IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
[ Upstream commit 99bc9f2eb3f79a2b4296d9bf43153e1d10ca50d3 ]
dentry->d_fsdata is set to NFS_FSDATA_BLOCKED while unlinking or
renaming-over a file to ensure that no open succeeds while the NFS
operation progressed on the server.
Setting dentry->d_fsdata to NFS_FSDATA_BLOCKED is done under ->d_lock
after checking the refcount is not elevated. Any attempt to open the
file (through that name) will go through lookp_open() which will take
->d_lock while incrementing the refcount, we can be sure that once the
new value is set, __nfs_lookup_revalidate() *will* see the new value and
will block.
We don't have any locking guarantee that when we set ->d_fsdata to NULL,
the wait_var_event() in __nfs_lookup_revalidate() will notice.
wait/wake primitives do NOT provide barriers to guarantee order. We
must use smp_load_acquire() in wait_var_event() to ensure we look at an
up-to-date value, and must use smp_store_release() before wake_up_var().
This patch adds those barrier functions and factors out
block_revalidate() and unblock_revalidate() far clarity.
There is also a hypothetical bug in that if memory allocation fails
(which never happens in practice) we might leave ->d_fsdata locked.
This patch adds the missing call to unblock_revalidate().
Reported-and-tested-by: Richard Kojedzinszky <richard+debian+bugreport@kojedz.in>
Closes: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1071501
Fixes: 3c59366c207e ("NFS: don't unhash dentry during unlink/rename")
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
b21cae4688