Jeff Layton 7b2296afb3 locks: give the blocked_hash its own spinlock
There's no reason we have to protect the blocked_hash and file_lock_list
with the same spinlock. With the tests I have, breaking it in two gives
a barely measurable performance benefit, but it seems reasonable to make
this locking as granular as possible.

Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
2013-06-29 12:57:46 +04:00
..
2012-01-03 22:54:57 -05:00
2009-08-19 10:40:13 -07:00
2013-04-09 22:11:22 -04:00
2012-05-10 11:45:31 +01:00
2011-11-04 12:01:48 -07:00
2012-09-17 12:00:01 -05:00
2011-09-27 18:08:04 +02:00
2010-05-10 11:56:30 +02:00
2011-03-31 11:26:23 -03:00
2008-07-26 12:00:05 -07:00
2011-03-31 11:26:23 -03:00
2013-06-29 12:57:04 +04:00
2012-01-03 22:55:03 -05:00
2008-11-12 17:17:17 -08:00