IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
stat & BIT(1) is the same as BIT(1), so let's
simplify things a bit by removing "stat &" from
all omap_i2c_ack_stat() calls.
Code snippet (extremely simplified):
if (stat & NACK) {
...
omap_i2c_ack_stat(dev, stat & NACK);
}
if (stat & RDR) {
...
omap_i2c_ack_stat(dev, stat & RDR);
}
and so on. The tricky place is only WRT errata handling, for example:
if (*stat & (NACK | AL)) {
omap_i2c_ack_stat(dev, *stat & (XRDY | XDR));
...
}
but in this case, the errata says we must clear XRDY and XDR if that
errata triggers, so if they just got enabled or not, it doesn't matter.
Another tricky place is RDR | RRDY (likewise for XDR | XRDY):
if (stat & (RDR | RRDY)) {
...
omap_i2c_ack_stat(dev, stat & (RDR | RRDY));
}
again here there will be no issues because those IRQs never fire
simultaneously and one will only after after we have handled the
previous, that's because the same FIFO is used anyway and we won't shift
data into FIFO until we tell the IP "hey, I'm done with the FIFO, you
can shift more data"
Signed-off-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Reviewed-by : Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
[Added the explaination from the discurssion to the commit logs]
Signed-off-by: Shubhrajyoti D <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@pengutronix.de>