IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
During the final phase of a device replace operation, I ran into a
transaction abort that resulted in the following trace:
[23919.655368] WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 30175 at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:9843 btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x15e/0x1ab [btrfs]()
[23919.664742] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -2)
[23919.665749] Modules linked in: btrfs crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop fuse parport_pc i2c_piix4 parport psmouse acpi_cpufreq processor i2c_core evdev microcode pcspkr button serio_raw ext4 crc16 jbd2 mbcache sd_mod sg sr_mod cdrom virtio_scsi ata_generic ata_piix virtio_pci floppy virtio_ring libata e1000 virtio scsi_mod [last unloaded: btrfs]
[23919.679442] CPU: 10 PID: 30175 Comm: fsstress Not tainted 4.3.0-rc5-btrfs-next-17+ #1
[23919.682392] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.8.1-0-g4adadbd-20150316_085822-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
[23919.689151] 0000000000000000 ffff8804020cbb50 ffffffff812566f4 ffff8804020cbb98
[23919.692604] ffff8804020cbb88 ffffffff8104d0a6 ffffffffa03eea69 ffff88041b678a48
[23919.694230] ffff88042ac38000 ffff88041b678930 00000000fffffffe ffff8804020cbbf0
[23919.696716] Call Trace:
[23919.698669] [<ffffffff812566f4>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x79
[23919.700597] [<ffffffff8104d0a6>] warn_slowpath_common+0x9f/0xb8
[23919.701958] [<ffffffffa03eea69>] ? btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x15e/0x1ab [btrfs]
[23919.703612] [<ffffffff8104d107>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x48/0x50
[23919.705047] [<ffffffffa03eea69>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x15e/0x1ab [btrfs]
[23919.706967] [<ffffffffa0402097>] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x84/0x2dd [btrfs]
[23919.708611] [<ffffffffa0402300>] btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x12 [btrfs]
[23919.710099] [<ffffffffa03ef0b8>] btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand+0x121/0x28b [btrfs]
[23919.711970] [<ffffffffa0413025>] btrfs_fallocate+0x7d3/0xc6d [btrfs]
[23919.713602] [<ffffffff8108b78f>] ? lock_acquire+0x10d/0x194
[23919.714756] [<ffffffff81086dbc>] ? percpu_down_read+0x51/0x78
[23919.716155] [<ffffffff8116ef1d>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
[23919.718918] [<ffffffff8116ef1d>] ? __sb_start_write+0x5f/0xb0
[23919.724170] [<ffffffff8116b579>] vfs_fallocate+0x170/0x1ff
[23919.725482] [<ffffffff8117c1d7>] ioctl_preallocate+0x89/0x9b
[23919.726790] [<ffffffff8117c5ef>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x406/0x4e6
[23919.728428] [<ffffffff81171175>] ? SYSC_newfstat+0x25/0x2e
[23919.729642] [<ffffffff8118574d>] ? __fget_light+0x4d/0x71
[23919.730782] [<ffffffff8117c726>] SyS_ioctl+0x57/0x79
[23919.731847] [<ffffffff8147cd97>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
[23919.733330] ---[ end trace 166ef301a335832a ]---
This is due to a race between device replace and chunk allocation, which
the following diagram illustrates:
CPU 1 CPU 2
btrfs_dev_replace_finishing()
at this point
dev_replace->tgtdev->devid ==
BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID (0ULL)
...
btrfs_start_transaction()
btrfs_commit_transaction()
btrfs_fallocate()
btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand()
btrfs_join_transaction()
--> starts a new transaction
do_chunk_alloc()
lock fs_info->chunk_mutex
btrfs_alloc_chunk()
--> creates extent map for
the new chunk with
em->bdev->map->stripes[i]->dev->devid
== X (X > 0)
--> extent map is added to
fs_info->mapping_tree
--> initial phase of bg A
allocation completes
unlock fs_info->chunk_mutex
lock fs_info->chunk_mutex
btrfs_dev_replace_update_device_in_mapping_tree()
--> iterates fs_info->mapping_tree and
replaces the device in every extent
map's map->stripes[] with
dev_replace->tgtdev, which still has
an id of 0ULL (BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID)
btrfs_end_transaction()
btrfs_create_pending_block_groups()
--> starts final phase of
bg A creation (update device,
extent, and chunk trees, etc)
btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc()
btrfs_update_device()
--> attempts to update a device
item with ID == 0ULL
(BTRFS_DEV_REPLACE_DEVID)
which is the current ID of
bg A's
em->bdev->map->stripes[i]->dev->devid
--> doesn't find such item
returns -ENOENT
--> the device id should have been X
and not 0ULL
got -ENOENT from
btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc()
and aborts current transaction
finishes setting up the target device,
namely it sets tgtdev->devid to the value
of srcdev->devid, which is X (and X > 0)
frees the srcdev
unlock fs_info->chunk_mutex
So fix this by taking the device list mutex when processing the chunk's
extent map stripes to update the device items. This avoids getting the
wrong device id and use-after-free problems if the task finishing a
chunk allocation grabs the replaced device, which is freed while the
dev replace task is holding the device list mutex.
This happened while running fstest btrfs/071.
Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
50460e3718