4207b556e6
The BPF helper bpf_cgroup_from_id() calls kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id()
which acquires kernfs_idr_lock, which is an non-raw non-IRQ-safe lock. This
can lead to deadlocks as bpf_cgroup_from_id() can be called from any BPF
programs including e.g. the ones that attach to functions which are holding
the scheduler rq lock.
Consider the following BPF program:
SEC("fentry/__set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked")
int BPF_PROG(__set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked, struct task_struct *p,
struct affinity_context *affn_ctx, struct rq *rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
{
struct cgroup *cgrp = bpf_cgroup_from_id(p->cgroups->dfl_cgrp->kn->id);
if (cgrp) {
bpf_printk("%d[%s] in %s", p->pid, p->comm, cgrp->kn->name);
bpf_cgroup_release(cgrp);
}
return 0;
}
__set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked() is called with rq lock held and the above
BPF program calls bpf_cgroup_from_id() within leading to the following
lockdep warning:
=====================================================
WARNING: HARDIRQ-safe -> HARDIRQ-unsafe lock order detected
6.7.0-rc3-work-00053-g07124366a1d7-dirty #147 Not tainted
-----------------------------------------------------
repro/1620 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE0:SE1] is trying to acquire:
ffffffff833b3688 (kernfs_idr_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}, at: kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id+0x1e/0x70
and this task is already holding:
ffff888237ced698 (&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: task_rq_lock+0x4e/0xf0
which would create a new lock dependency:
(&rq->__lock){-.-.}-{2:2} -> (kernfs_idr_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}
...
Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(kernfs_idr_lock);
local_irq_disable();
lock(&rq->__lock);
lock(kernfs_idr_lock);
<Interrupt>
lock(&rq->__lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
...
Call Trace:
dump_stack_lvl+0x55/0x70
dump_stack+0x10/0x20
__lock_acquire+0x781/0x2a40
lock_acquire+0xbf/0x1f0
_raw_spin_lock+0x2f/0x40
kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id+0x1e/0x70
cgroup_get_from_id+0x21/0x240
bpf_cgroup_from_id+0xe/0x20
bpf_prog_98652316e9337a5a___set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked+0x96/0x11a
bpf_trampoline_6442545632+0x4f/0x1000
__set_cpus_allowed_ptr_locked+0x5/0x5a0
sched_setaffinity+0x1b3/0x290
__x64_sys_sched_setaffinity+0x4f/0x60
do_syscall_64+0x40/0xe0
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e
Let's fix it by protecting kernfs_node and kernfs_root with RCU and making
kernfs_find_and_get_node_by_id() acquire rcu_read_lock() instead of
kernfs_idr_lock.
This adds an rcu_head to kernfs_node making it larger by 16 bytes on 64bit.
Combined with the preceding rearrange patch, the net increase is 8 bytes.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@canonical.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240109214828.252092-4-tj@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Linux kernel
============
There are several guides for kernel developers and users. These guides can
be rendered in a number of formats, like HTML and PDF. Please read
Documentation/admin-guide/README.rst first.
In order to build the documentation, use ``make htmldocs`` or
``make pdfdocs``. The formatted documentation can also be read online at:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/
There are various text files in the Documentation/ subdirectory,
several of them using the Restructured Text markup notation.
Please read the Documentation/process/changes.rst file, as it contains the
requirements for building and running the kernel, and information about
the problems which may result by upgrading your kernel.