IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
[ Upstream commit a7e4c6a3031c74078dba7fa36239d0f4fe476c53 ]
If during the quota disable we fail when cleaning the quota tree or when
deleting the root from the root tree, we jump to the 'out' label without
ever dropping the reference on the quota root, resulting in a leak of the
root since fs_info->quota_root is no longer pointing to the root (we have
set it to NULL just before those steps).
Fix this by always doing a btrfs_put_root() call under the 'out' label.
This is a problem that exists since qgroups were first added in 2012 by
commit bed92eae26cc ("Btrfs: qgroup implementation and prototypes"), but
back then we missed a kfree on the quota root and free_extent_buffer()
calls on its root and commit root nodes, since back then roots were not
yet reference counted.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 1645c283a87c61f84b2bffd81f50724df959b11a upstream.
[BUG]
There is a bug report that ntfs2btrfs had a bug that it can lead to
transaction abort and the filesystem flips to read-only.
[CAUSE]
For inline backref items, kernel has a strict requirement for their
ordered, they must follow the following rules:
- All btrfs_extent_inline_ref::type should be in an ascending order
- Within the same type, the items should follow a descending order by
their sequence number
For EXTENT_DATA_REF type, the sequence number is result from
hash_extent_data_ref().
For other types, their sequence numbers are
btrfs_extent_inline_ref::offset.
Thus if there is any code not following above rules, the resulted
inline backrefs can prevent the kernel to locate the needed inline
backref and lead to transaction abort.
[FIX]
Ntrfs2btrfs has already fixed the problem, and btrfs-progs has added the
ability to detect such problems.
For kernel, let's be more noisy and be more specific about the order, so
that the next time kernel hits such problem we would reject it in the
first place, without leading to transaction abort.
Link: https://github.com/kdave/btrfs-progs/pull/622
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ Fix a conflict due to header cleanup. ]
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 48f091fd50b2eb33ae5eaea9ed3c4f81603acf38 upstream.
There is a potential parallel list adding for retrying in
btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work and adding to the unused list. Since the block
group is removed from the reclaim list and it is on a relocation work,
it can be added into the unused list in parallel. When that happens,
adding it to the reclaim list will corrupt the list head and trigger
list corruption like below.
Fix it by taking fs_info->unused_bgs_lock.
[177.504][T2585409] BTRFS error (device nullb1): error relocating ch= unk 2415919104
[177.514][T2585409] list_del corruption. next->prev should be ff1100= 0344b119c0, but was ff11000377e87c70. (next=3Dff110002390cd9c0)
[177.529][T2585409] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[177.537][T2585409] kernel BUG at lib/list_debug.c:65!
[177.545][T2585409] Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN NOPTI
[177.555][T2585409] CPU: 9 PID: 2585409 Comm: kworker/u128:2 Tainted: G W 6.10.0-rc5-kts #1
[177.568][T2585409] Hardware name: Supermicro SYS-520P-WTR/X12SPW-TF, BIOS 1.2 02/14/2022
[177.579][T2585409] Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_reclaim_bgs_work[btrfs]
[177.589][T2585409] RIP: 0010:__list_del_entry_valid_or_report.cold+0x70/0x72
[177.624][T2585409] RSP: 0018:ff11000377e87a70 EFLAGS: 00010286
[177.633][T2585409] RAX: 000000000000006d RBX: ff11000344b119c0 RCX:0000000000000000
[177.644][T2585409] RDX: 000000000000006d RSI: 0000000000000008 RDI:ffe21c006efd0f40
[177.655][T2585409] RBP: ff110002e0509f78 R08: 0000000000000001 R09:ffe21c006efd0f08
[177.665][T2585409] R10: ff11000377e87847 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:ff110002390cd9c0
[177.676][T2585409] R13: ff11000344b119c0 R14: ff110002e0508000 R15:dffffc0000000000
[177.687][T2585409] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ff11000fec880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[177.700][T2585409] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[177.709][T2585409] CR2: 00007f06bc7b1978 CR3: 0000001021e86005 CR4:0000000000771ef0
[177.720][T2585409] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2:0000000000000000
[177.731][T2585409] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7:0000000000000400
[177.742][T2585409] PKRU: 55555554
[177.748][T2585409] Call Trace:
[177.753][T2585409] <TASK>
[177.759][T2585409] ? __die_body.cold+0x19/0x27
[177.766][T2585409] ? die+0x2e/0x50
[177.772][T2585409] ? do_trap+0x1ea/0x2d0
[177.779][T2585409] ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report.cold+0x70/0x72
[177.788][T2585409] ? do_error_trap+0xa3/0x160
[177.795][T2585409] ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report.cold+0x70/0x72
[177.805][T2585409] ? handle_invalid_op+0x2c/0x40
[177.812][T2585409] ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report.cold+0x70/0x72
[177.820][T2585409] ? exc_invalid_op+0x2d/0x40
[177.827][T2585409] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
[177.834][T2585409] ? __list_del_entry_valid_or_report.cold+0x70/0x72
[177.843][T2585409] btrfs_delete_unused_bgs+0x3d9/0x14c0 [btrfs]
There is a similar retry_list code in btrfs_delete_unused_bgs(), but it is
safe, AFAICS. Since the block group was in the unused list, the used bytes
should be 0 when it was added to the unused list. Then, it checks
block_group->{used,reserved,pinned} are still 0 under the
block_group->lock. So, they should be still eligible for the unused list,
not the reclaim list.
The reason it is safe there it's because because we're holding
space_info->groups_sem in write mode.
That means no other task can allocate from the block group, so while we
are at deleted_unused_bgs() it's not possible for other tasks to
allocate and deallocate extents from the block group, so it can't be
added to the unused list or the reclaim list by anyone else.
The bug can be reproduced by btrfs/166 after a few rounds. In practice
this can be hit when relocation cannot find more chunk space and ends
with ENOSPC.
Reported-by: Shinichiro Kawasaki <shinichiro.kawasaki@wdc.com>
Suggested-by: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@wdc.com>
Fixes: 4eb4e85c4f81 ("btrfs: retry block group reclaim without infinite loop")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit b4e585fffc1cf877112ed231a91f089e85688c2a ]
The following error message is displayed:
../fs/btrfs/scrub.c:2152:9: error: ‘ret’ may be used uninitialized
in this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]"
Compiler version: gcc version: (Debian 10.2.1-6) 10.2.1 20210110
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Lu Yao <yaolu@kylinos.cn>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit b9fd2affe4aa99a4ca14ee87e1f38fea22ece52a upstream.
When creating a new block group, it calls btrfs_add_new_free_space() to add
the entire block group range into the free space accounting.
__btrfs_add_free_space_zoned() checks if size == block_group->length to
detect the initial free space adding, and proceed that case properly.
However, if the zone_capacity == zone_size and the over-write speed is fast
enough, the entire zone can be over-written within one transaction. That
confuses __btrfs_add_free_space_zoned() to handle it as an initial free
space accounting. As a result, that block group becomes a strange state: 0
used bytes, 0 zone_unusable bytes, but alloc_offset == zone_capacity (no
allocation anymore).
The initial free space accounting can properly be checked by checking
alloc_offset too.
Fixes: 98173255bddd ("btrfs: zoned: calculate free space from zone capacity")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 4eb4e85c4f818491efc67e9373aa16b123c3f522 upstream.
If inc_block_group_ro systematically fails (e.g. due to ETXTBUSY from
swap) or btrfs_relocate_chunk systematically fails (from lack of
space), then this worker becomes an infinite loop.
At the very least, this strands the cleaner thread, but can also result
in hung tasks/RCU stalls on PREEMPT_NONE kernels and if the
reclaim_bgs_lock mutex is not contended.
I believe the best long term fix is to manage reclaim via work queue,
where we queue up a relocation on the triggering condition and re-queue
on failure. In the meantime, this is an easy fix to apply to avoid the
immediate pain.
Fixes: 7e2718099438 ("btrfs: reinsert BGs failed to reclaim")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 0090d6e1b210551e63cf43958dc7a1ec942cdde9 upstream.
While loading a zone's info during creation of a block group, we can race
with a device replace operation and then trigger a use-after-free on the
device that was just replaced (source device of the replace operation).
This happens because at btrfs_load_zone_info() we extract a device from
the chunk map into a local variable and then use the device while not
under the protection of the device replace rwsem. So if there's a device
replace operation happening when we extract the device and that device
is the source of the replace operation, we will trigger a use-after-free
if before we finish using the device the replace operation finishes and
frees the device.
Fix this by enlarging the critical section under the protection of the
device replace rwsem so that all uses of the device are done inside the
critical section.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1.x: 15c12fcc50a1: btrfs: zoned: introduce a zone_info struct in btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1.x: 09a46725cc84: btrfs: zoned: factor out per-zone logic from btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1.x: 9e0e3e74dc69: btrfs: zoned: factor out single bg handling from btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1.x: 87463f7e0250: btrfs: zoned: factor out DUP bg handling from btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1.x
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 87463f7e0250d471fac41e7c9c45ae21d83b5f85 upstream.
Split the code handling a type DUP block group from
btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info to make the code more readable.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 9e0e3e74dc6928a0956f4e27e24d473c65887e96 upstream.
Split the code handling a type single block group from
btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info to make the code more readable.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 09a46725cc84165af452d978a3532d6b97a28796 upstream.
Split out a helper for the body of the per-zone loop in
btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info to make the function easier to read and
modify.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 15c12fcc50a1b12a747f8b6ec05cdb18c537a4d1 upstream.
Add a new zone_info structure to hold per-zone information in
btrfs_load_block_group_zone_info and prepare for breaking out helpers
from it.
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit fb33eb2ef0d88e75564983ef057b44c5b7e4fded upstream.
Qgroup extent records are created when delayed ref heads are created and
then released after accounting extents at btrfs_qgroup_account_extents(),
called during the transaction commit path.
If a transaction is aborted we free the qgroup records by calling
btrfs_qgroup_destroy_extent_records() at btrfs_destroy_delayed_refs(),
unless we don't have delayed references. We are incorrectly assuming
that no delayed references means we don't have qgroup extents records.
We can currently have no delayed references because we ran them all
during a transaction commit and the transaction was aborted after that
due to some error in the commit path.
So fix this by ensuring we btrfs_qgroup_destroy_extent_records() at
btrfs_destroy_delayed_refs() even if we don't have any delayed references.
Reported-by: syzbot+0fecc032fa134afd49df@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/0000000000004e7f980619f91835@google.com/
Fixes: 81f7eb00ff5b ("btrfs: destroy qgroup extent records on transaction abort")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 9d274c19a71b3a276949933859610721a453946b upstream.
We have been seeing crashes on duplicate keys in
btrfs_set_item_key_safe():
BTRFS critical (device vdb): slot 4 key (450 108 8192) new key (450 108 8192)
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2620!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
CPU: 0 PID: 3139 Comm: xfs_io Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.9.0 #6
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-2.fc40 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:btrfs_set_item_key_safe+0x11f/0x290 [btrfs]
With the following stack trace:
#0 btrfs_set_item_key_safe (fs/btrfs/ctree.c:2620:4)
#1 btrfs_drop_extents (fs/btrfs/file.c:411:4)
#2 log_one_extent (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4732:9)
#3 btrfs_log_changed_extents (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:4955:9)
#4 btrfs_log_inode (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:6626:9)
#5 btrfs_log_inode_parent (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7070:8)
#6 btrfs_log_dentry_safe (fs/btrfs/tree-log.c:7171:8)
#7 btrfs_sync_file (fs/btrfs/file.c:1933:8)
#8 vfs_fsync_range (fs/sync.c:188:9)
#9 vfs_fsync (fs/sync.c:202:9)
#10 do_fsync (fs/sync.c:212:9)
#11 __do_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:225:9)
#12 __se_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:223:1)
#13 __x64_sys_fdatasync (fs/sync.c:223:1)
#14 do_syscall_x64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52:14)
#15 do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:83:7)
#16 entry_SYSCALL_64+0xaf/0x14c (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:121)
So we're logging a changed extent from fsync, which is splitting an
extent in the log tree. But this split part already exists in the tree,
triggering the BUG().
This is the state of the log tree at the time of the crash, dumped with
drgn (https://github.com/osandov/drgn/blob/main/contrib/btrfs_tree.py)
to get more details than btrfs_print_leaf() gives us:
>>> print_extent_buffer(prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[0]["eb"])
leaf 33439744 level 0 items 72 generation 9 owner 18446744073709551610
leaf 33439744 flags 0x100000000000000
fs uuid e5bd3946-400c-4223-8923-190ef1f18677
chunk uuid d58cb17e-6d02-494a-829a-18b7d8a399da
item 0 key (450 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 16123 itemsize 160
generation 7 transid 9 size 8192 nbytes 8473563889606862198
block group 0 mode 100600 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0
sequence 204 flags 0x10(PREALLOC)
atime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43)
ctime 1716417704.983333333 (2024-05-22 15:41:44)
mtime 1716417704.983333333 (2024-05-22 15:41:44)
otime 17592186044416.000000000 (559444-03-08 01:40:16)
item 1 key (450 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 16110 itemsize 13
index 195 namelen 3 name: 193
item 2 key (450 XATTR_ITEM 1640047104) itemoff 16073 itemsize 37
location key (0 UNKNOWN.0 0) type XATTR
transid 7 data_len 1 name_len 6
name: user.a
data a
item 3 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 16020 itemsize 53
generation 9 type 1 (regular)
extent data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288
extent data offset 0 nr 4096 ram 12288
extent compression 0 (none)
item 4 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 4096) itemoff 15967 itemsize 53
generation 9 type 2 (prealloc)
prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288
prealloc data offset 4096 nr 8192
item 5 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 8192) itemoff 15914 itemsize 53
generation 9 type 2 (prealloc)
prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288
prealloc data offset 8192 nr 4096
...
So the real problem happened earlier: notice that items 4 (4k-12k) and 5
(8k-12k) overlap. Both are prealloc extents. Item 4 straddles i_size and
item 5 starts at i_size.
Here is the state of the filesystem tree at the time of the crash:
>>> root = prog.crashed_thread().stack_trace()[2]["inode"].root
>>> ret, nodes, slots = btrfs_search_slot(root, BtrfsKey(450, 0, 0))
>>> print_extent_buffer(nodes[0])
leaf 30425088 level 0 items 184 generation 9 owner 5
leaf 30425088 flags 0x100000000000000
fs uuid e5bd3946-400c-4223-8923-190ef1f18677
chunk uuid d58cb17e-6d02-494a-829a-18b7d8a399da
...
item 179 key (450 INODE_ITEM 0) itemoff 4907 itemsize 160
generation 7 transid 7 size 4096 nbytes 12288
block group 0 mode 100600 links 1 uid 0 gid 0 rdev 0
sequence 6 flags 0x10(PREALLOC)
atime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43)
ctime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43)
mtime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43)
otime 1716417703.220000000 (2024-05-22 15:41:43)
item 180 key (450 INODE_REF 256) itemoff 4894 itemsize 13
index 195 namelen 3 name: 193
item 181 key (450 XATTR_ITEM 1640047104) itemoff 4857 itemsize 37
location key (0 UNKNOWN.0 0) type XATTR
transid 7 data_len 1 name_len 6
name: user.a
data a
item 182 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 4804 itemsize 53
generation 9 type 1 (regular)
extent data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288
extent data offset 0 nr 8192 ram 12288
extent compression 0 (none)
item 183 key (450 EXTENT_DATA 8192) itemoff 4751 itemsize 53
generation 9 type 2 (prealloc)
prealloc data disk byte 303144960 nr 12288
prealloc data offset 8192 nr 4096
Item 5 in the log tree corresponds to item 183 in the filesystem tree,
but nothing matches item 4. Furthermore, item 183 is the last item in
the leaf.
btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() is responsible for logging prealloc extents
beyond i_size. It first truncates any previously logged prealloc extents
that start beyond i_size. Then, it walks the filesystem tree and copies
the prealloc extent items to the log tree.
If it hits the end of a leaf, then it calls btrfs_next_leaf(), which
unlocks the tree and does another search. However, while the filesystem
tree is unlocked, an ordered extent completion may modify the tree. In
particular, it may insert an extent item that overlaps with an extent
item that was already copied to the log tree.
This may manifest in several ways depending on the exact scenario,
including an EEXIST error that is silently translated to a full sync,
overlapping items in the log tree, or this crash. This particular crash
is triggered by the following sequence of events:
- Initially, the file has i_size=4k, a regular extent from 0-4k, and a
prealloc extent beyond i_size from 4k-12k. The prealloc extent item is
the last item in its B-tree leaf.
- The file is fsync'd, which copies its inode item and both extent items
to the log tree.
- An xattr is set on the file, which sets the
BTRFS_INODE_COPY_EVERYTHING flag.
- The range 4k-8k in the file is written using direct I/O. i_size is
extended to 8k, but the ordered extent is still in flight.
- The file is fsync'd. Since BTRFS_INODE_COPY_EVERYTHING is set, this
calls copy_inode_items_to_log(), which calls
btrfs_log_prealloc_extents().
- btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() finds the 4k-12k prealloc extent in the
filesystem tree. Since it starts before i_size, it skips it. Since it
is the last item in its B-tree leaf, it calls btrfs_next_leaf().
- btrfs_next_leaf() unlocks the path.
- The ordered extent completion runs, which converts the 4k-8k part of
the prealloc extent to written and inserts the remaining prealloc part
from 8k-12k.
- btrfs_next_leaf() does a search and finds the new prealloc extent
8k-12k.
- btrfs_log_prealloc_extents() copies the 8k-12k prealloc extent into
the log tree. Note that it overlaps with the 4k-12k prealloc extent
that was copied to the log tree by the first fsync.
- fsync calls btrfs_log_changed_extents(), which tries to log the 4k-8k
extent that was written.
- This tries to drop the range 4k-8k in the log tree, which requires
adjusting the start of the 4k-12k prealloc extent in the log tree to
8k.
- btrfs_set_item_key_safe() sees that there is already an extent
starting at 8k in the log tree and calls BUG().
Fix this by detecting when we're about to insert an overlapping file
extent item in the log tree and truncating the part that would overlap.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 1db7959aacd905e6487d0478ac01d89f86eb1e51 upstream.
[BUG]
There is a recent report that when memory pressure is high (including
cached pages), btrfs can spend most of its time on memory allocation in
btrfs_alloc_page_array() for compressed read/write.
[CAUSE]
For btrfs_alloc_page_array() we always go alloc_pages_bulk_array(), and
even if the bulk allocation failed (fell back to single page
allocation) we still retry but with extra memalloc_retry_wait().
If the bulk alloc only returned one page a time, we would spend a lot of
time on the retry wait.
The behavior was introduced in commit 395cb57e8560 ("btrfs: wait between
incomplete batch memory allocations").
[FIX]
Although the commit mentioned that other filesystems do the wait, it's
not the case at least nowadays.
All the mainlined filesystems only call memalloc_retry_wait() if they
failed to allocate any page (not only for bulk allocation).
If there is any progress, they won't call memalloc_retry_wait() at all.
For example, xfs_buf_alloc_pages() would only call memalloc_retry_wait()
if there is no allocation progress at all, and the call is not for
metadata readahead.
So I don't believe we should call memalloc_retry_wait() unconditionally
for short allocation.
Call memalloc_retry_wait() if it fails to allocate any page for tree
block allocation (which goes with __GFP_NOFAIL and may not need the
special handling anyway), and reduce the latency for
btrfs_alloc_page_array().
Reported-by: Julian Taylor <julian.taylor@1und1.de>
Tested-by: Julian Taylor <julian.taylor@1und1.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/8966c095-cbe7-4d22-9784-a647d1bf27c3@1und1.de/
Fixes: 395cb57e8560 ("btrfs: wait between incomplete batch memory allocations")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 63a6ce5a1a6261e4c70bad2b55c4e0de8da4762e upstream.
[BUG]
When running generic/287, the following file extent items can be
generated:
item 16 key (258 EXTENT_DATA 2682880) itemoff 15305 itemsize 53
generation 9 type 1 (regular)
extent data disk byte 1378414592 nr 462848
extent data offset 0 nr 462848 ram 2097152
extent compression 0 (none)
Note that file extent item is not a compressed one, but its ram_bytes is
way larger than its disk_num_bytes.
According to btrfs on-disk scheme, ram_bytes should match disk_num_bytes
if it's not a compressed one.
[CAUSE]
Since commit b73a6fd1b1ef ("btrfs: split partial dio bios before
submit"), for partial dio writes, we would split the ordered extent.
However the function btrfs_split_ordered_extent() doesn't update the
ram_bytes even it has already shrunk the disk_num_bytes.
Originally the function btrfs_split_ordered_extent() is only introduced
for zoned devices in commit d22002fd37bd ("btrfs: zoned: split ordered
extent when bio is sent"), but later commit b73a6fd1b1ef ("btrfs: split
partial dio bios before submit") makes non-zoned btrfs affected.
Thankfully for un-compressed file extent, we do not really utilize the
ram_bytes member, thus it won't cause any real problem.
[FIX]
Also update btrfs_ordered_extent::ram_bytes inside
btrfs_split_ordered_extent().
Fixes: d22002fd37bd ("btrfs: zoned: split ordered extent when bio is sent")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 9af503d91298c3f2945e73703f0e00995be08c30 upstream.
The previous patch that replaced BUG_ON by error handling forgot to
unlock the mutex in the error path.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/Zh%2fHpAGFqa7YAFuM@duo.ucw.cz
Reported-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
Fixes: 7411055db5ce ("btrfs: handle chunk tree lookup error in btrfs_relocate_sys_chunks()")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@denx.de>
Signed-off-by: Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@atmark-techno.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 6ff09b6b8c2fb6b3edda4ffaa173153a40653067 upstream.
When compiling with gcc version 14.0.0 20231220 (experimental)
and W=1, I've noticed the following warning:
fs/btrfs/send.c: In function 'btrfs_ioctl_send':
fs/btrfs/send.c:8208:44: warning: 'kvcalloc' sizes specified with 'sizeof'
in the earlier argument and not in the later argument [-Wcalloc-transposed-args]
8208 | sctx->clone_roots = kvcalloc(sizeof(*sctx->clone_roots),
| ^
Since 'n' and 'size' arguments of 'kvcalloc()' are multiplied to
calculate the final size, their actual order doesn't affect the result
and so this is not a bug. But it's still worth to fix it.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Antipov <dmantipov@yandex.ru>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 6e68de0bb0ed59e0554a0c15ede7308c47351e2d ]
It is possible to clear a root's IN_TRANS tag from the radix tree, but
not clear its PERTRANS, if there is some error in between. Eliminate
that possibility by moving the free up to where we clear the tag.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 3c6f0c5ecc8910d4ffb0dfe85609ebc0c91c8f34 ]
Currently, this call site in btrfs_clear_delalloc_extent() only converts
the reservation. We are marking it not delalloc, so I don't think it
makes sense to keep the rsv around. This is a path where we are not
sure to join a transaction, so it leads to incorrect free-ing during
umount.
Helps with the pass rate of generic/269 and generic/475.
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 2f1aeab9fca1a5f583be1add175d1ee95c213cfa ]
When attempting to exclusive open a device which has no exclusive open
permission, such as a physical device associated with the flakey dm
device, the open operation will fail, resulting in a mount failure.
In this particular scenario, we erroneously return -EINVAL instead of the
correct error code provided by the bdev_open_by_path() function, which is
-EBUSY.
Fix this, by returning error code from the bdev_open_by_path() function.
With this correction, the mount error message will align with that of
ext4 and xfs.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 2f7ef5bb4a2f3e481ef05fab946edb97c84f67cf upstream.
Syzbot reported the following information leak for in
btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino():
BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline]
BUG: KMSAN: kernel-infoleak in _copy_to_user+0xbc/0x110 lib/usercopy.c:40
instrument_copy_to_user include/linux/instrumented.h:114 [inline]
_copy_to_user+0xbc/0x110 lib/usercopy.c:40
copy_to_user include/linux/uaccess.h:191 [inline]
btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino+0x440/0x750 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3499
btrfs_ioctl+0x714/0x1260
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0x261/0x450 fs/ioctl.c:890
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x96/0xe0 fs/ioctl.c:890
x64_sys_call+0x1883/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:17
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
Uninit was created at:
__kmalloc_large_node+0x231/0x370 mm/slub.c:3921
__do_kmalloc_node mm/slub.c:3954 [inline]
__kmalloc_node+0xb07/0x1060 mm/slub.c:3973
kmalloc_node include/linux/slab.h:648 [inline]
kvmalloc_node+0xc0/0x2d0 mm/util.c:634
kvmalloc include/linux/slab.h:766 [inline]
init_data_container+0x49/0x1e0 fs/btrfs/backref.c:2779
btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino+0x17c/0x750 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:3480
btrfs_ioctl+0x714/0x1260
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:904 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0x261/0x450 fs/ioctl.c:890
__x64_sys_ioctl+0x96/0xe0 fs/ioctl.c:890
x64_sys_call+0x1883/0x3b50 arch/x86/include/generated/asm/syscalls_64.h:17
do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
do_syscall_64+0xcf/0x1e0 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
Bytes 40-65535 of 65536 are uninitialized
Memory access of size 65536 starts at ffff888045a40000
This happens, because we're copying a 'struct btrfs_data_container' back
to user-space. This btrfs_data_container is allocated in
'init_data_container()' via kvmalloc(), which does not zero-fill the
memory.
Fix this by using kvzalloc() which zeroes out the memory on allocation.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reported-by: <syzbot+510a1abbb8116eeb341d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 7192833c4e55b26e8f15ef58577867a1bc808036 upstream.
When btrfs scrub finds an error, it reads mirrors to find correct data. If
all the errors are fixed, sctx->error_bitmap is cleared for the stripe
range. However, in the zoned mode, it runs relocation to repair scrub
errors when the bitmap is *not* empty, which is a flipped condition.
Also, it runs the relocation even if the scrub is read-only. This was
missed by a fix in commit 1f2030ff6e49 ("btrfs: scrub: respect the
read-only flag during repair").
The repair is only necessary when there is a repaired sector and should be
done on read-write scrub. So, tweak the condition for both regular and
zoned case.
Fixes: 54765392a1b9 ("btrfs: scrub: introduce helper to queue a stripe for scrub")
Fixes: 1f2030ff6e49 ("btrfs: scrub: respect the read-only flag during repair")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit fe1c6c7acce10baf9521d6dccc17268d91ee2305 upstream.
[BUG]
During my extent_map cleanup/refactor, with extra sanity checks,
extent-map-tests::test_case_7() would not pass the checks.
The problem is, after btrfs_drop_extent_map_range(), the resulted
extent_map has a @block_start way too large.
Meanwhile my btrfs_file_extent_item based members are returning a
correct @disk_bytenr/@offset combination.
The extent map layout looks like this:
0 16K 32K 48K
| PINNED | | Regular |
The regular em at [32K, 48K) also has 32K @block_start.
Then drop range [0, 36K), which should shrink the regular one to be
[36K, 48K).
However the @block_start is incorrect, we expect 32K + 4K, but got 52K.
[CAUSE]
Inside btrfs_drop_extent_map_range() function, if we hit an extent_map
that covers the target range but is still beyond it, we need to split
that extent map into half:
|<-- drop range -->|
|<----- existing extent_map --->|
And if the extent map is not compressed, we need to forward
extent_map::block_start by the difference between the end of drop range
and the extent map start.
However in that particular case, the difference is calculated using
(start + len - em->start).
The problem is @start can be modified if the drop range covers any
pinned extent.
This leads to wrong calculation, and would be caught by my later
extent_map sanity checks, which checks the em::block_start against
btrfs_file_extent_item::disk_bytenr + btrfs_file_extent_item::offset.
This is a regression caused by commit c962098ca4af ("btrfs: fix
incorrect splitting in btrfs_drop_extent_map_range"), which removed the
@len update for pinned extents.
[FIX]
Fix it by avoiding using @start completely, and use @end - em->start
instead, which @end is exclusive bytenr number.
And update the test case to verify the @block_start to prevent such
problem from happening.
Thankfully this is not going to lead to any data corruption, as IO path
does not utilize btrfs_drop_extent_map_range() with @skip_pinned set.
So this fix is only here for the sake of consistency/correctness.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.5+
Fixes: c962098ca4af ("btrfs: fix incorrect splitting in btrfs_drop_extent_map_range")
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 131a821a243f89be312ced9e62ccc37b2cf3846c upstream.
In commit b4ccace878f4 ("btrfs: refactor submit_compressed_extents()"), if
an async extent compressed but failed to find enough space, we changed
from falling back to an uncompressed write to just failing the write
altogether. The principle was that if there's not enough space to write
the compressed version of the data, there can't possibly be enough space
to write the larger, uncompressed version of the data.
However, this isn't necessarily true: due to fragmentation, there could
be enough discontiguous free blocks to write the uncompressed version,
but not enough contiguous free blocks to write the smaller but
unsplittable compressed version.
This has occurred to an internal workload which relied on write()'s
return value indicating there was space. While rare, it has happened a
few times.
Thus, in order to prevent early ENOSPC, re-add a fallback to
uncompressed writing.
Fixes: b4ccace878f4 ("btrfs: refactor submit_compressed_extents()")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Co-developed-by: Neal Gompa <neal@gompa.dev>
Signed-off-by: Neal Gompa <neal@gompa.dev>
Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 211de93367304ab395357f8cb12568a4d1e20701 upstream.
The transaction is only able to free PERTRANS reservations for a root
once that root has been recorded with the TRANS tag on the roots radix
tree. Therefore, until we are sure that this root will get tagged, it
isn't safe to convert. Generally, this is not an issue as *some*
transaction will likely tag the root before long and this reservation
will get freed in that transaction, but technically it could stick
around until unmount and result in a warning about leaked metadata
reservation space.
This path is most exercised by running the generic/269 fstest with
CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG.
Fixes: a6496849671a ("btrfs: fix start transaction qgroup rsv double free")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.6+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 71537e35c324ea6fbd68377a4f26bb93a831ae35 upstream.
When running delayed inode updates, we do not record the inode's root in
the transaction, but we do allocate PREALLOC and thus converted PERTRANS
space for it. To be sure we free that PERTRANS meta rsv, we must ensure
that we record the root in the transaction.
Fixes: 4f5427ccce5d ("btrfs: delayed-inode: Use new qgroup meta rsv for delayed inode and item")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 74e97958121aa1f5854da6effba70143f051b0cd upstream.
Create subvolume, create snapshot and delete subvolume all use
btrfs_subvolume_reserve_metadata() to reserve metadata for the changes
done to the parent subvolume's fs tree, which cannot be mediated in the
normal way via start_transaction. When quota groups (squota or qgroups)
are enabled, this reserves qgroup metadata of type PREALLOC. Once the
operation is associated to a transaction, we convert PREALLOC to
PERTRANS, which gets cleared in bulk at the end of the transaction.
However, the error paths of these three operations were not implementing
this lifecycle correctly. They unconditionally converted the PREALLOC to
PERTRANS in a generic cleanup step regardless of errors or whether the
operation was fully associated to a transaction or not. This resulted in
error paths occasionally converting this rsv to PERTRANS without calling
record_root_in_trans successfully, which meant that unless that root got
recorded in the transaction by some other thread, the end of the
transaction would not free that root's PERTRANS, leaking it. Ultimately,
this resulted in hitting a WARN in CONFIG_BTRFS_DEBUG builds at unmount
for the leaked reservation.
The fix is to ensure that every qgroup PREALLOC reservation observes the
following properties:
1. any failure before record_root_in_trans is called successfully
results in freeing the PREALLOC reservation.
2. after record_root_in_trans, we convert to PERTRANS, and now the
transaction owns freeing the reservation.
This patch enforces those properties on the three operations. Without
it, generic/269 with squotas enabled at mkfs time would fail in ~5-10
runs on my system. With this patch, it ran successfully 1000 times in a
row.
Fixes: e85fde5162bf ("btrfs: qgroup: fix qgroup meta rsv leak for subvolume operations")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 141fb8cd206ace23c02cd2791c6da52c1d77d42a upstream.
We use add_root_meta_rsv and sub_root_meta_rsv to track prealloc and
pertrans reservations for subvolumes when quotas are enabled. The
convert function does not properly increment pertrans after decrementing
prealloc, so the count is not accurate.
Note: we check that the fs is not read-only to mirror the logic in
qgroup_convert_meta, which checks that before adding to the pertrans rsv.
Fixes: 8287475a2055 ("btrfs: qgroup: Use root::qgroup_meta_rsv_* to record qgroup meta reserved space")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit 3c6ee34c6f9cd12802326da26631232a61743501 ]
Change BUG_ON to proper error handling if building the path buffer
fails. The pointers are not printed so we don't accidentally leak kernel
addresses.
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 26b66d1d366a375745755ca7365f67110bbf6bd5 ]
The get_parent handler looks up a parent of a given dentry, this can be
either a subvolume or a directory. The search is set up with offset -1
but it's never expected to find such item, as it would break allowed
range of inode number or a root id. This means it's a corruption (ext4
also returns this error code).
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 7411055db5ce64f836aaffd422396af0075fdc99 ]
The unhandled case in btrfs_relocate_sys_chunks() loop is a corruption,
as it could be caused only by two impossible conditions:
- at first the search key is set up to look for a chunk tree item, with
offset -1, this is an inexact search and the key->offset will contain
the correct offset upon a successful search, a valid chunk tree item
cannot have an offset -1
- after first successful search, the found_key corresponds to a chunk
item, the offset is decremented by 1 before the next loop, it's
impossible to find a chunk item there due to alignment and size
constraints
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 978b63f7464abcfd364a6c95f734282c50f3decf ]
For fiemap we recently stopped locking the target extent range for the
whole duration of the fiemap call, in order to avoid a deadlock in a
scenario where the fiemap buffer happens to be a memory mapped range of
the same file. This use case is very unlikely to be useful in practice but
it may be triggered by fuzz testing (syzbot, etc).
This however introduced a race that makes us miss delalloc ranges for
file regions that are currently holes, so the caller of fiemap will not
be aware that there's data for some file regions. This can be quite
serious for some use cases - for example in coreutils versions before 9.0,
the cp program used fiemap to detect holes and data in the source file,
copying only regions with data (extents or delalloc) from the source file
to the destination file in order to preserve holes (see the documentation
for its --sparse command line option). This means that if cp was used
with a source file that had delalloc in a hole, the destination file could
end up without that data, which is effectively a data loss issue, if it
happened to hit the race described below.
The race happens like this:
1) Fiemap is called, without the FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC flag, for a file that
has delalloc in the file range [64M, 65M[, which is currently a hole;
2) Fiemap locks the inode in shared mode, then starts iterating the
inode's subvolume tree searching for file extent items, without having
the whole fiemap target range locked in the inode's io tree - the
change introduced recently by commit b0ad381fa769 ("btrfs: fix
deadlock with fiemap and extent locking"). It only locks ranges in
the io tree when it finds a hole or prealloc extent since that
commit;
3) Note that fiemap clones each leaf before using it, and this is to
avoid deadlocks when locking a file range in the inode's io tree and
the fiemap buffer is memory mapped to some file, because writing
to the page with btrfs_page_mkwrite() will wait on any ordered extent
for the page's range and the ordered extent needs to lock the range
and may need to modify the same leaf, therefore leading to a deadlock
on the leaf;
4) While iterating the file extent items in the cloned leaf before
finding the hole in the range [64M, 65M[, the delalloc in that range
is flushed and its ordered extent completes - meaning the corresponding
file extent item is in the inode's subvolume tree, but not present in
the cloned leaf that fiemap is iterating over;
5) When fiemap finds the hole in the [64M, 65M[ range by seeing the gap in
the cloned leaf (or a file extent item with disk_bytenr == 0 in case
the NO_HOLES feature is not enabled), it will lock that file range in
the inode's io tree and then search for delalloc by checking for the
EXTENT_DELALLOC bit in the io tree for that range and ordered extents
(with btrfs_find_delalloc_in_range()). But it finds nothing since the
delalloc in that range was already flushed and the ordered extent
completed and is gone - as a result fiemap will not report that there's
delalloc or an extent for the range [64M, 65M[, so user space will be
mislead into thinking that there's a hole in that range.
This could actually be sporadically triggered with test case generic/094
from fstests, which reports a missing extent/delalloc range like this:
# generic/094 2s ... - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/094.out.bad)
# --- tests/generic/094.out 2020-06-10 19:29:03.830519425 +0100
# +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/094.out.bad 2024-02-28 11:00:00.381071525 +0000
# @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
# QA output created by 094
# fiemap run with sync
# fiemap run without sync
# +ERROR: couldn't find extent at 7
# +map is 'HHDDHPPDPHPH'
# +logical: [ 5.. 6] phys: 301517.. 301518 flags: 0x800 tot: 2
# +logical: [ 8.. 8] phys: 301520.. 301520 flags: 0x800 tot: 1
# ...
# (Run 'diff -u /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/tests/generic/094.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//generic/094.out.bad' to see the entire diff)
So in order to fix this, while still avoiding deadlocks in the case where
the fiemap buffer is memory mapped to the same file, change fiemap to work
like the following:
1) Always lock the whole range in the inode's io tree before starting to
iterate the inode's subvolume tree searching for file extent items,
just like we did before commit b0ad381fa769 ("btrfs: fix deadlock with
fiemap and extent locking");
2) Now instead of writing to the fiemap buffer every time we have an extent
to report, write instead to a temporary buffer (1 page), and when that
buffer becomes full, stop iterating the file extent items, unlock the
range in the io tree, release the search path, submit all the entries
kept in that buffer to the fiemap buffer, and then resume the search
for file extent items after locking again the remainder of the range in
the io tree.
The buffer having a size of a page, allows for 146 entries in a system
with 4K pages. This is a large enough value to have a good performance
by avoiding too many restarts of the search for file extent items.
In other words this preserves the huge performance gains made in the
last two years to fiemap, while avoiding the deadlocks in case the
fiemap buffer is memory mapped to the same file (useless in practice,
but possible and exercised by fuzz testing and syzbot).
Fixes: b0ad381fa769 ("btrfs: fix deadlock with fiemap and extent locking")
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit 418b09027743d9a9fb39116bed46a192f868a3c3 ]
When FIEMAP_FLAG_SYNC is given to fiemap the expectation is that that
are no concurrent writes and we get a stable view of the inode's extent
layout.
When the flag is given we flush all IO (and wait for ordered extents to
complete) and then lock the inode in shared mode, however that leaves open
the possibility that a write might happen right after the flushing and
before locking the inode. So fix this by flushing again after locking the
inode - we leave the initial flushing before locking the inode to avoid
holding the lock and blocking other RO operations while waiting for IO
and ordered extents to complete. The second flushing while holding the
inode's lock will most of the time do nothing or very little since the
time window for new writes to have happened is small.
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Stable-dep-of: 978b63f7464a ("btrfs: fix race when detecting delalloc ranges during fiemap")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 74098a989b9c3370f768140b7783a7aaec2759b3 upstream.
At the moment scrub_supers() doesn't grab the super block's location via
the zoned device aware btrfs_sb_log_location() but via btrfs_sb_offset().
This leads to checksum errors on 'scrub' as we're not accessing the
correct location of the super block.
So use btrfs_sb_log_location() for getting the super blocks location on
scrub.
Reported-by: WA AM <waautomata@gmail.com>
Link: http://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CANU2Z0EvUzfYxczLgGUiREoMndE9WdQnbaawV5Fv5gNXptPUKw@mail.gmail.com
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit a8b70c7f8600bc77d03c0b032c0662259b9e615e upstream.
Commit f4a9f219411f ("btrfs: do not delete unused block group if it may be
used soon") changed the behaviour of deleting unused block-groups on zoned
filesystems. Starting with this commit, we're using
btrfs_space_info_used() to calculate the number of used bytes in a
space_info. But btrfs_space_info_used() also accounts
btrfs_space_info::bytes_zone_unusable as used bytes.
So if a block group is 100% zone_unusable it is skipped from the deletion
step.
In order not to skip fully zone_unusable block-groups, also check if the
block-group has bytes left that can be used on a zoned filesystem.
Fixes: f4a9f219411f ("btrfs: do not delete unused block group if it may be used soon")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit ef1e68236b9153c27cb7cf29ead0c532870d4215 upstream.
There are reports from tree-checker that detects corrupted nodes,
without any obvious pattern so possibly an overwrite in memory.
After some debugging it turns out there's a race when reading an extent
buffer the uptodate status can be missed.
To prevent concurrent reads for the same extent buffer,
read_extent_buffer_pages() performs these checks:
/* (1) */
if (test_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE, &eb->bflags))
return 0;
/* (2) */
if (test_and_set_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_READING, &eb->bflags))
goto done;
At this point, it seems safe to start the actual read operation. Once
that completes, end_bbio_meta_read() does
/* (3) */
set_extent_buffer_uptodate(eb);
/* (4) */
clear_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_READING, &eb->bflags);
Normally, this is enough to ensure only one read happens, and all other
callers wait for it to finish before returning. Unfortunately, there is
a racey interleaving:
Thread A | Thread B | Thread C
---------+----------+---------
(1) | |
| (1) |
(2) | |
(3) | |
(4) | |
| (2) |
| | (1)
When this happens, thread B kicks of an unnecessary read. Worse, thread
C will see UPTODATE set and return immediately, while the read from
thread B is still in progress. This race could result in tree-checker
errors like this as the extent buffer is concurrently modified:
BTRFS critical (device dm-0): corrupted node, root=256
block=8550954455682405139 owner mismatch, have 11858205567642294356
expect [256, 18446744073709551360]
Fix it by testing UPTODATE again after setting the READING bit, and if
it's been set, skip the unnecessary read.
Fixes: d7172f52e993 ("btrfs: use per-buffer locking for extent_buffer reading")
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAHk-=whNdMaN9ntZ47XRKP6DBes2E5w7fi-0U3H2+PS18p+Pzw@mail.gmail.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/f51a6d5d7432455a6a858d51b49ecac183e0bbc9.1706312914.git.wqu@suse.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/c7241ea4-fcc6-48d2-98c8-b5ea790d6c89@gmx.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.5+
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Tavian Barnes <tavianator@tavianator.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ minor update of changelog ]
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit b0ad381fa7690244802aed119b478b4bdafc31dd upstream.
While working on the patchset to remove extent locking I got a lockdep
splat with fiemap and pagefaulting with my new extent lock replacement
lock.
This deadlock exists with our normal code, we just don't have lockdep
annotations with the extent locking so we've never noticed it.
Since we're copying the fiemap extent to user space on every iteration
we have the chance of pagefaulting. Because we hold the extent lock for
the entire range we could mkwrite into a range in the file that we have
mmap'ed. This would deadlock with the following stack trace
[<0>] lock_extent+0x28d/0x2f0
[<0>] btrfs_page_mkwrite+0x273/0x8a0
[<0>] do_page_mkwrite+0x50/0xb0
[<0>] do_fault+0xc1/0x7b0
[<0>] __handle_mm_fault+0x2fa/0x460
[<0>] handle_mm_fault+0xa4/0x330
[<0>] do_user_addr_fault+0x1f4/0x800
[<0>] exc_page_fault+0x7c/0x1e0
[<0>] asm_exc_page_fault+0x26/0x30
[<0>] rep_movs_alternative+0x33/0x70
[<0>] _copy_to_user+0x49/0x70
[<0>] fiemap_fill_next_extent+0xc8/0x120
[<0>] emit_fiemap_extent+0x4d/0xa0
[<0>] extent_fiemap+0x7f8/0xad0
[<0>] btrfs_fiemap+0x49/0x80
[<0>] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x3e1/0xb50
[<0>] do_syscall_64+0x94/0x1a0
[<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
I wrote an fstest to reproduce this deadlock without my replacement lock
and verified that the deadlock exists with our existing locking.
To fix this simply don't take the extent lock for the entire duration of
the fiemap. This is safe in general because we keep track of where we
are when we're searching the tree, so if an ordered extent updates in
the middle of our fiemap call we'll still emit the correct extents
because we know what offset we were on before.
The only place we maintain the lock is searching delalloc. Since the
delalloc stuff can change during writeback we want to lock the extent
range so we have a consistent view of delalloc at the time we're
checking to see if we need to set the delalloc flag.
With this patch applied we no longer deadlock with my testcase.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit ae6bd7f9b46a29af52ebfac25d395757e2031d0d ]
At contains_pending_extent() the value of the end offset of a chunk we
found in the device's allocation state io tree is inclusive, so when
we calculate the length we pass to the in_range() macro, we must sum
1 to the expression "physical_end - physical_offset".
In practice the wrong calculation should be harmless as chunks sizes
are never 1 byte and we should never have 1 byte ranges of unallocated
space. Nevertheless fix the wrong calculation.
Reported-by: Alex Lyakas <alex.lyakas@zadara.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CAOcd+r30e-f4R-5x-S7sV22RJPe7+pgwherA6xqN2_qe7o4XTg@mail.gmail.com/
Fixes: 1c11b63eff2a ("btrfs: replace pending/pinned chunks lists with io tree")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit d139ded8b9cdb897bb9539eb33311daf9a177fd2 ]
[BUG]
If qgroup is marked inconsistent (e.g. caused by operations needing full
subtree rescan, like creating a snapshot and assign to a higher level
qgroup), btrfs would immediately start leaking its data reserved space.
The following script can easily reproduce it:
mkfs.btrfs -O quota -f $dev
mount $dev $mnt
btrfs subvolume create $mnt/subv1
btrfs qgroup create 1/0 $mnt
# This snapshot creation would mark qgroup inconsistent,
# as the ownership involves different higher level qgroup, thus
# we have to rescan both source and snapshot, which can be very
# time consuming, thus here btrfs just choose to mark qgroup
# inconsistent, and let users to determine when to do the rescan.
btrfs subv snapshot -i 1/0 $mnt/subv1 $mnt/snap1
# Now this write would lead to qgroup rsv leak.
xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 64k" $mnt/file1
# And at unmount time, btrfs would report 64K DATA rsv space leaked.
umount $mnt
And we would have the following dmesg output for the unmount:
BTRFS info (device dm-1): last unmount of filesystem 14a3d84e-f47b-4f72-b053-a8a36eef74d3
BTRFS warning (device dm-1): qgroup 0/5 has unreleased space, type 0 rsv 65536
[CAUSE]
Since commit e15e9f43c7ca ("btrfs: introduce
BTRFS_QGROUP_RUNTIME_FLAG_NO_ACCOUNTING to skip qgroup accounting"),
we introduce a mode for btrfs qgroup to skip the timing consuming
backref walk, if the qgroup is already inconsistent.
But this skip also covered the data reserved freeing, thus the qgroup
reserved space for each newly created data extent would not be freed,
thus cause the leakage.
[FIX]
Make the data extent reserved space freeing mandatory.
The qgroup reserved space handling is way cheaper compared to the
backref walking part, and we always have the super sensitive leak
detector, thus it's definitely worth to always free the qgroup
reserved data space.
Reported-by: Fabian Vogt <fvogt@suse.com>
Fixes: e15e9f43c7ca ("btrfs: introduce BTRFS_QGROUP_RUNTIME_FLAG_NO_ACCOUNTING to skip qgroup accounting")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Link: https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1216196
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit c7bb26b847e5b97814f522686068c5628e2b3646 ]
At btrfs_use_block_rsv() we read the size of a block reserve without
locking its spinlock, which makes KCSAN complain because the size of a
block reserve is always updated while holding its spinlock. The report
from KCSAN is the following:
[653.313148] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in btrfs_update_delayed_refs_rsv [btrfs] / btrfs_use_block_rsv [btrfs]
[653.314755] read to 0x000000017f5871b8 of 8 bytes by task 7519 on cpu 0:
[653.314779] btrfs_use_block_rsv+0xe4/0x2f8 [btrfs]
[653.315606] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xdc/0x998 [btrfs]
[653.316421] btrfs_force_cow_block+0x220/0xe38 [btrfs]
[653.317242] btrfs_cow_block+0x1ac/0x568 [btrfs]
[653.318060] btrfs_search_slot+0xda2/0x19b8 [btrfs]
[653.318879] btrfs_del_csums+0x1dc/0x798 [btrfs]
[653.319702] __btrfs_free_extent.isra.0+0xc24/0x2028 [btrfs]
[653.320538] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xd3c/0x2390 [btrfs]
[653.321340] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xae/0x290 [btrfs]
[653.322140] flush_space+0x5e4/0x718 [btrfs]
[653.322958] btrfs_preempt_reclaim_metadata_space+0x102/0x2f8 [btrfs]
[653.323781] process_one_work+0x3b6/0x838
[653.323800] worker_thread+0x75e/0xb10
[653.323817] kthread+0x21a/0x230
[653.323836] __ret_from_fork+0x6c/0xb8
[653.323855] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30
[653.323887] write to 0x000000017f5871b8 of 8 bytes by task 576 on cpu 3:
[653.323906] btrfs_update_delayed_refs_rsv+0x1a4/0x250 [btrfs]
[653.324699] btrfs_add_delayed_data_ref+0x468/0x6d8 [btrfs]
[653.325494] btrfs_free_extent+0x76/0x120 [btrfs]
[653.326280] __btrfs_mod_ref+0x6a8/0x6b8 [btrfs]
[653.327064] btrfs_dec_ref+0x50/0x70 [btrfs]
[653.327849] walk_up_proc+0x236/0xa50 [btrfs]
[653.328633] walk_up_tree+0x21c/0x448 [btrfs]
[653.329418] btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x802/0x1328 [btrfs]
[653.330205] btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot+0x184/0x238 [btrfs]
[653.330995] cleaner_kthread+0x2b0/0x2f0 [btrfs]
[653.331781] kthread+0x21a/0x230
[653.331800] __ret_from_fork+0x6c/0xb8
[653.331818] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30
So add a helper to get the size of a block reserve while holding the lock.
Reading the field while holding the lock instead of using the data_race()
annotation is used in order to prevent load tearing.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
[ Upstream commit e06cc89475eddc1f3a7a4d471524256152c68166 ]
At space_info.c we have several places where we access the ->reserved
field of a block reserve without taking the block reserve's spinlock
first, which makes KCSAN warn about a data race since that field is
always updated while holding the spinlock.
The reports from KCSAN are like the following:
[117.193526] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in btrfs_block_rsv_release [btrfs] / need_preemptive_reclaim [btrfs]
[117.195148] read to 0x000000017f587190 of 8 bytes by task 6303 on cpu 3:
[117.195172] need_preemptive_reclaim+0x222/0x2f0 [btrfs]
[117.195992] __reserve_bytes+0xbb0/0xdc8 [btrfs]
[117.196807] btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes+0x4c/0x120 [btrfs]
[117.197620] btrfs_block_rsv_add+0x78/0xa8 [btrfs]
[117.198434] btrfs_delayed_update_inode+0x154/0x368 [btrfs]
[117.199300] btrfs_update_inode+0x108/0x1c8 [btrfs]
[117.200122] btrfs_dirty_inode+0xb4/0x140 [btrfs]
[117.200937] btrfs_update_time+0x8c/0xb0 [btrfs]
[117.201754] touch_atime+0x16c/0x1e0
[117.201789] filemap_read+0x674/0x728
[117.201823] btrfs_file_read_iter+0xf8/0x410 [btrfs]
[117.202653] vfs_read+0x2b6/0x498
[117.203454] ksys_read+0xa2/0x150
[117.203473] __s390x_sys_read+0x68/0x88
[117.203495] do_syscall+0x1c6/0x210
[117.203517] __do_syscall+0xc8/0xf0
[117.203539] system_call+0x70/0x98
[117.203579] write to 0x000000017f587190 of 8 bytes by task 11 on cpu 0:
[117.203604] btrfs_block_rsv_release+0x2e8/0x578 [btrfs]
[117.204432] btrfs_delayed_inode_release_metadata+0x7c/0x1d0 [btrfs]
[117.205259] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x37c/0x5e0 [btrfs]
[117.206093] btrfs_async_run_delayed_root+0x356/0x498 [btrfs]
[117.206917] btrfs_work_helper+0x160/0x7a0 [btrfs]
[117.207738] process_one_work+0x3b6/0x838
[117.207768] worker_thread+0x75e/0xb10
[117.207797] kthread+0x21a/0x230
[117.207830] __ret_from_fork+0x6c/0xb8
[117.207861] ret_from_fork+0xa/0x30
So add a helper to get the reserved amount of a block reserve while
holding the lock. The value may be not be up to date anymore when used by
need_preemptive_reclaim() and btrfs_preempt_reclaim_metadata_space(), but
that's ok since the worst it can do is cause more reclaim work do be done
sooner rather than later. Reading the field while holding the lock instead
of using the data_race() annotation is used in order to prevent load
tearing.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit 5897710b28cabab04ea6c7547f27b7989de646ae upstream.
If we have a sparse file with a trailing hole (from the last extent's end
to i_size) and then create an extent in the file that ends before the
file's i_size, then when doing an incremental send we will issue a write
full of zeroes for the range that starts immediately after the new extent
ends up to i_size. While this isn't incorrect because the file ends up
with exactly the same data, it unnecessarily results in using extra space
at the destination with one or more extents full of zeroes instead of
having a hole. In same cases this results in using megabytes or even
gigabytes of unnecessary space.
Example, reproducer:
$ cat test.sh
#!/bin/bash
DEV=/dev/sdh
MNT=/mnt/sdh
mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV
mount $DEV $MNT
# Create 1G sparse file.
xfs_io -f -c "truncate 1G" $MNT/foobar
# Create base snapshot.
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/mysnap1
# Create send stream (full send) for the base snapshot.
btrfs send -f /tmp/1.snap $MNT/mysnap1
# Now write one extent at the beginning of the file and one somewhere
# in the middle, leaving a gap between the end of this second extent
# and the file's size.
xfs_io -c "pwrite -S 0xab 0 128K" \
-c "pwrite -S 0xcd 512M 128K" \
$MNT/foobar
# Now create a second snapshot which is going to be used for an
# incremental send operation.
btrfs subvolume snapshot -r $MNT $MNT/mysnap2
# Create send stream (incremental send) for the second snapshot.
btrfs send -p $MNT/mysnap1 -f /tmp/2.snap $MNT/mysnap2
# Now recreate the filesystem by receiving both send streams and
# verify we get the same content that the original filesystem had
# and file foobar has only two extents with a size of 128K each.
umount $MNT
mkfs.btrfs -f $DEV
mount $DEV $MNT
btrfs receive -f /tmp/1.snap $MNT
btrfs receive -f /tmp/2.snap $MNT
echo -e "\nFile fiemap in the second snapshot:"
# Should have:
#
# 128K extent at file range [0, 128K[
# hole at file range [128K, 512M[
# 128K extent file range [512M, 512M + 128K[
# hole at file range [512M + 128K, 1G[
xfs_io -r -c "fiemap -v" $MNT/mysnap2/foobar
# File should be using 256K of data (two 128K extents).
echo -e "\nSpace used by the file: $(du -h $MNT/mysnap2/foobar | cut -f 1)"
umount $MNT
Running the test, we can see with fiemap that we get an extent for the
range [512M, 1G[, while in the source filesystem we have an extent for
the range [512M, 512M + 128K[ and a hole for the rest of the file (the
range [512M + 128K, 1G[):
$ ./test.sh
(...)
File fiemap in the second snapshot:
/mnt/sdh/mysnap2/foobar:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
0: [0..255]: 26624..26879 256 0x0
1: [256..1048575]: hole 1048320
2: [1048576..2097151]: 2156544..3205119 1048576 0x1
Space used by the file: 513M
This happens because once we finish processing an inode, at
finish_inode_if_needed(), we always issue a hole (write operations full
of zeros) if there's a gap between the end of the last processed extent
and the file's size, even if that range is already a hole in the parent
snapshot. Fix this by issuing the hole only if the range is not already
a hole.
After this change, running the test above, we get the expected layout:
$ ./test.sh
(...)
File fiemap in the second snapshot:
/mnt/sdh/mysnap2/foobar:
EXT: FILE-OFFSET BLOCK-RANGE TOTAL FLAGS
0: [0..255]: 26624..26879 256 0x0
1: [256..1048575]: hole 1048320
2: [1048576..1048831]: 26880..27135 256 0x1
3: [1048832..2097151]: hole 1048320
Space used by the file: 256K
A test case for fstests will follow soon.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reported-by: Dorai Ashok S A <dash.btrfs@inix.me>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/c0bf7818-9c45-46a8-b3d3-513230d0c86e@inix.me/
Reviewed-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 9845664b9ee47ce7ee7ea93caf47d39a9d4552c4 upstream.
There's a syzbot report that device name buffers passed to device
replace are not properly checked for string termination which could lead
to a read out of bounds in getname_kernel().
Add a helper that validates both source and target device name buffers.
For devid as the source initialize the buffer to empty string in case
something tries to read it later.
This was originally analyzed and fixed in a different way by Edward Adam
Davis (see links).
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000d1a1d1060cc9c5e7@google.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/tencent_44CA0665C9836EF9EEC80CB9E7E206DF5206@qq.com/
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+
CC: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com>
Reported-and-tested-by: syzbot+33f23b49ac24f986c9e8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit e2b54eaf28df0c978626c9736b94f003b523b451 upstream.
When creating a snapshot we may do a double free of an anonymous device
in case there's an error committing the transaction. The second free may
result in freeing an anonymous device number that was allocated by some
other subsystem in the kernel or another btrfs filesystem.
The steps that lead to this:
1) At ioctl.c:create_snapshot() we allocate an anonymous device number
and assign it to pending_snapshot->anon_dev;
2) Then we call btrfs_commit_transaction() and end up at
transaction.c:create_pending_snapshot();
3) There we call btrfs_get_new_fs_root() and pass it the anonymous device
number stored in pending_snapshot->anon_dev;
4) btrfs_get_new_fs_root() frees that anonymous device number because
btrfs_lookup_fs_root() returned a root - someone else did a lookup
of the new root already, which could some task doing backref walking;
5) After that some error happens in the transaction commit path, and at
ioctl.c:create_snapshot() we jump to the 'fail' label, and after
that we free again the same anonymous device number, which in the
meanwhile may have been reallocated somewhere else, because
pending_snapshot->anon_dev still has the same value as in step 1.
Recently syzbot ran into this and reported the following trace:
------------[ cut here ]------------
ida_free called for id=51 which is not allocated.
WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 31038 at lib/idr.c:525 ida_free+0x370/0x420 lib/idr.c:525
Modules linked in:
CPU: 1 PID: 31038 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.8.0-rc4-syzkaller-00410-gc02197fc9076 #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/25/2024
RIP: 0010:ida_free+0x370/0x420 lib/idr.c:525
Code: 10 42 80 3c 28 (...)
RSP: 0018:ffffc90015a67300 EFLAGS: 00010246
RAX: be5130472f5dd000 RBX: 0000000000000033 RCX: 0000000000040000
RDX: ffffc90009a7a000 RSI: 000000000003ffff RDI: 0000000000040000
RBP: ffffc90015a673f0 R08: ffffffff81577992 R09: 1ffff92002b4cdb4
R10: dffffc0000000000 R11: fffff52002b4cdb5 R12: 0000000000000246
R13: dffffc0000000000 R14: ffffffff8e256b80 R15: 0000000000000246
FS: 00007fca3f4b46c0(0000) GS:ffff8880b9500000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 00007f167a17b978 CR3: 000000001ed26000 CR4: 0000000000350ef0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
btrfs_get_root_ref+0xa48/0xaf0 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c:1346
create_pending_snapshot+0xff2/0x2bc0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1837
create_pending_snapshots+0x195/0x1d0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:1931
btrfs_commit_transaction+0xf1c/0x3740 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:2404
create_snapshot+0x507/0x880 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:848
btrfs_mksubvol+0x5d0/0x750 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:998
btrfs_mksnapshot+0xb5/0xf0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1044
__btrfs_ioctl_snap_create+0x387/0x4b0 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1306
btrfs_ioctl_snap_create_v2+0x1ca/0x400 fs/btrfs/ioctl.c:1393
btrfs_ioctl+0xa74/0xd40
vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline]
__do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:871 [inline]
__se_sys_ioctl+0xfe/0x170 fs/ioctl.c:857
do_syscall_64+0xfb/0x240
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6f/0x77
RIP: 0033:0x7fca3e67dda9
Code: 28 00 00 00 (...)
RSP: 002b:00007fca3f4b40c8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007fca3e7abf80 RCX: 00007fca3e67dda9
RDX: 00000000200005c0 RSI: 0000000050009417 RDI: 0000000000000003
RBP: 00007fca3e6ca47a R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: 000000000000000b R14: 00007fca3e7abf80 R15: 00007fff6bf95658
</TASK>
Where we get an explicit message where we attempt to free an anonymous
device number that is not currently allocated. It happens in a different
code path from the example below, at btrfs_get_root_ref(), so this change
may not fix the case triggered by syzbot.
To fix at least the code path from the example above, change
btrfs_get_root_ref() and its callers to receive a dev_t pointer argument
for the anonymous device number, so that in case it frees the number, it
also resets it to 0, so that up in the call chain we don't attempt to do
the double free.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000f673a1061202f630@google.com/
Fixes: e03ee2fe873e ("btrfs: do not ASSERT() if the newly created subvolume already got read")
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
[ Upstream commit a1a4a9ca77f143c00fce69c1239887ff8b813bec ]
For fiemap we recently stopped locking the target extent range for the
whole duration of the fiemap call, in order to avoid a deadlock in a
scenario where the fiemap buffer happens to be a memory mapped range of
the same file. This use case is very unlikely to be useful in practice but
it may be triggered by fuzz testing (syzbot, etc).
However by not locking the target extent range for the whole duration of
the fiemap call we can race with an ordered extent. This happens like
this:
1) The fiemap task finishes processing a file extent item that covers
the file range [512K, 1M[, and that file extent item is the last item
in the leaf currently being processed;
2) And ordered extent for the file range [768K, 2M[, in COW mode,
completes (btrfs_finish_one_ordered()) and the file extent item
covering the range [512K, 1M[ is trimmed to cover the range
[512K, 768K[ and then a new file extent item for the range [768K, 2M[
is inserted in the inode's subvolume tree;
3) The fiemap task calls fiemap_next_leaf_item(), which then calls
btrfs_next_leaf() to find the next leaf / item. This finds that the
the next key following the one we previously processed (its type is
BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY and its offset is 512K), is the key corresponding
to the new file extent item inserted by the ordered extent, which has
a type of BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY and an offset of 768K;
4) Later the fiemap code ends up at emit_fiemap_extent() and triggers
the warning:
if (cache->offset + cache->len > offset) {
WARN_ON(1);
return -EINVAL;
}
Since we get 1M > 768K, because the previously emitted entry for the
old extent covering the file range [512K, 1M[ ends at an offset that
is greater than the new extent's start offset (768K). This makes fiemap
fail with -EINVAL besides triggering the warning that produces a stack
trace like the following:
[1621.677651] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[1621.677656] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 204366 at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2492 emit_fiemap_extent+0x84/0x90 [btrfs]
[1621.677899] Modules linked in: btrfs blake2b_generic (...)
[1621.677951] CPU: 1 PID: 204366 Comm: pool Not tainted 6.8.0-rc5-btrfs-next-151+ #1
[1621.677954] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.16.2-0-gea1b7a073390-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
[1621.677956] RIP: 0010:emit_fiemap_extent+0x84/0x90 [btrfs]
[1621.678033] Code: 2b 4c 89 63 (...)
[1621.678035] RSP: 0018:ffffab16089ffd20 EFLAGS: 00010206
[1621.678037] RAX: 00000000004fa000 RBX: ffffab16089ffe08 RCX: 0000000000009000
[1621.678039] RDX: 00000000004f9000 RSI: 00000000004f1000 RDI: ffffab16089ffe90
[1621.678040] RBP: 00000000004f9000 R08: 0000000000001000 R09: 0000000000000000
[1621.678041] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000001000 R12: 0000000041d78000
[1621.678043] R13: 0000000000001000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: ffff9434f0b17850
[1621.678044] FS: 00007fa6e20006c0(0000) GS:ffff943bdfa40000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[1621.678046] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[1621.678048] CR2: 00007fa6b0801000 CR3: 000000012d404002 CR4: 0000000000370ef0
[1621.678053] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
[1621.678055] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
[1621.678056] Call Trace:
[1621.678074] <TASK>
[1621.678076] ? __warn+0x80/0x130
[1621.678082] ? emit_fiemap_extent+0x84/0x90 [btrfs]
[1621.678159] ? report_bug+0x1f4/0x200
[1621.678164] ? handle_bug+0x42/0x70
[1621.678167] ? exc_invalid_op+0x14/0x70
[1621.678170] ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x16/0x20
[1621.678178] ? emit_fiemap_extent+0x84/0x90 [btrfs]
[1621.678253] extent_fiemap+0x766/0xa30 [btrfs]
[1621.678339] btrfs_fiemap+0x45/0x80 [btrfs]
[1621.678420] do_vfs_ioctl+0x1e4/0x870
[1621.678431] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x6a/0xc0
[1621.678434] do_syscall_64+0x52/0x120
[1621.678445] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
There's also another case where before calling btrfs_next_leaf() we are
processing a hole or a prealloc extent and we had several delalloc ranges
within that hole or prealloc extent. In that case if the ordered extents
complete before we find the next key, we may end up finding an extent item
with an offset smaller than (or equals to) the offset in cache->offset.
So fix this by changing emit_fiemap_extent() to address these three
scenarios like this:
1) For the first case, steps listed above, adjust the length of the
previously cached extent so that it does not overlap with the current
extent, emit the previous one and cache the current file extent item;
2) For the second case where he had a hole or prealloc extent with
multiple delalloc ranges inside the hole or prealloc extent's range,
and the current file extent item has an offset that matches the offset
in the fiemap cache, just discard what we have in the fiemap cache and
assign the current file extent item to the cache, since it's more up
to date;
3) For the third case where he had a hole or prealloc extent with
multiple delalloc ranges inside the hole or prealloc extent's range
and the offset of the file extent item we just found is smaller than
what we have in the cache, just skip the current file extent item
if its range end at or behind the cached extent's end, because we may
have emitted (to the fiemap user space buffer) delalloc ranges that
overlap with the current file extent item's range. If the file extent
item's range goes beyond the end offset of the cached extent, just
emit the cached extent and cache a subrange of the file extent item,
that goes from the end offset of the cached extent to the end offset
of the file extent item.
Dealing with those cases in those ways makes everything consistent by
reflecting the current state of file extent items in the btree and
without emitting extents that have overlapping ranges (which would be
confusing and violating expectations).
This issue could be triggered often with test case generic/561, and was
also hit and reported by Wang Yugui.
Reported-by: Wang Yugui <wangyugui@e16-tech.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20240223104619.701F.409509F4@e16-tech.com/
Fixes: b0ad381fa769 ("btrfs: fix deadlock with fiemap and extent locking")
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
commit e42b9d8b9ea2672811285e6a7654887ff64d23f3 upstream.
[BUG]
With the following file extent layout, defrag would do unnecessary IO
and result more on-disk space usage.
# mkfs.btrfs -f $dev
# mount $dev $mnt
# xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 0 40m" $mnt/foobar
# sync
# xfs_io -f -c "pwrite 40m 16k" $mnt/foobar
# sync
Above command would lead to the following file extent layout:
item 6 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 15816 itemsize 53
generation 7 type 1 (regular)
extent data disk byte 298844160 nr 41943040
extent data offset 0 nr 41943040 ram 41943040
extent compression 0 (none)
item 7 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 41943040) itemoff 15763 itemsize 53
generation 8 type 1 (regular)
extent data disk byte 13631488 nr 16384
extent data offset 0 nr 16384 ram 16384
extent compression 0 (none)
Which is mostly fine. We can allow the final 16K to be merged with the
previous 40M, but it's upon the end users' preference.
But if we defrag the file using the default parameters, it would result
worse file layout:
# btrfs filesystem defrag $mnt/foobar
# sync
item 6 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 0) itemoff 15816 itemsize 53
generation 7 type 1 (regular)
extent data disk byte 298844160 nr 41943040
extent data offset 0 nr 8650752 ram 41943040
extent compression 0 (none)
item 7 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 8650752) itemoff 15763 itemsize 53
generation 9 type 1 (regular)
extent data disk byte 340787200 nr 33292288
extent data offset 0 nr 33292288 ram 33292288
extent compression 0 (none)
item 8 key (257 EXTENT_DATA 41943040) itemoff 15710 itemsize 53
generation 8 type 1 (regular)
extent data disk byte 13631488 nr 16384
extent data offset 0 nr 16384 ram 16384
extent compression 0 (none)
Note the original 40M extent is still there, but a new 32M extent is
created for no benefit at all.
[CAUSE]
There is an existing check to make sure we won't defrag a large enough
extent (the threshold is by default 32M).
But the check is using the length to the end of the extent:
range_len = em->len - (cur - em->start);
/* Skip too large extent */
if (range_len >= extent_thresh)
goto next;
This means, for the first 8MiB of the extent, the range_len is always
smaller than the default threshold, and would not be defragged.
But after the first 8MiB, the remaining part would fit the requirement,
and be defragged.
Such different behavior inside the same extent caused the above problem,
and we should avoid different defrag decision inside the same extent.
[FIX]
Instead of using @range_len, just use @em->len, so that we have a
consistent decision among the same file extent.
Now with this fix, we won't touch the extent, thus not making it any
worse.
Reported-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Fixes: 0cb5950f3f3b ("btrfs: fix deadlock when reserving space during defrag")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 5571e41ec6e56e35f34ae9f5b3a335ef510e0ade upstream.
While running the CI for an unrelated change I hit the following panic
with generic/648 on btrfs_holes_spacecache.
assertion failed: block_start != EXTENT_MAP_HOLE, in fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1385
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:1385!
invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
CPU: 1 PID: 2695096 Comm: fsstress Kdump: loaded Tainted: G W 6.8.0-rc2+ #1
RIP: 0010:__extent_writepage_io.constprop.0+0x4c1/0x5c0
Call Trace:
<TASK>
extent_write_cache_pages+0x2ac/0x8f0
extent_writepages+0x87/0x110
do_writepages+0xd5/0x1f0
filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x63/0x90
__filemap_fdatawrite_range+0x5c/0x80
btrfs_fdatawrite_range+0x1f/0x50
btrfs_write_out_cache+0x507/0x560
btrfs_write_dirty_block_groups+0x32a/0x420
commit_cowonly_roots+0x21b/0x290
btrfs_commit_transaction+0x813/0x1360
btrfs_sync_file+0x51a/0x640
__x64_sys_fdatasync+0x52/0x90
do_syscall_64+0x9c/0x190
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0x76
This happens because we fail to write out the free space cache in one
instance, come back around and attempt to write it again. However on
the second pass through we go to call btrfs_get_extent() on the inode to
get the extent mapping. Because this is a new block group, and with the
free space inode we always search the commit root to avoid deadlocking
with the tree, we find nothing and return a EXTENT_MAP_HOLE for the
requested range.
This happens because the first time we try to write the space cache out
we hit an error, and on an error we drop the extent mapping. This is
normal for normal files, but the free space cache inode is special. We
always expect the extent map to be correct. Thus the second time
through we end up with a bogus extent map.
Since we're deprecating this feature, the most straightforward way to
fix this is to simply skip dropping the extent map range for this failed
range.
I shortened the test by using error injection to stress the area to make
it easier to reproduce. With this patch in place we no longer panic
with my error injection test.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 1bd96c92c6a0a4d43815eb685c15aa4b78879dc9 upstream.
Currently we allow an encoded write against inodes that have the NODATASUM
flag set, either because they are NOCOW files or they were created while
the filesystem was mounted with "-o nodatasum". This results in having
compressed extents without corresponding checksums, which is a filesystem
inconsistency reported by 'btrfs check'.
For example, running btrfs/281 with MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o nodatacow" triggers
this and 'btrfs check' errors out with:
[1/7] checking root items
[2/7] checking extents
[3/7] checking free space tree
[4/7] checking fs roots
root 256 inode 257 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing
root 256 inode 258 errors 1040, bad file extent, some csum missing
ERROR: errors found in fs roots
(...)
So reject encoded writes if the target inode has NODATASUM set.
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1+
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Filipe Manana
Qu Wenruo
Naohiro Aota
Lu Yao
Boris Burkov
Johannes Thumshirn
Christoph Hellwig
Omar Sandoval
Dominique Martinet
Dmitry Antipov
Anand Jain
Sweet Tea Dorminy
David Sterba
Tavian Barnes
Josef Bacik