8728 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Filipe Manana
2daa2a8e89 btrfs: fix data race at btrfs_use_block_rsv() when accessing block reserve
[ Upstream commit c7bb26b847e5b97814f522686068c5628e2b3646 ]

At btrfs_use_block_rsv() we read the size of a block reserve without
locking its spinlock, which makes KCSAN complain because the size of a
block reserve is always updated while holding its spinlock. The report
from KCSAN is the following:

  [653.313148] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in btrfs_update_delayed_refs_rsv [btrfs] / btrfs_use_block_rsv [btrfs]

  [653.314755] read to 0x000000017f5871b8 of 8 bytes by task 7519 on cpu 0:
  [653.314779]  btrfs_use_block_rsv+0xe4/0x2f8 [btrfs]
  [653.315606]  btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xdc/0x998 [btrfs]
  [653.316421]  btrfs_force_cow_block+0x220/0xe38 [btrfs]
  [653.317242]  btrfs_cow_block+0x1ac/0x568 [btrfs]
  [653.318060]  btrfs_search_slot+0xda2/0x19b8 [btrfs]
  [653.318879]  btrfs_del_csums+0x1dc/0x798 [btrfs]
  [653.319702]  __btrfs_free_extent.isra.0+0xc24/0x2028 [btrfs]
  [653.320538]  __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xd3c/0x2390 [btrfs]
  [653.321340]  btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xae/0x290 [btrfs]
  [653.322140]  flush_space+0x5e4/0x718 [btrfs]
  [653.322958]  btrfs_preempt_reclaim_metadata_space+0x102/0x2f8 [btrfs]
  [653.323781]  process_one_work+0x3b6/0x838
  [653.323800]  worker_thread+0x75e/0xb10
  [653.323817]  kthread+0x21a/0x230
  [653.323836]  __ret_from_fork+0x6c/0xb8
  [653.323855]  ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30

  [653.323887] write to 0x000000017f5871b8 of 8 bytes by task 576 on cpu 3:
  [653.323906]  btrfs_update_delayed_refs_rsv+0x1a4/0x250 [btrfs]
  [653.324699]  btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x468/0x6d8 [btrfs]
  [653.325494]  btrfs_free_extent+0x76/0x120 [btrfs]
  [653.326280]  __btrfs_mod_ref+0x6a8/0x6b8 [btrfs]
  [653.327064]  btrfs_dec_ref+0x50/0x70 [btrfs]
  [653.327849]  walk_up_proc+0x236/0xa50 [btrfs]
  [653.328633]  walk_up_tree+0x21c/0x448 [btrfs]
  [653.329418]  btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x802/0x1328 [btrfs]
  [653.330205]  btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x184/0x238 [btrfs]
  [653.330995]  cleaner_kthread+0x2b0/0x2f0 [btrfs]
  [653.331781]  kthread+0x21a/0x230
  [653.331800]  __ret_from_fork+0x6c/0xb8
  [653.331818]  ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30

So add a helper to get the size of a block reserve while holding the lock.
Reading the field while holding the lock instead of using the data_race()
annotation is used in order to prevent load tearing.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-03-26 18:22:13 -04:00
David Sterba
c6652e20d7 btrfs: dev-replace: properly validate device names
commit 9845664b9ee47ce7ee7ea93caf47d39a9d4552c4 upstream.

There's a syzbot report that device name buffers passed to device
replace are not properly checked for string termination which could lead
to a read out of bounds in getname_kernel().

Add a helper that validates both source and target device name buffers.
For devid as the source initialize the buffer to empty string in case
something tries to read it later.

This was originally analyzed and fixed in a different way by Edward Adam
Davis (see links).

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000d1a1d1060cc9c5e7@google.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/tencent_44CA0665C9836EF9EEC80CB9E7E206DF5206@qq.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
CC: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+33f23b49ac24f986c9e8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-03-06 14:36:09 +00:00
David Sterba
89485251f6 btrfs: send: return EOPNOTSUPP on unknown flags
commit f884a9f9e59206a2d41f265e7e403f080d10b493 upstream.

When some ioctl flags are checked we return EOPNOTSUPP, like for
BTRFS_SCRUB_SUPPORTED_FLAGS, BTRFS_SUBVOL_CREATE_ARGS_MASK or fallocate
modes. The EINVAL is supposed to be for a supported but invalid
values or combination of options. Fix that when checking send flags so
it's consistent with the rest.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAL3q7H5rryOLzp3EKq8RTbjMHMHeaJubfpsVLF6H4qJnKCUR1w@mail.gmail.com/
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-23 08:25:09 +01:00
Boris Burkov
863837df8a btrfs: forbid deleting live subvol qgroup
commit a8df35619948bd8363d330c20a90c9a7fbff28c0 upstream.

If a subvolume still exists, forbid deleting its qgroup 0/subvolid.
This behavior generally leads to incorrect behavior in squotas and
doesn't have a legitimate purpose.

Fixes: cecbb533b5fc ("btrfs: record simple quota deltas in delayed refs")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-23 08:25:09 +01:00
Boris Burkov
d25031ba2a btrfs: forbid creating subvol qgroups
commit 0c309d66dacddf8ce939b891d9ead4a8e21ad6f0 upstream.

Creating a qgroup 0/subvolid leads to various races and it isn't
helpful, because you can't specify a subvol id when creating a subvol,
so you can't be sure it will be the right one. Any requirements on the
automatic subvol can be gratified by using a higher level qgroup and the
inheritance parameters of subvol creation.

Fixes: cecbb533b5fc ("btrfs: record simple quota deltas in delayed refs")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-23 08:25:08 +01:00
Qu Wenruo
69a0876252 btrfs: defrag: reject unknown flags of btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args
commit 173431b274a9a54fc10b273b46e67f46bcf62d2e upstream.

Add extra sanity check for btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args::flags.

This is not really to enhance fuzzing tests, but as a preparation for
future expansion on btrfs_ioctl_defrag_range_args.

In the future we're going to add new members, allowing more fine tuning
for btrfs defrag.  Without the -ENONOTSUPP error, there would be no way
to detect if the kernel supports those new defrag features.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-23 08:24:52 +01:00
David Sterba
d0bf04c965 btrfs: don't warn if discard range is not aligned to sector
commit a208b3f132b48e1f94f620024e66fea635925877 upstream.

There's a warning in btrfs_issue_discard() when the range is not aligned
to 512 bytes, originally added in 4d89d377bbb0 ("btrfs:
btrfs_issue_discard ensure offset/length are aligned to sector
boundaries"). We can't do sub-sector writes anyway so the adjustment is
the only thing that we can do and the warning is unnecessary.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reported-by: syzbot+4a4f1eba14eb5c3417d1@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-23 08:24:52 +01:00
Chung-Chiang Cheng
927d1a3d32 btrfs: tree-checker: fix inline ref size in error messages
commit f398e70dd69e6ceea71463a5380e6118f219197e upstream.

The error message should accurately reflect the size rather than the
type.

Fixes: f82d1c7ca8ae ("btrfs: tree-checker: Add EXTENT_ITEM and METADATA_ITEM check")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Chung-Chiang Cheng <cccheng@synology.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-23 08:24:51 +01:00
Fedor Pchelkin
5c9e576bfd btrfs: ref-verify: free ref cache before clearing mount opt
commit f03e274a8b29d1d1c1bbd7f764766cb5ca537ab7 upstream.

As clearing REF_VERIFY mount option indicates there were some errors in a
ref-verify process, a ref cache is not relevant anymore and should be
freed.

btrfs_free_ref_cache() requires REF_VERIFY option being set so call
it just before clearing the mount option.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with Syzkaller.

Reported-by: syzbot+be14ed7728594dc8bd42@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: fd708b81d972 ("Btrfs: add a extent ref verify tool")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/000000000000e5a65c05ee832054@google.com/
Reported-by: syzbot+c563a3c79927971f950f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/0000000000007fe09705fdc6086c@google.com/
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Fedor Pchelkin <pchelkin@ispras.ru>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2024-02-23 08:24:51 +01:00
Josef Bacik
04c2223344 btrfs: do not allow non subvolume root targets for snapshot
[ Upstream commit a8892fd71933126ebae3d60aec5918d4dceaae76 ]

Our btrfs subvolume snapshot <source> <destination> utility enforces
that <source> is the root of the subvolume, however this isn't enforced
in the kernel.  Update the kernel to also enforce this limitation to
avoid problems with other users of this ioctl that don't have the
appropriate checks in place.

Reported-by: Martin Michaelis <code@mgjm.de>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Neal Gompa <neal@gompa.dev>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2024-01-08 11:29:45 +01:00
Greg Kroah-Hartman
bdee8b2805 Revert "btrfs: add dmesg output for first mount and last unmount of a filesystem"
This reverts commit dd94ffab1b6d84b3ba9a8d09b6b0f44610d397eb which is
commit 2db313205f8b96eea467691917138d646bb50aef upstream.

As pointed out by many, the disk_super structure is NOT initialized
before it is dereferenced in the function
fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:open_ctree() that this commit adds, so something went
wrong here.

Revert it for now until it gets straightened out.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/5b0eb360-3765-40e1-854a-9da6d97eb405@roeck-us.net
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231209172836.GA2154579@dev-arch.thelio-3990X
Reported-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Cc: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-13 18:18:17 +01:00
Filipe Manana
6536698eea btrfs: make error messages more clear when getting a chunk map
commit 7d410d5efe04e42a6cd959bfe6d59d559fdf8b25 upstream.

When getting a chunk map, at btrfs_get_chunk_map(), we do some sanity
checks to verify we found a chunk map and that map found covers the
logical address the caller passed in. However the messages aren't very
clear in the sense that don't mention the issue is with a chunk map and
one of them prints the 'length' argument as if it were the end offset of
the requested range (while the in the string format we use %llu-%llu
which suggests a range, and the second %llu-%llu is actually a range for
the chunk map). So improve these two details in the error messages.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-08 08:44:26 +01:00
Jann Horn
4c6274cfd6 btrfs: send: ensure send_fd is writable
commit 0ac1d13a55eb37d398b63e6ff6db4a09a2c9128c upstream.

kernel_write() requires the caller to ensure that the file is writable.
Let's do that directly after looking up the ->send_fd.

We don't need a separate bailout path because the "out" path already
does fput() if ->send_filp is non-NULL.

This has no security impact for two reasons:

 - the ioctl requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN
 - __kernel_write() bails out on read-only files - but only since 5.8,
   see commit a01ac27be472 ("fs: check FMODE_WRITE in __kernel_write")

Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+12e098239d20385264d3@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=12e098239d20385264d3
Fixes: 31db9f7c23fb ("Btrfs: introduce BTRFS_IOC_SEND for btrfs send/receive")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-08 08:44:26 +01:00
Filipe Manana
79ffc04aba btrfs: fix off-by-one when checking chunk map includes logical address
commit 5fba5a571858ce2d787fdaf55814e42725bfa895 upstream.

At btrfs_get_chunk_map() we get the extent map for the chunk that contains
the given logical address stored in the 'logical' argument. Then we do
sanity checks to verify the extent map contains the logical address. One
of these checks verifies if the extent map covers a range with an end
offset behind the target logical address - however this check has an
off-by-one error since it will consider an extent map whose start offset
plus its length matches the target logical address as inclusive, while
the fact is that the last byte it covers is behind the target logical
address (by 1).

So fix this condition by using '<=' rather than '<' when comparing the
extent map's "start + length" against the target logical address.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-08 08:44:26 +01:00
Qu Wenruo
dd94ffab1b btrfs: add dmesg output for first mount and last unmount of a filesystem
commit 2db313205f8b96eea467691917138d646bb50aef upstream.

There is a feature request to add dmesg output when unmounting a btrfs.
There are several alternative methods to do the same thing, but with
their own problems:

- Use eBPF to watch btrfs_put_super()/open_ctree()
  Not end user friendly, they have to dip their head into the source
  code.

- Watch for directory /sys/fs/<uuid>/
  This is way more simple, but still requires some simple device -> uuid
  lookups.  And a script needs to use inotify to watch /sys/fs/.

Compared to all these, directly outputting the information into dmesg
would be the most simple one, with both device and UUID included.

And since we're here, also add the output when mounting a filesystem for
the first time for parity. A more fine grained monitoring of subvolume
mounts should be done by another layer, like audit.

Now mounting a btrfs with all default mkfs options would look like this:

  [81.906566] BTRFS info (device dm-8): first mount of filesystem 633b5c16-afe3-4b79-b195-138fe145e4f2
  [81.907494] BTRFS info (device dm-8): using crc32c (crc32c-intel) checksum algorithm
  [81.908258] BTRFS info (device dm-8): using free space tree
  [81.912644] BTRFS info (device dm-8): auto enabling async discard
  [81.913277] BTRFS info (device dm-8): checking UUID tree
  [91.668256] BTRFS info (device dm-8): last unmount of filesystem 633b5c16-afe3-4b79-b195-138fe145e4f2

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Link: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/issues/689
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ update changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-12-08 08:44:26 +01:00
Josef Bacik
665c2f186b btrfs: don't arbitrarily slow down delalloc if we're committing
commit 11aeb97b45ad2e0040cbb2a589bc403152526345 upstream.

We have a random schedule_timeout() if the current transaction is
committing, which seems to be a holdover from the original delalloc
reservation code.

Remove this, we have the proper flushing stuff, we shouldn't be hoping
for random timing things to make everything work.  This just induces
latency for no reason.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-11-28 16:50:19 +00:00
Filipe Manana
3542ef5c37 btrfs: use u64 for buffer sizes in the tree search ioctls
[ Upstream commit dec96fc2dcb59723e041416b8dc53e011b4bfc2e ]

In the tree search v2 ioctl we use the type size_t, which is an unsigned
long, to track the buffer size in the local variable 'buf_size'. An
unsigned long is 32 bits wide on a 32 bits architecture. The buffer size
defined in struct btrfs_ioctl_search_args_v2 is a u64, so when we later
try to copy the local variable 'buf_size' to the argument struct, when
the search returns -EOVERFLOW, we copy only 32 bits which will be a
problem on big endian systems.

Fix this by using a u64 type for the buffer sizes, not only at
btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2(), but also everywhere down the call chain
so that we can use the u64 at btrfs_ioctl_tree_search_v2().

Fixes: cc68a8a5a433 ("btrfs: new ioctl TREE_SEARCH_V2")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/ce6f4bd6-9453-4ffe-ba00-cee35495e10f@moroto.mountain/
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-11-20 10:30:16 +01:00
Josef Bacik
9cae05233b btrfs: fix some -Wmaybe-uninitialized warnings in ioctl.c
[ Upstream commit 9147b9ded499d9853bdf0e9804b7eaa99c4429ed ]

Jens reported the following warnings from -Wmaybe-uninitialized recent
Linus' branch.

  In file included from ./include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:26,
		   from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h:71,
		   from ./include/linux/compiler.h:246,
		   from ./include/linux/export.h:5,
		   from ./include/linux/linkage.h:7,
		   from ./include/linux/kernel.h:17,
		   from fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:6:
  In function ‘instrument_copy_from_user_before’,
      inlined from ‘_copy_from_user’ at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:148:3,
      inlined from ‘copy_from_user’ at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:183:7,
      inlined from ‘btrfs_ioctl_space_info’ at fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2999:6,
      inlined from ‘btrfs_ioctl’ at fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4616:10:
  ./include/linux/kasan-checks.h:38:27: warning: ‘space_args’ may be used
  uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
     38 | #define kasan_check_write __kasan_check_write
  ./include/linux/instrumented.h:129:9: note: in expansion of macro
  ‘kasan_check_write’
    129 |         kasan_check_write(to, n);
	|         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  ./include/linux/kasan-checks.h: In function ‘btrfs_ioctl’:
  ./include/linux/kasan-checks.h:20:6: note: by argument 1 of type ‘const
  volatile void *’ to ‘__kasan_check_write’ declared here
     20 | bool __kasan_check_write(const volatile void *p, unsigned int
	size);
	|      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2981:39: note: ‘space_args’ declared here
   2981 |         struct btrfs_ioctl_space_args space_args;
	|                                       ^~~~~~~~~~
  In function ‘instrument_copy_from_user_before’,
      inlined from ‘_copy_from_user’ at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:148:3,
      inlined from ‘copy_from_user’ at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:183:7,
      inlined from ‘_btrfs_ioctl_send’ at fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4343:9,
      inlined from ‘btrfs_ioctl’ at fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4658:10:
  ./include/linux/kasan-checks.h:38:27: warning: ‘args32’ may be used
  uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
     38 | #define kasan_check_write __kasan_check_write
  ./include/linux/instrumented.h:129:9: note: in expansion of macro
  ‘kasan_check_write’
    129 |         kasan_check_write(to, n);
	|         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  ./include/linux/kasan-checks.h: In function ‘btrfs_ioctl’:
  ./include/linux/kasan-checks.h:20:6: note: by argument 1 of type ‘const
  volatile void *’ to ‘__kasan_check_write’ declared here
     20 | bool __kasan_check_write(const volatile void *p, unsigned int
	size);
	|      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4341:49: note: ‘args32’ declared here
   4341 |                 struct btrfs_ioctl_send_args_32 args32;
	|                                                 ^~~~~~

This was due to his config options and having KASAN turned on,
which adds some extra checks around copy_from_user(), which then
triggered the -Wmaybe-uninitialized checker for these cases.

Fix the warnings by initializing the different structs we're copying
into.

Reported-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-10-25 11:53:23 +02:00
Josef Bacik
97cb55f41e btrfs: initialize start_slot in btrfs_log_prealloc_extents
[ Upstream commit b4c639f699349880b7918b861e1bd360442ec450 ]

Jens reported a compiler warning when using
CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y that looks like this

  fs/btrfs/tree-log.c: In function ‘btrfs_log_prealloc_extents’:
  fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4828:23: warning: ‘start_slot’ may be used
  uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
   4828 |                 ret = copy_items(trans, inode, dst_path, path,
	|                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   4829 |                                  start_slot, ins_nr, 1, 0);
	|                                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4725:13: note: ‘start_slot’ was declared here
   4725 |         int start_slot;
	|             ^~~~~~~~~~

The compiler is incorrect, as we only use this code when ins_len > 0,
and when ins_len > 0 we have start_slot properly initialized.  However
we generally find the -Wmaybe-uninitialized warnings valuable, so
initialize start_slot to get rid of the warning.

Reported-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Tested-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-10-25 11:53:22 +02:00
Filipe Manana
a055d9d4dd btrfs: return -EUCLEAN for delayed tree ref with a ref count not equals to 1
[ Upstream commit 1bf76df3fee56d6637718e267f7c34ed70d0c7dc ]

When running a delayed tree reference, if we find a ref count different
from 1, we return -EIO. This isn't an IO error, as it indicates either a
bug in the delayed refs code or a memory corruption, so change the error
code from -EIO to -EUCLEAN. Also tag the branch as 'unlikely' as this is
not expected to ever happen, and change the error message to print the
tree block's bytenr without the parenthesis (and there was a missing space
between the 'block' word and the opening parenthesis), for consistency as
that's the style we used everywhere else.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-10-25 11:53:22 +02:00
Josef Bacik
47062af859 btrfs: properly report 0 avail for very full file systems
commit 58bfe2ccec5f9f137b41dd38f335290dcc13cd5c upstream.

A user reported some issues with smaller file systems that get very
full.  While investigating this issue I noticed that df wasn't showing
100% full, despite having 0 chunk space and having < 1MiB of available
metadata space.

This turns out to be an overflow issue, we're doing:

  total_available_metadata_space - SZ_4M < global_block_rsv_size

to determine if there's not enough space to make metadata allocations,
which overflows if total_available_metadata_space is < 4M.  Fix this by
checking to see if our available space is greater than the 4M threshold.
This makes df properly report 100% usage on the file system.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-10-10 21:46:41 +02:00
Filipe Manana
a70c6e5731 btrfs: fix lockdep splat and potential deadlock after failure running delayed items
commit e110f8911ddb93e6f55da14ccbbe705397b30d0b upstream.

When running delayed items we are holding a delayed node's mutex and then
we will attempt to modify a subvolume btree to insert/update/delete the
delayed items. However if have an error during the insertions for example,
btrfs_insert_delayed_items() may return with a path that has locked extent
buffers (a leaf at the very least), and then we attempt to release the
delayed node at __btrfs_run_delayed_items(), which requires taking the
delayed node's mutex, causing an ABBA type of deadlock. This was reported
by syzbot and the lockdep splat is the following:

  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00024-g93f5de5f648d #0 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  syz-executor.2/13257 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff88801835c0c0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff88802a5ab8e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x3c/0x2a0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:198

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}:
         __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5475 [inline]
         lock_release+0x36f/0x9d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5781
         up_write+0x79/0x580 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1625
         btrfs_tree_unlock_rw fs/btrfs/locking.h:189 [inline]
         btrfs_unlock_up_safe+0x179/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:239
         search_leaf fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1986 [inline]
         btrfs_search_slot+0x2511/0x2f80 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2230
         btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x9c/0x180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:4376
         btrfs_insert_delayed_item fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:746 [inline]
         btrfs_insert_delayed_items fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:824 [inline]
         __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0xd24/0x2410 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1111
         __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x1db/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1153
         flush_space+0x269/0xe70 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:723
         btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x106/0x350 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1078
         process_one_work+0x92c/0x12c0 kernel/workqueue.c:2600
         worker_thread+0xa63/0x1210 kernel/workqueue.c:2751
         kthread+0x2b8/0x350 kernel/kthread.c:389
         ret_from_fork+0x2e/0x60 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:145
         ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304

  -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
         check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
         check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
         validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
         __lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
         lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761
         __mutex_lock_common+0x1d8/0x2530 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
         __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
         mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
         __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256
         btrfs_release_delayed_node fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:281 [inline]
         __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x2b5/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1156
         btrfs_commit_transaction+0x859/0x2ff0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2276
         btrfs_sync_file+0xf56/0x1330 fs/btrfs/file.c:1988
         vfs_fsync_range fs/sync.c:188 [inline]
         vfs_fsync fs/sync.c:202 [inline]
         do_fsync fs/sync.c:212 [inline]
         __do_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:220 [inline]
         __se_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:218 [inline]
         __x64_sys_fsync+0x196/0x1e0 fs/sync.c:218
         do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
         do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

  other info that might help us debug this:

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0                    CPU1
         ----                    ----
    lock(btrfs-tree-00);
                                 lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
                                 lock(btrfs-tree-00);
    lock(&delayed_node->mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  3 locks held by syz-executor.2/13257:
   #0: ffff88802c1ee370 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: spin_unlock include/linux/spinlock.h:391 [inline]
   #0: ffff88802c1ee370 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0xb87/0xe00 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:287
   #1: ffff88802c1ee398 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0xbb2/0xe00 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288
   #2: ffff88802a5ab8e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x3c/0x2a0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:198

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 0 PID: 13257 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00024-g93f5de5f648d #0
  Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/26/2023
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
   dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
   check_noncircular+0x375/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2195
   check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
   check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
   validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
   __lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
   lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761
   __mutex_lock_common+0x1d8/0x2530 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
   __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
   mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
   __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256
   btrfs_release_delayed_node fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:281 [inline]
   __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x2b5/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1156
   btrfs_commit_transaction+0x859/0x2ff0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2276
   btrfs_sync_file+0xf56/0x1330 fs/btrfs/file.c:1988
   vfs_fsync_range fs/sync.c:188 [inline]
   vfs_fsync fs/sync.c:202 [inline]
   do_fsync fs/sync.c:212 [inline]
   __do_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:220 [inline]
   __se_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:218 [inline]
   __x64_sys_fsync+0x196/0x1e0 fs/sync.c:218
   do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
   do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
  RIP: 0033:0x7f3ad047cae9
  Code: 28 00 00 00 75 (...)
  RSP: 002b:00007f3ad12510c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004a
  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f3ad059bf80 RCX: 00007f3ad047cae9
  RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000005
  RBP: 00007f3ad04c847a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
  R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007f3ad059bf80 R15: 00007ffe56af92f8
   </TASK>
  ------------[ cut here ]------------

Fix this by releasing the path before releasing the delayed node in the
error path at __btrfs_run_delayed_items().

Reported-by: syzbot+a379155f07c134ea9879@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000abba27060403b5bd@google.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-09-23 11:00:06 +02:00
Anand Jain
5b50c95cf8 btrfs: compare the correct fsid/metadata_uuid in btrfs_validate_super
[ Upstream commit 6bfe3959b0e7a526f5c64747801a8613f002f05a ]

The function btrfs_validate_super() should verify the metadata_uuid in
the provided superblock argument. Because, all its callers expect it to
do that.

Such as in the following stacks:

  write_all_supers()
   sb = fs_info->super_for_commit;
   btrfs_validate_write_super(.., sb)
     btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)

  scrub_one_super()
	btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)

And
   check_dev_super()
	btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)

However, it currently verifies the fs_info::super_copy::metadata_uuid
instead.  Fix this using the correct metadata_uuid in the superblock
argument.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-09-23 11:00:05 +02:00
Anand Jain
b61aad18b3 btrfs: add a helper to read the superblock metadata_uuid
[ Upstream commit 4844c3664a72d36cc79752cb651c78860b14c240 ]

In some cases, we need to read the FSID from the superblock when the
metadata_uuid is not set, and otherwise, read the metadata_uuid. So,
add a helper.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 6bfe3959b0e7 ("btrfs: compare the correct fsid/metadata_uuid in btrfs_validate_super")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-09-23 11:00:05 +02:00
Josef Bacik
bd0fe54891 btrfs: move btrfs_pinned_by_swapfile prototype into volumes.h
[ Upstream commit c2e79e865b87c2920a3cd39de69c35f2bc758a51 ]

This is defined in volumes.c, move the prototype into volumes.h.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 6bfe3959b0e7 ("btrfs: compare the correct fsid/metadata_uuid in btrfs_validate_super")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-09-23 11:00:05 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
7afbfde45d btrfs: output extra debug info if we failed to find an inline backref
[ Upstream commit 7f72f50547b7af4ddf985b07fc56600a4deba281 ]

[BUG]
Syzbot reported several warning triggered inside
lookup_inline_extent_backref().

[CAUSE]
As usual, the reproducer doesn't reliably trigger locally here, but at
least we know the WARN_ON() is triggered when an inline backref can not
be found, and it can only be triggered when @insert is true. (I.e.
inserting a new inline backref, which means the backref should already
exist)

[ENHANCEMENT]
After the WARN_ON(), dump all the parameters and the extent tree
leaf to help debug.

Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d6f9ff86c1d804ba2bc6
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-09-23 11:00:02 +02:00
Anand Jain
aa64f6f0ce btrfs: use the correct superblock to compare fsid in btrfs_validate_super
commit d167aa76dc0683828588c25767da07fb549e4f48 upstream.

The function btrfs_validate_super() should verify the fsid in the provided
superblock argument. Because, all its callers expect it to do that.

Such as in the following stack:

   write_all_supers()
       sb = fs_info->super_for_commit;
       btrfs_validate_write_super(.., sb)
         btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)

   scrub_one_super()
	btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)

And
   check_dev_super()
	btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)

However, it currently verifies the fs_info::super_copy::fsid instead,
which is not correct.  Fix this using the correct fsid in the superblock
argument.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-09-23 11:00:00 +02:00
Filipe Manana
6eb1fc314c btrfs: don't start transaction when joining with TRANS_JOIN_NOSTART
commit 4490e803e1fe9fab8db5025e44e23b55df54078b upstream.

When joining a transaction with TRANS_JOIN_NOSTART, if we don't find a
running transaction we end up creating one. This goes against the purpose
of TRANS_JOIN_NOSTART which is to join a running transaction if its state
is at or below the state TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START, otherwise return an
-ENOENT error and don't start a new transaction. So fix this to not create
a new transaction if there's no running transaction at or below that
state.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Fixes: a6d155d2e363 ("Btrfs: fix deadlock between fiemap and transaction commits")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-09-23 11:00:00 +02:00
xiaoshoukui
a0a462a0f2 btrfs: fix BUG_ON condition in btrfs_cancel_balance
commit 29eefa6d0d07e185f7bfe9576f91e6dba98189c2 upstream.

Pausing and canceling balance can race to interrupt balance lead to BUG_ON
panic in btrfs_cancel_balance. The BUG_ON condition in btrfs_cancel_balance
does not take this race scenario into account.

However, the race condition has no other side effects. We can fix that.

Reproducing it with panic trace like this:

  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4618!
  RIP: 0010:btrfs_cancel_balance+0x5cf/0x6a0
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   ? do_nanosleep+0x60/0x120
   ? hrtimer_nanosleep+0xb7/0x1a0
   ? sched_core_clone_cookie+0x70/0x70
   btrfs_ioctl_balance_ctl+0x55/0x70
   btrfs_ioctl+0xa46/0xd20
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x7d/0xa0
   do_syscall_64+0x38/0x80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

  Race scenario as follows:
  > mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
  > --------------------
  > .......issue pause and cancel req in another thread
  > --------------------
  > ret = __btrfs_balance(fs_info);
  >
  > mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
  > if (ret == -ECANCELED && atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_pause_req)) {
  >         btrfs_info(fs_info, "balance: paused");
  >         btrfs_exclop_balance(fs_info, BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE_PAUSED);
  > }

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Signed-off-by: xiaoshoukui <xiaoshoukui@ruijie.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-30 16:27:15 +02:00
Josef Bacik
756c024698 btrfs: set cache_block_group_error if we find an error
commit 92fb94b69c6accf1e49fff699640fa0ce03dc910 upstream.

We set cache_block_group_error if btrfs_cache_block_group() returns an
error, this is because we could end up not finding space to allocate and
mistakenly return -ENOSPC, and which could then abort the transaction
with the incorrect errno, and in the case of ENOSPC result in a
WARN_ON() that will trip up tests like generic/475.

However there's the case where multiple threads can be racing, one
thread gets the proper error, and the other thread doesn't actually call
btrfs_cache_block_group(), it instead sees ->cached ==
BTRFS_CACHE_ERROR.  Again the result is the same, we fail to allocate
our space and return -ENOSPC.  Instead we need to set
cache_block_group_error to -EIO in this case to make sure that if we do
not make our allocation we get the appropriate error returned back to
the caller.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-16 18:19:24 +02:00
Christoph Hellwig
fa7bc2684a btrfs: don't stop integrity writeback too early
commit effa24f689ce0948f68c754991a445a8d697d3a8 upstream.

extent_write_cache_pages stops writing pages as soon as nr_to_write hits
zero.  That is the right thing for opportunistic writeback, but incorrect
for data integrity writeback, which needs to ensure that no dirty pages
are left in the range.  Thus only stop the writeback for WB_SYNC_NONE
if nr_to_write hits 0.

This is a port of write_cache_pages changes in commit 05fe478dd04e
("mm: write_cache_pages integrity fix").

Note that I've only trigger the problem with other changes to the btrfs
writeback code, but this condition seems worthwhile fixing anyway.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ updated comment ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-16 18:19:24 +02:00
Filipe Manana
0e0f324c25 btrfs: fix race between quota disable and quota assign ioctls
commit 2f1a6be12ab6c8470d5776e68644726c94257c54 upstream.

The quota assign ioctl can currently run in parallel with a quota disable
ioctl call. The assign ioctl uses the quota root, while the disable ioctl
frees that root, and therefore we can have a use-after-free triggered in
the assign ioctl, leading to a trace like the following when KASAN is
enabled:

  [672.723][T736] BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in btrfs_search_slot+0x2962/0x2db0
  [672.723][T736] Read of size 8 at addr ffff888022ec0208 by task btrfs_search_sl/27736
  [672.724][T736]
  [672.725][T736] CPU: 1 PID: 27736 Comm: btrfs_search_sl Not tainted 6.3.0-rc3 #37
  [672.723][T736] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014
  [672.727][T736] Call Trace:
  [672.728][T736]  <TASK>
  [672.728][T736]  dump_stack_lvl+0xd9/0x150
  [672.725][T736]  print_report+0xc1/0x5e0
  [672.720][T736]  ? __virt_addr_valid+0x61/0x2e0
  [672.727][T736]  ? __phys_addr+0xc9/0x150
  [672.725][T736]  ? btrfs_search_slot+0x2962/0x2db0
  [672.722][T736]  kasan_report+0xc0/0xf0
  [672.729][T736]  ? btrfs_search_slot+0x2962/0x2db0
  [672.724][T736]  btrfs_search_slot+0x2962/0x2db0
  [672.723][T736]  ? fs_reclaim_acquire+0xba/0x160
  [672.722][T736]  ? split_leaf+0x13d0/0x13d0
  [672.726][T736]  ? rcu_is_watching+0x12/0xb0
  [672.723][T736]  ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x338/0x3c0
  [672.722][T736]  update_qgroup_status_item+0xf7/0x320
  [672.724][T736]  ? add_qgroup_rb+0x3d0/0x3d0
  [672.739][T736]  ? do_raw_spin_lock+0x12d/0x2b0
  [672.730][T736]  ? spin_bug+0x1d0/0x1d0
  [672.737][T736]  btrfs_run_qgroups+0x5de/0x840
  [672.730][T736]  ? btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0xa70/0xa70
  [672.738][T736]  ? __del_qgroup_relation+0x4ba/0xe00
  [672.738][T736]  btrfs_ioctl+0x3d58/0x5d80
  [672.735][T736]  ? tomoyo_path_number_perm+0x16a/0x550
  [672.737][T736]  ? tomoyo_execute_permission+0x4a0/0x4a0
  [672.731][T736]  ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x50/0x50
  [672.737][T736]  ? __sanitizer_cov_trace_switch+0x54/0x90
  [672.734][T736]  ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x132/0x1660
  [672.730][T736]  ? vfs_fileattr_set+0xc40/0xc40
  [672.730][T736]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2e/0x50
  [672.732][T736]  ? sigprocmask+0xf2/0x340
  [672.737][T736]  ? __fget_files+0x26a/0x480
  [672.732][T736]  ? bpf_lsm_file_ioctl+0x9/0x10
  [672.738][T736]  ? btrfs_ioctl_get_supported_features+0x50/0x50
  [672.736][T736]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x198/0x210
  [672.736][T736]  do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
  [672.731][T736]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
  [672.739][T736] RIP: 0033:0x4556ad
  [672.742][T736]  </TASK>
  [672.743][T736]
  [672.748][T736] Allocated by task 27677:
  [672.743][T736]  kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x40
  [672.741][T736]  kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30
  [672.741][T736]  __kasan_kmalloc+0xa4/0xb0
  [672.749][T736]  btrfs_alloc_root+0x48/0x90
  [672.746][T736]  btrfs_create_tree+0x146/0xa20
  [672.744][T736]  btrfs_quota_enable+0x461/0x1d20
  [672.743][T736]  btrfs_ioctl+0x4a1c/0x5d80
  [672.747][T736]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x198/0x210
  [672.749][T736]  do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
  [672.744][T736]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
  [672.756][T736]
  [672.757][T736] Freed by task 27677:
  [672.759][T736]  kasan_save_stack+0x22/0x40
  [672.759][T736]  kasan_set_track+0x25/0x30
  [672.756][T736]  kasan_save_free_info+0x2e/0x50
  [672.751][T736]  ____kasan_slab_free+0x162/0x1c0
  [672.758][T736]  slab_free_freelist_hook+0x89/0x1c0
  [672.752][T736]  __kmem_cache_free+0xaf/0x2e0
  [672.752][T736]  btrfs_put_root+0x1ff/0x2b0
  [672.759][T736]  btrfs_quota_disable+0x80a/0xbc0
  [672.752][T736]  btrfs_ioctl+0x3e5f/0x5d80
  [672.756][T736]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x198/0x210
  [672.753][T736]  do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
  [672.765][T736]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
  [672.769][T736]
  [672.768][T736] The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff888022ec0000
  [672.768][T736]  which belongs to the cache kmalloc-4k of size 4096
  [672.769][T736] The buggy address is located 520 bytes inside of
  [672.769][T736]  freed 4096-byte region [ffff888022ec0000, ffff888022ec1000)
  [672.760][T736]
  [672.764][T736] The buggy address belongs to the physical page:
  [672.761][T736] page:ffffea00008bb000 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x0 pfn:0x22ec0
  [672.766][T736] head:ffffea00008bb000 order:3 entire_mapcount:0 nr_pages_mapped:0 pincount:0
  [672.779][T736] flags: 0xfff00000010200(slab|head|node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x7ff)
  [672.770][T736] raw: 00fff00000010200 ffff888012842140 ffffea000054ba00 dead000000000002
  [672.770][T736] raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000040004 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000
  [672.771][T736] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
  [672.778][T736] page_owner tracks the page as allocated
  [672.777][T736] page last allocated via order 3, migratetype Unmovable, gfp_mask 0xd2040(__GFP_IO|__GFP_NOWARN|__GFP_NORETRY|__GFP_COMP|__GFP_NOMEMALLOC), pid 88
  [672.779][T736]  get_page_from_freelist+0x119c/0x2d50
  [672.779][T736]  __alloc_pages+0x1cb/0x4a0
  [672.776][T736]  alloc_pages+0x1aa/0x270
  [672.773][T736]  allocate_slab+0x260/0x390
  [672.771][T736]  ___slab_alloc+0xa9a/0x13e0
  [672.778][T736]  __slab_alloc.constprop.0+0x56/0xb0
  [672.771][T736]  __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x136/0x320
  [672.789][T736]  __kmalloc+0x4e/0x1a0
  [672.783][T736]  tomoyo_realpath_from_path+0xc3/0x600
  [672.781][T736]  tomoyo_path_perm+0x22f/0x420
  [672.782][T736]  tomoyo_path_unlink+0x92/0xd0
  [672.780][T736]  security_path_unlink+0xdb/0x150
  [672.788][T736]  do_unlinkat+0x377/0x680
  [672.788][T736]  __x64_sys_unlink+0xca/0x110
  [672.789][T736]  do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
  [672.783][T736]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
  [672.784][T736] page last free stack trace:
  [672.787][T736]  free_pcp_prepare+0x4e5/0x920
  [672.787][T736]  free_unref_page+0x1d/0x4e0
  [672.784][T736]  __unfreeze_partials+0x17c/0x1a0
  [672.797][T736]  qlist_free_all+0x6a/0x180
  [672.796][T736]  kasan_quarantine_reduce+0x189/0x1d0
  [672.797][T736]  __kasan_slab_alloc+0x64/0x90
  [672.793][T736]  kmem_cache_alloc+0x17c/0x3c0
  [672.799][T736]  getname_flags.part.0+0x50/0x4e0
  [672.799][T736]  getname_flags+0x9e/0xe0
  [672.792][T736]  vfs_fstatat+0x77/0xb0
  [672.791][T736]  __do_sys_newlstat+0x84/0x100
  [672.798][T736]  do_syscall_64+0x39/0xb0
  [672.796][T736]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
  [672.790][T736]
  [672.791][T736] Memory state around the buggy address:
  [672.799][T736]  ffff888022ec0100: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
  [672.805][T736]  ffff888022ec0180: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
  [672.802][T736] >ffff888022ec0200: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
  [672.809][T736]                       ^
  [672.809][T736]  ffff888022ec0280: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb
  [672.809][T736]  ffff888022ec0300: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb

Fix this by having the qgroup assign ioctl take the qgroup ioctl mutex
before calling btrfs_run_qgroups(), which is what all qgroup ioctls should
call.

Reported-by: butt3rflyh4ck <butterflyhuangxx@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAFcO6XN3VD8ogmHwqRk4kbiwtpUSNySu2VAxN8waEPciCHJvMA@mail.gmail.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Harshvardhan Jha <harshvardhan.j.jha@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-11 11:53:54 +02:00
Marcos Paulo de Souza
4f8f86bc5d btrfs: qgroup: return ENOTCONN instead of EINVAL when quotas are not enabled
commit 8a36e408d40606e21cd4e2dd9601004a67b14868 upstream.

[PROBLEM]
qgroup create/remove code is currently returning EINVAL when the user
tries to create a qgroup on a subvolume without quota enabled. EINVAL is
already being used for too many error scenarios so that is hard to
depict what is the problem.

[FIX]
Currently scrub and balance code return -ENOTCONN when the user tries to
cancel/pause and no scrub or balance is currently running for the
desired subvolume. Do the same here by returning -ENOTCONN  when a user
tries to create/delete/assing/list a qgroup on a subvolume without quota
enabled.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Harshvardhan Jha <harshvardhan.j.jha@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-11 11:53:53 +02:00
Marcos Paulo de Souza
8c1d1f3a33 btrfs: qgroup: remove one-time use variables for quota_root checks
commit e3b0edd29737d44137fc7583a9c185abda6e23b8 upstream.

Remove some variables that are set only to be checked later, and never
used.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcos Paulo de Souza <mpdesouza@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Harshvardhan Jha <harshvardhan.j.jha@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-11 11:53:53 +02:00
Filipe Manana
6db2a3c5c2 btrfs: check if the transaction was aborted at btrfs_wait_for_commit()
[ Upstream commit bf7ecbe9875061bf3fce1883e3b26b77f847d1e8 ]

At btrfs_wait_for_commit() we wait for a transaction to finish and then
always return 0 (success) without checking if it was aborted, in which
case the transaction didn't happen due to some critical error. Fix this
by checking if the transaction was aborted.

Fixes: 462045928bda ("Btrfs: add START_SYNC, WAIT_SYNC ioctls")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-08-11 11:53:52 +02:00
Filipe Manana
d1c6e68003 btrfs: check for commit error at btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier()
commit b28ff3a7d7e97456fd86b68d24caa32e1cfa7064 upstream.

btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier() is used to get a handle pointing to the
current running transaction if the transaction has not started its commit
yet (its state is < TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START). If the transaction commit
has started, then we wait for the transaction to commit and finish before
returning - however we completely ignore if the transaction was aborted
due to some error during its commit, we simply return ERR_PT(-ENOENT),
which makes the caller assume everything is fine and no errors happened.

This could make an fsync return success (0) to user space when in fact we
had a transaction abort and the target inode changes were therefore not
persisted.

Fix this by checking for the return value from btrfs_wait_for_commit(),
and if it returned an error, return it back to the caller.

Fixes: d4edf39bd5db ("Btrfs: fix uncompleted transaction")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-11 11:53:52 +02:00
Filipe Manana
356056cbe6 btrfs: fix extent buffer leak after tree mod log failure at split_node()
[ Upstream commit ede600e497b1461d06d22a7d17703d9096868bc3 ]

At split_node(), if we fail to log the tree mod log copy operation, we
return without unlocking the split extent buffer we just allocated and
without decrementing the reference we own on it. Fix this by unlocking
it and decrementing the ref count before returning.

Fixes: 5de865eebb83 ("Btrfs: fix tree mod logging")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-08-11 11:53:44 +02:00
Filipe Manana
63008dab58 btrfs: fix race between quota disable and relocation
[ Upstream commit 8a4a0b2a3eaf75ca8854f856ef29690c12b2f531 ]

If we disable quotas while we have a relocation of a metadata block group
that has extents belonging to the quota root, we can cause the relocation
to fail with -ENOENT. This is because relocation builds backref nodes for
extents of the quota root and later needs to walk the backrefs and access
the quota root - however if in between a task disables quotas, it results
in deleting the quota root from the root tree (with btrfs_del_root(),
called from btrfs_quota_disable().

This can be sporadically triggered by test case btrfs/255 from fstests:

  $ ./check btrfs/255
  FSTYP         -- btrfs
  PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 debian0 6.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-134+ #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Jun 15 11:59:28 WEST 2023
  MKFS_OPTIONS  -- /dev/sdc
  MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdc /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1

  btrfs/255 6s ... _check_dmesg: something found in dmesg (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/255.dmesg)
  - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/255.out.bad)
#      --- tests/btrfs/255.out	2023-03-02 21:47:53.876609426 +0000
#      +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/255.out.bad	2023-06-16 10:20:39.267563212 +0100
#      @@ -1,2 +1,4 @@
#       QA output created by 255
#      +ERROR: error during balancing '/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1': No such file or directory
#      +There may be more info in syslog - try dmesg | tail
#       Silence is golden
#      ...
      (Run 'diff -u /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/tests/btrfs/255.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/255.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)
  Ran: btrfs/255
  Failures: btrfs/255
  Failed 1 of 1 tests

To fix this make the quota disable operation take the cleaner mutex, as
relocation of a block group also takes this mutex. This is also what we
do when deleting a subvolume/snapshot, we take the cleaner mutex in the
cleaner kthread (at cleaner_kthread()) and then we call btrfs_del_root()
at btrfs_drop_snapshot() while under the protection of the cleaner mutex.

Fixes: bed92eae26cc ("Btrfs: qgroup implementation and prototypes")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-08-11 11:53:44 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
0a55f346e0 btrfs: qgroup: catch reserved space leaks at unmount time
[ Upstream commit 5958253cf65de42493f17f36877a901486a90365 ]

Before this patch, qgroup completely relies on per-inode extent io tree
to detect reserved data space leak.

However previous bug has already shown how release page before
btrfs_finish_ordered_io() could lead to leak, and since it's
QGROUP_RESERVED bit cleared without triggering qgroup rsv, it can't be
detected by per-inode extent io tree.

So this patch adds another (and hopefully the final) safety net to catch
qgroup data reserved space leak.  At least the new safety net catches
all the leaks during development, so it should be pretty useful in the
real world.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 8a4a0b2a3eaf ("btrfs: fix race between quota disable and relocation")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-08-11 11:53:44 +02:00
Filipe Manana
ae91ab710d btrfs: fix warning when putting transaction with qgroups enabled after abort
commit aa84ce8a78a1a5c10cdf9c7a5fb0c999fbc2c8d6 upstream.

If we have a transaction abort with qgroups enabled we get a warning
triggered when doing the final put on the transaction, like this:

  [552.6789] ------------[ cut here ]------------
  [552.6815] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 81745 at fs/btrfs/transaction.c:144 btrfs_put_transaction+0x123/0x130 [btrfs]
  [552.6817] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic xor (...)
  [552.6819] CPU: 4 PID: 81745 Comm: btrfs-transacti Tainted: G        W          6.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-134+ #1
  [552.6819] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-0-gea1b7a073390-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  [552.6819] RIP: 0010:btrfs_put_transaction+0x123/0x130 [btrfs]
  [552.6821] Code: bd a0 01 00 (...)
  [552.6821] RSP: 0018:ffffa168c0527e28 EFLAGS: 00010286
  [552.6821] RAX: ffff936042caed00 RBX: ffff93604a3eb448 RCX: 0000000000000000
  [552.6821] RDX: ffff93606421b028 RSI: ffffffff92ff0878 RDI: ffff93606421b010
  [552.6821] RBP: ffff93606421b000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffa168c0d07c20
  [552.6821] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff93608dc52950 R12: ffffa168c0527e70
  [552.6821] R13: ffff93606421b000 R14: ffff93604a3eb420 R15: ffff93606421b028
  [552.6821] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff93675fb00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [552.6821] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [552.6821] CR2: 0000558ad262b000 CR3: 000000014feda005 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
  [552.6822] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  [552.6822] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  [552.6822] Call Trace:
  [552.6822]  <TASK>
  [552.6822]  ? __warn+0x80/0x130
  [552.6822]  ? btrfs_put_transaction+0x123/0x130 [btrfs]
  [552.6824]  ? report_bug+0x1f4/0x200
  [552.6824]  ? handle_bug+0x42/0x70
  [552.6824]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70
  [552.6824]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
  [552.6824]  ? btrfs_put_transaction+0x123/0x130 [btrfs]
  [552.6826]  btrfs_cleanup_transaction+0xe7/0x5e0 [btrfs]
  [552.6828]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x23/0x40
  [552.6828]  ? try_to_wake_up+0x94/0x5e0
  [552.6828]  ? __pfx_process_timeout+0x10/0x10
  [552.6828]  transaction_kthread+0x103/0x1d0 [btrfs]
  [552.6830]  ? __pfx_transaction_kthread+0x10/0x10 [btrfs]
  [552.6832]  kthread+0xee/0x120
  [552.6832]  ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
  [552.6832]  ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50
  [552.6832]  </TASK>
  [552.6832] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

This corresponds to this line of code:

  void btrfs_put_transaction(struct btrfs_transaction *transaction)
  {
      (...)
          WARN_ON(!RB_EMPTY_ROOT(
                          &transaction->delayed_refs.dirty_extent_root));
      (...)
  }

The warning happens because btrfs_qgroup_destroy_extent_records(), called
in the transaction abort path, we free all entries from the rbtree
"dirty_extent_root" with rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(), but we
don't actually empty the rbtree - it's still pointing to nodes that were
freed.

So set the rbtree's root node to NULL to avoid this warning (assign
RB_ROOT).

Fixes: 81f7eb00ff5b ("btrfs: destroy qgroup extent records on transaction abort")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-07-27 08:37:40 +02:00
Filipe Manana
679c34821a btrfs: fix race when deleting quota root from the dirty cow roots list
commit b31cb5a6eb7a48b0a7bfdf06832b1fd5088d8c79 upstream.

When disabling quotas we are deleting the quota root from the list
fs_info->dirty_cowonly_roots without taking the lock that protects it,
which is struct btrfs_fs_info::trans_lock. This unsynchronized list
manipulation may cause chaos if there's another concurrent manipulation
of this list, such as when adding a root to it with
ctree.c:add_root_to_dirty_list().

This can result in all sorts of weird failures caused by a race, such as
the following crash:

  [337571.278245] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdead000000000108: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
  [337571.278933] CPU: 1 PID: 115447 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G        W          6.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-134+ #1
  [337571.279153] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  [337571.279572] RIP: 0010:commit_cowonly_roots+0x11f/0x250 [btrfs]
  [337571.279928] Code: 85 38 06 00 (...)
  [337571.280363] RSP: 0018:ffff9f63446efba0 EFLAGS: 00010206
  [337571.280582] RAX: ffff942d98ec2638 RBX: ffff9430b82b4c30 RCX: 0000000449e1c000
  [337571.280798] RDX: dead000000000100 RSI: ffff9430021e4900 RDI: 0000000000036070
  [337571.281015] RBP: ffff942d98ec2000 R08: ffff942d98ec2000 R09: 000000000000015b
  [337571.281254] R10: 0000000000000009 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff942fe8fbf600
  [337571.281476] R13: ffff942dabe23040 R14: ffff942dabe20800 R15: ffff942d92cf3b48
  [337571.281723] FS:  00007f478adb7340(0000) GS:ffff94349fa40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [337571.281950] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [337571.282184] CR2: 00007f478ab9a3d5 CR3: 000000001e02c001 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
  [337571.282416] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  [337571.282647] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  [337571.282874] Call Trace:
  [337571.283101]  <TASK>
  [337571.283327]  ? __die_body+0x1b/0x60
  [337571.283570]  ? die_addr+0x39/0x60
  [337571.283796]  ? exc_general_protection+0x22e/0x430
  [337571.284022]  ? asm_exc_general_protection+0x22/0x30
  [337571.284251]  ? commit_cowonly_roots+0x11f/0x250 [btrfs]
  [337571.284531]  btrfs_commit_transaction+0x42e/0xf90 [btrfs]
  [337571.284803]  ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x15/0x30
  [337571.285031]  ? release_extent_buffer+0x103/0x130 [btrfs]
  [337571.285305]  reset_balance_state+0x152/0x1b0 [btrfs]
  [337571.285578]  btrfs_balance+0xa50/0x11e0 [btrfs]
  [337571.285864]  ? __kmem_cache_alloc_node+0x14a/0x410
  [337571.286086]  btrfs_ioctl+0x249a/0x3320 [btrfs]
  [337571.286358]  ? mod_objcg_state+0xd2/0x360
  [337571.286577]  ? refill_obj_stock+0xb0/0x160
  [337571.286798]  ? seq_release+0x25/0x30
  [337571.287016]  ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0x3ba/0x4b0
  [337571.287235]  ? percpu_counter_add_batch+0x2e/0xa0
  [337571.287455]  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
  [337571.287675]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
  [337571.287901]  do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
  [337571.288126]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
  [337571.288352] RIP: 0033:0x7f478aaffe9b

So fix this by locking struct btrfs_fs_info::trans_lock before deleting
the quota root from that list.

Fixes: bed92eae26cc ("Btrfs: qgroup implementation and prototypes")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-07-27 08:37:26 +02:00
Johannes Thumshirn
28850d25a6 btrfs: handle memory allocation failure in btrfs_csum_one_bio
[ Upstream commit 806570c0bb7b4847828c22c4934fcf2dc8fc572f ]

Since f8a53bb58ec7 ("btrfs: handle checksum generation in the storage
layer") the failures of btrfs_csum_one_bio() are handled via
bio_end_io().

This means, we can return BLK_STS_RESOURCE from btrfs_csum_one_bio() in
case the allocation of the ordered sums fails.

This also fixes a syzkaller report, where injecting a failure into the
kvzalloc() call results in a BUG_ON().

Reported-by: syzbot+d8941552e21eac774778@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-06-21 15:44:09 +02:00
Zixuan Fu
8e54667403 btrfs: unset reloc control if transaction commit fails in prepare_to_relocate()
commit 85f02d6c856b9f3a0acf5219de6e32f58b9778eb upstream.

In btrfs_relocate_block_group(), the rc is allocated.  Then
btrfs_relocate_block_group() calls

relocate_block_group()
  prepare_to_relocate()
    set_reloc_control()

that assigns rc to the variable fs_info->reloc_ctl. When
prepare_to_relocate() returns, it calls

btrfs_commit_transaction()
  btrfs_start_dirty_block_groups()
    btrfs_alloc_path()
      kmem_cache_zalloc()

which may fail for example (or other errors could happen). When the
failure occurs, btrfs_relocate_block_group() detects the error and frees
rc and doesn't set fs_info->reloc_ctl to NULL. After that, in
btrfs_init_reloc_root(), rc is retrieved from fs_info->reloc_ctl and
then used, which may cause a use-after-free bug.

This possible bug can be triggered by calling btrfs_ioctl_balance()
before calling btrfs_ioctl_defrag().

To fix this possible bug, in prepare_to_relocate(), check if
btrfs_commit_transaction() fails. If the failure occurs,
unset_reloc_control() is called to set fs_info->reloc_ctl to NULL.

The error log in our fault-injection testing is shown as follows:

  [   58.751070] BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x7ca/0x920 [btrfs]
  ...
  [   58.753577] Call Trace:
  ...
  [   58.755800]  kasan_report+0x45/0x60
  [   58.756066]  btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x7ca/0x920 [btrfs]
  [   58.757304]  record_root_in_trans+0x792/0xa10 [btrfs]
  [   58.757748]  btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0x463/0x4f0 [btrfs]
  [   58.758231]  start_transaction+0x896/0x2950 [btrfs]
  [   58.758661]  btrfs_defrag_root+0x250/0xc00 [btrfs]
  [   58.759083]  btrfs_ioctl_defrag+0x467/0xa00 [btrfs]
  [   58.759513]  btrfs_ioctl+0x3c95/0x114e0 [btrfs]
  ...
  [   58.768510] Allocated by task 23683:
  [   58.768777]  ____kasan_kmalloc+0xb5/0xf0
  [   58.769069]  __kmalloc+0x227/0x3d0
  [   58.769325]  alloc_reloc_control+0x10a/0x3d0 [btrfs]
  [   58.769755]  btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x7aa/0x1e20 [btrfs]
  [   58.770228]  btrfs_relocate_chunk+0xf1/0x760 [btrfs]
  [   58.770655]  __btrfs_balance+0x1326/0x1f10 [btrfs]
  [   58.771071]  btrfs_balance+0x3150/0x3d30 [btrfs]
  [   58.771472]  btrfs_ioctl_balance+0xd84/0x1410 [btrfs]
  [   58.771902]  btrfs_ioctl+0x4caa/0x114e0 [btrfs]
  ...
  [   58.773337] Freed by task 23683:
  ...
  [   58.774815]  kfree+0xda/0x2b0
  [   58.775038]  free_reloc_control+0x1d6/0x220 [btrfs]
  [   58.775465]  btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x115c/0x1e20 [btrfs]
  [   58.775944]  btrfs_relocate_chunk+0xf1/0x760 [btrfs]
  [   58.776369]  __btrfs_balance+0x1326/0x1f10 [btrfs]
  [   58.776784]  btrfs_balance+0x3150/0x3d30 [btrfs]
  [   58.777185]  btrfs_ioctl_balance+0xd84/0x1410 [btrfs]
  [   58.777621]  btrfs_ioctl+0x4caa/0x114e0 [btrfs]
  ...

Reported-by: TOTE Robot <oslab@tsinghua.edu.cn>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Zixuan Fu <r33s3n6@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Ghinea <stefan.ghinea@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-06-14 10:59:59 +02:00
Josef Bacik
4223d91ca1 btrfs: check return value of btrfs_commit_transaction in relocation
commit fb686c6824dd6294ca772b92424b8fba666e7d00 upstream.

There are a few places where we don't check the return value of
btrfs_commit_transaction in relocation.c.  Thankfully all these places
have straightforward error handling, so simply change all of the sites
at once.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Ghinea <stefan.ghinea@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-06-14 10:59:59 +02:00
Josef Bacik
a9f5423460 btrfs: use nofs when cleaning up aborted transactions
commit 597441b3436a43011f31ce71dc0a6c0bf5ce958a upstream.

Our CI system caught a lockdep splat:

  ======================================================
  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  6.3.0-rc7+ #1167 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  kswapd0/46 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff8c6543abd650 (sb_internal#2){++++}-{0:0}, at: btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x5f/0x120

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffffffffabe61b40 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0x4aa/0x7a0

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}:
	 fs_reclaim_acquire+0xa5/0xe0
	 kmem_cache_alloc+0x31/0x2c0
	 alloc_extent_state+0x1d/0xd0
	 __clear_extent_bit+0x2e0/0x4f0
	 try_release_extent_mapping+0x216/0x280
	 btrfs_release_folio+0x2e/0x90
	 invalidate_inode_pages2_range+0x397/0x470
	 btrfs_cleanup_dirty_bgs+0x9e/0x210
	 btrfs_cleanup_one_transaction+0x22/0x760
	 btrfs_commit_transaction+0x3b7/0x13a0
	 create_subvol+0x59b/0x970
	 btrfs_mksubvol+0x435/0x4f0
	 __btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x11e/0x1b0
	 btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0xbf/0x140
	 btrfs_ioctl+0xa45/0x28f0
	 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x88/0xc0
	 do_syscall_64+0x38/0x90
	 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc

  -> #0 (sb_internal#2){++++}-{0:0}:
	 __lock_acquire+0x1435/0x21a0
	 lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2b0
	 start_transaction+0x401/0x730
	 btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x5f/0x120
	 btrfs_evict_inode+0x292/0x3d0
	 evict+0xcc/0x1d0
	 inode_lru_isolate+0x14d/0x1e0
	 __list_lru_walk_one+0xbe/0x1c0
	 list_lru_walk_one+0x58/0x80
	 prune_icache_sb+0x39/0x60
	 super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1f0
	 do_shrink_slab+0x163/0x340
	 shrink_slab+0x1d3/0x290
	 shrink_node+0x300/0x720
	 balance_pgdat+0x35c/0x7a0
	 kswapd+0x205/0x410
	 kthread+0xf0/0x120
	 ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50

  other info that might help us debug this:

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

	 CPU0                    CPU1
	 ----                    ----
    lock(fs_reclaim);
				 lock(sb_internal#2);
				 lock(fs_reclaim);
    lock(sb_internal#2);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  3 locks held by kswapd0/46:
   #0: ffffffffabe61b40 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat+0x4aa/0x7a0
   #1: ffffffffabe50270 (shrinker_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: shrink_slab+0x113/0x290
   #2: ffff8c6543abd0e0 (&type->s_umount_key#44){++++}-{3:3}, at: super_cache_scan+0x38/0x1f0

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 0 PID: 46 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 6.3.0-rc7+ #1167
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.13.0-2.fc32 04/01/2014
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   dump_stack_lvl+0x58/0x90
   check_noncircular+0xd6/0x100
   ? save_trace+0x3f/0x310
   ? add_lock_to_list+0x97/0x120
   __lock_acquire+0x1435/0x21a0
   lock_acquire+0xc2/0x2b0
   ? btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x5f/0x120
   start_transaction+0x401/0x730
   ? btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x5f/0x120
   btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_inode+0x5f/0x120
   btrfs_evict_inode+0x292/0x3d0
   ? lock_release+0x134/0x270
   ? __pfx_wake_bit_function+0x10/0x10
   evict+0xcc/0x1d0
   inode_lru_isolate+0x14d/0x1e0
   __list_lru_walk_one+0xbe/0x1c0
   ? __pfx_inode_lru_isolate+0x10/0x10
   ? __pfx_inode_lru_isolate+0x10/0x10
   list_lru_walk_one+0x58/0x80
   prune_icache_sb+0x39/0x60
   super_cache_scan+0x161/0x1f0
   do_shrink_slab+0x163/0x340
   shrink_slab+0x1d3/0x290
   shrink_node+0x300/0x720
   balance_pgdat+0x35c/0x7a0
   kswapd+0x205/0x410
   ? __pfx_autoremove_wake_function+0x10/0x10
   ? __pfx_kswapd+0x10/0x10
   kthread+0xf0/0x120
   ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
   ret_from_fork+0x29/0x50
   </TASK>

This happens because when we abort the transaction in the transaction
commit path we call invalidate_inode_pages2_range on our block group
cache inodes (if we have space cache v1) and any delalloc inodes we may
have.  The plain invalidate_inode_pages2_range() call passes through
GFP_KERNEL, which makes sense in most cases, but not here.  Wrap these
two invalidate callees with memalloc_nofs_save/memalloc_nofs_restore to
make sure we don't end up with the fs reclaim dependency under the
transaction dependency.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-05-30 12:44:09 +01:00
Filipe Manana
a3714a47b4 btrfs: fix space cache inconsistency after error loading it from disk
[ Upstream commit 0004ff15ea26015a0a3a6182dca3b9d1df32e2b7 ]

When loading a free space cache from disk, at __load_free_space_cache(),
if we fail to insert a bitmap entry, we still increment the number of
total bitmaps in the btrfs_free_space_ctl structure, which is incorrect
since we failed to add the bitmap entry. On error we then empty the
cache by calling __btrfs_remove_free_space_cache(), which will result
in getting the total bitmaps counter set to 1.

A failure to load a free space cache is not critical, so if a failure
happens we just rebuild the cache by scanning the extent tree, which
happens at block-group.c:caching_thread(). Yet the failure will result
in having the total bitmaps of the btrfs_free_space_ctl always bigger
by 1 then the number of bitmap entries we have. So fix this by having
the total bitmaps counter be incremented only if we successfully added
the bitmap entry.

Fixes: a67509c30079 ("Btrfs: add a io_ctl struct and helpers for dealing with the space cache")
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-05-30 12:44:04 +01:00
Nikolay Borisov
5968983037 btrfs: replace calls to btrfs_find_free_ino with btrfs_find_free_objectid
[ Upstream commit abadc1fcd72e887a8f875dabe4a07aa8c28ac8af ]

The former is going away as part of the inode map removal so switch
callers to btrfs_find_free_objectid. No functional changes since with
INODE_MAP disabled (default) find_free_objectid was called anyway.

Signed-off-by: Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 0004ff15ea26 ("btrfs: fix space cache inconsistency after error loading it from disk")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-05-30 12:44:04 +01:00
Anastasia Belova
3e2b4bceaa btrfs: print-tree: parent bytenr must be aligned to sector size
commit c87f318e6f47696b4040b58f460d5c17ea0280e6 upstream.

Check nodesize to sectorsize in alignment check in print_extent_item.
The comment states that and this is correct, similar check is done
elsewhere in the functions.

Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.

Fixes: ea57788eb76d ("btrfs: require only sector size alignment for parent eb bytenr")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Anastasia Belova <abelova@astralinux.ru>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-05-17 11:36:00 +02:00
Josef Bacik
1e05bf5e80 btrfs: don't free qgroup space unless specified
commit d246331b78cbef86237f9c22389205bc9b4e1cc1 upstream.

Boris noticed in his simple quotas testing that he was getting a leak
with Sweet Tea's change to subvol create that stopped doing a
transaction commit.  This was just a side effect of that change.

In the delayed inode code we have an optimization that will free extra
reservations if we think we can pack a dir item into an already modified
leaf.  Previously this wouldn't be triggered in the subvolume create
case because we'd commit the transaction, it was still possible but
much harder to trigger.  It could actually be triggered if we did a
mkdir && subvol create with qgroups enabled.

This occurs because in btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index(), which gets
called when we're adding the dir item, we do the following:

  btrfs_block_rsv_release(fs_info, trans->block_rsv, bytes, NULL);

if we're able to skip reserving space.

The problem here is that trans->block_rsv points at the temporary block
rsv for the subvolume create, which has qgroup reservations in the block
rsv.

This is a problem because btrfs_block_rsv_release() will do the
following:

  if (block_rsv->qgroup_rsv_reserved >= block_rsv->qgroup_rsv_size) {
	  qgroup_to_release = block_rsv->qgroup_rsv_reserved -
		  block_rsv->qgroup_rsv_size;
	  block_rsv->qgroup_rsv_reserved = block_rsv->qgroup_rsv_size;
  }

The temporary block rsv just has ->qgroup_rsv_reserved set,
->qgroup_rsv_size == 0.  The optimization in
btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index() sets ->qgroup_rsv_reserved = 0.  Then
later on when we call btrfs_subvolume_release_metadata() which has

  btrfs_block_rsv_release(fs_info, rsv, (u64)-1, &qgroup_to_release);
  btrfs_qgroup_convert_reserved_meta(root, qgroup_to_release);

qgroup_to_release is set to 0, and we do not convert the reserved
metadata space.

The problem here is that the block rsv code has been unconditionally
messing with ->qgroup_rsv_reserved, because the main place this is used
is delalloc, and any time we call btrfs_block_rsv_release() we do it
with qgroup_to_release set, and thus do the proper accounting.

The subvolume code is the only other code that uses the qgroup
reservation stuff, but it's intermingled with the above optimization,
and thus was getting its reservation freed out from underneath it and
thus leaking the reserved space.

The solution is to simply not mess with the qgroup reservations if we
don't have qgroup_to_release set.  This works with the existing code as
anything that messes with the delalloc reservations always have
qgroup_to_release set.  This fixes the leak that Boris was observing.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-05-17 11:36:00 +02:00
Filipe Manana
b232f5e8cf btrfs: fix btrfs_prev_leaf() to not return the same key twice
commit 6f932d4ef007d6a4ae03badcb749fbb8f49196f6 upstream.

A call to btrfs_prev_leaf() may end up returning a path that points to the
same item (key) again. This happens if while btrfs_prev_leaf(), after we
release the path, a concurrent insertion happens, which moves items off
from a sibling into the front of the previous leaf, and an item with the
computed previous key does not exists.

For example, suppose we have the two following leaves:

  Leaf A

  -------------------------------------------------------------
  | ...   key (300 96 10)   key (300 96 15)   key (300 96 16) |
  -------------------------------------------------------------
              slot 20             slot 21             slot 22

  Leaf B

  -------------------------------------------------------------
  | key (300 96 20)   key (300 96 21)   key (300 96 22)   ... |
  -------------------------------------------------------------
      slot 0             slot 1             slot 2

If we call btrfs_prev_leaf(), from btrfs_previous_item() for example, with
a path pointing to leaf B and slot 0 and the following happens:

1) At btrfs_prev_leaf() we compute the previous key to search as:
   (300 96 19), which is a key that does not exists in the tree;

2) Then we call btrfs_release_path() at btrfs_prev_leaf();

3) Some other task inserts a key at leaf A, that sorts before the key at
   slot 20, for example it has an objectid of 299. In order to make room
   for the new key, the key at slot 22 is moved to the front of leaf B.
   This happens at push_leaf_right(), called from split_leaf().

   After this leaf B now looks like:

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | key (300 96 16)    key (300 96 20)   key (300 96 21)   key (300 96 22)   ... |
  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
       slot 0              slot 1             slot 2             slot 3

4) At btrfs_prev_leaf() we call btrfs_search_slot() for the computed
   previous key: (300 96 19). Since the key does not exists,
   btrfs_search_slot() returns 1 and with a path pointing to leaf B
   and slot 1, the item with key (300 96 20);

5) This makes btrfs_prev_leaf() return a path that points to slot 1 of
   leaf B, the same key as before it was called, since the key at slot 0
   of leaf B (300 96 16) is less than the computed previous key, which is
   (300 96 19);

6) As a consequence btrfs_previous_item() returns a path that points again
   to the item with key (300 96 20).

For some users of btrfs_prev_leaf() or btrfs_previous_item() this may not
be functional a problem, despite not making sense to return a new path
pointing again to the same item/key. However for a caller such as
tree-log.c:log_dir_items(), this has a bad consequence, as it can result
in not logging some dir index deletions in case the directory is being
logged without holding the inode's VFS lock (logging triggered while
logging a child inode for example) - for the example scenario above, in
case the dir index keys 17, 18 and 19 were deleted in the current
transaction.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-05-17 11:36:00 +02:00