IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Trivial to do now, just need our own io_comp_batch on the stack and pass
that in to the usual command completion handling.
I pondered making this dependent on how many entries we had to process,
but even for a single entry there's no discernable difference in
performance or latency. Running a sync workload over io_uring:
t/io_uring -b512 -d1 -s1 -c1 -p0 -F1 -B1 -n2 /dev/nvme1n1 /dev/nvme2n1
yields the below performance before the patch:
IOPS=254820, BW=124MiB/s, IOS/call=1/1, inflight=(1 1)
IOPS=251174, BW=122MiB/s, IOS/call=1/1, inflight=(1 1)
IOPS=250806, BW=122MiB/s, IOS/call=1/1, inflight=(1 1)
and the following after:
IOPS=255972, BW=124MiB/s, IOS/call=1/1, inflight=(1 1)
IOPS=251920, BW=123MiB/s, IOS/call=1/1, inflight=(1 1)
IOPS=251794, BW=122MiB/s, IOS/call=1/1, inflight=(1 1)
which definitely isn't slower, about the same if you factor in a bit of
variance. For peak performance workloads, benchmarking shows a 2%
improvement.
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
4f5022453a