IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Harshit Mogalapalli says:
In ebt_do_table() function dereferencing 'private->hook_entry[hook]'
can lead to NULL pointer dereference. [..] Kernel panic:
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000005: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000028-0x000000000000002f]
[..]
RIP: 0010:ebt_do_table+0x1dc/0x1ce0
Code: 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 80 3c 02 00 0f 85 5c 16 00 00 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 49 8b 6c df 08 48 8d 7d 2c 48 89 fa 48 c1 ea 03 <0f> b6 14 02 48 89 f8 83 e0 07 83 c0 03 38 d0 7c 08 84 d2 0f 85 88
[..]
Call Trace:
nf_hook_slow+0xb1/0x170
__br_forward+0x289/0x730
maybe_deliver+0x24b/0x380
br_flood+0xc6/0x390
br_dev_xmit+0xa2e/0x12c0
For some reason ebtables rejects blobs that provide entry points that are
not supported by the table, but what it should instead reject is the
opposite: blobs that DO NOT provide an entry point supported by the table.
t->valid_hooks is the bitmask of hooks (input, forward ...) that will see
packets. Providing an entry point that is not support is harmless
(never called/used), but the inverse isn't: it results in a crash
because the ebtables traverser doesn't expect a NULL blob for a location
its receiving packets for.
Instead of fixing all the individual checks, do what iptables is doing and
reject all blobs that differ from the expected hooks.
Fixes: 1da177e4c3 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
Reported-by: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@oracle.com>
Reported-by: syzkaller <syzkaller@googlegroups.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
7997eff828