IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
There is a possible race in d_splice_alias. Though __d_find_alias(inode, 1)
will only return a dentry with DCACHE_DISCONNECTED set, it is possible for it
to get cleared before the BUG_ON, and it is is not possible to lock against
that.
There are a couple of problems here. Firstly, the code doesn't match the
comment. The comment describes a 'disconnected' dentry as being IS_ROOT as
well as DCACHE_DISCONNECTED, however there is not testing of IS_ROOT anythere.
A dentry is marked DCACHE_DISCONNECTED when allocated with d_alloc_anon, and
remains DCACHE_DISCONNECTED while a path is built up towards the root. So a
dentry can have a valid name and a valid parent and even grandparent, but will
still be DCACHE_DISCONNECTED until a path to the root is created. Once the
path to the root is complete, everything in the path gets DCACHE_DISCONNECTED
cleared. So the fact that DCACHE_DISCONNECTED isn't enough to say that a
dentry is free to be spliced in with a given name. This can only be allowed
if the dentry does not yet have a name, so the IS_ROOT test is needed too.
However even adding that test to __d_find_alias isn't enough. As
d_splice_alias drops dcache_lock before calling d_move to perform the splice,
it could race with another thread calling d_splice_alias to splice the inode
in with a different name in a different part of the tree (in the case where a
file has hard links). So that splicing code is only really safe for
directories (as we know that directories only have one link). For
directories, the caller of d_splice_alias will be holding i_mutex on the
(unique) parent so there is no room for a race.
A consequence of this is that a non-directory will never benefit from being
spliced into a pre-exisiting dentry, but that isn't a problem. It is
perfectly OK for a non-directory to have multiple dentries, some anonymous,
some not. And the comment for d_splice_alias says that it only happens for
directories anyway.
Signed-off-by: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
21c0d8fdd9