IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Sometimes PORT_EXIT messages are lost when a process is exiting.
This happens if you subscribe to the announce port with client A,
then subscribe to the announce port with client B, then kill client A.
Client B will not see the PORT_EXIT message because client A's port is
closing and is earlier in the announce port subscription list. The
for each loop will try to send the announcement to client A and fail,
then will stop trying to broadcast to other ports. Killing B works fine
since the announcement will already have gone to A. The CLIENT_EXIT
message does not get lost.
How to reproduce problem:
*** termA
$ aseqdump -p 0:1
0:1 Port subscribed 0:1 -> 128:0
*** termB
$ aseqdump -p 0:1
*** termA
0:1 Client start client 129
0:1 Port start 129:0
0:1 Port subscribed 0:1 -> 129:0
*** termB
0:1 Port subscribed 0:1 -> 129:0
*** termA
^C
*** termB
0:1 Client exit client 128
<--- expected Port exit as well (before client exit)
Signed-off-by: Adam Goode <agoode@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
27423257b7