53cea34b0a
There's no reason for secvar_operations to use uint64_t vs the more common kernel type u64. The types are compatible, but they require different printk format strings which can lead to confusion. Change all the secvar related routines to use u64. Reviewed-by: Russell Currey <ruscur@russell.cc> Reviewed-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Donnellan <ajd@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230210080401.345462-5-ajd@linux.ibm.com