Eric W. Biederman 9360b13308 signal/cifs: Fix cifs_put_tcp_session to call send_sig instead of force_sig
[ Upstream commit 72abe3bcf0911d69b46c1e8bdb5612675e0ac42c ]

The locking in force_sig_info is not prepared to deal with a task that
exits or execs (as sighand may change).  The is not a locking problem
in force_sig as force_sig is only built to handle synchronous
exceptions.

Further the function force_sig_info changes the signal state if the
signal is ignored, or blocked or if SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE will prevent the
delivery of the signal.  The signal SIGKILL can not be ignored and can
not be blocked and SIGNAL_UNKILLABLE won't prevent it from being
delivered.

So using force_sig rather than send_sig for SIGKILL is confusing
and pointless.

Because it won't impact the sending of the signal and and because
using force_sig is wrong, replace force_sig with send_sig.

Cc: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Cc: Steve French <smfrench@gmail.com>
Fixes: a5c3e1c725af ("Revert "cifs: No need to send SIGKILL to demux_thread during umount"")
Fixes: e7ddee9037e7 ("cifs: disable sharing session and tcon and add new TCP sharing code")
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
2020-01-27 14:46:36 +01:00
..
2019-08-06 19:05:23 +02:00
2019-12-17 20:38:33 +01:00
2019-12-17 20:39:43 +01:00
2020-01-17 19:45:52 +01:00
2019-12-17 20:38:44 +01:00
2019-12-17 20:38:15 +01:00
2020-01-09 10:17:57 +01:00
2018-12-21 14:13:04 +01:00
2017-09-04 19:05:15 -04:00
2019-12-05 15:38:25 +01:00