Peter Zijlstra 1c06918788 sched: Consider task_struct::saved_state in wait_task_inactive()
With the introduction of task_struct::saved_state in commit
5f220be21418 ("sched/wakeup: Prepare for RT sleeping spin/rwlocks")
matching the task state has gotten more complicated. That same commit
changed try_to_wake_up() to consider both states, but
wait_task_inactive() has been neglected.

Sebastian noted that the wait_task_inactive() usage in
ptrace_check_attach() can misbehave when ptrace_stop() is blocked on
the tasklist_lock after it sets TASK_TRACED.

Therefore extract a common helper from ttwu_state_match() and use that
to teach wait_task_inactive() about the PREEMPT_RT locks.

Originally-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20230601091234.GW83892@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
2023-06-05 21:11:03 +02:00
..
2023-04-29 10:05:22 -07:00
2023-04-27 12:07:50 -07:00
2022-12-02 11:25:00 +01:00
2023-04-29 10:29:57 -07:00
2023-04-28 14:41:53 -07:00
2022-12-21 14:31:52 -08:00
2023-04-28 14:53:30 -07:00
2023-05-05 12:56:55 -07:00
2023-04-24 12:16:14 -07:00
2023-05-05 13:11:02 -07:00
2022-08-29 19:47:03 -04:00
2022-09-26 10:13:13 -07:00
2023-04-28 15:57:53 -07:00
2023-04-30 13:00:38 -07:00
2023-03-24 11:01:29 +01:00
2023-04-27 16:36:55 -07:00
2023-04-20 22:55:35 -04:00
2023-04-03 11:16:56 +02:00
2023-04-27 16:36:55 -07:00
2022-08-06 16:38:17 -07:00
2023-04-29 09:48:52 -07:00