5521de7ddd
kmap() and kmap_atomic() are being deprecated in favor of kmap_local_page() which is appropriate for any thread local context.[1] A recent locking bug report with userfaultfd showed that the conversion of the kmap_atomic()'s in those code flows requires care with regard to the prevention of deadlock.[2] git archaeology implied that the recursion may not be an actual bug.[3] However, depending on the implementation of the mmap_lock and the condition of the call there may still be a deadlock.[4] So this is not purely a lockdep issue. Considering a single threaded call stack there are 3 options. 1) Different mm's are in play (no issue) 2) Readlock implementation is recursive and same mm is in play (no issue) 3) Readlock implementation is _not_ recursive (issue) The mmap_lock is recursive so with a single thread there is no issue. However, Matthew pointed out a deadlock scenario when you consider additional process' and threads thusly. "The readlock implementation is only recursive if nobody else has taken a write lock. If you have a multithreaded process, one of the other threads can call mmap() and that will prevent recursion (due to fairness). Even if it's a different process that you're trying to acquire the mmap read lock on, you can still get into a deadly embrace. eg: process A thread 1 takes read lock on own mmap_lock process A thread 2 calls mmap, blocks taking write lock process B thread 1 takes page fault, read lock on own mmap lock process B thread 2 calls mmap, blocks taking write lock process A thread 1 blocks taking read lock on process B process B thread 1 blocks taking read lock on process A Now all four threads are blocked waiting for each other." Regardless using pagefault_disable() ensures that no matter what locking implementation is used a deadlock will not occur. Complete kmap conversion in userfaultfd by replacing the kmap() and kmap_atomic() calls with kmap_local_page(). When replacing the kmap_atomic() call ensure page faults continue to be disabled to support the correct fall back behavior and add a comment to inform future souls of the requirement. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220813220034.806698-1-ira.weiny@intel.com/ [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y1Mh2S7fUGQ%2FiKFR@iweiny-desk3/ [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/Y1MymJ%2FINb45AdaY@iweiny-desk3/ [4] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y1bXBtGTCym77%2FoD@casper.infradead.org/ [ira.weiny@intel.com: v2] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221025220136.2366143-1-ira.weiny@intel.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20221024043452.1491677-1-ira.weiny@intel.com Signed-off-by: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Cc: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Linux kernel
============
There are several guides for kernel developers and users. These guides can
be rendered in a number of formats, like HTML and PDF. Please read
Documentation/admin-guide/README.rst first.
In order to build the documentation, use ``make htmldocs`` or
``make pdfdocs``. The formatted documentation can also be read online at:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/
There are various text files in the Documentation/ subdirectory,
several of them using the Restructured Text markup notation.
Please read the Documentation/process/changes.rst file, as it contains the
requirements for building and running the kernel, and information about
the problems which may result by upgrading your kernel.