IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The PCIe specification, rev 3.0, section 2.2.8.1, contains the following
implementation note:
Virtual Wire Mapping for INTx Interrupts From ARI Devices
The implied Device Number for an ARI Device is 0. When ARI-aware
software (including BIOS and operating system) enables ARI Forwarding in
the Downstream Port immediately above an ARI Device in order to access
its Extended Functions, software must comprehend that the Downstream Port
will use Device Number 0 for the virtual wire mappings of INTx interrupts
coming from all Functions of the ARI Device. If non-ARI-aware software
attempts to determine the virtual wire mappings for Extended Functions,
it can come up with incorrect mappings by examining the traditional
Device Number field and finding it to be non-0.
We account for this in pci_swizzle_interrupt_pin(), but it looks like we
miss it here, looking for a _PRT entry with a slot matching the ARI device
slot number. This can cause errors like:
pcieport 0000:80:03.0: can't derive routing for PCI INT B
sfc 0000:82:01.1: PCI INT B: no GSI
pci_dev.irq is then invalid, resulting in errors for drivers that attempt
to enable INTx on the device. Fix by using slot 0 for ARI enabled devices.
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
917bfd93d3