IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This isn't functionally apparent for some reason, but
when we test io at extreme offsets at the end of the loff_t
rang, such as in fstests xfs/071, the calculation of
"max" in dax_io() can be wrong due to pos + size overflowing.
For example,
# xfs_io -c "pwrite 9223372036854771712 512" /mnt/test/file
enters dax_io with:
start 0x7ffffffffffff000
end 0x7ffffffffffff200
and the rounded up "size" variable is 0x1000. This yields:
pos + size 0x8000000000000000 (overflows loff_t)
end 0x7ffffffffffff200
Due to the overflow, the min() function picks the wrong
value for the "max" variable, and when we send (max - pos)
into i.e. copy_from_iter_pmem() it is also the wrong value.
This somehow(tm) gets magically absorbed without incident,
probably because iter->count is correct. But it seems best
to fix it up properly by comparing the two values as
unsigned.
Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
023954351f