David Vernet 7d35eb1a18 bpf, docs: s/eBPF/BPF in standards documents ...

There isn't really anything other than just "BPF" at this point,
so referring to it as "eBPF" in our standards document just causes
unnecessary confusion. Let's just be consistent and use "BPF".

Suggested-by: Will Hawkins <hawkinsw@obs.cr>
Signed-off-by: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20230828155948.123405-4-void@manifault.com

2023-08-30 16:36:10 +02:00

..

abi.rst

bpf, docs: Add abi.rst document to standardization subdirectory

2023-08-30 16:35:58 +02:00

index.rst

bpf, docs: Add abi.rst document to standardization subdirectory

2023-08-30 16:35:58 +02:00

instruction-set.rst

bpf, docs: s/eBPF/BPF in standards documents

2023-08-30 16:36:10 +02:00