IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The struct clocksource callbacks enable() and disable() are described as a
way to allow clock sources to enter a power save mode. See commit
4614e6adaf ("clocksource: add enable() and disable() callbacks")
But using runtime PM from these callbacks triggers a cyclic lockdep warning when
switching clock source using change_clocksource().
# echo e60f0000.timer > /sys/devices/system/clocksource/clocksource0/current_clocksource
======================================================
WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
------------------------------------------------------
migration/0/11 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff0000403ed220 (&dev->power.lock){-...}-{2:2}, at: __pm_runtime_resume+0x40/0x74
but task is already holding lock:
ffff8000113c8f88 (tk_core.seq.seqcount){----}-{0:0}, at: multi_cpu_stop+0xa4/0x190
which lock already depends on the new lock.
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
-> #2 (tk_core.seq.seqcount){----}-{0:0}:
ktime_get+0x28/0xa0
hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x210/0x2dc
generic_sched_clock_init+0x70/0x88
sched_clock_init+0x40/0x64
start_kernel+0x494/0x524
-> #1 (hrtimer_bases.lock){-.-.}-{2:2}:
hrtimer_start_range_ns+0x68/0x2dc
rpm_suspend+0x308/0x5dc
rpm_idle+0xc4/0x2a4
pm_runtime_work+0x98/0xc0
process_one_work+0x294/0x6f0
worker_thread+0x70/0x45c
kthread+0x154/0x160
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
-> #0 (&dev->power.lock){-...}-{2:2}:
_raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x7c/0xc4
__pm_runtime_resume+0x40/0x74
sh_cmt_start+0x1c4/0x260
sh_cmt_clocksource_enable+0x28/0x50
change_clocksource+0x9c/0x160
multi_cpu_stop+0xa4/0x190
cpu_stopper_thread+0x90/0x154
smpboot_thread_fn+0x244/0x270
kthread+0x154/0x160
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
other info that might help us debug this:
Chain exists of:
&dev->power.lock --> hrtimer_bases.lock --> tk_core.seq.seqcount
Possible unsafe locking scenario:
CPU0 CPU1
---- ----
lock(tk_core.seq.seqcount);
lock(hrtimer_bases.lock);
lock(tk_core.seq.seqcount);
lock(&dev->power.lock);
*** DEADLOCK ***
2 locks held by migration/0/11:
#0: ffff8000113c9278 (timekeeper_lock){-.-.}-{2:2}, at: change_clocksource+0x2c/0x160
#1: ffff8000113c8f88 (tk_core.seq.seqcount){----}-{0:0}, at: multi_cpu_stop+0xa4/0x190
Rework change_clocksource() so it enables the new clocksource and disables
the old clocksource outside of the timekeeper_lock and seqcount write held
region. There is no requirement that these callbacks are invoked from the
lock held region.
Signed-off-by: Niklas Söderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Tested-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210211134318.323910-1-niklas.soderlund+renesas@ragnatech.se
d4c7c28806