11526 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Filipe Manana
1869638a14 btrfs: error out when reallocating block for defrag using a stale transaction
[ Upstream commit e36f94914021e58ee88a8856c7fdf35adf9c7ee1 ]

At btrfs_realloc_node() we have these checks to verify we are not using a
stale transaction (a past transaction with an unblocked state or higher),
and the only thing we do is to trigger two WARN_ON(). This however is a
critical problem, highly unexpected and if it happens it's most likely due
to a bug, so we should error out and turn the fs into error state so that
such issue is much more easily noticed if it's triggered.

The problem is critical because in btrfs_realloc_node() we COW tree blocks,
and using such stale transaction will lead to not persisting the extent
buffers used for the COW operations, as allocating tree block adds the
range of the respective extent buffers to the ->dirty_pages iotree of the
transaction, and a stale transaction, in the unlocked state or higher,
will not flush dirty extent buffers anymore, therefore resulting in not
persisting the tree block and resource leaks (not cleaning the dirty_pages
iotree for example).

So do the following changes:

1) Return -EUCLEAN if we find a stale transaction;

2) Turn the fs into error state, with error -EUCLEAN, so that no
   transaction can be committed, and generate a stack trace;

3) Combine both conditions into a single if statement, as both are related
   and have the same error message;

4) Mark the check as unlikely, since this is not expected to ever happen.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-10-25 12:03:11 +02:00
Filipe Manana
f174c8d2c6 btrfs: error when COWing block from a root that is being deleted
[ Upstream commit a2caab29884397e583d09be6546259a83ebfbdb1 ]

At btrfs_cow_block() we check if the block being COWed belongs to a root
that is being deleted and if so we log an error message. However this is
an unexpected case and it indicates a bug somewhere, so we should return
an error and abort the transaction. So change this in the following ways:

1) Abort the transaction with -EUCLEAN, so that if the issue ever happens
   it can easily be noticed;

2) Change the logged message level from error to critical, and change the
   message itself to print the block's logical address and the ID of the
   root;

3) Return -EUCLEAN to the caller;

4) As this is an unexpected scenario, that should never happen, mark the
   check as unlikely, allowing the compiler to potentially generate better
   code.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-10-25 12:03:11 +02:00
Filipe Manana
c833f1e28d btrfs: error out when COWing block using a stale transaction
[ Upstream commit 48774f3bf8b4dd3b1a0e155825c9ce48483db14c ]

At btrfs_cow_block() we have these checks to verify we are not using a
stale transaction (a past transaction with an unblocked state or higher),
and the only thing we do is to trigger a WARN with a message and a stack
trace. This however is a critical problem, highly unexpected and if it
happens it's most likely due to a bug, so we should error out and turn the
fs into error state so that such issue is much more easily noticed if it's
triggered.

The problem is critical because using such stale transaction will lead to
not persisting the extent buffer used for the COW operation, as allocating
a tree block adds the range of the respective extent buffer to the
->dirty_pages iotree of the transaction, and a stale transaction, in the
unlocked state or higher, will not flush dirty extent buffers anymore,
therefore resulting in not persisting the tree block and resource leaks
(not cleaning the dirty_pages iotree for example).

So do the following changes:

1) Return -EUCLEAN if we find a stale transaction;

2) Turn the fs into error state, with error -EUCLEAN, so that no
   transaction can be committed, and generate a stack trace;

3) Combine both conditions into a single if statement, as both are related
   and have the same error message;

4) Mark the check as unlikely, since this is not expected to ever happen.

Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-10-25 12:03:11 +02:00
Josef Bacik
9d99acb6a1 btrfs: fix some -Wmaybe-uninitialized warnings in ioctl.c
[ Upstream commit 9147b9ded499d9853bdf0e9804b7eaa99c4429ed ]

Jens reported the following warnings from -Wmaybe-uninitialized recent
Linus' branch.

  In file included from ./include/asm-generic/rwonce.h:26,
		   from ./arch/arm64/include/asm/rwonce.h:71,
		   from ./include/linux/compiler.h:246,
		   from ./include/linux/export.h:5,
		   from ./include/linux/linkage.h:7,
		   from ./include/linux/kernel.h:17,
		   from fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:6:
  In function ‘instrument_copy_from_user_before’,
      inlined from ‘_copy_from_user’ at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:148:3,
      inlined from ‘copy_from_user’ at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:183:7,
      inlined from ‘btrfs_ioctl_space_info’ at fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2999:6,
      inlined from ‘btrfs_ioctl’ at fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4616:10:
  ./include/linux/kasan-checks.h:38:27: warning: ‘space_args’ may be used
  uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
     38 | #define kasan_check_write __kasan_check_write
  ./include/linux/instrumented.h:129:9: note: in expansion of macro
  ‘kasan_check_write’
    129 |         kasan_check_write(to, n);
	|         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  ./include/linux/kasan-checks.h: In function ‘btrfs_ioctl’:
  ./include/linux/kasan-checks.h:20:6: note: by argument 1 of type ‘const
  volatile void *’ to ‘__kasan_check_write’ declared here
     20 | bool __kasan_check_write(const volatile void *p, unsigned int
	size);
	|      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2981:39: note: ‘space_args’ declared here
   2981 |         struct btrfs_ioctl_space_args space_args;
	|                                       ^~~~~~~~~~
  In function ‘instrument_copy_from_user_before’,
      inlined from ‘_copy_from_user’ at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:148:3,
      inlined from ‘copy_from_user’ at ./include/linux/uaccess.h:183:7,
      inlined from ‘_btrfs_ioctl_send’ at fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4343:9,
      inlined from ‘btrfs_ioctl’ at fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4658:10:
  ./include/linux/kasan-checks.h:38:27: warning: ‘args32’ may be used
  uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
     38 | #define kasan_check_write __kasan_check_write
  ./include/linux/instrumented.h:129:9: note: in expansion of macro
  ‘kasan_check_write’
    129 |         kasan_check_write(to, n);
	|         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  ./include/linux/kasan-checks.h: In function ‘btrfs_ioctl’:
  ./include/linux/kasan-checks.h:20:6: note: by argument 1 of type ‘const
  volatile void *’ to ‘__kasan_check_write’ declared here
     20 | bool __kasan_check_write(const volatile void *p, unsigned int
	size);
	|      ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4341:49: note: ‘args32’ declared here
   4341 |                 struct btrfs_ioctl_send_args_32 args32;
	|                                                 ^~~~~~

This was due to his config options and having KASAN turned on,
which adds some extra checks around copy_from_user(), which then
triggered the -Wmaybe-uninitialized checker for these cases.

Fix the warnings by initializing the different structs we're copying
into.

Reported-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-10-25 12:03:11 +02:00
Josef Bacik
febcad3d32 btrfs: initialize start_slot in btrfs_log_prealloc_extents
[ Upstream commit b4c639f699349880b7918b861e1bd360442ec450 ]

Jens reported a compiler warning when using
CONFIG_CC_OPTIMIZE_FOR_SIZE=y that looks like this

  fs/btrfs/tree-log.c: In function ‘btrfs_log_prealloc_extents’:
  fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4828:23: warning: ‘start_slot’ may be used
  uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
   4828 |                 ret = copy_items(trans, inode, dst_path, path,
	|                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   4829 |                                  start_slot, ins_nr, 1, 0);
	|                                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4725:13: note: ‘start_slot’ was declared here
   4725 |         int start_slot;
	|             ^~~~~~~~~~

The compiler is incorrect, as we only use this code when ins_len > 0,
and when ins_len > 0 we have start_slot properly initialized.  However
we generally find the -Wmaybe-uninitialized warnings valuable, so
initialize start_slot to get rid of the warning.

Reported-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Tested-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-10-25 12:03:09 +02:00
Filipe Manana
563853bf3b btrfs: return -EUCLEAN for delayed tree ref with a ref count not equals to 1
[ Upstream commit 1bf76df3fee56d6637718e267f7c34ed70d0c7dc ]

When running a delayed tree reference, if we find a ref count different
from 1, we return -EIO. This isn't an IO error, as it indicates either a
bug in the delayed refs code or a memory corruption, so change the error
code from -EIO to -EUCLEAN. Also tag the branch as 'unlikely' as this is
not expected to ever happen, and change the error message to print the
tree block's bytenr without the parenthesis (and there was a missing space
between the 'block' word and the opening parenthesis), for consistency as
that's the style we used everywhere else.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-10-25 12:03:09 +02:00
Filipe Manana
8a4e34fe1b btrfs: prevent transaction block reserve underflow when starting transaction
[ Upstream commit a7ddeeb079505961355cf0106154da0110f1fdff ]

When starting a transaction, with a non-zero number of items, we reserve
metadata space for that number of items and for delayed refs by doing a
call to btrfs_block_rsv_add(), with the transaction block reserve passed
as the block reserve argument. This reserves metadata space and adds it
to the transaction block reserve. Later we migrate the space we reserved
for delayed references from the transaction block reserve into the delayed
refs block reserve, by calling btrfs_migrate_to_delayed_refs_rsv().

btrfs_migrate_to_delayed_refs_rsv() decrements the number of bytes to
migrate from the source block reserve, and this however may result in an
underflow in case the space added to the transaction block reserve ended
up being used by another task that has not reserved enough space for its
own use - examples are tasks doing reflinks or hole punching because they
end up calling btrfs_replace_file_extents() -> btrfs_drop_extents() and
may need to modify/COW a variable number of leaves/paths, so they keep
trying to use space from the transaction block reserve when they need to
COW an extent buffer, and may end up trying to use more space then they
have reserved (1 unit/path only for removing file extent items).

This can be avoided by simply reserving space first without adding it to
the transaction block reserve, then add the space for delayed refs to the
delayed refs block reserve and finally add the remaining reserved space
to the transaction block reserve. This also makes the code a bit shorter
and simpler. So just do that.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-10-25 12:03:09 +02:00
Zygo Blaxell
fb8e1608b0 btrfs: fix stripe length calculation for non-zoned data chunk allocation
commit 8a540e990d7da36813cb71a4a422712bfba448a4 upstream.

Commit f6fca3917b4d "btrfs: store chunk size in space-info struct"
broke data chunk allocations on non-zoned multi-device filesystems when
using default chunk_size.  Commit 5da431b71d4b "btrfs: fix the max chunk
size and stripe length calculation" partially fixed that, and this patch
completes the fix for that case.

After commit f6fca3917b4d and 5da431b71d4b, the sequence of events for
a data chunk allocation on a non-zoned filesystem is:

        1.  btrfs_create_chunk calls init_alloc_chunk_ctl, which copies
        space_info->chunk_size (default 10 GiB) to ctl->max_stripe_len
        unmodified.  Before f6fca3917b4d, ctl->max_stripe_len value was
        1 GiB for non-zoned data chunks and not configurable.

        2.  btrfs_create_chunk calls gather_device_info which consumes
        and produces more fields of chunk_ctl.

        3.  gather_device_info multiplies ctl->max_stripe_len by
        ctl->dev_stripes (which is 1 in all cases except dup)
        and calls find_free_dev_extent with that number as num_bytes.

        4.  find_free_dev_extent locates the first dev_extent hole on
        a device which is at least as large as num_bytes.  With default
        max_chunk_size from f6fca3917b4d, it finds the first hole which is
        longer than 10 GiB, or the largest hole if that hole is shorter
        than 10 GiB.  This is different from the pre-f6fca3917b4d
        behavior, where num_bytes is 1 GiB, and find_free_dev_extent
        may choose a different hole.

        5.  gather_device_info repeats step 4 with all devices to find
        the first or largest dev_extent hole that can be allocated on
        each device.

        6.  gather_device_info sorts the device list by the hole size
        on each device, using total unallocated space on each device to
        break ties, then returns to btrfs_create_chunk with the list.

        7.  btrfs_create_chunk calls decide_stripe_size_regular.

        8.  decide_stripe_size_regular finds the largest stripe_len that
        fits across the first nr_devs device dev_extent holes that were
        found by gather_device_info (and satisfies other constraints
        on stripe_len that are not relevant here).

        9.  decide_stripe_size_regular caps the length of the stripe it
        computed at 1 GiB.  This cap appeared in 5da431b71d4b to correct
        one of the other regressions introduced in f6fca3917b4d.

        10.  btrfs_create_chunk creates a new chunk with the above
        computed size and number of devices.

At step 4, gather_device_info() has found a location where stripe up to
10 GiB in length could be allocated on several devices, and selected
which devices should have a dev_extent allocated on them, but at step
9, only 1 GiB of the space that was found on each device can be used.
This mismatch causes new suboptimal chunk allocation cases that did not
occur in pre-f6fca3917b4d kernels.

Consider a filesystem using raid1 profile with 3 devices.  After some
balances, device 1 has 10x 1 GiB unallocated space, while devices 2
and 3 have 1x 10 GiB unallocated space, i.e. the same total amount of
space, but distributed across different numbers of dev_extent holes.
For visualization, let's ignore all the chunks that were allocated before
this point, and focus on the remaining holes:

        Device 1:  [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] (10x 1 GiB unallocated)
        Device 2:  [__________] (10 GiB contig unallocated)
        Device 3:  [__________] (10 GiB contig unallocated)

Before f6fca3917b4d, the allocator would fill these optimally by
allocating chunks with dev_extents on devices 1 and 2 ([12]), 1 and 3
([13]), or 2 and 3 ([23]):

        [after 0 chunk allocations]
        Device 1:  [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] (10 GiB)
        Device 2:  [__________] (10 GiB)
        Device 3:  [__________] (10 GiB)

        [after 1 chunk allocation]
        Device 1:  [12] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_]
        Device 2:  [12] [_________] (9 GiB)
        Device 3:  [__________] (10 GiB)

        [after 2 chunk allocations]
        Device 1:  [12] [13] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] (8 GiB)
        Device 2:  [12] [_________] (9 GiB)
        Device 3:  [13] [_________] (9 GiB)

        [after 3 chunk allocations]
        Device 1:  [12] [13] [12] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] (7 GiB)
        Device 2:  [12] [12] [________] (8 GiB)
        Device 3:  [13] [_________] (9 GiB)

        [...]

        [after 12 chunk allocations]
        Device 1:  [12] [13] [12] [13] [12] [13] [12] [13] [_] [_] (2 GiB)
        Device 2:  [12] [12] [23] [23] [12] [12] [23] [23] [__] (2 GiB)
        Device 3:  [13] [13] [23] [23] [13] [23] [13] [23] [__] (2 GiB)

        [after 13 chunk allocations]
        Device 1:  [12] [13] [12] [13] [12] [13] [12] [13] [12] [_] (1 GiB)
        Device 2:  [12] [12] [23] [23] [12] [12] [23] [23] [12] [_] (1 GiB)
        Device 3:  [13] [13] [23] [23] [13] [23] [13] [23] [__] (2 GiB)

        [after 14 chunk allocations]
        Device 1:  [12] [13] [12] [13] [12] [13] [12] [13] [12] [13] (full)
        Device 2:  [12] [12] [23] [23] [12] [12] [23] [23] [12] [_] (1 GiB)
        Device 3:  [13] [13] [23] [23] [13] [23] [13] [23] [13] [_] (1 GiB)

        [after 15 chunk allocations]
        Device 1:  [12] [13] [12] [13] [12] [13] [12] [13] [12] [13] (full)
        Device 2:  [12] [12] [23] [23] [12] [12] [23] [23] [12] [23] (full)
        Device 3:  [13] [13] [23] [23] [13] [23] [13] [23] [13] [23] (full)

This allocates all of the space with no waste.  The sorting function used
by gather_device_info considers free space holes above 1 GiB in length
to be equal to 1 GiB, so once find_free_dev_extent locates a sufficiently
long hole on each device, all the holes appear equal in the sort, and the
comparison falls back to sorting devices by total free space.  This keeps
usable space on each device equal so they can all be filled completely.

After f6fca3917b4d, the allocator prefers the devices with larger holes
over the devices with more free space, so it makes bad allocation choices:

        [after 1 chunk allocation]
        Device 1:  [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] (10 GiB)
        Device 2:  [23] [_________] (9 GiB)
        Device 3:  [23] [_________] (9 GiB)

        [after 2 chunk allocations]
        Device 1:  [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] (10 GiB)
        Device 2:  [23] [23] [________] (8 GiB)
        Device 3:  [23] [23] [________] (8 GiB)

        [after 3 chunk allocations]
        Device 1:  [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] (10 GiB)
        Device 2:  [23] [23] [23] [_______] (7 GiB)
        Device 3:  [23] [23] [23] [_______] (7 GiB)

        [...]

        [after 9 chunk allocations]
        Device 1:  [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] (10 GiB)
        Device 2:  [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [_] (1 GiB)
        Device 3:  [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [_] (1 GiB)

        [after 10 chunk allocations]
        Device 1:  [12] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] (9 GiB)
        Device 2:  [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [12] (full)
        Device 3:  [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [_] (1 GiB)

        [after 11 chunk allocations]
        Device 1:  [12] [13] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] [_] (8 GiB)
        Device 2:  [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [12] (full)
        Device 3:  [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [23] [13] (full)

No further allocations are possible, with 8 GiB wasted (4 GiB of data
space).  The sort in gather_device_info now considers free space in
holes longer than 1 GiB to be distinct, so it will prefer devices 2 and
3 over device 1 until all but 1 GiB is allocated on devices 2 and 3.
At that point, with only 1 GiB unallocated on every device, the largest
hole length on each device is equal at 1 GiB, so the sort finally moves
to ordering the devices with the most free space, but by this time it
is too late to make use of the free space on device 1.

Note that it's possible to contrive a case where the pre-f6fca3917b4d
allocator fails the same way, but these cases generally have extensive
dev_extent fragmentation as a precondition (e.g. many holes of 768M
in length on one device, and few holes 1 GiB in length on the others).
With the regression in f6fca3917b4d, bad chunk allocation can occur even
under optimal conditions, when all dev_extent holes are exact multiples
of stripe_len in length, as in the example above.

Also note that post-f6fca3917b4d kernels do treat dev_extent holes
larger than 10 GiB as equal, so the bad behavior won't show up on a
freshly formatted filesystem; however, as the filesystem ages and fills
up, and holes ranging from 1 GiB to 10 GiB in size appear, the problem
can show up as a failure to balance after adding or removing devices,
or an unexpected shortfall in available space due to unequal allocation.

To fix the regression and make data chunk allocation work
again, set ctl->max_stripe_len back to the original SZ_1G, or
space_info->chunk_size if that's smaller (the latter can happen if the
user set space_info->chunk_size to less than 1 GiB via sysfs, or it's
a 32 MiB system chunk with a hardcoded chunk_size and stripe_len).

While researching the background of the earlier commits, I found that an
identical fix was already proposed at:

  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/de83ac46-a4a3-88d3-85ce-255b7abc5249@gmx.com/

The previous review missed one detail:  ctl->max_stripe_len is used
before decide_stripe_size_regular() is called, when it is too late for
the changes in that function to have any effect.  ctl->max_stripe_len is
not used directly by decide_stripe_size_regular(), but the parameter
does heavily influence the per-device free space data presented to
the function.

Fixes: f6fca3917b4d ("btrfs: store chunk size in space-info struct")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20231007051421.19657-1-ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org/
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Zygo Blaxell <ce3g8jdj@umail.furryterror.org>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-10-25 12:03:04 +02:00
Bernd Schubert
6e4c40aa27 btrfs: file_remove_privs needs an exclusive lock in direct io write
commit 9af86694fd5d387992699ec99007ed374966ce9a upstream.

This was noticed by Miklos that file_remove_privs might call into
notify_change(), which requires to hold an exclusive lock. The problem
exists in FUSE and btrfs. We can fix it without any additional helpers
from VFS, in case the privileges would need to be dropped, change the
lock type to be exclusive and redo the loop.

Fixes: e9adabb9712e ("btrfs: use shared lock for direct writes within EOF")
CC: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Bernd Schubert <bschubert@ddn.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-10-10 22:00:46 +02:00
Filipe Manana
6cd57f5c77 btrfs: fix fscrypt name leak after failure to join log transaction
commit fee4c19937439693f2420a916169d08e88576e8e upstream.

When logging a new name, we don't expect to fail joining a log transaction
since we know at least one of the inodes was logged before in the current
transaction. However if we fail for some unexpected reason, we end up not
freeing the fscrypt name we previously allocated. So fix that by freeing
the name in case we failed to join a log transaction.

Fixes: ab3c5c18e8fa ("btrfs: setup qstr from dentrys using fscrypt helper")
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-10-10 22:00:46 +02:00
Christophe JAILLET
6d05a1a7a4 btrfs: fix an error handling path in btrfs_rename()
commit abe3bf7425fb695a9b37394af18b9ea58a800802 upstream.

If new_whiteout_inode() fails, some resources need to be freed.
Add the missing goto to the error handling path.

Fixes: ab3c5c18e8fa ("btrfs: setup qstr from dentrys using fscrypt helper")
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-10-10 22:00:46 +02:00
Sweet Tea Dorminy
ef54db5b5d btrfs: use struct fscrypt_str instead of struct qstr
[ Upstream commit 6db75318823a169e836a478ca57d6a7c0a156b77 ]

While struct qstr is more natural without fscrypt, since it's provided
by dentries, struct fscrypt_str is provided by the fscrypt handlers
processing dentries, and is thus more natural in the fscrypt world.
Replace all of the struct qstr uses with struct fscrypt_str.

Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 9af86694fd5d ("btrfs: file_remove_privs needs an exclusive lock in direct io write")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-10-10 22:00:36 +02:00
Sweet Tea Dorminy
68ad364ec8 btrfs: setup qstr from dentrys using fscrypt helper
[ Upstream commit ab3c5c18e8fa3f8ea116016095d25adab466cd39 ]

Most places where we get a struct qstr, we are doing so from a dentry.
With fscrypt, the dentry's name may be encrypted on-disk, so fscrypt
provides a helper to convert a dentry name to the appropriate disk name
if necessary. Convert each of the dentry name accesses to use
fscrypt_setup_filename(), then convert the resulting fscrypt_name back
to an unencrypted qstr. This does not work for nokey names, but the
specific locations that could spawn nokey names are noted.

At present, since there are no encrypted directories, nothing goes down
the filename encryption paths.

Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 9af86694fd5d ("btrfs: file_remove_privs needs an exclusive lock in direct io write")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-10-10 22:00:36 +02:00
Sweet Tea Dorminy
1cf474cd47 btrfs: use struct qstr instead of name and namelen pairs
[ Upstream commit e43eec81c5167b655b72c781b0e75e62a05e415e ]

Many functions throughout btrfs take name buffer and name length
arguments. Most of these functions at the highest level are usually
called with these arguments extracted from a supplied dentry's name.
But the entire name can be passed instead, making each function a little
more elegant.

Each function whose arguments are currently the name and length
extracted from a dentry is herein converted to instead take a pointer to
the name in the dentry. The couple of calls to these calls without a
struct dentry are converted to create an appropriate qstr to pass in.
Additionally, every function which is only called with a name/len
extracted directly from a qstr is also converted.

This change has positive effect on stack consumption, frame of many
functions is reduced but this will be used in the future for fscrypt
related structures.

Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 9af86694fd5d ("btrfs: file_remove_privs needs an exclusive lock in direct io write")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-10-10 22:00:36 +02:00
Josef Bacik
d6a749e4ca btrfs: properly report 0 avail for very full file systems
commit 58bfe2ccec5f9f137b41dd38f335290dcc13cd5c upstream.

A user reported some issues with smaller file systems that get very
full.  While investigating this issue I noticed that df wasn't showing
100% full, despite having 0 chunk space and having < 1MiB of available
metadata space.

This turns out to be an overflow issue, we're doing:

  total_available_metadata_space - SZ_4M < global_block_rsv_size

to determine if there's not enough space to make metadata allocations,
which overflows if total_available_metadata_space is < 4M.  Fix this by
checking to see if our available space is greater than the 4M threshold.
This makes df properly report 100% usage on the file system.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-10-06 14:57:04 +02:00
Filipe Manana
45ad79c9cb btrfs: assert delayed node locked when removing delayed item
[ Upstream commit a57c2d4e46f519b24558ae0752c17eec416ac72a ]

When removing a delayed item, or releasing which will remove it as well,
we will modify one of the delayed node's rbtrees and item counter if the
delayed item is in one of the rbtrees. This require having the delayed
node's mutex locked, otherwise we will race with other tasks modifying
the rbtrees and the counter.

This is motivated by a previous version of another patch actually calling
btrfs_release_delayed_item() after unlocking the delayed node's mutex and
against a delayed item that is in a rbtree.

So assert at __btrfs_remove_delayed_item() that the delayed node's mutex
is locked.

Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-10-06 14:56:52 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
cca10592ff btrfs: reset destination buffer when read_extent_buffer() gets invalid range
[ Upstream commit 74ee79142c0a344d4eae2eb7012ebc4e82254109 ]

Commit f98b6215d7d1 ("btrfs: extent_io: do extra check for extent buffer
read write functions") changed how we handle invalid extent buffer range
for read_extent_buffer().

Previously if the range is invalid we just set the destination to zero,
but after the patch we do nothing and error out.

This can lead to smatch static checker errors like:

  fs/btrfs/print-tree.c:186 print_uuid_item() error: uninitialized symbol 'subvol_id'.
  fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c:338 check_eb_bitmap() error: uninitialized symbol 'has'.
  fs/btrfs/tests/extent-io-tests.c:353 check_eb_bitmap() error: uninitialized symbol 'has'.
  fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c:203 btrfs_uuid_tree_remove() error: uninitialized symbol 'read_subid'.
  fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c:353 btrfs_uuid_tree_iterate() error: uninitialized symbol 'subid_le'.
  fs/btrfs/uuid-tree.c:72 btrfs_uuid_tree_lookup() error: uninitialized symbol 'data'.
  fs/btrfs/volumes.c:7415 btrfs_dev_stats_value() error: uninitialized symbol 'val'.

Fix those warnings by reverting back to the old memset() behavior.
By this we keep the static checker happy and would still make a lot of
noise when such invalid ranges are passed in.

Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Fixes: f98b6215d7d1 ("btrfs: extent_io: do extra check for extent buffer read write functions")
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-10-06 14:56:45 +02:00
Filipe Manana
39c4a9522d btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index item
[ Upstream commit 2c58c3931ede7cd08cbecf1f1a4acaf0a04a41a9 ]

Instead of calling BUG() when we fail to insert a delayed dir index item
into the delayed node's tree, we can just release all the resources we
have allocated/acquired before and return the error to the caller. This is
fine because all existing call chains undo anything they have done before
calling btrfs_insert_delayed_dir_index() or BUG_ON (when creating pending
snapshots in the transaction commit path).

So remove the BUG() call and do proper error handling.

This relates to a syzbot report linked below, but does not fix it because
it only prevents hitting a BUG(), it does not fix the issue where somehow
we attempt to use twice the same index number for different index items.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/00000000000036e1290603e097e0@google.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-10-06 14:56:32 +02:00
Filipe Manana
0d1a761dec btrfs: improve error message after failure to add delayed dir index item
[ Upstream commit 91bfe3104b8db0310f76f2dcb6aacef24c889366 ]

If we fail to add a delayed dir index item because there's already another
item with the same index number, we print an error message (and then BUG).
However that message isn't very helpful to debug anything because we don't
know what's the index number and what are the values of index counters in
the inode and its delayed inode (index_cnt fields of struct btrfs_inode
and struct btrfs_delayed_node).

So update the error message to include the index number and counters.

We actually had a recent case where this issue was hit by a syzbot report
(see the link below).

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/00000000000036e1290603e097e0@google.com/
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 2c58c3931ede ("btrfs: remove BUG() after failure to insert delayed dir index item")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-10-06 14:56:32 +02:00
Josef Bacik
1f89e6daf2 btrfs: check for BTRFS_FS_ERROR in pending ordered assert
commit 4ca8e03cf2bfaeef7c85939fa1ea0c749cd116ab upstream.

If we do fast tree logging we increment a counter on the current
transaction for every ordered extent we need to wait for.  This means we
expect the transaction to still be there when we clear pending on the
ordered extent.  However if we happen to abort the transaction and clean
it up, there could be no running transaction, and thus we'll trip the
"ASSERT(trans)" check.  This is obviously incorrect, and the code
properly deals with the case that the transaction doesn't exist.  Fix
this ASSERT() to only fire if there's no trans and we don't have
BTRFS_FS_ERROR() set on the file system.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-09-23 11:11:11 +02:00
Filipe Manana
50e385d98b btrfs: release path before inode lookup during the ino lookup ioctl
commit ee34a82e890a7babb5585daf1a6dd7d4d1cf142a upstream.

During the ino lookup ioctl we can end up calling btrfs_iget() to get an
inode reference while we are holding on a root's btree. If btrfs_iget()
needs to lookup the inode from the root's btree, because it's not
currently loaded in memory, then it will need to lock another or the
same path in the same root btree. This may result in a deadlock and
trigger the following lockdep splat:

  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00004-gf7757129e3de #0 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  syz-executor277/5012 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff88802df41710 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff88802df418e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}:
         down_read_nested+0x49/0x2f0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1645
         __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136
         btrfs_search_slot+0x13a4/0x2f80 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2302
         btrfs_init_root_free_objectid+0x148/0x320 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:4955
         btrfs_init_fs_root fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1128 [inline]
         btrfs_get_root_ref+0x5ae/0xae0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1338
         btrfs_get_fs_root fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1390 [inline]
         open_ctree+0x29c8/0x3030 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:3494
         btrfs_fill_super+0x1c7/0x2f0 fs/btrfs/super.c:1154
         btrfs_mount_root+0x7e0/0x910 fs/btrfs/super.c:1519
         legacy_get_tree+0xef/0x190 fs/fs_context.c:611
         vfs_get_tree+0x8c/0x270 fs/super.c:1519
         fc_mount fs/namespace.c:1112 [inline]
         vfs_kern_mount+0xbc/0x150 fs/namespace.c:1142
         btrfs_mount+0x39f/0xb50 fs/btrfs/super.c:1579
         legacy_get_tree+0xef/0x190 fs/fs_context.c:611
         vfs_get_tree+0x8c/0x270 fs/super.c:1519
         do_new_mount+0x28f/0xae0 fs/namespace.c:3335
         do_mount fs/namespace.c:3675 [inline]
         __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3884 [inline]
         __se_sys_mount+0x2d9/0x3c0 fs/namespace.c:3861
         do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
         do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

  -> #0 (btrfs-tree-01){++++}-{3:3}:
         check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
         check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
         validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
         __lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
         lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761
         down_read_nested+0x49/0x2f0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1645
         __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136
         btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:142 [inline]
         btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x292/0x3c0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:281
         btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1832 [inline]
         btrfs_search_slot+0x4ff/0x2f80 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2154
         btrfs_lookup_inode+0xdc/0x480 fs/btrfs/inode-item.c:412
         btrfs_read_locked_inode fs/btrfs/inode.c:3892 [inline]
         btrfs_iget_path+0x2d9/0x1520 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5716
         btrfs_search_path_in_tree_user fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1961 [inline]
         btrfs_ioctl_ino_lookup_user+0x77a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2105
         btrfs_ioctl+0xb0b/0xd40 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4683
         vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
         __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
         __se_sys_ioctl+0xf8/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:856
         do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
         do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

  other info that might help us debug this:

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0                    CPU1
         ----                    ----
    rlock(btrfs-tree-00);
                                 lock(btrfs-tree-01);
                                 lock(btrfs-tree-00);
    rlock(btrfs-tree-01);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  1 lock held by syz-executor277/5012:
   #0: ffff88802df418e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 1 PID: 5012 Comm: syz-executor277 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00004-gf7757129e3de #0
  Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/26/2023
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
   dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
   check_noncircular+0x375/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2195
   check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
   check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
   validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
   __lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
   lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761
   down_read_nested+0x49/0x2f0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1645
   __btrfs_tree_read_lock+0x2f/0x220 fs/btrfs/locking.c:136
   btrfs_tree_read_lock fs/btrfs/locking.c:142 [inline]
   btrfs_read_lock_root_node+0x292/0x3c0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:281
   btrfs_search_slot_get_root fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1832 [inline]
   btrfs_search_slot+0x4ff/0x2f80 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2154
   btrfs_lookup_inode+0xdc/0x480 fs/btrfs/inode-item.c:412
   btrfs_read_locked_inode fs/btrfs/inode.c:3892 [inline]
   btrfs_iget_path+0x2d9/0x1520 fs/btrfs/inode.c:5716
   btrfs_search_path_in_tree_user fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1961 [inline]
   btrfs_ioctl_ino_lookup_user+0x77a/0xf50 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:2105
   btrfs_ioctl+0xb0b/0xd40 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:4683
   vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
   __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline]
   __se_sys_ioctl+0xf8/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:856
   do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
   do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
  RIP: 0033:0x7f0bec94ea39

Fix this simply by releasing the path before calling btrfs_iget() as at
point we don't need the path anymore.

Reported-by: syzbot+bf66ad948981797d2f1d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/00000000000045fa140603c4a969@google.com/
Fixes: 23d0b79dfaed ("btrfs: Add unprivileged version of ino_lookup ioctl")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-09-23 11:11:11 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
52932bbc6d btrfs: fix a compilation error if DEBUG is defined in btree_dirty_folio
commit 5e0e879926c1ce7e1f5e0dfaacaf2d105f7d8a05 upstream.

[BUG]
After commit 72a69cd03082 ("btrfs: subpage: pack all subpage bitmaps
into a larger bitmap"), the DEBUG section of btree_dirty_folio() would
no longer compile.

[CAUSE]
If DEBUG is defined, we would do extra checks for btree_dirty_folio(),
mostly to make sure the range we marked dirty has an extent buffer and
that extent buffer is dirty.

For subpage, we need to iterate through all the extent buffers covered
by that page range, and make sure they all matches the criteria.

However commit 72a69cd03082 ("btrfs: subpage: pack all subpage bitmaps
into a larger bitmap") changes how we store the bitmap, we pack all the
16 bits bitmaps into a larger bitmap, which would save some space.

This means we no longer have btrfs_subpage::dirty_bitmap, instead the
dirty bitmap is starting at btrfs_subpage_info::dirty_offset, and has a
length of btrfs_subpage_info::bitmap_nr_bits.

[FIX]
Although I'm not sure if it still makes sense to maintain such code, at
least let it compile.

This patch would let us test the bits one by one through the bitmaps.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-09-23 11:11:10 +02:00
Filipe Manana
32247b9526 btrfs: fix lockdep splat and potential deadlock after failure running delayed items
commit e110f8911ddb93e6f55da14ccbbe705397b30d0b upstream.

When running delayed items we are holding a delayed node's mutex and then
we will attempt to modify a subvolume btree to insert/update/delete the
delayed items. However if have an error during the insertions for example,
btrfs_insert_delayed_items() may return with a path that has locked extent
buffers (a leaf at the very least), and then we attempt to release the
delayed node at __btrfs_run_delayed_items(), which requires taking the
delayed node's mutex, causing an ABBA type of deadlock. This was reported
by syzbot and the lockdep splat is the following:

  WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
  6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00024-g93f5de5f648d #0 Not tainted
  ------------------------------------------------------
  syz-executor.2/13257 is trying to acquire lock:
  ffff88801835c0c0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256

  but task is already holding lock:
  ffff88802a5ab8e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x3c/0x2a0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:198

  which lock already depends on the new lock.

  the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

  -> #1 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}:
         __lock_release kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5475 [inline]
         lock_release+0x36f/0x9d0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5781
         up_write+0x79/0x580 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1625
         btrfs_tree_unlock_rw fs/btrfs/locking.h:189 [inline]
         btrfs_unlock_up_safe+0x179/0x3b0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:239
         search_leaf fs/btrfs/ctree.c:1986 [inline]
         btrfs_search_slot+0x2511/0x2f80 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2230
         btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x9c/0x180 fs/btrfs/ctree.c:4376
         btrfs_insert_delayed_item fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:746 [inline]
         btrfs_insert_delayed_items fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:824 [inline]
         __btrfs_commit_inode_delayed_items+0xd24/0x2410 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1111
         __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x1db/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1153
         flush_space+0x269/0xe70 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:723
         btrfs_async_reclaim_metadata_space+0x106/0x350 fs/btrfs/space-info.c:1078
         process_one_work+0x92c/0x12c0 kernel/workqueue.c:2600
         worker_thread+0xa63/0x1210 kernel/workqueue.c:2751
         kthread+0x2b8/0x350 kernel/kthread.c:389
         ret_from_fork+0x2e/0x60 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:145
         ret_from_fork_asm+0x11/0x20 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:304

  -> #0 (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}:
         check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
         check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
         validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
         __lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
         lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761
         __mutex_lock_common+0x1d8/0x2530 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
         __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
         mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
         __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256
         btrfs_release_delayed_node fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:281 [inline]
         __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x2b5/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1156
         btrfs_commit_transaction+0x859/0x2ff0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2276
         btrfs_sync_file+0xf56/0x1330 fs/btrfs/file.c:1988
         vfs_fsync_range fs/sync.c:188 [inline]
         vfs_fsync fs/sync.c:202 [inline]
         do_fsync fs/sync.c:212 [inline]
         __do_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:220 [inline]
         __se_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:218 [inline]
         __x64_sys_fsync+0x196/0x1e0 fs/sync.c:218
         do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
         do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
         entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

  other info that might help us debug this:

   Possible unsafe locking scenario:

         CPU0                    CPU1
         ----                    ----
    lock(btrfs-tree-00);
                                 lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
                                 lock(btrfs-tree-00);
    lock(&delayed_node->mutex);

   *** DEADLOCK ***

  3 locks held by syz-executor.2/13257:
   #0: ffff88802c1ee370 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: spin_unlock include/linux/spinlock.h:391 [inline]
   #0: ffff88802c1ee370 (btrfs_trans_num_writers){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0xb87/0xe00 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:287
   #1: ffff88802c1ee398 (btrfs_trans_num_extwriters){++++}-{0:0}, at: join_transaction+0xbb2/0xe00 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:288
   #2: ffff88802a5ab8e8 (btrfs-tree-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x3c/0x2a0 fs/btrfs/locking.c:198

  stack backtrace:
  CPU: 0 PID: 13257 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.5.0-rc7-syzkaller-00024-g93f5de5f648d #0
  Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 07/26/2023
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline]
   dump_stack_lvl+0x1e7/0x2d0 lib/dump_stack.c:106
   check_noncircular+0x375/0x4a0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2195
   check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3142 [inline]
   check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3261 [inline]
   validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3876 [inline]
   __lock_acquire+0x39ff/0x7f70 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5144
   lock_acquire+0x1e3/0x520 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5761
   __mutex_lock_common+0x1d8/0x2530 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603
   __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline]
   mutex_lock_nested+0x1b/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799
   __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x9a/0xaa0 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:256
   btrfs_release_delayed_node fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:281 [inline]
   __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x2b5/0x430 fs/btrfs/delayed-inode.c:1156
   btrfs_commit_transaction+0x859/0x2ff0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2276
   btrfs_sync_file+0xf56/0x1330 fs/btrfs/file.c:1988
   vfs_fsync_range fs/sync.c:188 [inline]
   vfs_fsync fs/sync.c:202 [inline]
   do_fsync fs/sync.c:212 [inline]
   __do_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:220 [inline]
   __se_sys_fsync fs/sync.c:218 [inline]
   __x64_sys_fsync+0x196/0x1e0 fs/sync.c:218
   do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:50 [inline]
   do_syscall_64+0x41/0xc0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
  RIP: 0033:0x7f3ad047cae9
  Code: 28 00 00 00 75 (...)
  RSP: 002b:00007f3ad12510c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 000000000000004a
  RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f3ad059bf80 RCX: 00007f3ad047cae9
  RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000005
  RBP: 00007f3ad04c847a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
  R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007f3ad059bf80 R15: 00007ffe56af92f8
   </TASK>
  ------------[ cut here ]------------

Fix this by releasing the path before releasing the delayed node in the
error path at __btrfs_run_delayed_items().

Reported-by: syzbot+a379155f07c134ea9879@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000abba27060403b5bd@google.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-09-23 11:11:10 +02:00
Anand Jain
2174731a17 btrfs: compare the correct fsid/metadata_uuid in btrfs_validate_super
[ Upstream commit 6bfe3959b0e7a526f5c64747801a8613f002f05a ]

The function btrfs_validate_super() should verify the metadata_uuid in
the provided superblock argument. Because, all its callers expect it to
do that.

Such as in the following stacks:

  write_all_supers()
   sb = fs_info->super_for_commit;
   btrfs_validate_write_super(.., sb)
     btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)

  scrub_one_super()
	btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)

And
   check_dev_super()
	btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)

However, it currently verifies the fs_info::super_copy::metadata_uuid
instead.  Fix this using the correct metadata_uuid in the superblock
argument.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-09-23 11:11:08 +02:00
Anand Jain
31242daa10 btrfs: add a helper to read the superblock metadata_uuid
[ Upstream commit 4844c3664a72d36cc79752cb651c78860b14c240 ]

In some cases, we need to read the FSID from the superblock when the
metadata_uuid is not set, and otherwise, read the metadata_uuid. So,
add a helper.

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 6bfe3959b0e7 ("btrfs: compare the correct fsid/metadata_uuid in btrfs_validate_super")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-09-23 11:11:08 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
28062cd6ed btrfs: output extra debug info if we failed to find an inline backref
[ Upstream commit 7f72f50547b7af4ddf985b07fc56600a4deba281 ]

[BUG]
Syzbot reported several warning triggered inside
lookup_inline_extent_backref().

[CAUSE]
As usual, the reproducer doesn't reliably trigger locally here, but at
least we know the WARN_ON() is triggered when an inline backref can not
be found, and it can only be triggered when @insert is true. (I.e.
inserting a new inline backref, which means the backref should already
exist)

[ENHANCEMENT]
After the WARN_ON(), dump all the parameters and the extent tree
leaf to help debug.

Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=d6f9ff86c1d804ba2bc6
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-09-23 11:10:59 +02:00
Anand Jain
09974a1352 btrfs: use the correct superblock to compare fsid in btrfs_validate_super
commit d167aa76dc0683828588c25767da07fb549e4f48 upstream.

The function btrfs_validate_super() should verify the fsid in the provided
superblock argument. Because, all its callers expect it to do that.

Such as in the following stack:

   write_all_supers()
       sb = fs_info->super_for_commit;
       btrfs_validate_write_super(.., sb)
         btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)

   scrub_one_super()
	btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)

And
   check_dev_super()
	btrfs_validate_super(.., sb, ..)

However, it currently verifies the fs_info::super_copy::fsid instead,
which is not correct.  Fix this using the correct fsid in the superblock
argument.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Tested-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-09-19 12:28:06 +02:00
Naohiro Aota
b692f7d157 btrfs: zoned: re-enable metadata over-commit for zoned mode
commit 5b135b382a360f4c87cf8896d1465b0b07f10cb0 upstream.

Now that, we can re-enable metadata over-commit. As we moved the activation
from the reservation time to the write time, we no longer need to ensure
all the reserved bytes is properly activated.

Without the metadata over-commit, it suffers from lower performance because
it needs to flush the delalloc items more often and allocate more block
groups. Re-enabling metadata over-commit will solve the issue.

Fixes: 79417d040f4f ("btrfs: zoned: disable metadata overcommit for zoned")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-09-19 12:28:06 +02:00
Josef Bacik
08daa38ca2 btrfs: set page extent mapped after read_folio in relocate_one_page
commit e7f1326cc24e22b38afc3acd328480a1183f9e79 upstream.

One of the CI runs triggered the following panic

  assertion failed: PagePrivate(page) && page->private, in fs/btrfs/subpage.c:229
  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/subpage.c:229!
  Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP
  CPU: 0 PID: 923660 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 6.5.0-rc3+ #1
  pstate: 61400005 (nZCv daif +PAN -UAO -TCO +DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--)
  pc : btrfs_subpage_assert+0xbc/0xf0
  lr : btrfs_subpage_assert+0xbc/0xf0
  sp : ffff800093213720
  x29: ffff800093213720 x28: ffff8000932138b4 x27: 000000000c280000
  x26: 00000001b5d00000 x25: 000000000c281000 x24: 000000000c281fff
  x23: 0000000000001000 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: ffffff42b95bf880
  x20: ffff42b9528e0000 x19: 0000000000001000 x18: ffffffffffffffff
  x17: 667274622f736620 x16: 6e69202c65746176 x15: 0000000000000028
  x14: 0000000000000003 x13: 00000000002672d7 x12: 0000000000000000
  x11: ffffcd3f0ccd9204 x10: ffffcd3f0554ae50 x9 : ffffcd3f0379528c
  x8 : ffff800093213428 x7 : 0000000000000000 x6 : ffffcd3f091771e8
  x5 : ffff42b97f333948 x4 : 0000000000000000 x3 : 0000000000000000
  x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff42b9556cde80 x0 : 000000000000004f
  Call trace:
   btrfs_subpage_assert+0xbc/0xf0
   btrfs_subpage_set_dirty+0x38/0xa0
   btrfs_page_set_dirty+0x58/0x88
   relocate_one_page+0x204/0x5f0
   relocate_file_extent_cluster+0x11c/0x180
   relocate_data_extent+0xd0/0xf8
   relocate_block_group+0x3d0/0x4e8
   btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x2d8/0x490
   btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x54/0x1a8
   btrfs_balance+0x7f4/0x1150
   btrfs_ioctl+0x10f0/0x20b8
   __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x120/0x11d8
   invoke_syscall.constprop.0+0x80/0xd8
   do_el0_svc+0x6c/0x158
   el0_svc+0x50/0x1b0
   el0t_64_sync_handler+0x120/0x130
   el0t_64_sync+0x194/0x198
  Code: 91098021 b0007fa0 91346000 97e9c6d2 (d4210000)

This is the same problem outlined in 17b17fcd6d44 ("btrfs:
set_page_extent_mapped after read_folio in btrfs_cont_expand") , and the
fix is the same.  I originally looked for the same pattern elsewhere in
our code, but mistakenly skipped over this code because I saw the page
cache readahead before we set_page_extent_mapped, not realizing that
this was only in the !page case, that we can still end up with a
!uptodate page and then do the btrfs_read_folio further down.

The fix here is the same as the above mentioned patch, move the
set_page_extent_mapped call to after the btrfs_read_folio() block to
make sure that we have the subpage blocksize stuff setup properly before
using the page.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-09-19 12:28:06 +02:00
Filipe Manana
91f6a538d6 btrfs: don't start transaction when joining with TRANS_JOIN_NOSTART
commit 4490e803e1fe9fab8db5025e44e23b55df54078b upstream.

When joining a transaction with TRANS_JOIN_NOSTART, if we don't find a
running transaction we end up creating one. This goes against the purpose
of TRANS_JOIN_NOSTART which is to join a running transaction if its state
is at or below the state TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START, otherwise return an
-ENOENT error and don't start a new transaction. So fix this to not create
a new transaction if there's no running transaction at or below that
state.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Fixes: a6d155d2e363 ("Btrfs: fix deadlock between fiemap and transaction commits")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-09-19 12:28:06 +02:00
Boris Burkov
f933a1c43b btrfs: free qgroup rsv on io failure
commit e28b02118b94e42be3355458a2406c6861e2dd32 upstream.

If we do a write whose bio suffers an error, we will never reclaim the
qgroup reserved space for it. We allocate the space in the write_iter
codepath, then release the reservation as we allocate the ordered
extent, but we only create a delayed ref if the ordered extent finishes.
If it has an error, we simply leak the rsv. This is apparent in running
any error injecting (dmerror) fstests like btrfs/146 or btrfs/160. Such
tests fail due to dmesg on umount complaining about the leaked qgroup
data space.

When we clean up other aspects of space on failed ordered_extents, also
free the qgroup rsv.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-09-19 12:28:06 +02:00
Boris Burkov
cdc3ba292d btrfs: fix start transaction qgroup rsv double free
commit a6496849671a5bc9218ecec25a983253b34351b1 upstream.

btrfs_start_transaction reserves metadata space of the PERTRANS type
before it identifies a transaction to start/join. This allows flushing
when reserving that space without a deadlock. However, it results in a
race which temporarily breaks qgroup rsv accounting.

T1                                              T2
start_transaction
do_stuff
                                            start_transaction
                                                qgroup_reserve_meta_pertrans
commit_transaction
    qgroup_free_meta_all_pertrans
                                            hit an error starting txn
                                            goto reserve_fail
                                            qgroup_free_meta_pertrans (already freed!)

The basic issue is that there is nothing preventing another commit from
committing before start_transaction finishes (in fact sometimes we
intentionally wait for it) so any error path that frees the reserve is
at risk of this race.

While this exact space was getting freed anyway, and it's not a huge
deal to double free it (just a warning, the free code catches this), it
can result in incorrectly freeing some other pertrans reservation in
this same reservation, which could then lead to spuriously granting
reservations we might not have the space for. Therefore, I do believe it
is worth fixing.

To fix it, use the existing prealloc->pertrans conversion mechanism.
When we first reserve the space, we reserve prealloc space and only when
we are sure we have a transaction do we convert it to pertrans. This way
any racing commits do not blow away our reservation, but we still get a
pertrans reservation that is freed when _this_ transaction gets committed.

This issue can be reproduced by running generic/269 with either qgroups
or squotas enabled via mkfs on the scratch device.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-09-19 12:28:05 +02:00
Naohiro Aota
59c38f050d btrfs: zoned: do not zone finish data relocation block group
commit 332581bde2a419d5f12a93a1cdc2856af649a3cc upstream.

When multiple writes happen at once, we may need to sacrifice a currently
active block group to be zone finished for a new allocation. We choose a
block group with the least free space left, and zone finish it.

To do the finishing, we need to send IOs for already allocated region
and wait for them and on-going IOs. Otherwise, these IOs fail because the
zone is already finished at the time the IO reach a device.

However, if a block group dedicated to the data relocation is zone
finished, there is a chance that finishing it before an ongoing write IO
reaches the device. That is because there is timing gap between an
allocation is done (block_group->reservations == 0, as pre-allocation is
done) and an ordered extent is created when the relocation IO starts.
Thus, if we finish the zone between them, we can fail the IOs.

We cannot simply use "fs_info->data_reloc_bg == block_group->start" to
avoid the zone finishing. Because, the data_reloc_bg may already switch to
a new block group, while there are still ongoing write IOs to the old
data_reloc_bg.

So, this patch reworks the BLOCK_GROUP_FLAG_ZONED_DATA_RELOC bit to
indicate there is a data relocation allocation and/or ongoing write to the
block group. The bit is set on allocation and cleared in end_io function of
the last IO for the currently allocated region.

To change the timing of the bit setting also solves the issue that the bit
being left even after there is no IO going on. With the current code, if
the data_reloc_bg switches after the last IO to the current data_reloc_bg,
the bit is set at this timing and there is no one clearing that bit. As a
result, that block group is kept unallocatable for anything.

Fixes: 343d8a30851c ("btrfs: zoned: prevent allocation from previous data relocation BG")
Fixes: 74e91b12b115 ("btrfs: zoned: zone finish unused block group")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-09-19 12:28:05 +02:00
xiaoshoukui
ceb9ba8e30 btrfs: fix BUG_ON condition in btrfs_cancel_balance
commit 29eefa6d0d07e185f7bfe9576f91e6dba98189c2 upstream.

Pausing and canceling balance can race to interrupt balance lead to BUG_ON
panic in btrfs_cancel_balance. The BUG_ON condition in btrfs_cancel_balance
does not take this race scenario into account.

However, the race condition has no other side effects. We can fix that.

Reproducing it with panic trace like this:

  kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4618!
  RIP: 0010:btrfs_cancel_balance+0x5cf/0x6a0
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   ? do_nanosleep+0x60/0x120
   ? hrtimer_nanosleep+0xb7/0x1a0
   ? sched_core_clone_cookie+0x70/0x70
   btrfs_ioctl_balance_ctl+0x55/0x70
   btrfs_ioctl+0xa46/0xd20
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x7d/0xa0
   do_syscall_64+0x38/0x80
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd

  Race scenario as follows:
  > mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
  > --------------------
  > .......issue pause and cancel req in another thread
  > --------------------
  > ret = __btrfs_balance(fs_info);
  >
  > mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
  > if (ret == -ECANCELED && atomic_read(&fs_info->balance_pause_req)) {
  >         btrfs_info(fs_info, "balance: paused");
  >         btrfs_exclop_balance(fs_info, BTRFS_EXCLOP_BALANCE_PAUSED);
  > }

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Signed-off-by: xiaoshoukui <xiaoshoukui@ruijie.com.cn>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-23 17:52:31 +02:00
Josef Bacik
9f68e2105d btrfs: fix incorrect splitting in btrfs_drop_extent_map_range
commit c962098ca4af146f2625ed64399926a098752c9c upstream.

In production we were seeing a variety of WARN_ON()'s in the extent_map
code, specifically in btrfs_drop_extent_map_range() when we have to call
add_extent_mapping() for our second split.

Consider the following extent map layout

	PINNED
	[0 16K)  [32K, 48K)

and then we call btrfs_drop_extent_map_range for [0, 36K), with
skip_pinned == true.  The initial loop will have

	start = 0
	end = 36K
	len = 36K

we will find the [0, 16k) extent, but since we are pinned we will skip
it, which has this code

	start = em_end;
	if (end != (u64)-1)
		len = start + len - em_end;

em_end here is 16K, so now the values are

	start = 16K
	len = 16K + 36K - 16K = 36K

len should instead be 20K.  This is a problem when we find the next
extent at [32K, 48K), we need to split this extent to leave [36K, 48k),
however the code for the split looks like this

	split->start = start + len;
	split->len = em_end - (start + len);

In this case we have

	em_end = 48K
	split->start = 16K + 36K       // this should be 16K + 20K
	split->len = 48K - (16K + 36K) // this overflows as 16K + 36K is 52K

and now we have an invalid extent_map in the tree that potentially
overlaps other entries in the extent map.  Even in the non-overlapping
case we will have split->start set improperly, which will cause problems
with any block related calculations.

We don't actually need len in this loop, we can simply use end as our
end point, and only adjust start up when we find a pinned extent we need
to skip.

Adjust the logic to do this, which keeps us from inserting an invalid
extent map.

We only skip_pinned in the relocation case, so this is relatively rare,
except in the case where you are running relocation a lot, which can
happen with auto relocation on.

Fixes: 55ef68990029 ("Btrfs: Fix btrfs_drop_extent_cache for skip pinned case")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-23 17:52:31 +02:00
Filipe Manana
6297644db2 btrfs: fix use-after-free of new block group that became unused
[ Upstream commit 0657b20c5a76c938612f8409735a8830d257866e ]

If a task creates a new block group and that block group becomes unused
before we finish its creation, at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups(),
then when btrfs_mark_bg_unused() is called against the block group, we
assume that the block group is currently in the list of block groups to
reclaim, and we move it out of the list of new block groups and into the
list of unused block groups. This has two consequences:

1) We move it out of the list of new block groups associated to the
   current transaction. So the block group creation is not finished and
   if we attempt to delete the bg because it's unused, we will not find
   the block group item in the extent tree (or the new block group tree),
   its device extent items in the device tree etc, resulting in the
   deletion to fail due to the missing items;

2) We don't increment the reference count on the block group when we
   move it to the list of unused block groups, because we assumed the
   block group was on the list of block groups to reclaim, and in that
   case it already has the correct reference count. However the block
   group was on the list of new block groups, in which case no extra
   reference was taken because it's local to the current task. This
   later results in doing an extra reference count decrement when
   removing the block group from the unused list, eventually leading the
   reference count to 0.

This second case was caught when running generic/297 from fstests, which
produced the following assertion failure and stack trace:

  [589.559] assertion failed: refcount_read(&block_group->refs) == 1, in fs/btrfs/block-group.c:4299
  [589.559] ------------[ cut here ]------------
  [589.559] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/block-group.c:4299!
  [589.560] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
  [589.560] CPU: 8 PID: 2819134 Comm: umount Tainted: G        W          6.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-134+ #1
  [589.560] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-0-gea1b7a073390-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
  [589.560] RIP: 0010:btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs]
  [589.561] Code: 68 62 da c0 (...)
  [589.561] RSP: 0018:ffffa55a8c3b3d98 EFLAGS: 00010246
  [589.561] RAX: 0000000000000058 RBX: ffff8f030d7f2000 RCX: 0000000000000000
  [589.562] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: ffffffff953f0878 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
  [589.562] RBP: ffff8f030d7f2088 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: ffffa55a8c3b3c50
  [589.562] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8f05850b4c00
  [589.562] R13: ffff8f030d7f2090 R14: ffff8f05850b4cd8 R15: dead000000000100
  [589.563] FS:  00007f497fd2e840(0000) GS:ffff8f09dfc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  [589.563] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  [589.563] CR2: 00007f497ff8ec10 CR3: 0000000271472006 CR4: 0000000000370ee0
  [589.563] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
  [589.564] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
  [589.564] Call Trace:
  [589.564]  <TASK>
  [589.565]  ? __die_body+0x1b/0x60
  [589.565]  ? die+0x39/0x60
  [589.565]  ? do_trap+0xeb/0x110
  [589.565]  ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs]
  [589.566]  ? do_error_trap+0x6a/0x90
  [589.566]  ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs]
  [589.566]  ? exc_invalid_op+0x4e/0x70
  [589.566]  ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs]
  [589.567]  ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
  [589.567]  ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs]
  [589.567]  ? btrfs_free_block_groups+0x449/0x4a0 [btrfs]
  [589.567]  close_ctree+0x35d/0x560 [btrfs]
  [589.568]  ? fsnotify_sb_delete+0x13e/0x1d0
  [589.568]  ? dispose_list+0x3a/0x50
  [589.568]  ? evict_inodes+0x151/0x1a0
  [589.568]  generic_shutdown_super+0x73/0x1a0
  [589.569]  kill_anon_super+0x14/0x30
  [589.569]  btrfs_kill_super+0x12/0x20 [btrfs]
  [589.569]  deactivate_locked_super+0x2e/0x70
  [589.569]  cleanup_mnt+0x104/0x160
  [589.570]  task_work_run+0x56/0x90
  [589.570]  exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x160/0x170
  [589.570]  syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x22/0x50
  [589.570]  ? __x64_sys_umount+0x12/0x20
  [589.571]  do_syscall_64+0x48/0x90
  [589.571]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x72/0xdc
  [589.571] RIP: 0033:0x7f497ff0a567
  [589.571] Code: af 98 0e (...)
  [589.572] RSP: 002b:00007ffc98347358 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000a6
  [589.572] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 00007f49800b8264 RCX: 00007f497ff0a567
  [589.572] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000557f558abfa0
  [589.573] RBP: 0000557f558a6ba0 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 00007ffc98346100
  [589.573] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
  [589.573] R13: 0000557f558abfa0 R14: 0000557f558a6cb0 R15: 0000557f558a6dd0
  [589.573]  </TASK>
  [589.574] Modules linked in: dm_snapshot dm_thin_pool (...)
  [589.576] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Fix this by adding a runtime flag to the block group to tell that the
block group is still in the list of new block groups, and therefore it
should not be moved to the list of unused block groups, at
btrfs_mark_bg_unused(), until the flag is cleared, when we finish the
creation of the block group at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups().

Fixes: a9f189716cf1 ("btrfs: move out now unused BG from the reclaim list")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-08-23 17:52:29 +02:00
David Sterba
29cebf8087 btrfs: convert btrfs_block_group::seq_zone to runtime flag
[ Upstream commit 961f5b8bf48a463ac5fe5b13143426d79eb41817 ]

In zoned mode the sequential status of zone can be also tracked in the
runtime flags of block group.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 0657b20c5a76 ("btrfs: fix use-after-free of new block group that became unused")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-08-23 17:52:28 +02:00
David Sterba
94cde94169 btrfs: convert btrfs_block_group::needs_free_space to runtime flag
[ Upstream commit 0d7764ff58b4b45c39eb03f2c74a819c1a88fa7b ]

We already have flags in block group to track various status bits,
convert needs_free_space as well and reduce size of btrfs_block_group.

Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 0657b20c5a76 ("btrfs: fix use-after-free of new block group that became unused")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-08-23 17:52:28 +02:00
Naohiro Aota
01eca70ef8 btrfs: move out now unused BG from the reclaim list
[ Upstream commit a9f189716cf15913c453299d72f69c51a9b0f86b ]

An unused block group is easy to remove to free up space and should be
reclaimed fast. Such block group can often already be a target of the
reclaim process. As we check list_empty(&bg->bg_list), we keep it in the
reclaim list. That block group is never reclaimed until the file system
is filled e.g. up to 75%.

Instead, we can move unused block group to the unused list and delete it
fast.

Fixes: 18bb8bbf13c1 ("btrfs: zoned: automatically reclaim zones")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-08-23 17:52:28 +02:00
Josef Bacik
bf67802453 btrfs: set cache_block_group_error if we find an error
commit 92fb94b69c6accf1e49fff699640fa0ce03dc910 upstream.

We set cache_block_group_error if btrfs_cache_block_group() returns an
error, this is because we could end up not finding space to allocate and
mistakenly return -ENOSPC, and which could then abort the transaction
with the incorrect errno, and in the case of ENOSPC result in a
WARN_ON() that will trip up tests like generic/475.

However there's the case where multiple threads can be racing, one
thread gets the proper error, and the other thread doesn't actually call
btrfs_cache_block_group(), it instead sees ->cached ==
BTRFS_CACHE_ERROR.  Again the result is the same, we fail to allocate
our space and return -ENOSPC.  Instead we need to set
cache_block_group_error to -EIO in this case to make sure that if we do
not make our allocation we get the appropriate error returned back to
the caller.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-16 18:27:30 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
3ae93b316c btrfs: reject invalid reloc tree root keys with stack dump
commit 6ebcd021c92b8e4b904552e4d87283032100796d upstream.

[BUG]
Syzbot reported a crash that an ASSERT() got triggered inside
prepare_to_merge().

That ASSERT() makes sure the reloc tree is properly pointed back by its
subvolume tree.

[CAUSE]
After more debugging output, it turns out we had an invalid reloc tree:

  BTRFS error (device loop1): reloc tree mismatch, root 8 has no reloc root, expect reloc root key (-8, 132, 8) gen 17

Note the above root key is (TREE_RELOC_OBJECTID, ROOT_ITEM,
QUOTA_TREE_OBJECTID), meaning it's a reloc tree for quota tree.

But reloc trees can only exist for subvolumes, as for non-subvolume
trees, we just COW the involved tree block, no need to create a reloc
tree since those tree blocks won't be shared with other trees.

Only subvolumes tree can share tree blocks with other trees (thus they
have BTRFS_ROOT_SHAREABLE flag).

Thus this new debug output proves my previous assumption that corrupted
on-disk data can trigger that ASSERT().

[FIX]
Besides the dedicated fix and the graceful exit, also let tree-checker to
check such root keys, to make sure reloc trees can only exist for subvolumes.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reported-by: syzbot+ae97a827ae1c3336bbb4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-16 18:27:30 +02:00
Qu Wenruo
9d04716e36 btrfs: exit gracefully if reloc roots don't match
commit 05d7ce504545f7874529701664c90814ca645c5d upstream.

[BUG]
Syzbot reported a crash that an ASSERT() got triggered inside
prepare_to_merge().

[CAUSE]
The root cause of the triggered ASSERT() is we can have a race between
quota tree creation and relocation.

This leads us to create a duplicated quota tree in the
btrfs_read_fs_root() path, and since it's treated as fs tree, it would
have ROOT_SHAREABLE flag, causing us to create a reloc tree for it.

The bug itself is fixed by a dedicated patch for it, but this already
taught us the ASSERT() is not something straightforward for
developers.

[ENHANCEMENT]
Instead of using an ASSERT(), let's handle it gracefully and output
extra info about the mismatch reloc roots to help debug.

Also with the above ASSERT() removed, we can trigger ASSERT(0)s inside
merge_reloc_roots() later.
Also replace those ASSERT(0)s with WARN_ON()s.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reported-by: syzbot+ae97a827ae1c3336bbb4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-16 18:27:30 +02:00
Christoph Hellwig
7112abc9e8 btrfs: properly clear end of the unreserved range in cow_file_range
commit 12b2d64e591652a2d97dd3afa2b062ca7a4ba352 upstream.

When the call to btrfs_reloc_clone_csums in cow_file_range returns an
error, we jump to the out_unlock label with the extent_reserved variable
set to false.   The cleanup at the label will then call
extent_clear_unlock_delalloc on the range from start to end.  But we've
already added cur_alloc_size to start before the jump, so there might no
range be left from the newly incremented start to end.  Move the check for
'start < end' so that it is reached by also for the !extent_reserved case.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Fixes: a315e68f6e8b ("Btrfs: fix invalid attempt to free reserved space on failure to cow range")
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-16 18:27:29 +02:00
Christoph Hellwig
504d81c512 btrfs: don't stop integrity writeback too early
commit effa24f689ce0948f68c754991a445a8d697d3a8 upstream.

extent_write_cache_pages stops writing pages as soon as nr_to_write hits
zero.  That is the right thing for opportunistic writeback, but incorrect
for data integrity writeback, which needs to ensure that no dirty pages
are left in the range.  Thus only stop the writeback for WB_SYNC_NONE
if nr_to_write hits 0.

This is a port of write_cache_pages changes in commit 05fe478dd04e
("mm: write_cache_pages integrity fix").

Note that I've only trigger the problem with other changes to the btrfs
writeback code, but this condition seems worthwhile fixing anyway.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ updated comment ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-16 18:27:29 +02:00
Josef Bacik
4e18c827d6 btrfs: wait for actual caching progress during allocation
commit fc1f91b9231a28fba333f931a031bf776bc6ef0e upstream.

Recently we've been having mysterious hangs while running generic/475 on
the CI system.  This turned out to be something like this:

  Task 1
  dmsetup suspend --nolockfs
  -> __dm_suspend
   -> dm_wait_for_completion
    -> dm_wait_for_bios_completion
     -> Unable to complete because of IO's on a plug in Task 2

  Task 2
  wb_workfn
  -> wb_writeback
   -> blk_start_plug
    -> writeback_sb_inodes
     -> Infinite loop unable to make an allocation

  Task 3
  cache_block_group
  ->read_extent_buffer_pages
   ->Waiting for IO to complete that can't be submitted because Task 1
     suspended the DM device

The problem here is that we need Task 2 to be scheduled completely for
the blk plug to flush.  Normally this would happen, we normally wait for
the block group caching to finish (Task 3), and this schedule would
result in the block plug flushing.

However if there's enough free space available from the current caching
to satisfy the allocation we won't actually wait for the caching to
complete.  This check however just checks that we have enough space, not
that we can make the allocation.  In this particular case we were trying
to allocate 9MiB, and we had 10MiB of free space, but we didn't have
9MiB of contiguous space to allocate, and thus the allocation failed and
we looped.

We specifically don't cycle through the FFE loop until we stop finding
cached block groups because we don't want to allocate new block groups
just because we're caching, so we short circuit the normal loop once we
hit LOOP_CACHING_WAIT and we found a caching block group.

This is normally fine, except in this particular case where the caching
thread can't make progress because the DM device has been suspended.

Fix this by not only waiting for free space to >= the amount of space we
want to allocate, but also that we make some progress in caching from
the time we start waiting.  This will keep us from busy looping when the
caching is taking a while but still theoretically has enough space for
us to allocate from, and fixes this particular case by forcing us to
actually sleep and wait for forward progress, which will flush the plug.

With this fix we're no longer hanging with generic/475.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-16 18:27:29 +02:00
Filipe Manana
23e72231f8 btrfs: remove BUG_ON()'s in add_new_free_space()
commit d8ccbd21918fd7fa6ce3226cffc22c444228e8ad upstream.

At add_new_free_space() we have these BUG_ON()'s that are there to deal
with any failure to add free space to the in memory free space cache.
Such failures are mostly -ENOMEM that should be very rare. However there's
no need to have these BUG_ON()'s, we can just return any error to the
caller and all callers and their upper call chain are already dealing with
errors.

So just make add_new_free_space() return any errors, while removing the
BUG_ON()'s, and returning the total amount of added free space to an
optional u64 pointer argument.

Reported-by: syzbot+3ba856e07b7127889d8c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000e9cb8305ff4e8327@google.com/
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-11 12:08:24 +02:00
Filipe Manana
360c98f583 btrfs: check for commit error at btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier()
commit b28ff3a7d7e97456fd86b68d24caa32e1cfa7064 upstream.

btrfs_attach_transaction_barrier() is used to get a handle pointing to the
current running transaction if the transaction has not started its commit
yet (its state is < TRANS_STATE_COMMIT_START). If the transaction commit
has started, then we wait for the transaction to commit and finish before
returning - however we completely ignore if the transaction was aborted
due to some error during its commit, we simply return ERR_PT(-ENOENT),
which makes the caller assume everything is fine and no errors happened.

This could make an fsync return success (0) to user space when in fact we
had a transaction abort and the target inode changes were therefore not
persisted.

Fix this by checking for the return value from btrfs_wait_for_commit(),
and if it returned an error, return it back to the caller.

Fixes: d4edf39bd5db ("Btrfs: fix uncompleted transaction")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-03 10:24:13 +02:00
Filipe Manana
a7b85dc316 btrfs: check if the transaction was aborted at btrfs_wait_for_commit()
commit bf7ecbe9875061bf3fce1883e3b26b77f847d1e8 upstream.

At btrfs_wait_for_commit() we wait for a transaction to finish and then
always return 0 (success) without checking if it was aborted, in which
case the transaction didn't happen due to some critical error. Fix this
by checking if the transaction was aborted.

Fixes: 462045928bda ("Btrfs: add START_SYNC, WAIT_SYNC ioctls")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-03 10:24:13 +02:00
Filipe Manana
cbec34d302 btrfs: account block group tree when calculating global reserve size
commit 8dbfc14fc736eb701089aff09645c3d4ad3decb1 upstream.

When using the block group tree feature, this tree is a critical tree just
like the extent, csum and free space trees, and just like them it uses the
delayed refs block reserve.

So take into account the block group tree, and its current size, when
calculating the size for the global reserve.

CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2023-08-03 10:24:13 +02:00
Filipe Manana
7b7291ab29 btrfs: fix race between quota disable and relocation
[ Upstream commit 8a4a0b2a3eaf75ca8854f856ef29690c12b2f531 ]

If we disable quotas while we have a relocation of a metadata block group
that has extents belonging to the quota root, we can cause the relocation
to fail with -ENOENT. This is because relocation builds backref nodes for
extents of the quota root and later needs to walk the backrefs and access
the quota root - however if in between a task disables quotas, it results
in deleting the quota root from the root tree (with btrfs_del_root(),
called from btrfs_quota_disable().

This can be sporadically triggered by test case btrfs/255 from fstests:

  $ ./check btrfs/255
  FSTYP         -- btrfs
  PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 debian0 6.4.0-rc6-btrfs-next-134+ #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Thu Jun 15 11:59:28 WEST 2023
  MKFS_OPTIONS  -- /dev/sdc
  MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdc /home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1

  btrfs/255 6s ... _check_dmesg: something found in dmesg (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/255.dmesg)
  - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/255.out.bad)
#      --- tests/btrfs/255.out	2023-03-02 21:47:53.876609426 +0000
#      +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/255.out.bad	2023-06-16 10:20:39.267563212 +0100
#      @@ -1,2 +1,4 @@
#       QA output created by 255
#      +ERROR: error during balancing '/home/fdmanana/btrfs-tests/scratch_1': No such file or directory
#      +There may be more info in syslog - try dmesg | tail
#       Silence is golden
#      ...
      (Run 'diff -u /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/tests/btrfs/255.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/255.out.bad'  to see the entire diff)
  Ran: btrfs/255
  Failures: btrfs/255
  Failed 1 of 1 tests

To fix this make the quota disable operation take the cleaner mutex, as
relocation of a block group also takes this mutex. This is also what we
do when deleting a subvolume/snapshot, we take the cleaner mutex in the
cleaner kthread (at cleaner_kthread()) and then we call btrfs_del_root()
at btrfs_drop_snapshot() while under the protection of the cleaner mutex.

Fixes: bed92eae26cc ("Btrfs: qgroup implementation and prototypes")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2023-08-03 10:23:49 +02:00