IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
With allocation fastpaths no longer divided between two .c files, we
have better inlining, however checking the disassembly of
kmem_cache_alloc() reveals we can do better to make the fastpaths
smaller and move the less common situations out of line or to separate
functions, to reduce instruction cache pressure.
- split memcg pre/post alloc hooks to inlined checks that use likely()
to assume there will be no objcg handling necessary, and non-inline
functions doing the actual handling
- add some more likely/unlikely() to pre/post alloc hooks to indicate
which scenarios should be out of line
- change gfp_allowed_mask handling in slab_post_alloc_hook() so the
code can be optimized away when kasan/kmsan/kmemleak is configured out
bloat-o-meter shows:
add/remove: 4/2 grow/shrink: 1/8 up/down: 521/-2924 (-2403)
Function old new delta
__memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook - 461 +461
kmem_cache_alloc_bulk 775 791 +16
__pfx_should_failslab.constprop - 16 +16
__pfx___memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook - 16 +16
should_failslab.constprop - 12 +12
__pfx_memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook 16 - -16
kmem_cache_alloc_lru 1295 1023 -272
kmem_cache_alloc_node 1118 817 -301
kmem_cache_alloc 1076 772 -304
kmalloc_node_trace 1149 838 -311
kmalloc_trace 1102 789 -313
__kmalloc_node_track_caller 1393 1080 -313
__kmalloc_node 1397 1082 -315
__kmalloc 1374 1059 -315
memcg_slab_post_alloc_hook 464 - -464
Note that gcc still decided to inline __memcg_pre_alloc_hook(), but the
code is out of line. Forcing noinline did not improve the results. As a
result the fastpaths are shorter and overal code size is reduced.
Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Tested-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Tested-by: Hyeonggon Yoo <42.hyeyoo@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
3450a0e5a6