9ce0f7c4bc
Modern interactive systems, such as recent Android phones, tend to have power efficient shallow idle states. Selecting deeper idle states on a device while a latency-sensitive workload is running can adversely impact performance due to increased latency. Additionally, if the CPU wakes up from a deeper sleep before its target residency as is often the case, it results in a waste of energy on top of that. At the moment, none of the available idle governors take any scheduling information into account. They also tend to overestimate the idle duration quite often, which causes them to select excessively deep idle states, thus leading to increased wakeup latency and lower performance with no power saving. For 'menu' while web browsing on Android for instance, those types of wakeups ('too deep') account for over 24% of all wakeups. At the same time, on some platforms idle state 0 can be power efficient enough to warrant wanting to prefer it over idle state 1. This is because the power usage of the two states can be so close that sufficient amounts of too deep state 1 sleeps can completely offset the state 1 power saving to the point where it would've been more power efficient to just use state 0 instead. This is, of course, for systems where state 0 is not a polling state, such as arm-based devices. Sleeps that happened in state 0 while they could have used state 1 ('too shallow') only save less power than they otherwise could have. Too deep sleeps, on the other hand, harm performance and nullify the potential power saving from using state 1 in the first place. While taking this into account, it is clear that on balance it is preferable for an idle governor to have more too shallow sleeps instead of more too deep sleeps on those kinds of platforms. This patch specifically tunes TEO to prefer shallower idle states in order to reduce wakeup latency and achieve better performance. To this end, before selecting the next idle state it uses the avg_util signal of a CPU's runqueue in order to determine to what extent the CPU is being utilized. This util value is then compared to a threshold defined as a percentage of the CPU's capacity (capacity >> 6 ie. ~1.5% in the current implementation). If the util is above the threshold, the index of the idle state selected by TEO metrics will be reduced by 1, thus selecting a shallower state. If the util is below the threshold, the governor defaults to the TEO metrics mechanism to try to select the deepest available idle state based on the closest timer event and its own correctness. The main goal of this is to reduce latency and increase performance for some workloads. Under some workloads it will result in an increase in power usage (Geekbench 5) while for other workloads it will also result in a decrease in power usage compared to TEO (PCMark Web, Jankbench, Speedometer). It can provide drastically decreased latency and performance benefits in certain types of workloads that are sensitive to latency. Example test results: 1. GB5 (better score, latency & more power usage) | metric | menu | teo | teo-util-aware | | ------------------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------- | ----------------- | | gmean score | 2826.5 (0.0%) | 2764.8 (-2.18%) | 2865 (1.36%) | | gmean power usage [mW] | 2551.4 (0.0%) | 2606.8 (2.17%) | 2722.3 (6.7%) | | gmean too deep % | 14.99% | 9.65% | 4.02% | | gmean too shallow % | 2.5% | 5.96% | 14.59% | | gmean task wakeup latency (asynctask) | 78.16μs (0.0%) | 61.60μs (-21.19%) | 54.45μs (-30.34%) | 2. Jankbench (better score, latency & less power usage) | metric | menu | teo | teo-util-aware | | ------------------------------------- | -------------- | ----------------- | ----------------- | | gmean frame duration | 13.9 (0.0%) | 14.7 (6.0%) | 12.6 (-9.0%) | | gmean jank percentage | 1.5 (0.0%) | 2.1 (36.99%) | 1.3 (-17.37%) | | gmean power usage [mW] | 144.6 (0.0%) | 136.9 (-5.27%) | 121.3 (-16.08%) | | gmean too deep % | 26.00% | 11.00% | 2.54% | | gmean too shallow % | 4.74% | 11.89% | 21.93% | | gmean wakeup latency (RenderThread) | 139.5μs (0.0%) | 116.5μs (-16.49%) | 91.11μs (-34.7%) | | gmean wakeup latency (surfaceflinger) | 124.0μs (0.0%) | 151.9μs (22.47%) | 87.65μs (-29.33%) | Signed-off-by: Kajetan Puchalski <kajetan.puchalski@arm.com> [ rjw: Comment edits and white space adjustments ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
629 lines
20 KiB
C
629 lines
20 KiB
C
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
|
|
/*
|
|
* Timer events oriented CPU idle governor
|
|
*
|
|
* TEO governor:
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2018 - 2021 Intel Corporation
|
|
* Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
|
|
*
|
|
* Util-awareness mechanism:
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2022 Arm Ltd.
|
|
* Author: Kajetan Puchalski <kajetan.puchalski@arm.com>
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* DOC: teo-description
|
|
*
|
|
* The idea of this governor is based on the observation that on many systems
|
|
* timer events are two or more orders of magnitude more frequent than any
|
|
* other interrupts, so they are likely to be the most significant cause of CPU
|
|
* wakeups from idle states. Moreover, information about what happened in the
|
|
* (relatively recent) past can be used to estimate whether or not the deepest
|
|
* idle state with target residency within the (known) time till the closest
|
|
* timer event, referred to as the sleep length, is likely to be suitable for
|
|
* the upcoming CPU idle period and, if not, then which of the shallower idle
|
|
* states to choose instead of it.
|
|
*
|
|
* Of course, non-timer wakeup sources are more important in some use cases
|
|
* which can be covered by taking a few most recent idle time intervals of the
|
|
* CPU into account. However, even in that context it is not necessary to
|
|
* consider idle duration values greater than the sleep length, because the
|
|
* closest timer will ultimately wake up the CPU anyway unless it is woken up
|
|
* earlier.
|
|
*
|
|
* Thus this governor estimates whether or not the prospective idle duration of
|
|
* a CPU is likely to be significantly shorter than the sleep length and selects
|
|
* an idle state for it accordingly.
|
|
*
|
|
* The computations carried out by this governor are based on using bins whose
|
|
* boundaries are aligned with the target residency parameter values of the CPU
|
|
* idle states provided by the %CPUIdle driver in the ascending order. That is,
|
|
* the first bin spans from 0 up to, but not including, the target residency of
|
|
* the second idle state (idle state 1), the second bin spans from the target
|
|
* residency of idle state 1 up to, but not including, the target residency of
|
|
* idle state 2, the third bin spans from the target residency of idle state 2
|
|
* up to, but not including, the target residency of idle state 3 and so on.
|
|
* The last bin spans from the target residency of the deepest idle state
|
|
* supplied by the driver to infinity.
|
|
*
|
|
* Two metrics called "hits" and "intercepts" are associated with each bin.
|
|
* They are updated every time before selecting an idle state for the given CPU
|
|
* in accordance with what happened last time.
|
|
*
|
|
* The "hits" metric reflects the relative frequency of situations in which the
|
|
* sleep length and the idle duration measured after CPU wakeup fall into the
|
|
* same bin (that is, the CPU appears to wake up "on time" relative to the sleep
|
|
* length). In turn, the "intercepts" metric reflects the relative frequency of
|
|
* situations in which the measured idle duration is so much shorter than the
|
|
* sleep length that the bin it falls into corresponds to an idle state
|
|
* shallower than the one whose bin is fallen into by the sleep length (these
|
|
* situations are referred to as "intercepts" below).
|
|
*
|
|
* In addition to the metrics described above, the governor counts recent
|
|
* intercepts (that is, intercepts that have occurred during the last
|
|
* %NR_RECENT invocations of it for the given CPU) for each bin.
|
|
*
|
|
* In order to select an idle state for a CPU, the governor takes the following
|
|
* steps (modulo the possible latency constraint that must be taken into account
|
|
* too):
|
|
*
|
|
* 1. Find the deepest CPU idle state whose target residency does not exceed
|
|
* the current sleep length (the candidate idle state) and compute 3 sums as
|
|
* follows:
|
|
*
|
|
* - The sum of the "hits" and "intercepts" metrics for the candidate state
|
|
* and all of the deeper idle states (it represents the cases in which the
|
|
* CPU was idle long enough to avoid being intercepted if the sleep length
|
|
* had been equal to the current one).
|
|
*
|
|
* - The sum of the "intercepts" metrics for all of the idle states shallower
|
|
* than the candidate one (it represents the cases in which the CPU was not
|
|
* idle long enough to avoid being intercepted if the sleep length had been
|
|
* equal to the current one).
|
|
*
|
|
* - The sum of the numbers of recent intercepts for all of the idle states
|
|
* shallower than the candidate one.
|
|
*
|
|
* 2. If the second sum is greater than the first one or the third sum is
|
|
* greater than %NR_RECENT / 2, the CPU is likely to wake up early, so look
|
|
* for an alternative idle state to select.
|
|
*
|
|
* - Traverse the idle states shallower than the candidate one in the
|
|
* descending order.
|
|
*
|
|
* - For each of them compute the sum of the "intercepts" metrics and the sum
|
|
* of the numbers of recent intercepts over all of the idle states between
|
|
* it and the candidate one (including the former and excluding the
|
|
* latter).
|
|
*
|
|
* - If each of these sums that needs to be taken into account (because the
|
|
* check related to it has indicated that the CPU is likely to wake up
|
|
* early) is greater than a half of the corresponding sum computed in step
|
|
* 1 (which means that the target residency of the state in question had
|
|
* not exceeded the idle duration in over a half of the relevant cases),
|
|
* select the given idle state instead of the candidate one.
|
|
*
|
|
* 3. By default, select the candidate state.
|
|
*
|
|
* Util-awareness mechanism:
|
|
*
|
|
* The idea behind the util-awareness extension is that there are two distinct
|
|
* scenarios for the CPU which should result in two different approaches to idle
|
|
* state selection - utilized and not utilized.
|
|
*
|
|
* In this case, 'utilized' means that the average runqueue util of the CPU is
|
|
* above a certain threshold.
|
|
*
|
|
* When the CPU is utilized while going into idle, more likely than not it will
|
|
* be woken up to do more work soon and so a shallower idle state should be
|
|
* selected to minimise latency and maximise performance. When the CPU is not
|
|
* being utilized, the usual metrics-based approach to selecting the deepest
|
|
* available idle state should be preferred to take advantage of the power
|
|
* saving.
|
|
*
|
|
* In order to achieve this, the governor uses a utilization threshold.
|
|
* The threshold is computed per-CPU as a percentage of the CPU's capacity
|
|
* by bit shifting the capacity value. Based on testing, the shift of 6 (~1.56%)
|
|
* seems to be getting the best results.
|
|
*
|
|
* Before selecting the next idle state, the governor compares the current CPU
|
|
* util to the precomputed util threshold. If it's below, it defaults to the
|
|
* TEO metrics mechanism. If it's above, the closest shallower idle state will
|
|
* be selected instead, as long as is not a polling state.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
|
|
#include <linux/jiffies.h>
|
|
#include <linux/kernel.h>
|
|
#include <linux/sched.h>
|
|
#include <linux/sched/clock.h>
|
|
#include <linux/sched/topology.h>
|
|
#include <linux/tick.h>
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* The number of bits to shift the CPU's capacity by in order to determine
|
|
* the utilized threshold.
|
|
*
|
|
* 6 was chosen based on testing as the number that achieved the best balance
|
|
* of power and performance on average.
|
|
*
|
|
* The resulting threshold is high enough to not be triggered by background
|
|
* noise and low enough to react quickly when activity starts to ramp up.
|
|
*/
|
|
#define UTIL_THRESHOLD_SHIFT 6
|
|
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* The PULSE value is added to metrics when they grow and the DECAY_SHIFT value
|
|
* is used for decreasing metrics on a regular basis.
|
|
*/
|
|
#define PULSE 1024
|
|
#define DECAY_SHIFT 3
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Number of the most recent idle duration values to take into consideration for
|
|
* the detection of recent early wakeup patterns.
|
|
*/
|
|
#define NR_RECENT 9
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* struct teo_bin - Metrics used by the TEO cpuidle governor.
|
|
* @intercepts: The "intercepts" metric.
|
|
* @hits: The "hits" metric.
|
|
* @recent: The number of recent "intercepts".
|
|
*/
|
|
struct teo_bin {
|
|
unsigned int intercepts;
|
|
unsigned int hits;
|
|
unsigned int recent;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* struct teo_cpu - CPU data used by the TEO cpuidle governor.
|
|
* @time_span_ns: Time between idle state selection and post-wakeup update.
|
|
* @sleep_length_ns: Time till the closest timer event (at the selection time).
|
|
* @state_bins: Idle state data bins for this CPU.
|
|
* @total: Grand total of the "intercepts" and "hits" metrics for all bins.
|
|
* @next_recent_idx: Index of the next @recent_idx entry to update.
|
|
* @recent_idx: Indices of bins corresponding to recent "intercepts".
|
|
* @util_threshold: Threshold above which the CPU is considered utilized
|
|
* @utilized: Whether the last sleep on the CPU happened while utilized
|
|
*/
|
|
struct teo_cpu {
|
|
s64 time_span_ns;
|
|
s64 sleep_length_ns;
|
|
struct teo_bin state_bins[CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX];
|
|
unsigned int total;
|
|
int next_recent_idx;
|
|
int recent_idx[NR_RECENT];
|
|
unsigned long util_threshold;
|
|
bool utilized;
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct teo_cpu, teo_cpus);
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* teo_cpu_is_utilized - Check if the CPU's util is above the threshold
|
|
* @cpu: Target CPU
|
|
* @cpu_data: Governor CPU data for the target CPU
|
|
*/
|
|
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
|
|
static bool teo_cpu_is_utilized(int cpu, struct teo_cpu *cpu_data)
|
|
{
|
|
return sched_cpu_util(cpu) > cpu_data->util_threshold;
|
|
}
|
|
#else
|
|
static bool teo_cpu_is_utilized(int cpu, struct teo_cpu *cpu_data)
|
|
{
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
#endif
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* teo_update - Update CPU metrics after wakeup.
|
|
* @drv: cpuidle driver containing state data.
|
|
* @dev: Target CPU.
|
|
*/
|
|
static void teo_update(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev)
|
|
{
|
|
struct teo_cpu *cpu_data = per_cpu_ptr(&teo_cpus, dev->cpu);
|
|
int i, idx_timer = 0, idx_duration = 0;
|
|
u64 measured_ns;
|
|
|
|
if (cpu_data->time_span_ns >= cpu_data->sleep_length_ns) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* One of the safety nets has triggered or the wakeup was close
|
|
* enough to the closest timer event expected at the idle state
|
|
* selection time to be discarded.
|
|
*/
|
|
measured_ns = U64_MAX;
|
|
} else {
|
|
u64 lat_ns = drv->states[dev->last_state_idx].exit_latency_ns;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* The computations below are to determine whether or not the
|
|
* (saved) time till the next timer event and the measured idle
|
|
* duration fall into the same "bin", so use last_residency_ns
|
|
* for that instead of time_span_ns which includes the cpuidle
|
|
* overhead.
|
|
*/
|
|
measured_ns = dev->last_residency_ns;
|
|
/*
|
|
* The delay between the wakeup and the first instruction
|
|
* executed by the CPU is not likely to be worst-case every
|
|
* time, so take 1/2 of the exit latency as a very rough
|
|
* approximation of the average of it.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (measured_ns >= lat_ns)
|
|
measured_ns -= lat_ns / 2;
|
|
else
|
|
measured_ns /= 2;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
cpu_data->total = 0;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Decay the "hits" and "intercepts" metrics for all of the bins and
|
|
* find the bins that the sleep length and the measured idle duration
|
|
* fall into.
|
|
*/
|
|
for (i = 0; i < drv->state_count; i++) {
|
|
s64 target_residency_ns = drv->states[i].target_residency_ns;
|
|
struct teo_bin *bin = &cpu_data->state_bins[i];
|
|
|
|
bin->hits -= bin->hits >> DECAY_SHIFT;
|
|
bin->intercepts -= bin->intercepts >> DECAY_SHIFT;
|
|
|
|
cpu_data->total += bin->hits + bin->intercepts;
|
|
|
|
if (target_residency_ns <= cpu_data->sleep_length_ns) {
|
|
idx_timer = i;
|
|
if (target_residency_ns <= measured_ns)
|
|
idx_duration = i;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
i = cpu_data->next_recent_idx++;
|
|
if (cpu_data->next_recent_idx >= NR_RECENT)
|
|
cpu_data->next_recent_idx = 0;
|
|
|
|
if (cpu_data->recent_idx[i] >= 0)
|
|
cpu_data->state_bins[cpu_data->recent_idx[i]].recent--;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* If the measured idle duration falls into the same bin as the sleep
|
|
* length, this is a "hit", so update the "hits" metric for that bin.
|
|
* Otherwise, update the "intercepts" metric for the bin fallen into by
|
|
* the measured idle duration.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (idx_timer == idx_duration) {
|
|
cpu_data->state_bins[idx_timer].hits += PULSE;
|
|
cpu_data->recent_idx[i] = -1;
|
|
} else {
|
|
cpu_data->state_bins[idx_duration].intercepts += PULSE;
|
|
cpu_data->state_bins[idx_duration].recent++;
|
|
cpu_data->recent_idx[i] = idx_duration;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
cpu_data->total += PULSE;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static bool teo_time_ok(u64 interval_ns)
|
|
{
|
|
return !tick_nohz_tick_stopped() || interval_ns >= TICK_NSEC;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static s64 teo_middle_of_bin(int idx, struct cpuidle_driver *drv)
|
|
{
|
|
return (drv->states[idx].target_residency_ns +
|
|
drv->states[idx+1].target_residency_ns) / 2;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* teo_find_shallower_state - Find shallower idle state matching given duration.
|
|
* @drv: cpuidle driver containing state data.
|
|
* @dev: Target CPU.
|
|
* @state_idx: Index of the capping idle state.
|
|
* @duration_ns: Idle duration value to match.
|
|
* @no_poll: Don't consider polling states.
|
|
*/
|
|
static int teo_find_shallower_state(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
|
|
struct cpuidle_device *dev, int state_idx,
|
|
s64 duration_ns, bool no_poll)
|
|
{
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
for (i = state_idx - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
|
|
if (dev->states_usage[i].disable ||
|
|
(no_poll && drv->states[i].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLLING))
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
state_idx = i;
|
|
if (drv->states[i].target_residency_ns <= duration_ns)
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
return state_idx;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* teo_select - Selects the next idle state to enter.
|
|
* @drv: cpuidle driver containing state data.
|
|
* @dev: Target CPU.
|
|
* @stop_tick: Indication on whether or not to stop the scheduler tick.
|
|
*/
|
|
static int teo_select(struct cpuidle_driver *drv, struct cpuidle_device *dev,
|
|
bool *stop_tick)
|
|
{
|
|
struct teo_cpu *cpu_data = per_cpu_ptr(&teo_cpus, dev->cpu);
|
|
s64 latency_req = cpuidle_governor_latency_req(dev->cpu);
|
|
unsigned int idx_intercept_sum = 0;
|
|
unsigned int intercept_sum = 0;
|
|
unsigned int idx_recent_sum = 0;
|
|
unsigned int recent_sum = 0;
|
|
unsigned int idx_hit_sum = 0;
|
|
unsigned int hit_sum = 0;
|
|
int constraint_idx = 0;
|
|
int idx0 = 0, idx = -1;
|
|
bool alt_intercepts, alt_recent;
|
|
ktime_t delta_tick;
|
|
s64 duration_ns;
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
if (dev->last_state_idx >= 0) {
|
|
teo_update(drv, dev);
|
|
dev->last_state_idx = -1;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
cpu_data->time_span_ns = local_clock();
|
|
|
|
duration_ns = tick_nohz_get_sleep_length(&delta_tick);
|
|
cpu_data->sleep_length_ns = duration_ns;
|
|
|
|
/* Check if there is any choice in the first place. */
|
|
if (drv->state_count < 2) {
|
|
idx = 0;
|
|
goto end;
|
|
}
|
|
if (!dev->states_usage[0].disable) {
|
|
idx = 0;
|
|
if (drv->states[1].target_residency_ns > duration_ns)
|
|
goto end;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
cpu_data->utilized = teo_cpu_is_utilized(dev->cpu, cpu_data);
|
|
/*
|
|
* If the CPU is being utilized over the threshold and there are only 2
|
|
* states to choose from, the metrics need not be considered, so choose
|
|
* the shallowest non-polling state and exit.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (drv->state_count < 3 && cpu_data->utilized) {
|
|
for (i = 0; i < drv->state_count; ++i) {
|
|
if (!dev->states_usage[i].disable &&
|
|
!(drv->states[i].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLLING)) {
|
|
idx = i;
|
|
goto end;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Find the deepest idle state whose target residency does not exceed
|
|
* the current sleep length and the deepest idle state not deeper than
|
|
* the former whose exit latency does not exceed the current latency
|
|
* constraint. Compute the sums of metrics for early wakeup pattern
|
|
* detection.
|
|
*/
|
|
for (i = 1; i < drv->state_count; i++) {
|
|
struct teo_bin *prev_bin = &cpu_data->state_bins[i-1];
|
|
struct cpuidle_state *s = &drv->states[i];
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Update the sums of idle state mertics for all of the states
|
|
* shallower than the current one.
|
|
*/
|
|
intercept_sum += prev_bin->intercepts;
|
|
hit_sum += prev_bin->hits;
|
|
recent_sum += prev_bin->recent;
|
|
|
|
if (dev->states_usage[i].disable)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
if (idx < 0) {
|
|
idx = i; /* first enabled state */
|
|
idx0 = i;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (s->target_residency_ns > duration_ns)
|
|
break;
|
|
|
|
idx = i;
|
|
|
|
if (s->exit_latency_ns <= latency_req)
|
|
constraint_idx = i;
|
|
|
|
idx_intercept_sum = intercept_sum;
|
|
idx_hit_sum = hit_sum;
|
|
idx_recent_sum = recent_sum;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/* Avoid unnecessary overhead. */
|
|
if (idx < 0) {
|
|
idx = 0; /* No states enabled, must use 0. */
|
|
goto end;
|
|
} else if (idx == idx0) {
|
|
goto end;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* If the sum of the intercepts metric for all of the idle states
|
|
* shallower than the current candidate one (idx) is greater than the
|
|
* sum of the intercepts and hits metrics for the candidate state and
|
|
* all of the deeper states, or the sum of the numbers of recent
|
|
* intercepts over all of the states shallower than the candidate one
|
|
* is greater than a half of the number of recent events taken into
|
|
* account, the CPU is likely to wake up early, so find an alternative
|
|
* idle state to select.
|
|
*/
|
|
alt_intercepts = 2 * idx_intercept_sum > cpu_data->total - idx_hit_sum;
|
|
alt_recent = idx_recent_sum > NR_RECENT / 2;
|
|
if (alt_recent || alt_intercepts) {
|
|
s64 first_suitable_span_ns = duration_ns;
|
|
int first_suitable_idx = idx;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* Look for the deepest idle state whose target residency had
|
|
* not exceeded the idle duration in over a half of the relevant
|
|
* cases (both with respect to intercepts overall and with
|
|
* respect to the recent intercepts only) in the past.
|
|
*
|
|
* Take the possible latency constraint and duration limitation
|
|
* present if the tick has been stopped already into account.
|
|
*/
|
|
intercept_sum = 0;
|
|
recent_sum = 0;
|
|
|
|
for (i = idx - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
|
|
struct teo_bin *bin = &cpu_data->state_bins[i];
|
|
s64 span_ns;
|
|
|
|
intercept_sum += bin->intercepts;
|
|
recent_sum += bin->recent;
|
|
|
|
span_ns = teo_middle_of_bin(i, drv);
|
|
|
|
if ((!alt_recent || 2 * recent_sum > idx_recent_sum) &&
|
|
(!alt_intercepts ||
|
|
2 * intercept_sum > idx_intercept_sum)) {
|
|
if (teo_time_ok(span_ns) &&
|
|
!dev->states_usage[i].disable) {
|
|
idx = i;
|
|
duration_ns = span_ns;
|
|
} else {
|
|
/*
|
|
* The current state is too shallow or
|
|
* disabled, so take the first enabled
|
|
* deeper state with suitable time span.
|
|
*/
|
|
idx = first_suitable_idx;
|
|
duration_ns = first_suitable_span_ns;
|
|
}
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (dev->states_usage[i].disable)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
if (!teo_time_ok(span_ns)) {
|
|
/*
|
|
* The current state is too shallow, but if an
|
|
* alternative candidate state has been found,
|
|
* it may still turn out to be a better choice.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (first_suitable_idx != idx)
|
|
continue;
|
|
|
|
break;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
first_suitable_span_ns = span_ns;
|
|
first_suitable_idx = i;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* If there is a latency constraint, it may be necessary to select an
|
|
* idle state shallower than the current candidate one.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (idx > constraint_idx)
|
|
idx = constraint_idx;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* If the CPU is being utilized over the threshold, choose a shallower
|
|
* non-polling state to improve latency
|
|
*/
|
|
if (cpu_data->utilized)
|
|
idx = teo_find_shallower_state(drv, dev, idx, duration_ns, true);
|
|
|
|
end:
|
|
/*
|
|
* Don't stop the tick if the selected state is a polling one or if the
|
|
* expected idle duration is shorter than the tick period length.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (((drv->states[idx].flags & CPUIDLE_FLAG_POLLING) ||
|
|
duration_ns < TICK_NSEC) && !tick_nohz_tick_stopped()) {
|
|
*stop_tick = false;
|
|
|
|
/*
|
|
* The tick is not going to be stopped, so if the target
|
|
* residency of the state to be returned is not within the time
|
|
* till the closest timer including the tick, try to correct
|
|
* that.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (idx > idx0 &&
|
|
drv->states[idx].target_residency_ns > delta_tick)
|
|
idx = teo_find_shallower_state(drv, dev, idx, delta_tick, false);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
return idx;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* teo_reflect - Note that governor data for the CPU need to be updated.
|
|
* @dev: Target CPU.
|
|
* @state: Entered state.
|
|
*/
|
|
static void teo_reflect(struct cpuidle_device *dev, int state)
|
|
{
|
|
struct teo_cpu *cpu_data = per_cpu_ptr(&teo_cpus, dev->cpu);
|
|
|
|
dev->last_state_idx = state;
|
|
/*
|
|
* If the wakeup was not "natural", but triggered by one of the safety
|
|
* nets, assume that the CPU might have been idle for the entire sleep
|
|
* length time.
|
|
*/
|
|
if (dev->poll_time_limit ||
|
|
(tick_nohz_idle_got_tick() && cpu_data->sleep_length_ns > TICK_NSEC)) {
|
|
dev->poll_time_limit = false;
|
|
cpu_data->time_span_ns = cpu_data->sleep_length_ns;
|
|
} else {
|
|
cpu_data->time_span_ns = local_clock() - cpu_data->time_span_ns;
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* teo_enable_device - Initialize the governor's data for the target CPU.
|
|
* @drv: cpuidle driver (not used).
|
|
* @dev: Target CPU.
|
|
*/
|
|
static int teo_enable_device(struct cpuidle_driver *drv,
|
|
struct cpuidle_device *dev)
|
|
{
|
|
struct teo_cpu *cpu_data = per_cpu_ptr(&teo_cpus, dev->cpu);
|
|
unsigned long max_capacity = arch_scale_cpu_capacity(dev->cpu);
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
memset(cpu_data, 0, sizeof(*cpu_data));
|
|
cpu_data->util_threshold = max_capacity >> UTIL_THRESHOLD_SHIFT;
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < NR_RECENT; i++)
|
|
cpu_data->recent_idx[i] = -1;
|
|
|
|
return 0;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
static struct cpuidle_governor teo_governor = {
|
|
.name = "teo",
|
|
.rating = 19,
|
|
.enable = teo_enable_device,
|
|
.select = teo_select,
|
|
.reflect = teo_reflect,
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
static int __init teo_governor_init(void)
|
|
{
|
|
return cpuidle_register_governor(&teo_governor);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
postcore_initcall(teo_governor_init);
|