6a954e94d0
Dan Williams suggested changing the struct 'node_hmem_attrs' to 'access_coordinates' [1]. The struct is a container of r/w-latency and r/w-bandwidth numbers. Moving forward, this container will also be used by CXL to store the performance characteristics of each link hop in the PCIE/CXL topology. So, where node_hmem_attrs is just the access parameters of a memory-node, access_coordinates applies more broadly to hardware topology characteristics. The observation is that seemed like an exercise in having the application identify "where" it falls on a spectrum of bandwidth and latency needs. For the tuple of read/write-latency and read/write-bandwidth, "coordinates" is not a perfect fit. Sometimes it is just conveying values in isolation and not a "location" relative to other performance points, but in the end this data is used to identify the performance operation point of a given memory-node. [2] Link: http://lore.kernel.org/r/64471313421f7_1b66294d5@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-cxl/645e6215ee0de_1e6f2945e@dwillia2-xfh.jf.intel.com.notmuch/ Suggested-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com> Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/170319615734.2212653.15319394025985499185.stgit@djiang5-mobl3 Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>