Christoph Hellwig 8a48088f64 xfs: don't flush inodes from background inode reclaim
We already flush dirty inodes throug the AIL regularly, there is no reason
to have second thread compete with it and disturb the I/O pattern.  We still
do write inodes when doing a synchronous reclaim from the shrinker or during
unmount for now.

Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
2012-05-14 16:20:28 -05:00
..
2011-08-12 16:21:35 -05:00
2011-08-12 16:21:35 -05:00
2011-08-12 16:21:35 -05:00
2011-08-12 16:21:35 -05:00
2011-08-12 16:21:35 -05:00
2011-07-25 15:03:13 -05:00
2011-10-11 21:15:07 -05:00
2011-07-25 15:03:13 -05:00
2011-11-08 10:48:23 -06:00
2011-07-25 15:03:13 -05:00
2011-07-13 13:43:48 +02:00
2011-07-13 13:43:48 +02:00
2011-07-13 13:43:48 +02:00
2011-07-13 13:43:48 +02:00
2011-08-12 16:21:35 -05:00
2011-08-12 16:21:35 -05:00
2011-03-07 10:09:35 +11:00
2011-08-12 16:21:35 -05:00
2011-11-08 10:48:23 -06:00
2011-08-12 16:21:35 -05:00
2012-01-03 22:55:00 -05:00
2012-01-03 22:55:00 -05:00
2011-08-12 16:21:35 -05:00
2011-08-12 16:21:35 -05:00
2010-12-16 16:05:51 -06:00
2011-08-12 16:21:35 -05:00
2011-08-12 16:21:35 -05:00
2011-08-12 16:21:35 -05:00
2011-10-11 21:15:10 -05:00
2011-10-11 21:15:10 -05:00
2012-03-13 17:01:15 -05:00
2011-08-12 16:21:35 -05:00
2011-08-12 16:21:35 -05:00
2011-08-12 16:21:35 -05:00
2011-04-28 13:18:04 -05:00
2012-01-03 22:55:00 -05:00
2011-08-12 16:21:35 -05:00