IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
gcc-6.0 notices that the use of the property_entry in this file that
was recently introduced cannot work right, as we initialize the wrong
field:
raumfeld.c:387:3: error: the address of 'raumfeld_rotary_encoder_steps' will always evaluate as 'true' [-Werror=address]
DEV_PROP_U32, 1, &raumfeld_rotary_encoder_steps, },
^~~~~~~~~~~~
raumfeld.c:389:3: error: the address of 'raumfeld_rotary_encoder_axis' will always evaluate as 'true' [-Werror=address]
DEV_PROP_U32, 1, &raumfeld_rotary_encoder_axis, },
^~~~~~~~~~~~
raumfeld.c:391:3: error: the address of 'raumfeld_rotary_encoder_relative_axis' will always evaluate as 'true' [-Werror=address]
DEV_PROP_U32, 1, &raumfeld_rotary_encoder_relative_axis, },
^~~~~~~~~~~~
The problem appears to stem from relying on an old definition of
'struct property', but it has changed several times since the code
could have last been correct.
This changes the code to use the PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER() macro instead,
which works fine for the current definition and is a safer way of doing
the initialization.
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Fixes: a9e340dce3c3 ("Input: rotary_encoder - move away from platform data structure")
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
4d2508a559