IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
[ Upstream commit de4eda9de2 ]
READ/WRITE proved to be actively confusing - the meanings are
"data destination, as used with read(2)" and "data source, as
used with write(2)", but people keep interpreting those as
"we read data from it" and "we write data to it", i.e. exactly
the wrong way.
Call them ITER_DEST and ITER_SOURCE - at least that is harder
to misinterpret...
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Stable-dep-of: 6dd88fd59d ("vhost-scsi: unbreak any layout for response")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 27f2a2dcc6 ]
When shared domain is enabled, doing mount twice with the same fsid and
domain_id will trigger sysfs warning as shown below:
sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/fs/erofs/d0,meta.bin'
CPU: 15 PID: 1051 Comm: mount Not tainted 6.1.0-rc6+ #1
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996)
Call Trace:
<TASK>
dump_stack_lvl+0x38/0x49
dump_stack+0x10/0x12
sysfs_warn_dup.cold+0x17/0x27
sysfs_create_dir_ns+0xb8/0xd0
kobject_add_internal+0xb1/0x240
kobject_init_and_add+0x71/0xa0
erofs_register_sysfs+0x89/0x110
erofs_fc_fill_super+0x98c/0xaf0
vfs_get_super+0x7d/0x100
get_tree_nodev+0x16/0x20
erofs_fc_get_tree+0x20/0x30
vfs_get_tree+0x24/0xb0
path_mount+0x2fa/0xa90
do_mount+0x7c/0xa0
__x64_sys_mount+0x8b/0xe0
do_syscall_64+0x30/0x60
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
The reason is erofs_fscache_register_cookie() doesn't guarantee the primary
data blob (aka fsid) is unique in the shared domain and
erofs_register_sysfs() invoked by the second mount will fail due to the
duplicated fsid in the shared domain and report warning.
It would be better to check the uniqueness of fsid before doing
erofs_register_sysfs(), so adding a new flags parameter for
erofs_fscache_register_cookie() and doing the uniqueness check if
EROFS_REG_COOKIE_NEED_NOEXIST is enabled.
After the patch, the error in dmesg for the duplicated mount would be:
erofs: ...: erofs_domain_register_cookie: XX already exists in domain YY
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221125110822.3812942-1-houtao@huaweicloud.com
Fixes: 7d41963759 ("erofs: Support sharing cookies in the same domain")
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
When erofs instance is remounted with fsid or domain_id mount option
specified, the original fsid and domain_id string pointer in sbi->opt
is directly overridden with the fsid and domain_id string in the new
fs_context, without freeing the original fsid and domain_id string.
What's worse, when the new fsid and domain_id string is transferred to
sbi, they are not reset to NULL in fs_context, and thus they are freed
when remount finishes, while sbi is still referring to these strings.
Reconfiguration for fsid and domain_id seems unusual. Thus clarify this
restriction explicitly and dump a warning when users are attempting to
do this.
Besides, to fix the use-after-free issue, move fsid and domain_id from
erofs_mount_opts to outside.
Fixes: c6be2bd0a5 ("erofs: register fscache volume")
Fixes: 8b7adf1dff ("erofs: introduce fscache-based domain")
Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Jia Zhu <zhujia.zj@bytedance.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221021023153.1330-1-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
For unmapped range, the returned map.m_llen is zero, and thus the
calculated count is unexpected zero.
Prior to the refactoring introduced by commit 1ae9470c3e ("erofs:
clean up .read_folio() and .readahead() in fscache mode"), only the
readahead routine suffers from this. With the refactoring of making
.read_folio() and .readahead() calling one common routine, both
read_folio and readahead have this issue now.
Fix this by calculating count separately in unmapped condition.
Fixes: c665b394b9 ("erofs: implement fscache-based data readahead")
Fixes: 1ae9470c3e ("erofs: clean up .read_folio() and .readahead() in fscache mode")
Signed-off-by: Jingbo Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221104054028.52208-3-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Pull more erofs updates from Gao Xiang:
"This is a follow-up to the main updates, including some fixes of
fscache mode related to compressed inodes and a cachefiles tracepoint.
There is also a patch to fix an unexpected decompression strategy
change due to a cleanup in the past. All the fixes are quite small.
Apart from these, documentation is also updated for a better
description of recent new features.
In addition, this has some trivial cleanups without actual code logic
changes, so I could have a more recent codebase to work on folios and
avoiding the PG_error page flag for the next cycle.
Summary:
- Leave compressed inodes unsupported in fscache mode for now
- Avoid crash when using tracepoint cachefiles_prep_read
- Fix `backmost' behavior due to a recent cleanup
- Update documentation for better description of recent new features
- Several decompression cleanups w/o logical change"
* tag 'erofs-for-5.19-rc1-fixes' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/xiang/erofs:
erofs: fix 'backmost' member of z_erofs_decompress_frontend
erofs: simplify z_erofs_pcluster_readmore()
erofs: get rid of label `restart_now'
erofs: get rid of `struct z_erofs_collection'
erofs: update documentation
erofs: fix crash when enable tracepoint cachefiles_prep_read
erofs: leave compressed inodes unsupported in fscache mode for now
Pull page cache updates from Matthew Wilcox:
- Appoint myself page cache maintainer
- Fix how scsicam uses the page cache
- Use the memalloc_nofs_save() API to replace AOP_FLAG_NOFS
- Remove the AOP flags entirely
- Remove pagecache_write_begin() and pagecache_write_end()
- Documentation updates
- Convert several address_space operations to use folios:
- is_dirty_writeback
- readpage becomes read_folio
- releasepage becomes release_folio
- freepage becomes free_folio
- Change filler_t to require a struct file pointer be the first
argument like ->read_folio
* tag 'folio-5.19' of git://git.infradead.org/users/willy/pagecache: (107 commits)
nilfs2: Fix some kernel-doc comments
Appoint myself page cache maintainer
fs: Remove aops->freepage
secretmem: Convert to free_folio
nfs: Convert to free_folio
orangefs: Convert to free_folio
fs: Add free_folio address space operation
fs: Convert drop_buffers() to use a folio
fs: Change try_to_free_buffers() to take a folio
jbd2: Convert release_buffer_page() to use a folio
jbd2: Convert jbd2_journal_try_to_free_buffers to take a folio
reiserfs: Convert release_buffer_page() to use a folio
fs: Remove last vestiges of releasepage
ubifs: Convert to release_folio
reiserfs: Convert to release_folio
orangefs: Convert to release_folio
ocfs2: Convert to release_folio
nilfs2: Remove comment about releasepage
nfs: Convert to release_folio
jfs: Convert to release_folio
...
A new fscache based mode is going to be introduced for erofs, in which
case on-demand read semantics is implemented through fscache.
As the first step, register fscache volume for each erofs filesystem.
That means, data blobs can not be shared among erofs filesystems. In the
following iteration, we are going to introduce the domain semantics, in
which case several erofs filesystems can belong to one domain, and data
blobs can be shared among these erofs filesystems of one domain.
Signed-off-by: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220425122143.56815-12-jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com
Acked-by: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
