Wang Shilong 4c7a6f74ce Btrfs: rework ulist with list+rb_tree
We are really suffering from now ulist's implementation, some developers
gave their try, and i just gave some of my ideas for things:

 1. use list+rb_tree instead of arrary+rb_tree

 2. add cur_list to iterator rather than ulist structure.

 3. add seqnum into every node when they are added, this is
 used to do selfcheck when iterating node.

I noticed Zach Brown's comments before, long term is to kick off
ulist implementation, however, for now, we need at least avoid
arrary from ulist.

Cc: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Cc: Zach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Wang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
2014-01-29 07:06:27 -08:00
..
2013-10-24 23:43:27 -04:00
2013-12-27 15:14:45 -06:00
2013-11-13 12:09:12 +09:00
2014-01-06 14:00:23 -05:00
2013-06-29 12:56:53 +04:00
2013-12-08 21:14:59 -05:00
2013-10-27 16:27:07 -07:00
2013-09-16 18:20:25 -07:00
2013-12-05 13:05:48 -08:00
2013-06-29 12:56:32 +04:00
2013-11-09 00:16:32 -05:00
2013-06-29 12:56:39 +04:00
2013-06-29 12:56:29 +04:00
2013-12-22 11:03:49 -08:00
2013-06-29 12:57:04 +04:00
2013-10-24 23:34:54 -04:00
2013-04-29 15:40:23 -04:00
2013-09-13 23:06:40 -04:00
2013-10-24 23:34:54 -04:00
2013-06-29 12:57:05 +04:00
2013-03-03 23:00:23 -05:00
2013-09-10 18:56:31 -04:00
2013-10-24 23:34:54 -04:00
2013-11-09 00:16:20 -05:00
2013-10-24 23:34:54 -04:00
2013-04-17 13:25:09 +01:00
2013-11-09 00:16:19 -05:00
2013-10-24 23:35:00 -04:00
2013-10-24 23:34:54 -04:00
2013-10-24 23:34:54 -04:00
2013-10-24 23:34:54 -04:00
2013-11-09 00:16:31 -05:00
2013-11-09 00:16:20 -05:00
2013-05-29 12:57:34 -07:00