IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
[ Upstream commit 9a6b294ab496650e9f270123730df37030911b55 ]
When an afs_volume struct is put, its refcount is reduced to 0 before
the cell->volume_lock is taken and the volume removed from the
cell->volumes tree.
Unfortunately, this means that the lookup code can race and see a volume
with a zero ref in the tree, resulting in a use-after-free:
refcount_t: addition on 0; use-after-free.
WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 130782 at lib/refcount.c:25 refcount_warn_saturate+0x7a/0xda
...
RIP: 0010:refcount_warn_saturate+0x7a/0xda
...
Call Trace:
afs_get_volume+0x3d/0x55
afs_create_volume+0x126/0x1de
afs_validate_fc+0xfe/0x130
afs_get_tree+0x20/0x2e5
vfs_get_tree+0x1d/0xc9
do_new_mount+0x13b/0x22e
do_mount+0x5d/0x8a
__do_sys_mount+0x100/0x12a
do_syscall_64+0x3a/0x94
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x62/0x6a
Fix this by:
(1) When putting, use a flag to indicate if the volume has been removed
from the tree and skip the rb_erase if it has.
(2) When looking up, use a conditional ref increment and if it fails
because the refcount is 0, replace the node in the tree and set the
removal flag.
Fixes: 20325960f875 ("afs: Reorganise volume and server trees to be rooted on the cell")
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Altman <jaltman@auristor.com>
cc: Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
cc: linux-afs@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
98fb5eaade