IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
[ Upstream commit 26bfb8b57063f52b867f9b6c8d1742fcb5bd656c ]
When a SOCK_DGRAM socket connect()s to another socket, the both sockets'
sk->sk_state are changed to TCP_ESTABLISHED so that we can register them
to BPF SOCKMAP.
When the socket disconnects from the peer by connect(AF_UNSPEC), the state
is set back to TCP_CLOSE.
Then, the peer's state is also set to TCP_CLOSE, but the update is done
locklessly and unconditionally.
Let's say socket A connect()ed to B, B connect()ed to C, and A disconnects
from B.
After the first two connect()s, all three sockets' sk->sk_state are
TCP_ESTABLISHED:
$ ss -xa
Netid State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:PortProcess
u_dgr ESTAB 0 0 @A 641 * 642
u_dgr ESTAB 0 0 @B 642 * 643
u_dgr ESTAB 0 0 @C 643 * 0
And after the disconnect, B's state is TCP_CLOSE even though it's still
connected to C and C's state is TCP_ESTABLISHED.
$ ss -xa
Netid State Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address:Port Peer Address:PortProcess
u_dgr UNCONN 0 0 @A 641 * 0
u_dgr UNCONN 0 0 @B 642 * 643
u_dgr ESTAB 0 0 @C 643 * 0
In this case, we cannot register B to SOCKMAP.
So, when a socket disconnects from the peer, we should not set TCP_CLOSE to
the peer if the peer is connected to yet another socket, and this must be
done under unix_state_lock().
Note that we use WRITE_ONCE() for sk->sk_state as there are many lockless
readers. These data-races will be fixed in the following patches.
Fixes: 83301b5367a9 ("af_unix: Set TCP_ESTABLISHED for datagram sockets too")
Signed-off-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
8003545ca1