150a27328b
Building the kernel with CONFIG_BPF_PRELOAD, and by providing a relative path for the output directory, may fail with the following error: $ make O=build bindeb-pkg ... /.../linux/tools/scripts/Makefile.include:5: *** O=build does not exist. Stop. make[7]: *** [/.../linux/kernel/bpf/preload/Makefile:9: kernel/bpf/preload/libbpf.a] Error 2 make[6]: *** [/.../linux/scripts/Makefile.build:500: kernel/bpf/preload] Error 2 make[5]: *** [/.../linux/scripts/Makefile.build:500: kernel/bpf] Error 2 make[4]: *** [/.../linux/Makefile:1799: kernel] Error 2 make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... In the case above, for the "bindeb-pkg" target, the error is produced by the "dummy" check in Makefile.include, called from libbpf's Makefile. This check changes directory to $(PWD) before checking for the existence of $(O). But at this step we have $(PWD) pointing to "/.../linux/build", and $(O) pointing to "build". So the Makefile.include tries in fact to assert the existence of a directory named "/.../linux/build/build", which does not exist. Note that the error does not occur for all make targets and architectures combinations. This was observed on x86 for "bindeb-pkg", or for a regular build for UML [0]. Here are some details. The root Makefile recursively calls itself once, after changing directory to $(O). The content for the variable $(PWD) is preserved across recursive calls to make, so it is unchanged at this step. For "bindeb-pkg", $(PWD) is eventually updated because the target writes a new Makefile (as debian/rules) and calls it indirectly through dpkg-buildpackage. This script does not preserve $(PWD), which is reset to the current working directory when the target in debian/rules is called. Although not investigated, it seems likely that something similar causes UML to change its value for $(PWD). Non-trivial fixes could be to remove the use of $(PWD) from the "dummy" check, or to make sure that $(PWD) and $(O) are preserved or updated to always play well and form a valid $(PWD)/$(O) path across the different targets and architectures. Instead, we take a simpler approach and just update $(O) when calling libbpf's Makefile, so it points to an absolute path which should always resolve for the "dummy" check run (through includes) by that Makefile. David Gow previously posted a slightly different version of this patch as a RFC [0], two months ago or so. [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20201119085022.3606135-1-davidgow@google.com/t/#u Fixes: d71fa5c9763c ("bpf: Add kernel module with user mode driver that populates bpffs.") Reported-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com> Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin@isovalent.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org> Cc: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com> Cc: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210126161320.24561-1-quentin@isovalent.com
Linux kernel
============
There are several guides for kernel developers and users. These guides can
be rendered in a number of formats, like HTML and PDF. Please read
Documentation/admin-guide/README.rst first.
In order to build the documentation, use ``make htmldocs`` or
``make pdfdocs``. The formatted documentation can also be read online at:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/
There are various text files in the Documentation/ subdirectory,
several of them using the Restructured Text markup notation.
Please read the Documentation/process/changes.rst file, as it contains the
requirements for building and running the kernel, and information about
the problems which may result by upgrading your kernel.