IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
bnxt_open() can fail in this code path, especially on a VF when
it fails to reserve default rings:
bnxt_open()
__bnxt_open_nic()
bnxt_clear_int_mode()
bnxt_init_dflt_ring_mode()
RX rings would be set to 0 when we hit this error path.
It is possible for a subsequent bnxt_open() call to potentially succeed
with a code path like this:
bnxt_open()
bnxt_hwrm_if_change()
bnxt_fw_init_one()
bnxt_fw_init_one_p3()
bnxt_set_dflt_rfs()
bnxt_rfs_capable()
bnxt_hwrm_reserve_rings()
On older chips, RFS is capable if we can reserve the number of vnics that
is equal to RX rings + 1. But since RX rings is still set to 0 in this
code path, we may mistakenly think that RFS is supported for 0 RX rings.
Later, when the default RX rings are reserved and we try to enable
RFS, it would fail and cause bnxt_open() to fail unnecessarily.
We fix this in 2 places. bnxt_rfs_capable() will always return false if
RX rings is not yet set. bnxt_init_dflt_ring_mode() will call
bnxt_set_dflt_rfs() which will always clear the RFS flags if RFS is not
supported.
Fixes: 20d7d1c5c9b1 ("bnxt_en: reliably allocate IRQ table on reset to avoid crash")
Signed-off-by: Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>