Tejun Heo 61a0adbfaa workqueue: restore WQ_UNBOUND/max_active==1 to be ordered
commit 5c0338c68706be53b3dc472e4308961c36e4ece1 upstream.

The combination of WQ_UNBOUND and max_active == 1 used to imply
ordered execution.  After NUMA affinity 4c16bd327c74 ("workqueue:
implement NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues"), this is no longer
true due to per-node worker pools.

While the right way to create an ordered workqueue is
alloc_ordered_workqueue(), the documentation has been misleading for a
long time and people do use WQ_UNBOUND and max_active == 1 for ordered
workqueues which can lead to subtle bugs which are very difficult to
trigger.

It's unlikely that we'd see noticeable performance impact by enforcing
ordering on WQ_UNBOUND / max_active == 1 workqueues.  Let's
automatically set __WQ_ORDERED for those workqueues.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reported-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Reported-by: Alexei Potashnik <alexei@purestorage.com>
Fixes: 4c16bd327c74 ("workqueue: implement NUMA affinity for unbound workqueues")
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
2017-08-11 08:49:28 -07:00
..
2016-04-04 09:46:47 -04:00
2017-06-14 15:06:00 +02:00
2017-05-20 14:28:40 +02:00
2017-07-05 14:40:24 +02:00
2016-05-27 15:26:11 -07:00
2016-10-07 18:46:30 -07:00
2016-09-22 20:00:36 -05:00