ee65728e10
so it will be consistent with code mm directory and with Documentation/admin-guide/mm and won't be confused with virtual machines. Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Suggested-by: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Tested-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Acked-by: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Acked-by: Wu XiangCheng <bobwxc@email.cn>
224 lines
11 KiB
ReStructuredText
224 lines
11 KiB
ReStructuredText
.. _mm_concepts:
|
|
|
|
=================
|
|
Concepts overview
|
|
=================
|
|
|
|
The memory management in Linux is a complex system that evolved over the
|
|
years and included more and more functionality to support a variety of
|
|
systems from MMU-less microcontrollers to supercomputers. The memory
|
|
management for systems without an MMU is called ``nommu`` and it
|
|
definitely deserves a dedicated document, which hopefully will be
|
|
eventually written. Yet, although some of the concepts are the same,
|
|
here we assume that an MMU is available and a CPU can translate a virtual
|
|
address to a physical address.
|
|
|
|
.. contents:: :local:
|
|
|
|
Virtual Memory Primer
|
|
=====================
|
|
|
|
The physical memory in a computer system is a limited resource and
|
|
even for systems that support memory hotplug there is a hard limit on
|
|
the amount of memory that can be installed. The physical memory is not
|
|
necessarily contiguous; it might be accessible as a set of distinct
|
|
address ranges. Besides, different CPU architectures, and even
|
|
different implementations of the same architecture have different views
|
|
of how these address ranges are defined.
|
|
|
|
All this makes dealing directly with physical memory quite complex and
|
|
to avoid this complexity a concept of virtual memory was developed.
|
|
|
|
The virtual memory abstracts the details of physical memory from the
|
|
application software, allows to keep only needed information in the
|
|
physical memory (demand paging) and provides a mechanism for the
|
|
protection and controlled sharing of data between processes.
|
|
|
|
With virtual memory, each and every memory access uses a virtual
|
|
address. When the CPU decodes an instruction that reads (or
|
|
writes) from (or to) the system memory, it translates the `virtual`
|
|
address encoded in that instruction to a `physical` address that the
|
|
memory controller can understand.
|
|
|
|
The physical system memory is divided into page frames, or pages. The
|
|
size of each page is architecture specific. Some architectures allow
|
|
selection of the page size from several supported values; this
|
|
selection is performed at the kernel build time by setting an
|
|
appropriate kernel configuration option.
|
|
|
|
Each physical memory page can be mapped as one or more virtual
|
|
pages. These mappings are described by page tables that allow
|
|
translation from a virtual address used by programs to the physical
|
|
memory address. The page tables are organized hierarchically.
|
|
|
|
The tables at the lowest level of the hierarchy contain physical
|
|
addresses of actual pages used by the software. The tables at higher
|
|
levels contain physical addresses of the pages belonging to the lower
|
|
levels. The pointer to the top level page table resides in a
|
|
register. When the CPU performs the address translation, it uses this
|
|
register to access the top level page table. The high bits of the
|
|
virtual address are used to index an entry in the top level page
|
|
table. That entry is then used to access the next level in the
|
|
hierarchy with the next bits of the virtual address as the index to
|
|
that level page table. The lowest bits in the virtual address define
|
|
the offset inside the actual page.
|
|
|
|
Huge Pages
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
The address translation requires several memory accesses and memory
|
|
accesses are slow relatively to CPU speed. To avoid spending precious
|
|
processor cycles on the address translation, CPUs maintain a cache of
|
|
such translations called Translation Lookaside Buffer (or
|
|
TLB). Usually TLB is pretty scarce resource and applications with
|
|
large memory working set will experience performance hit because of
|
|
TLB misses.
|
|
|
|
Many modern CPU architectures allow mapping of the memory pages
|
|
directly by the higher levels in the page table. For instance, on x86,
|
|
it is possible to map 2M and even 1G pages using entries in the second
|
|
and the third level page tables. In Linux such pages are called
|
|
`huge`. Usage of huge pages significantly reduces pressure on TLB,
|
|
improves TLB hit-rate and thus improves overall system performance.
|
|
|
|
There are two mechanisms in Linux that enable mapping of the physical
|
|
memory with the huge pages. The first one is `HugeTLB filesystem`, or
|
|
hugetlbfs. It is a pseudo filesystem that uses RAM as its backing
|
|
store. For the files created in this filesystem the data resides in
|
|
the memory and mapped using huge pages. The hugetlbfs is described at
|
|
:ref:`Documentation/admin-guide/mm/hugetlbpage.rst <hugetlbpage>`.
|
|
|
|
Another, more recent, mechanism that enables use of the huge pages is
|
|
called `Transparent HugePages`, or THP. Unlike the hugetlbfs that
|
|
requires users and/or system administrators to configure what parts of
|
|
the system memory should and can be mapped by the huge pages, THP
|
|
manages such mappings transparently to the user and hence the
|
|
name. See
|
|
:ref:`Documentation/admin-guide/mm/transhuge.rst <admin_guide_transhuge>`
|
|
for more details about THP.
|
|
|
|
Zones
|
|
=====
|
|
|
|
Often hardware poses restrictions on how different physical memory
|
|
ranges can be accessed. In some cases, devices cannot perform DMA to
|
|
all the addressable memory. In other cases, the size of the physical
|
|
memory exceeds the maximal addressable size of virtual memory and
|
|
special actions are required to access portions of the memory. Linux
|
|
groups memory pages into `zones` according to their possible
|
|
usage. For example, ZONE_DMA will contain memory that can be used by
|
|
devices for DMA, ZONE_HIGHMEM will contain memory that is not
|
|
permanently mapped into kernel's address space and ZONE_NORMAL will
|
|
contain normally addressed pages.
|
|
|
|
The actual layout of the memory zones is hardware dependent as not all
|
|
architectures define all zones, and requirements for DMA are different
|
|
for different platforms.
|
|
|
|
Nodes
|
|
=====
|
|
|
|
Many multi-processor machines are NUMA - Non-Uniform Memory Access -
|
|
systems. In such systems the memory is arranged into banks that have
|
|
different access latency depending on the "distance" from the
|
|
processor. Each bank is referred to as a `node` and for each node Linux
|
|
constructs an independent memory management subsystem. A node has its
|
|
own set of zones, lists of free and used pages and various statistics
|
|
counters. You can find more details about NUMA in
|
|
:ref:`Documentation/mm/numa.rst <numa>` and in
|
|
:ref:`Documentation/admin-guide/mm/numa_memory_policy.rst <numa_memory_policy>`.
|
|
|
|
Page cache
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
The physical memory is volatile and the common case for getting data
|
|
into the memory is to read it from files. Whenever a file is read, the
|
|
data is put into the `page cache` to avoid expensive disk access on
|
|
the subsequent reads. Similarly, when one writes to a file, the data
|
|
is placed in the page cache and eventually gets into the backing
|
|
storage device. The written pages are marked as `dirty` and when Linux
|
|
decides to reuse them for other purposes, it makes sure to synchronize
|
|
the file contents on the device with the updated data.
|
|
|
|
Anonymous Memory
|
|
================
|
|
|
|
The `anonymous memory` or `anonymous mappings` represent memory that
|
|
is not backed by a filesystem. Such mappings are implicitly created
|
|
for program's stack and heap or by explicit calls to mmap(2) system
|
|
call. Usually, the anonymous mappings only define virtual memory areas
|
|
that the program is allowed to access. The read accesses will result
|
|
in creation of a page table entry that references a special physical
|
|
page filled with zeroes. When the program performs a write, a regular
|
|
physical page will be allocated to hold the written data. The page
|
|
will be marked dirty and if the kernel decides to repurpose it,
|
|
the dirty page will be swapped out.
|
|
|
|
Reclaim
|
|
=======
|
|
|
|
Throughout the system lifetime, a physical page can be used for storing
|
|
different types of data. It can be kernel internal data structures,
|
|
DMA'able buffers for device drivers use, data read from a filesystem,
|
|
memory allocated by user space processes etc.
|
|
|
|
Depending on the page usage it is treated differently by the Linux
|
|
memory management. The pages that can be freed at any time, either
|
|
because they cache the data available elsewhere, for instance, on a
|
|
hard disk, or because they can be swapped out, again, to the hard
|
|
disk, are called `reclaimable`. The most notable categories of the
|
|
reclaimable pages are page cache and anonymous memory.
|
|
|
|
In most cases, the pages holding internal kernel data and used as DMA
|
|
buffers cannot be repurposed, and they remain pinned until freed by
|
|
their user. Such pages are called `unreclaimable`. However, in certain
|
|
circumstances, even pages occupied with kernel data structures can be
|
|
reclaimed. For instance, in-memory caches of filesystem metadata can
|
|
be re-read from the storage device and therefore it is possible to
|
|
discard them from the main memory when system is under memory
|
|
pressure.
|
|
|
|
The process of freeing the reclaimable physical memory pages and
|
|
repurposing them is called (surprise!) `reclaim`. Linux can reclaim
|
|
pages either asynchronously or synchronously, depending on the state
|
|
of the system. When the system is not loaded, most of the memory is free
|
|
and allocation requests will be satisfied immediately from the free
|
|
pages supply. As the load increases, the amount of the free pages goes
|
|
down and when it reaches a certain threshold (low watermark), an
|
|
allocation request will awaken the ``kswapd`` daemon. It will
|
|
asynchronously scan memory pages and either just free them if the data
|
|
they contain is available elsewhere, or evict to the backing storage
|
|
device (remember those dirty pages?). As memory usage increases even
|
|
more and reaches another threshold - min watermark - an allocation
|
|
will trigger `direct reclaim`. In this case allocation is stalled
|
|
until enough memory pages are reclaimed to satisfy the request.
|
|
|
|
Compaction
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
As the system runs, tasks allocate and free the memory and it becomes
|
|
fragmented. Although with virtual memory it is possible to present
|
|
scattered physical pages as virtually contiguous range, sometimes it is
|
|
necessary to allocate large physically contiguous memory areas. Such
|
|
need may arise, for instance, when a device driver requires a large
|
|
buffer for DMA, or when THP allocates a huge page. Memory `compaction`
|
|
addresses the fragmentation issue. This mechanism moves occupied pages
|
|
from the lower part of a memory zone to free pages in the upper part
|
|
of the zone. When a compaction scan is finished free pages are grouped
|
|
together at the beginning of the zone and allocations of large
|
|
physically contiguous areas become possible.
|
|
|
|
Like reclaim, the compaction may happen asynchronously in the ``kcompactd``
|
|
daemon or synchronously as a result of a memory allocation request.
|
|
|
|
OOM killer
|
|
==========
|
|
|
|
It is possible that on a loaded machine memory will be exhausted and the
|
|
kernel will be unable to reclaim enough memory to continue to operate. In
|
|
order to save the rest of the system, it invokes the `OOM killer`.
|
|
|
|
The `OOM killer` selects a task to sacrifice for the sake of the overall
|
|
system health. The selected task is killed in a hope that after it exits
|
|
enough memory will be freed to continue normal operation.
|