3 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Hengqi Chen	30651cff1e	LoongArch, bpf: Use 4 instructions for function address in JIT ... [ Upstream commit 64f50f6575721ef03d001e907455cbe3baa2a5b1 ] This patch fixes the following issue of function calls in JIT, like: [ 29.346981] multi-func JIT bug 105 != 103 The issus can be reproduced by running the "inline simple bpf_loop call" verifier test. This is because we are emiting 2-4 instructions for 64-bit immediate moves. During the first pass of JIT, the placeholder address is zero, emiting two instructions for it. In the extra pass, the function address is in XKVRANGE, emiting four instructions for it. This change the instruction index in JIT context. Let's always use 4 instructions for function address in JIT. So that the instruction sequences don't change between the first pass and the extra pass for function calls. Fixes: 5dc615520c4d ("LoongArch: Add BPF JIT support") Signed-off-by: Hengqi Chen <hengqi.chen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Tested-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230214152633.2265699-1-hengqi.chen@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>	2023-03-10 09:33:06 +01:00
Huacai Chen	bbfddb904d	LoongArch: BPF: Avoid declare variables in switch-case ... Not all compilers support declare variables in switch-case, so move declarations to the beginning of a function. Otherwise we may get such build errors: arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c: In function ‘emit_atomic’: arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c:362:3: error: a label can only be part of a statement and a declaration is not a statement u8 r0 = regmap[BPF_REG_0]; ^~ arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c: In function ‘build_insn’: arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c:727:3: error: a label can only be part of a statement and a declaration is not a statement u8 t7 = -1; ^~ arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c:778:3: error: a label can only be part of a statement and a declaration is not a statement int ret; ^~~ arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c:779:3: error: expected expression before ‘u64’ u64 func_addr; ^~~ arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c:780:3: warning: ISO C90 forbids mixed declarations and code [-Wdeclaration-after-statement] bool func_addr_fixed; ^~~~ arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c:784:11: error: ‘func_addr’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘in_addr’? &func_addr, &func_addr_fixed); ^~~~~~~~~ in_addr arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c:784:11: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in arch/loongarch/net/bpf_jit.c:814:3: error: a label can only be part of a statement and a declaration is not a statement u64 imm64 = (u64)(insn + 1)->imm << 32 | (u32)insn->imm; ^~~ Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>	2022-10-29 16:29:31 +08:00
Tiezhu Yang	5dc615520c	LoongArch: Add BPF JIT support ... BPF programs are normally handled by a BPF interpreter, add BPF JIT support for LoongArch to allow the kernel to generate native code when a program is loaded into the kernel. This will significantly speed-up processing of BPF programs. Co-developed-by: Youling Tang <tangyouling@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Youling Tang <tangyouling@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@loongson.cn>	2022-10-12 16:36:20 +08:00