Jan Beulich 3c1596efe1 mm: don't use alloc_bootmem_low() where not strictly needed
Since alloc_bootmem() will never return inaccessible (via virtual
addressing) memory anyway, using the ..._low() variant only makes sense
when the physical address range of the allocated memory must fulfill
further constraints, espacially since on 64-bits (or more generally in all
cases where the pools the two variants allocate from are than the full
available range.

Probably the use in alloc_tce_table() could also be eliminated (based on
code inspection of pci-calgary_64.c), but that seems too risky given I
know nothing about that hardware and have no way to test it.

Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
2009-09-22 07:17:38 -07:00
..
2009-08-20 10:29:28 +10:00
2009-06-24 00:02:38 -04:00
2009-06-24 00:02:38 -04:00
2009-09-18 09:48:52 -07:00
2009-06-16 19:47:48 -07:00
2009-09-19 13:13:17 -07:00
2009-05-15 07:56:24 -05:00
2009-07-24 10:53:29 +02:00
2009-09-18 21:22:08 +02:00
2009-01-14 18:09:02 +01:00
2009-06-18 13:03:56 -07:00
2009-07-24 15:30:45 -04:00
2009-06-18 13:03:55 -07:00
2009-09-14 17:41:42 -07:00
2009-07-14 00:30:40 +10:00
2009-09-19 08:53:22 +02:00
2009-09-19 08:53:22 +02:00
2009-09-19 08:53:22 +02:00
2009-09-18 20:47:30 +02:00
2009-08-01 11:18:56 -07:00
2009-08-26 17:24:28 -07:00
2009-07-12 14:03:27 -07:00
2009-06-15 21:30:23 -07:00
2009-06-18 13:03:55 -07:00