IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The v0 extent item has been deprecated for a long time, and we don't have
any report from the community either.
So it's time to remove the v0 extent specific error handling, and just
treat them as regular extent tree corruption.
This patch would remove the btrfs_print_v0_err() helper, and enhance the
involved error handling to treat them just as any extent tree
corruption. No reports regarding v0 extents have been seen since the
graceful handling was added in 2018.
This involves:
- btrfs_backref_add_tree_node()
This change is a little tricky, the new code is changed to only handle
BTRFS_TREE_BLOCK_REF_KEY and BTRFS_SHARED_BLOCK_REF_KEY.
But this is safe, as we have rejected any unknown inline refs through
btrfs_get_extent_inline_ref_type().
For keyed backrefs, we're safe to skip anything we don't know (that's
if it can pass tree-checker in the first place).
- btrfs_lookup_extent_info()
- lookup_inline_extent_backref()
- run_delayed_extent_op()
- __btrfs_free_extent()
- add_tree_block()
Regular error handling of unexpected extent tree item, and abort
transaction (if we have a trans handle).
- remove_extent_data_ref()
It's pretty much the same as the regular rejection of unknown backref
key.
But for this particular case, we can also remove a BUG_ON().
- extent_data_ref_count()
We can remove the BTRFS_EXTENT_REF_V0_KEY BUG_ON(), as it would be
rejected by the only caller.
- btrfs_print_leaf()
Remove the handling for BTRFS_EXTENT_REF_V0_KEY.
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
182741d287