900b2801bf
Running the page-pool sample on production machines under moderate networking load shows recycling rate higher than 100%: $ page-pool eth0[2] page pools: 14 (zombies: 0) refs: 89088 bytes: 364904448 (refs: 0 bytes: 0) recycling: 100.3% (alloc: 1392:2290247724 recycle: 469289484:1828235386) Note that outstanding refs (89088) == slow alloc * cache size (1392 * 64) which means this machine is recycling page pool pages perfectly, not a single page has been released. The extra 0.3% is because sample ignores allocations from the ptr_ring. Treat those the same as alloc_fast, the ring vs cache alloc is already captured accurately enough by recycling stats. With the fix: $ page-pool eth0[2] page pools: 14 (zombies: 0) refs: 89088 bytes: 364904448 (refs: 0 bytes: 0) recycling: 100.0% (alloc: 1392:2331141604 recycle: 473625579:1857460661) Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
.gitignore | ||
devlink.c | ||
ethtool.c | ||
Makefile | ||
netdev.c | ||
ovs.c | ||
page-pool.c |