46f704 upstream.
If a layout return is in progress, we should wait for it to complete,
in case the layout segment we are picking up gets returned too.
Fixes: 30cb3ee299cb ("pNFS: Handle NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID on layoutreturn by bumping the state seqid")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 67bbceedc9bb8ad48993a8bd6486054756d711f4 upstream.
If the layout return-on-close failed because the layoutreturn was never
sent, then we should mark the layout for return again.
Fixes: 9c47b18cf722 ("pNFS: Ensure we do clear the return-on-close layout stateid on fatal errors")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 078000d02d57f02dde61de4901f289672e98c8bc upstream.
If the inode is being evicted, it should be safe to run return-on-close,
so we should do it to ensure we don't inadvertently leak layout segments.
Fixes: 1c5bd76d17cc ("pNFS: Enable layoutreturn operation for return-on-close")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 3d1a90ab0ed93362ec8ac85cf291243c87260c21 upstream.
It is only safe to call the tracepoint before rpc_put_task() because
'data' is freed inside nfs4_lock_release (rpc_release).
Fixes: 48c9579a1afe ("Adding stateid information to tracepoints")
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 2659d3bff3e1b000f49907d0839178b101a89887 ]
Retry close command if it gets interrupted to not leak open handles on
the server.
Signed-off-by: Paulo Alcantara (SUSE) <pc@cjr.nz>
Reported-by: Duncan Findlay <duncf@duncf.ca>
Suggested-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@microsoft.com>
Fixes: 6988a619f5b7 ("cifs: allow syscalls to be restarted in __smb_send_rqst()")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewd-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 9e8fae2597405ab1deac8909928eb8e99876f639 ]
close was relayered to allow passing in an async flag which
is no longer needed in this path. Remove the unneeded parameter
"flags" passed in on close.
Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <pshilov@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 5a3b590d4b2db187faa6f06adc9a53d6199fb1f9 ]
When the first file is opened, ext4 samples the mountpoint of the
filesystem in 64 bytes of the super block. It does so using
strlcpy(), this means that the remaining bytes in the super block
string buffer are untouched. If the mount point before had a longer
path than the current one, it can be reconstructed.
Consider the case where the fs was mounted to "/media/johnjdeveloper"
and later to "/". The super block buffer then contains
"/\x00edia/johnjdeveloper".
This case was seen in the wild and caused confusion how the name
of a developer ands up on the super block of a filesystem used
in production...
Fix this by using strncpy() instead of strlcpy(). The superblock
field is defined to be a fixed-size char array, and it is already
marked using __nonstring in fs/ext4/ext4.h. The consumer of the field
in e2fsprogs already assumes that in the case of a 64+ byte mount
path, that s_last_mounted will not be NUL terminated.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/X9ujIOJG/HqMr88R@mit.edu
Reported-by: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 6b4b8e6b4ad8553660421d6360678b3811d5deb9 ]
We got a "deleted inode referenced" warning cross our fsstress test. The
bug can be reproduced easily with following steps:
cd /dev/shm
mkdir test/
fallocate -l 128M img
mkfs.ext4 -b 1024 img
mount img test/
dd if=/dev/zero of=test/foo bs=1M count=128
mkdir test/dir/ && cd test/dir/
for ((i=0;i<1000;i++)); do touch file$i; done # consume all block
cd ~ && renameat2(AT_FDCWD, /dev/shm/test/dir/file1, AT_FDCWD,
/dev/shm/test/dir/dst_file, RENAME_WHITEOUT) # ext4_add_entry in
ext4_rename will return ENOSPC!!
cd /dev/shm/ && umount test/ && mount img test/ && ls -li test/dir/file1
We will get the output:
"ls: cannot access 'test/dir/file1': Structure needs cleaning"
and the dmesg show:
"EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_lookup:1626: inode #2049: comm ls:
deleted inode referenced: 139"
ext4_rename will create a special inode for whiteout and use this 'ino'
to replace the source file's dir entry 'ino'. Once error happens
latter(the error above was the ENOSPC return from ext4_add_entry in
ext4_rename since all space has been consumed), the cleanup do drop the
nlink for whiteout, but forget to restore 'ino' with source file. This
will trigger the bug describle as above.
Signed-off-by: yangerkun <yangerkun@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: cd808deced43 ("ext4: support RENAME_WHITEOUT")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210105062857.3566-1-yangerkun@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 29b665cc51e8b602bf2a275734349494776e3dbc upstream.
Some extent io trees are initialized with NULL private member (e.g.
btrfs_device::alloc_state and btrfs_fs_info::excluded_extents).
Dereference of a NULL tree->private as inode pointer will cause panic.
Pass tree->fs_info as it's known to be valid in all cases.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=208929
Fixes: 05912a3c04eb ("btrfs: drop extent_io_ops::tree_fs_info callback")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Su Yue <l@damenly.su>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 0b3f407e6728d990ae1630a02c7b952c21c288d3 upstream.
When doing an incremental send, if we have a new inode that happens to
have the same number that an old directory inode had in the base snapshot
and that old directory has a pending rmdir operation, we end up computing
a wrong path for the new inode, causing the receiver to fail.
Example reproducer:
$ cat test-send-rmdir.sh
#!/bin/bash
DEV=/dev/sdi
MNT=/mnt/sdi
mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null
mount $DEV $MNT
mkdir $MNT/dir
touch $MNT/dir/file1
touch $MNT/dir/file2
touch $MNT/dir/file3
# Filesystem looks like:
#
# . (ino 256)
# |----- dir/ (ino 257)
# |----- file1 (ino 258)
# |----- file2 (ino 259)
# |----- file3 (ino 260)
#
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap1
btrfs send -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT/snap1
# Now remove our directory and all its files.
rm -fr $MNT/dir
# Unmount the filesystem and mount it again. This is to ensure that
# the next inode that is created ends up with the same inode number
# that our directory "dir" had, 257, which is the first free "objectid"
# available after mounting again the filesystem.
umount $MNT
mount $DEV $MNT
# Now create a new file (it could be a directory as well).
touch $MNT/newfile
# Filesystem now looks like:
#
# . (ino 256)
# |----- newfile (ino 257)
#
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/snap2
btrfs send -f /tmp/snap2.send -p $MNT/snap1 $MNT/snap2
# Now unmount the filesystem, create a new one, mount it and try to apply
# both send streams to recreate both snapshots.
umount $DEV
mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV >/dev/null
mount $DEV $MNT
btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap1.send $MNT
btrfs receive -f /tmp/snap2.send $MNT
umount $MNT
When running the test, the receive operation for the incremental stream
fails:
$ ./test-send-rmdir.sh
Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap1'
At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap1
Create a readonly snapshot of '/mnt/sdi' in '/mnt/sdi/snap2'
At subvol /mnt/sdi/snap2
At subvol snap1
At snapshot snap2
ERROR: chown o257-9-0 failed: No such file or directory
So fix this by tracking directories that have a pending rmdir by inode
number and generation number, instead of only inode number.
A test case for fstests follows soon.
Reported-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net>
Tested-by: Massimo B. <massimo.b@gmx.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/6ae34776e85912960a253a8327068a892998e685.camel@gmx.net/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit c6c75deda81344c3a95d1d1f606d5cee109e5d54 ]
Commit 1fde6f21d90f ("proc: fix /proc/net/* after setns(2)") only forced
revalidation of regular files under /proc/net/
However, /proc/net/ is unusual in the sense of /proc/net/foo handlers
take netns pointer from parent directory which is old netns.
Steps to reproduce:
(void)open("/proc/net/sctp/snmp", O_RDONLY);
unshare(CLONE_NEWNET);
int fd = open("/proc/net/sctp/snmp", O_RDONLY);
read(fd, &c, 1);
Read will read wrong data from original netns.
Patch forces lookup on every directory under /proc/net .
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201205160916.GA109739@localhost.localdomain
Fixes: 1da4d377f943 ("proc: revalidate misc dentries")
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Reported-by: "Rantala, Tommi T. (Nokia - FI/Espoo)" <tommi.t.rantala@nokia.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit e06689bf57017ac022ccf0f2a5071f760821ce0f ]
Currently gluing PDE into global /proc tree is done under lock, but
changing ->nlink is not. Additionally struct proc_dir_entry::nlink is
not atomic so updates can be lost.
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190925202436.GA17388@avx2
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit f7cfd871ae0c5008d94b6f66834e7845caa93c15 ]
Recently syzbot reported[0] that there is a deadlock amongst the users
of exec_update_mutex. The problematic lock ordering found by lockdep
was:
perf_event_open (exec_update_mutex -> ovl_i_mutex)
chown (ovl_i_mutex -> sb_writes)
sendfile (sb_writes -> p->lock)
by reading from a proc file and writing to overlayfs
proc_pid_syscall (p->lock -> exec_update_mutex)
While looking at possible solutions it occured to me that all of the
users and possible users involved only wanted to state of the given
process to remain the same. They are all readers. The only writer is
exec.
There is no reason for readers to block on each other. So fix
this deadlock by transforming exec_update_mutex into a rw_semaphore
named exec_update_lock that only exec takes for writing.
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Cc: Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@openwall.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Christopher Yeoh <cyeoh@au1.ibm.com>
Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
Cc: Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Fixes: eea9673250db ("exec: Add exec_update_mutex to replace cred_guard_mutex")
[0] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/00000000000063640c05ade8e3de@google.com
Reported-by: syzbot+db9cdf3dd1f64252c6ef@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87ft4mbqen.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org
Signed-off-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 5d069dbe8aaf2a197142558b6fb2978189ba3454 ]
Jan Kara's analysis of the syzbot report (edited):
The reproducer opens a directory on FUSE filesystem, it then attaches
dnotify mark to the open directory. After that a fuse_do_getattr() call
finds that attributes returned by the server are inconsistent, and calls
make_bad_inode() which, among other things does:
inode->i_mode = S_IFREG;
This then confuses dnotify which doesn't tear down its structures
properly and eventually crashes.
Avoid calling make_bad_inode() on a live inode: switch to a private flag on
the fuse inode. Also add the test to ops which the bad_inode_ops would
have caught.
This bug goes back to the initial merge of fuse in 2.6.14...
Reported-by: syzbot+f427adf9324b92652ccc@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@redhat.com>
Tested-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit edf7ddbf1c5eb98b720b063b73e20e8a4a1ce673 ]
Missing calls to mntget() (or equivalently, too many calls to mntput())
are hard to detect because mntput() delays freeing mounts using
task_work_add(), then again using call_rcu(). As a result, mnt_count
can often be decremented to -1 without getting a KASAN use-after-free
report. Such cases are still bugs though, and they point to real
use-after-frees being possible.
For an example of this, see the bug fixed by commit 1b0b9cc8d379
("vfs: fsmount: add missing mntget()"), discussed at
https://lkml.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20190605135401.GB30925@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/T/#u.
This bug *should* have been trivial to find. But actually, it wasn't
found until syzkaller happened to use fchdir() to manipulate the
reference count just right for the bug to be noticeable.
Address this by making mntput_no_expire() issue a WARN if mnt_count has
become negative.
Suggested-by: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit b6d49ecd1081740b6e632366428b960461f8158b ]
When returning the layout in nfs4_evict_inode(), we need to ensure that
the layout is actually done being freed before we can proceed to free the
inode itself.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 10f04d40a9fa29785206c619f80d8beedb778837 ]
The on-disk quota format supports quota files with upto 2^32 blocks. Be
careful when computing quota file offsets in the quota files from block
numbers as they can overflow 32-bit types. Since quota files larger than
4GB would require ~26 millions of quota users, this is mostly a
theoretical concern now but better be careful, fuzzers would find the
problem sooner or later anyway...
Reviewed-by: Andreas Dilger <adilger@dilger.ca>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 8d1ddb5e79374fb277985a6b3faa2ed8631c5b4c upstream.
Syzbot reports a potential deadlock found by the newly added recursive
read deadlock detection in lockdep:
[...] ========================================================
[...] WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected
[...] 5.9.0-rc2-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
[...] --------------------------------------------------------
[...] syz-executor.1/10214 just changed the state of lock:
[...] ffff88811f506338 (&f->f_owner.lock){.+..}-{2:2}, at: send_sigurg+0x1d/0x200
[...] but this lock was taken by another, HARDIRQ-safe lock in the past:
[...] (&dev->event_lock){-...}-{2:2}
[...]
[...]
[...] and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.
[...]
[...]
[...] other info that might help us debug this:
[...] Chain exists of:
[...] &dev->event_lock --> &new->fa_lock --> &f->f_owner.lock
[...]
[...] Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
[...]
[...] CPU0 CPU1
[...] ---- ----
[...] lock(&f->f_owner.lock);
[...] local_irq_disable();
[...] lock(&dev->event_lock);
[...] lock(&new->fa_lock);
[...] <Interrupt>
[...] lock(&dev->event_lock);
[...]
[...] *** DEADLOCK ***
The corresponding deadlock case is as followed:
CPU 0 CPU 1 CPU 2
read_lock(&fown->lock);
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock, ...)
write_lock_irq(&filp->f_owner.lock); // wait for the lock
read_lock(&fown-lock); // have to wait until the writer release
// due to the fairness
<interrupted>
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock); // wait for the lock
The lock dependency on CPU 1 happens if there exists a call sequence:
input_inject_event():
spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->event_lock,...);
input_handle_event():
input_pass_values():
input_to_handler():
handler->event(): // evdev_event()
evdev_pass_values():
spin_lock(&client->buffer_lock);
__pass_event():
kill_fasync():
kill_fasync_rcu():
read_lock(&fa->fa_lock);
send_sigio():
read_lock(&fown->lock);
To fix this, make the reader in send_sigurg() and send_sigio() use
read_lock_irqsave() and read_lock_irqrestore().
Reported-by: syzbot+22e87cdf94021b984aa6@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+c5e32344981ad9f33750@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit dc889b8d4a8122549feabe99eead04e6b23b6513 upstream.
Make the printk() [bfs "printf" macro] seem less severe by changing
"WARNING:" to "NOTE:".
<asm-generic/bug.h> warns us about using WARNING or BUG in a format string
other than in WARN() or BUG() family macros. bfs/inode.c is doing just
that in a normal printk() call, so change the "WARNING" string to be
"NOTE".
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201203212634.17278-1-rdunlap@infradead.org
Reported-by: syzbot+3fd34060f26e766536ff@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: "Tigran A. Aivazian" <aivazian.tigran@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Pavel Shilovsky
Gustavo A. R. Silva
Aurelien Aptel
Liangyan
David Howells
lianzhi chang
ethanwu
Trond Myklebust
Josef Bacik
Eric Biggers
Jan Kara
Steve French
Nicolai Stange
Ronnie Sahlberg
Filipe Manana
J. Bruce Fields
Dave Wysochanski
Paulo Alcantara
Theodore Ts'o
yangerkun
Su Yue
Alexey Dobriyan
Eric W. Biederman
Miklos Szeredi
Jaegeuk Kim
Boqun Feng
Randy Dunlap
Chao Yu
Rustam Kovhaev
Jamie Iles